Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[1679867499]

1679867499

[1679867499]

1679867499

[1679867499]

1679867499

[1679867499]

1679867499

[JayJuanGee]

...
JJG 627118

Yeah, I've seen the Citadel but just now noticed the ranks (as nobility) just to the right of the mount.

I suspect we all wish we were one or two levels higher than we are now...  LOL

Likely if we have been active with our BTC stashes over many years, there are a lot of ways to make mistakes along the way in terms of balancing our strategy(ies), figuring out where we are, where we want to be, and what risks we are ready, willing and able to take... and even to reconsider some of our views including that this is a work-in-progress - including sometimes making sure that we are going to be able to preserve our stash into the future (perhaps at certain target dates in the future), and maybe that is part of your reference in terms of considering that if we have more BTC stash, then we have more cushion to ride out the volatility and also to make sure that we get to some anticipated future places (can we call them checkpoints?) that we would like to be.

There may well be plenty of us who are relatively active in this here thread who have enough coins, but we still have to make sure that we are able to hang onto a certain number of those coins that we already have and are able to access them at certain points in the future.

There are challenges in managing our own stash (which might well be stronger levels of assurance to future-proof our coins), but at the same time, some of the ways of (and thoughts about ) how to hold coins can change with time, and for sure there would be some frustrations to run across a situation in which you have locked yourself out of your coins or even that your heirs might not be able to access your coins - to the extent that you have some legacy desires or consider that those snot-noses deserve your coins.. .hahahahahaha

...
JJG 627118
.....

Interesting way to quote. Never seen that before. I like it.

It's not as good as linking, because as soon as someone deletes any post upstream, then the number is off (it works for ONLY a short period of time because inevitably posts get deleted, and sometimes some guys (not going to name any names here Bxxx.. .. ).. but some guys will go on hundreds of posts deleting sprees for "reasons,"  then the number is way off.. but if you quote the post or use a link, then it is always easy to reference.... #justsaying.

JJG 627118

Interesting way to quote. Never seen that before. I like it.

thats some opcode or machine code for the JJG bot that accidentally got displayed.. poor error trapping probably

For sure... OROBTC deserves a batslapping for that.  #justsaying

 

.....
i wonder.
.......

That's all I do. And then I post.

Like an algorithm.. it works until it doesn't.

who can guess that shitcoin I was briefly mining for good profit in 2015 with an S4 (Hint....SHA256, obviously)
First correct answer gets a merit. (and a batslap from jay... lol)

 I see that Bat slaps no don't work no more.

Gotta switch to adjust to the changes in the virus (or is it a bacteria?  asking for a friend)

.....

...... no shitcoins need apply.

Agreed, they don't need to, but they do, and now we have millions of the bastards...

Stop reminding us..

AAAAAAAUUUUUGGGGGHHHH



That's me, by the way.

I broke opsec..

Out of emotions, I could not help my lil selfie.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[sirazimuth]

.....

Here you go.. .





POW>>>>>





Don't be saying that I never did not gave uie-pooie nuttin.  

.....

Stop reminding us..

AAAAAAAUUUUUGGGGGHHHH



That's me, by the way.

I broke opsec..

Out of emotions, I could not help my lil selfie.

My goodness ...I just got a warm fuzzy.....  #no homo

[Crypt0S0ul]

I hope you did not confuse the WO with twitter and expect us to send you back double the amount...  
 

What is the relation between sharing love and Twitter?
Savage Gachapin!
I should shut my mouth off and Not argue with JJG.
I shouldn't reveal who that was.
I revealed that 20 hours later, right after JJG questioned my origin.
Why do you believe I could expect the double? LOL.

[goldkingcoiner]

There may be some folks who believe that there is an "us" that is willing (or able) to be "driven towards green energy," but I am thinking that you are getting your language wrong here.. because the incentives built into bitcoin gives no ratts' asses whether energy is green or not... There are incentives that the energy be less expensive; however, the extent to which any mining operation is going to be operating at "optimal efficiencies" will depend upon a variety of factors - which (the last time I checked) continue to be decentralized to the extent that individuals, mining institutions (and surely pools too) are considering a variety of factors in regards to when, where and how to conduct their mining operations and "green" aspects may well be discretionary - depending on a variety of factors.

I am not proclaiming that you are completely wrong.. but your suggestion that "green" has to be a priority based on current happenings seems to misdescribe what might be dogs and what might be tails - even though they are both present on the same animal.

Not sure we are talking about the same incentives. Mining with cheaper, green energy instead of dirty, more expensive energy : Which is better? Economically and ethically obviously the clean energy miners. I already gave you the source on green energy production costing less than outdated energy production.

At some point, people will start realizing that they can get the same electricity but at lower costs. Thats when big oil starts dying and their lobbyist buddies no longer have incentives to screw everyone over by polluting our living-environment and bodies. I guess some people just enjoy their fish pre-oiled before cooking. Guten Apetite. 

Aren't you presuming too much, goldkingcoiner?  Where do you get the idea that "Green" energy is always cheaper?  Might the cost of energy and the advantages and disadvantages of each energy type differ based on location, and sometimes there could be some justifications to operate some kinds of energy at a loss in order to fund research or the development of future energy-related technologies.. and surely bitcoin has a lot of various ways in which energy can be consumed that had not been previously practical. so I am not really disagreeing with the ideas about the need to analyze generation, transmission and distribution.. . .and it seems that we also have concerns about how energy is consumed too.. especially when it comes to certain kinds of consumption that is deemed to be "less important" by some segments of the population.. so surely generation, transmission and distribution are supply side factors and some concerns about consumption has recently been part of what is being considered in the recent formulas too... and also who consumes the energy.. there seem to be some protectionism regarding who can consume what kinds of energy too, no?  and bitcoin is part of the idea.. but "we" don't want poor people to be consuming energy, right?  They might get richer by figuring out how to consume energy in ways to benefit their situations rather than contributing to the ability of others to be able to consume.  I am not claiming to know the answer.. but it seems that arguments are being convoluted and maybe it is not always on purpose... even though sometimes it seems that the convolution is happening on purpose.. and it is not just on one side of the political spectrum, either

I linked the source. But I guess if you live in the Arctic, it would be hard to generate electricity with sunlight or wind. I guess you are half-right. But a few more decades of global warming and we won't have to worry about that. We will be too busy treating daily heatstroke.

Big oil is the bad guy?  I have difficulties with this presumption. 

Your difficulties have been noted and will be taken seriously.

I understand various arguments regarding privatizing the gains and socializing the losses, so I would agree that companies should not be socializing some of their expenses (which would include costs to the environment that sometimes need to be sufficiently and adequately considered).. I am also not inclined to privatize everything, so there is a role for government and also a role to protect various public interests when it comes to energy production and also energy availability, yet I have difficulties considering that the energy companies are always the bad guys.. because there are some needs for allowing for the production and finding of resources and the various supply-side factors that you mentioned.

Big Oil is running on marketing only, at this point. People are either too afraid or too greedy to give our old energy production system up for a better system. Like people who cannot give fiat up even though it is obviously becoming redundant. We call those people nocoiners.

Climate change deniers are the nocoiners of science.

[Hueristic]

 Pantheon, good series so far.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Rehan Zakir]

Want a $1 Million Job in Crypto? How About Chief Metaverse Officer - They Are all the Rage

Metaverse technology has continued to be the rage among big-name brands that are now dolling out million-dollar paychecks to so-called "chief metaverse officers" to think up their metaverse adoption strategy.

According to a Bloomberg report, brands such as Disney, Proctor and Gamble (P&G), LVMH, Creative Artists Agency (CAA), Spanish telecom carrier Telefonica SA, and wedding-registry retailer Crate & Barrel are among giants that have invested in a CMO of recent.

These firms, while each having modified job descriptions for their CMO, are all making the appointment with a view not to be left behind in the adoption of the emerging technology. Hamza Khan, the co-lead of metaverse efforts at management and consulting firm McKinsey & Co.

McKinsey estimates that annual global spending related to the virtual world could reach as much as $5 trillion by 2030. Analysis by Gartner Inc. supports the position that the metaverse is the next big innovation with its forecast that one in four people will spend at least an hour a day in the metaverse within a few years.

Despite the "digital FOMO" trend, companies are still treading cautiously in their metaverse adoption as the sector is yet to prove itself to be a big earner. Bloomberg found that it is presently not uncommon to see newly named chief metaverse officers having additional responsibilities in order not to constrain company resources, although their paychecks still run into millions in some cases.

Information source: https://cryptonews.com/news/want-a-1-million-job-in-crypto-how-about-chief-metaverse-officer-they-are-all-the-rage.htm

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[ThemePen]

Performance of a few major indices since the COVID bottom.

Bitcoin:  +201%
Commodities: +86%
Nasdaq: +62%
Russell 3000: +60%
Gold: +7%
High Yield Bonds: +4%
Long Duration Bonds: -33%



Source.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Republikcoin.com]

Want a $1 Million Job in Crypto? How About Chief Metaverse Officer - They Are all the Rage

Metaverse technology has continued to be the rage among big-name brands that are now dolling out million-dollar paychecks to so-called "chief metaverse officers" to think up their metaverse adoption strategy.

According to a Bloomberg report, brands such as Disney, Proctor and Gamble (P&G), LVMH, Creative Artists Agency (CAA), Spanish telecom carrier Telefonica SA, and wedding-registry retailer Crate & Barrel are among giants that have invested in a CMO of recent.

It looks like it will be a very tough job to be done by certain individuals or by one person individually, because being a chief metaverse officer requires special skills in managing work in order to have better results. Granted the offer looks great for some companies, but it won't be good enough for those who don't work within the company or who are self-employed.

And a little suggestion for you, I think you can make this news about becoming a chief metaverse officer into another topic so that it can give birth to a warmer and different discussion than just making it here where the topic of discussion is not related to the problem of the chief metaverse officer.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Ami0]

United Nations 🇺🇳 reports 'emerging economies' are adopting digital currency

[philipma1957]

United Nations 🇺🇳 reports 'emerging economies' are adopting digital currency

[img height 150]https://i.ibb.co/PxXfx2P/20220924-192901.jpg[/img]

Nice chart it should be looked at closely. If it is true I find it interesting that two countries locked into a war
are #1 and #2