|
Hfertig
|
 |
March 03, 2015, 09:27:53 PM |
|
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wary
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:32:21 PM |
|
Can a person that calls state a "stationary bandit" be dreaming of a state?
I'll start with the brief version: the sentiment communicated in the sentence I have marked with bold is illogical. It either means that you are an anarchist (left or right, one is dumber, both are illogical), or a liberal (don't start with faux inventive american term: libertarian) who can't grasp that the state plays a vital role in protecting those liberal rights, or you are someone who is anti-politics with strong political opinions. Do you need more? Have I misunderstood something? This one would do, thanks. However, I cannot see problem with logic. Person that calls the state "stationary bandit" obviously doesn't like the state. Right? While "dreaming of a ... state" means that the person likes some form of state. Right? So the bolded sentence can be translated to: "if I say that I don't like state, why you are making conclusion that I like state?". IMO, this is logical and reasonable question. While your conclusion is not logical. Your move  My claim was that based on my experience with you I cannot assume that there is a logical consistency behind what you are saying. What I was trying to show in the last post was why. Either you got lost trying to figure out what logic is, or you don't want to share with me which one of the three types of illogical political leanings you have. Or maybe there is a fourth that I haven't thought of. No moves, just curious. So you are not using logic because you think that I don't use it either. And you think that I don't use logic because I don't share your political views. OK. Thanks for the discussion, it was really enlightening. |
|
|
|
|
|
ghandi
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:33:10 PM |
|
Boom! $294 @ Finex  |
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:33:31 PM |
|
wow nice buy batman
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:33:44 PM |
|
Holy Guacamole!!! $293 on finex
|
|
|
|
|
|
karolina
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:33:51 PM |
|
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting
Yep, declining alright. Declining so much that I just saw a 1700 BTC green candle pop up. |
|
|
|
|
damiano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:35:30 PM |
|
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting
Spoke to soon |
|
|
|
|
stereotype
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:36:46 PM |
|
Futures not keeping up though.
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:37:16 PM |
|
Can a person that calls state a "stationary bandit" be dreaming of a state?
I'll start with the brief version: the sentiment communicated in the sentence I have marked with bold is illogical. It either means that you are an anarchist (left or right, one is dumber, both are illogical), or a liberal (don't start with faux inventive american term: libertarian) who can't grasp that the state plays a vital role in protecting those liberal rights, or you are someone who is anti-politics with strong political opinions. Do you need more? Have I misunderstood something? This one would do, thanks. However, I cannot see problem with logic. Person that calls the state "stationary bandit" obviously doesn't like the state. Right? While "dreaming of a ... state" means that the person likes some form of state. Right? So the bolded sentence can be translated to: "if I say that I don't like state, why you are making conclusion that I like state?". IMO, this is logical and reasonable question. While your conclusion is not logical. Your move My claim was that based on my experience with you I cannot assume that there is a logical consistency behind what you are saying. What I was trying to show in the last post was why. Either you got lost trying to figure out what logic is, or you don't want to share with me which one of the three types of illogical political leanings you have. Or maybe there is a fourth that I haven't thought of. No moves, just curious. So you are not using logic because you think that I don't use it either. And you think that I don't use logic because I don't share your political views. OK. Thanks for the discussion, it was really enlightening. qe? That was the weirdest cop out I've seen in a while. Well, the best of luck to you! |
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:37:20 PM |
|
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting
go ahead |
|
|
|
|
|
Hfertig
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:37:44 PM |
|
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting
Spoke to soon I said start to... did not say that this is the top |
|
|
|
|
|
Hfertig
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:40:10 PM |
|
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting
go ahead I am surely taking profits now... |
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:40:56 PM |
|
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting
go ahead I am surely taking profits now... nothing to complain about |
|
|
|
|
petahashminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1037
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:43:00 PM |
|
going to $ 300 and more nice..
|
|
|
|
|
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:43:31 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12345mm
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:45:40 PM |
|
laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa ... that's as close to singing as i can type ... was neat to see that 400k buy ... guess somebody thinks 300+ is near (and wants to make 10 grand while it does) ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hfertig
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:46:31 PM |
|
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting
go ahead I am surely taking profits now... nothing to complain about ...and opened s amall short, just for the fun of it |
|
|
|
|
|
KryptoFoo
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:46:49 PM |
|
I told myself I would stop believing in the power of shorts covering to fuel more upside when the BTC swaps at finex hit 16K. No reason for that number except that they have bottomed out around that level so far in 2015. Doesn't mean much, of course more short may want to cover.
Going to wait and see how it shakes out before getting long again on a dip. May have left a couple dollars on the table, but what the hell, you're supposed to sell strength right?
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:47:49 PM |
|
laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa ... that's as close to singing as i can type ... was neat to see that 400k buy ... guess somebody thinks 300+ is near (and wants to make 10 grand while it does) ...
Why the heck are you singing Coldplay? |
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
March 03, 2015, 09:49:17 PM |
|
laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa ... that's as close to singing as i can type ... was neat to see that 400k buy ... guess somebody thinks 300+ is near (and wants to make 10 grand while it does) ...
Why the heck are you singing Coldplay? lmao |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
