Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2026, 04:50:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 15187 15188 15189 15190 15191 15192 15193 15194 15195 15196 15197 15198 15199 15200 15201 15202 15203 15204 15205 15206 15207 15208 15209 15210 15211 15212 15213 15214 15215 15216 15217 15218 15219 15220 15221 15222 15223 15224 15225 15226 15227 15228 15229 15230 15231 15232 15233 15234 15235 15236 [15237] 15238 15239 15240 15241 15242 15243 15244 15245 15246 15247 15248 15249 15250 15251 15252 15253 15254 15255 15256 15257 15258 15259 15260 15261 15262 15263 15264 15265 15266 15267 15268 15269 15270 15271 15272 15273 15274 15275 15276 15277 15278 15279 15280 15281 15282 15283 15284 15285 15286 15287 ... 35733 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26964330 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
stereotype
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 07, 2016, 12:35:58 PM

God my ass is burning from hotsauce.
Bullish
Hmmm.  satoshisauce.com has a certain ring to it, and still available.

What would the ingredients be?
Finely chopped Craig liver, cooked rare so the blood still flows. Followed by a highly whipped Matonis merange (must be whipped, thoroughly), served with prime plump Andresen plums.   
ssmc2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 03:07:06 PM

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-05/a-cartel-and-a-briefcase-how-drug-cash-moves-on-a-river-of-gold

"“If I had a lot of money to launder, I would choose gold,” says John Cassara, a former U.S. Treasury special agent and author of books on money laundering"


BS MSM article claiming cartels are using gold to launder most of their cash. Hmmm how long before they use this to add a ban on personal ownership of PM's into the "ban on cash" mix? And what might that mean for BTC...I think good things.
bitconerian
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 03:50:39 PM

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-05/a-cartel-and-a-briefcase-how-drug-cash-moves-on-a-river-of-gold

"“If I had a lot of money to launder, I would choose gold,” says John Cassara, a former U.S. Treasury special agent and author of books on money laundering. "Bitcoin is full of criminals, the dumb ones flock to it like flies to shit, placing it under intense scrutiny of crime prevention agencies around the world. Having a bitscoin wallet, or even mentioning bitcoins, is akin to painting "Arrest me! I'm an incompetent criminal" sign on your back, not something you'd want to do. The noose is tightening around crypto's unwashed, scrawny neck, and, with the creator of online money Liberty Reserve getting thrown in prison for 20 years Shocked, the bitcoins jig is nearly up."

Hmm...
JimboToronto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4690
Merit: 6169


You're never too old to think young.


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 04:06:23 PM

Good morning Bitcoinland. Still hovering around $460, eh? 

USB-S
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 250

In XEM we trust


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 04:12:34 PM
Last edit: May 07, 2016, 04:24:54 PM by USB-S

I think we're going to touch 470 wall at least once before correcting again. This kind of rapid growth isn't sustainable by any means.
We've been hovering around this price range for 2 months now, on an upwards trajectory. Lets keep this up.

LegendaryMiner
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 407
Merit: 250


DAG, Built-in Chat and Conditional Payments


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 04:30:03 PM

Wow, nice pump lately.
whored
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 05:02:27 PM

The $460 major psychological resistance is being tested again.
LFC_Bitcoin
Diamond Hands
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4242
Merit: 12768



View Profile
May 07, 2016, 05:39:17 PM

The $460 major psychological resistance is being tested again.
True lets hope it doesnt get ruined by some cruel ass whale dumping on us. I think there's going to be lots of games played by big players as we lead up to the halving.
Denker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1016


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 06:31:31 PM

The $460 major psychological resistance is being tested again.
True lets hope it doesnt get ruined by some cruel ass whale dumping on us. I think there's going to be lots of games played by big players as we lead up to the halving.

I think it's not so much the $460 which is a barrier. It's more the chinese and the 3000 yuan which could hinder us to climb higher.
SheHadMANHands
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 06:35:38 PM

Look how calm we are...   

re re re re test 3,000 imminent    Cheesy
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4424
Merit: 14357


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 07:31:53 PM

The price will rise around the halving time because miners will get less coins mined per day, and in order to still be profitable and not only do +- $0/day, they will need to manipulate the market to their favour.

This theory about manipulation of price upwards by miners is frequently overblown and exaggerated.

Even though miners have an incentive for prices to go up, there is no evidence that they are actually engaged in any kind of large scale price manipulation... and likely their involvement in upwards price manipulation is marginal at best. 


By the way, frequently when folks emphasize upward price being caused by miner manipulation they are attempting to suggest that Bitcoin's price is not as organic as it is... organic meaning widespread amongst a variety of persons.. and the more organic bitcoin price becomes with the passage of time and increased use, etc etc... the less that it matters concerning any one segment, including miner behavior... the halving, in fact makes it a bit less important regarding what miners do because they have control over a lower and lower percentage of the coins (new coins in this case).


This is good for us who even hold a few bitcoins or more, but less good for people who want to invest in bitcoin and jump on the train in a late stage. But who cares, most of us here want to make money, and some do, and some lose, thats the nature of the game. 

I agree with you that upward price movement, no matter how it occurs is good for people who already own coins and those who have already stockpiled some coins in anticipation of upwards price movement.  However, I doubt that we need to feel sorry for subsequent users...  There is always going to be different cost basis for folks depending on when they get into any kind of appreciating asset, and the extent to which it can appreciate will change, of course, but that mere fact does not mean that they are screwed by such appreciation.. They just need to make choices about appreciating assets at the time that they make them, and there will likely be other appreciating assets in the future.. We just happen to be involved with this one (bitcoin) and we happen to be lucky enough to know about it (those of us who have been studying it). 

I have attempted to inform a lot of my friends and relatives and even other acquaintances about our lil friend (bitcoin), and sometimes, the seed is planted and they research into it (and maybe even invest), and other times, they are just not ready for it and too nervous about it... for whatever reason.  I don't feel sorry for them.. or feel guilty about my own early investment.




I can't imagine all those who bought for $800-1000/btc...they must feel like losers, but cheer up, we will get back to new heights soon. And if you cant make profit, I am sure your losses will be much smaller.

I don't think that you need to worry about those who bought in the $800 to $1000 price arenas.  It's very likely they are are going to be fine, as long as they held and maybe took other investment precautions.  But, yeah, it is a problem regarding some of those who bought at those levels and sold in the $200s or some other price that was lower than their initial investment.  Those kinds of things happen in volatile assets, and certainly, bitcoin's future appreciation is far from certain.

By the way, I bought my first coins at $1,200, and I continued to buy all the way down below $200 and to bring my average down.  I accumulated several coins in the lower $200s, and took reasonable precautions to sell on the way up above $250 and currently, then to buy back on dips.  Sure it has taken some nursing along the way, yet currently, my BTC portfolio is in really decent shape because I have BTC accumulated and fiat stacked within the portfolio.  Thus there are several ways to view and calculate cost per BTC to attempt to figure if your holdings are profitable.  Sure, yeah, maybe to be a purist, I should wait for $1,200 to cash out the coins that I bought at $1,200, but really that is not absolutely necessary in order to still have an overall financially profitable holdings and selling position based on the overall average cost of the investment.







dumbfbrankings
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 07:50:05 PM

... I don't feel sorry for them.. or feel guilty about my own early investment.

Dude, you're still underwater on your shrewd early BTCeanie investment.

Why would you feel sorry for them?...  for NOT losing as much money as you have? Makes no sense.

And guilt? That's probably how they feel after ruthlessly mocking you behind your back after you tried to rope them into your little neckbeard pyramid pesos scam.

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4424
Merit: 14357


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 08:09:43 PM

... I don't feel sorry for them.. or feel guilty about my own early investment.

Dude, you're still underwater on your shrewd early BTCeanie investment.

Why would you feel sorry for them?...  for NOT losing as much money as you have? Makes no sense.


You are quite into goading, no?


You are making assumptions about my BTC portfolio that are contrary to what I have already disclosed, and pretty much I have been disclosing on a timely and ongoing basis.  What have you disclosed about your own personal BTC investment strategies or lack of that would contribute to conversations that are relevant to this thread?

O.k... Yeah... I have no problem if you are either calling out folks who are making claims that are either untrue or they are deceptive in some kind of way, yet the substantive aspects of my posts in no way fall close to that.... because they are attempts at being substantive regarding investment strategies in terms of both BTC's past price performance and anticipated future price performance, which certainly is relevant to this thread.

What about you, dumbfrankings?  tell us a bit about your BTC investment strategy to the extent that it relates to the topic of this thread?  or you want to tell us about some competing investment that you made, that does not relate?  I actually suspect that you have no substance to add because you want to criticize and distract and to fill space without adding anything substantive or meaningful.


And guilt? That's probably how they feel after ruthlessly mocking you behind your back after you tried to rope them into your little neckbeard pyramid pesos scam.

I think that I already explained my use of the term guilt.  Hey, you know what, I could have invested in Microsoft or Apple in the early 80s, but I didn't... except possibly to the extent that they may have been included in index funds.  Accordingly, I have additional choices now, and one of those choices is bitcoin.  In the future, there are going to be other choices, and so in whatever time line we are, we have choices that are based on a variety of factors including our cash flow, risk profile, information at our disposal, etc.. and there would be no reason to have guilt about profiting from a category of an early adopter investment... on the other hand, if we profit considerably from an early adopter investment, arguably we may have some community obligations regarding how we treat those profits (whether that be dumping on the community or investing in the community.. and some of those are personal choices that are going to vary between individuals which may include their morals and ethics as well).





goldsun
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 09:08:32 PM

What exchanges do you like to trade and buy bitcoins on, and check the prices etc?

Because there is a few dollars difference between most of the exchanges. So I am not sure which one to follow.
European Central Bank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087



View Profile
May 07, 2016, 09:28:30 PM

There are ones that take the prices from multiple joints and give you an average. Preev.com is one, the Winkdex is another and I'm sure there are more. Some of them use localbitcoins too which can make the price look kinda unrealistic.
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072


Crypto is the separation of Power and State.


View Profile WWW
May 07, 2016, 09:34:21 PM

February?

BAAAAA!!! HAAAAA!!! HAAAAAA!!!!

Stop it! It's too much!!

You're such a tiny little man!

Why do you have such a huge problem with being held accountable for what you said in the past?

Do your posts have an expiration date, after which you are no longer responsible for their (spectacularly wrong) assertions?

Your Hillaryesque "Old news is old; at this point what difference does it make?" deflection doesn't change the fact you got #REKT.
Ultrafinery
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 09:43:22 PM
Last edit: May 07, 2016, 09:58:46 PM by Ultrafinery

The volume, gentlemen! It is increasingly unvolumous not volumenous involuminous berry berry bad.

*Horrible thought: Strawberry Shortcake "berry talk," was the entire thing just mangling "very" into "berry"? Did she try it on any other words, like "berryly legal"? Because if just very->berry? lame! Now you take smurfirization...
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4424
Merit: 14357


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 10:05:53 PM

What exchanges do you like to trade and buy bitcoins on, and check the prices etc?

Because there is a few dollars difference between most of the exchanges. So I am not sure which one to follow.

From time to time, we debate in this thread regarding which exchanges are price leaders or which exchanges are more reflective of actual BTC price.  Frequently, there are reasonable differences of opinions, yet also some of your choices in this regard may also depend upon, in part regarding how you are using the information - whether that be to engage in your own trading or whether you are attempting to make either a short or a long term price prediction based on price (which may also include the assessment of trade  volume).

I personally like to use Stamp because 1) my trading is somewhat pegged to price movements on that exchange, 2) several businesses in my areas of activities seem to peg prices on Stamp, 3) Stamp does not engage in margin trading or no fee trading, so their volume seems to be reflective of realistic changes in volume (on this last point, I have been becoming a bit more concerned about Stamp in recent months, because their volume seems to be shrinking more than other exchanges so in that regard, I have been considering that in recent times the decreases in Stamp's volume may not be as reflective of decreases in bitcoin trade volume but instead somewhat connected with a potential decrease in Stamp's bitcoin exchange market share).

BayAreaCoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4508
Merit: 1393


AltQuick.com Owner


View Profile WWW
May 07, 2016, 10:29:04 PM

What a shocker that Craig wasn't Satoshi...
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 10:43:42 PM

February?

BAAAAA!!! HAAAAA!!! HAAAAAA!!!!

Stop it! It's too much!!

You're such a tiny little man!

Why do you have such a huge problem with being held accountable for what you said in the past?

Do your posts have an expiration date, after which you are no longer responsible for their (spectacularly wrong) assertions?

Your Hillaryesque "Old news is old; at this point what difference does it make?" deflection doesn't change the fact you got #REKT.

BAAAAAA!!!! HAAAAAA!!! HAAAAA!!!



Seriously! This is too much!!!

And you're outside of your pathetic little echo chamber, so you can't even delete my posts!



You lot of whining ninnies kind of lose track of the real world in there, don't ya?

Well, at least you're kind enough to comfort Gmaxwell, and tell him what he wants to hear.

I'm not sure if that makes you human, but at least you serve a purpose. Sort of. Maybe.
Pages: « 1 ... 15187 15188 15189 15190 15191 15192 15193 15194 15195 15196 15197 15198 15199 15200 15201 15202 15203 15204 15205 15206 15207 15208 15209 15210 15211 15212 15213 15214 15215 15216 15217 15218 15219 15220 15221 15222 15223 15224 15225 15226 15227 15228 15229 15230 15231 15232 15233 15234 15235 15236 [15237] 15238 15239 15240 15241 15242 15243 15244 15245 15246 15247 15248 15249 15250 15251 15252 15253 15254 15255 15256 15257 15258 15259 15260 15261 15262 15263 15264 15265 15266 15267 15268 15269 15270 15271 15272 15273 15274 15275 15276 15277 15278 15279 15280 15281 15282 15283 15284 15285 15286 15287 ... 35733 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!