vroom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1304
Merit: 1682
a Cray can run an endless loop in under 4 hours
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 08:45:07 PM |
|
Breaking News:
Even Cristiano Ronaldo is now mining crypto currencies !!!!
Just visit -infected site- and pay attention to your cpu workload.
I clicked on your link and my antivirus said it was infected with JSMiner. ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) That will become the next pest on internet, worse than just ordinary household virusses ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I see this javascript mining as a good alternative to ads. can not be worse than these stupid flash banners or autoplaying videos with audio
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:13:08 PM |
|
I mean really.... Can you at least agree that we are somewhere on the lower end of a fraction of a percentage of world adoption, and just imagine first of all getting to a point of 1% adoption might take some time.
The important vision is ubiquity of Bitcoin. As for me, I am working toward that vision. If there are 7 billion people in the world, then 1% would be 70 million using bitcoin in some kind of way... Are we even close to that?
Obviously not. It would take about 280 days to make 70 million transactions on today's Bitcoin Core. Over a month on Bitcoin Cash, which is still too long, but nearly an order of magnitude better. Because big blocks.
|
|
|
|
JimboToronto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4130
Merit: 4764
You're never too old to think young.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:13:39 PM |
|
I see this javascript mining as a good alternative to ads. can not be worse than these stupid flash banners or autoplaying videos with audio
I don't see it as a good alternative to ads. Malware is malware, plain and simple. I agree almost nothing can be worse than annoying autoplaying flash videos with audio. It's one of the worst forms of malware. I've tried to avoid autoplaying videos by not upgrading my flash player so that Firefox doesn't start it automatically and I have to manually allow it to start. This often helps but many ads still autostart. Another annoyance is videos that re-position themselves on-screen when you mute the sound and scroll them out of sight. I suppose advertising does serve a purpose in that it lets you know what products to boycott, but at times it gets so infuriating that I want to actively badmouth the products. Does anyone know of a good ad blocker that targets this annoying malware?
|
|
|
|
soullyG
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:22:25 PM |
|
I see this javascript mining as a good alternative to ads. can not be worse than these stupid flash banners or autoplaying videos with audio
I don't see it as a good alternative to ads. Malware is malware, plain and simple. I agree almost nothing can be worse than annoying autoplaying flash videos with audio. It's one of the worst forms of malware. I've tried to avoid autoplaying videos by not upgrading my flash player so that Firefox doesn't start it automatically and I have to manually allow it to start. This often helps but many ads still autostart. Another annoyance is videos that re-position themselves on-screen when you mute the sound and scroll them out of sight. I suppose advertising does serve a purpose in that it lets you know what products to boycott, but at times it gets so infuriating that I want to actively badmouth the products. Does anyone know of a good ad blocker that targets this annoying malware? Use Chrome as a browser, it's better than Firefox and doesn't even support Flash any more ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) You can get the "No Coin" extension that will block CoinHive scripts from running: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/no-coin/gojamcfopckidlocpkbelmpjcgmbgjcl?hl=en
|
|
|
|
vroom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1304
Merit: 1682
a Cray can run an endless loop in under 4 hours
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:22:45 PM |
|
Does anyone know of a good ad blocker that targets this annoying malware?
give "uBlock Origin" a try
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:23:17 PM |
|
oh oh do tell how block increases helps on boarding the world? Would you mind doing a simple math on how big your blocks should be for every person in the world to do just one transaction on chain per day? I'll wait
About 25G.
|
|
|
|
fluidjax
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:30:52 PM |
|
oh oh do tell how block increases helps on boarding the world? Would you mind doing a simple math on how big your blocks should be for every person in the world to do just one transaction on chain per day? I'll wait
About 25G. Clearly that's way too big, what's the solution, L2?
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:36:40 PM |
|
To split your coins On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once). Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners. Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.
IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:39:53 PM |
|
So if we want to use the Bitcoin blockchain now we have to send two txs at once, one real one and one spam. That right?
No. ivomm is describing a single transaction with one additional output. I rather prefer the mechanism of making your transaction include an input that was the output of a post-fork transaction.
|
|
|
|
fluidjax
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:40:32 PM |
|
To split your coins On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once). Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners. Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.
IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner. Yes, it's a policy, miners could ignore the policy and include the transaction. But if you are sending coins to your own addresses, and they break policy and include the transaction in a block, there is no harm done.
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2632
Merit: 12762
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:55:11 PM |
|
END list, good luck! 19/9 rayx12 ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 24/9 kidbitter* ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 25/9 binaryreign* ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 26/9 player99 ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 27/9 xhomerx10 ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 28/9 khufuking ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 29/9 jhayzxenon* 30/9 yermom ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 01/10 teamtarp* ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 02/10 bitchick * ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 03/10 ^BuTcH^ ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 04/10 minermannc ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 05/10 punisher1314* ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) 06/10 jimbo Toronto* 07/10 player514* 09/10 Oinas* 10/10 bikerlezno* LAST WINNER 11/10 ted e. bare 12/10 harrymmmm* 13/10 cryptoqueeen* 14/10 bitcoinaire* 15/10 ludwigvon* 16/10 BitchicksHusband* 17/10 shroomskit_disgrace 18/10 dakustaking76 19/10 birobob* 20/10 leowonderful 21/10 paashaas 22/10 cmacwiz* 23/10 spaceman_spiff_original* 24/10 colonel panic 25/10 soullyG 26/10 weltmaster* 27/10 vroom 28/10 entons* 29/10 roombot* 30/10 notme* 31/10 twocorn 01/11 YamashitaRen 02/11 orpington 03/11 Haciendo* 04/11 lilloboy 05/11 jojo69* 06/11 d_eddie* 07/11 empowering* 08/11 northyplole* 09/11 podyx* 10/11 u9y42* 11/11 starving_marvin 12/11 sirazimuth* 13/11 dotto* 14/11 hazukison* 15/11 organic* 16/11 Heater* 17/11 foxygoxy* 18/11 600watt 19/11 arriemoller 20/11 drbrockcoin* 21/11 icygreen* 22/11 rakessh 23/11 erisdiscordia 24/11 oblox* 25/11 mfort312* 26/11 globbo* 27/11 lfc_bitcoin 28/11 conspirosphere.tk* 29/11 rjclarck2000 30/11 last of the v8s * 01/12 newworldcoiner* 02/12 souspeed* 03/12 jaapgvk 04/12 sgk* 05/12 fluidjax 07/12 free-bit.co.in 08/12 imbatman 09/12 yonton 10/12 fragout* 11/12 itod 12/12 lontonbit* 13/12 CistaCista 14/12 cAPSLOCK 15/12 philivey 16/12 marcus_of_augustus* 17/12 mattimann 18/12 coincube* 21/12 2dogs 24/12 bones261* 25/12 mndan 26/12 karatma1* 28/12 deathangel* 30/12 erre 31/12 elwar 01/01/2018 lewis pirenne* 02/01/2018 addressed* 03/01/2018 bathy 05/01/2018 bitcoin psycho 06/01/2018 chowhan 07/01/2018 fabiorem* 18/01/2018 raja_mbz* 22/01/2018 _javi_ 26/01/2018 kurious* 28/01/2018 steelboy* 29/01/2018 alcohodl 01/02/2018 cristitcm 18/02/2018 in the silence 20/04/2018 fractal universe* 15/03/2018 Carl85 15/05/2018 oldtimegin* 15/06/2018 samson 16/08/2018 samarkand
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 09:59:16 PM |
|
oh oh do tell how block increases helps on boarding the world? Would you mind doing a simple math on how big your blocks should be for every person in the world to do just one transaction on chain per day? I'll wait
About 25G. Clearly that's way too big, Today, clearly. At some point where we might actually achieve ubiquity? Probably not. what's the solution, L2?
L2 is probably part of the solution. But there is no known L2 technology that can achieve this scale unless larger blocks is also part of the solution.
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 10:05:28 PM |
|
I suppose advertising does serve a purpose
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimagizer.imageshack.us%2Fa%2Fimg923%2F3753%2F17LxiR.gif&t=665&c=ZPV8MkmI95jkmw) Bitcoin don't have advertising. Only a controlled supply. And it's enough.
|
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 10:13:31 PM |
|
And be prepared for this friday ... miners have ordered a stucked MEMpool (mud fees). ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimagizer.imageshack.us%2Fa%2Fimg924%2F9207%2Fw2j3bn.png&t=665&c=dM5lgZ8Yv3590g)
|
|
|
|
ivomm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1880
Merit: 3046
All good things to those who wait
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 10:17:37 PM |
|
To split your coins On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once). Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners. Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.
IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner. Yes, it's a policy, miners could ignore the policy and include the transaction. No, this is not correct. Transactions to that address are will be considered invalid by 2x nodes & miners; A block containing them would be invalid and not be built upon.
|
|
|
|
fluidjax
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 10:38:46 PM |
|
To split your coins On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once). Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners. Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.
IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner. Yes, it's a policy, miners could ignore the policy and include the transaction. No, this is not correct. Transactions to that address are will be considered invalid by 2x nodes & miners; A block containing them would be invalid and not be built upon. My mistake you are right.
|
|
|
|
buyandhold
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 231
Merit: 43
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 10:41:04 PM |
|
To split your coins On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once). Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners. Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.
IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner. Dude just feckin stop flailing about shilling for this utter crap of an altcoin. Your one mad discredited dumped dev Garzik has already merged that spammy shit into your altcoin. https://github.com/btc1/bitcoin/commit/a3c41256984bf11d95a560ae89c0fcbadfbe73dc#diff-4f6d60b6976522cec2974a0aea9a5ab3R801 ff Keep up dunderbluss, you're way behind latest developments on your crapcoin. Hey also guess what it ficks up lightning (if the channel doesn't enforce your famous facking blacklist). https://0bin.net/paste/nQwqU76pQ3CW00ZV#TUB68SXcEn-fSIQAWkULnUEL0NaUK/5TzPrQWEFwWyg https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/915945691997929472You will lose people money, you and your cronies. What people actually in bitcoin call 'being a scammer'. Just focking stop.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 10:44:28 PM |
|
To split your coins On BTC chain you have some coins in address (A), you send your coins to another address you own (B), and include a further special recipient address 3Bit1xA4apyzgmFNT2k8Pvnd6zb6TnwcTi to whom you send a few satoshis. (You have to use send to many option in your wallet, to send them at once). Any transactions that contain this special address will be ignored by 2X miners. Once this is successful, you will have your BTC in an address(B) you own.
IIUC, I would not employ this mechanism for my coins. The part that I have underlined seems to require full faith in what the miners will do. You have no a priori method of knowing whether that address will 'be ignored' by any miner. Yes, it's a policy, miners could ignore the policy and include the transaction. No, this is not correct. Transactions to that address are will be considered invalid by 2x nodes & miners; A block containing them would be invalid and not be built upon. Only by miners that agree to implement this, and do not renege. What guarantee do you have that this will be the case? For that matter, what guarantee do you have that someone does not know the private key corresponding to this address? I'm just trying to point out that there is at least one alternative method that a transaction originator can use to split their coins, which does not suffer these drawbacks.
|
|
|
|
drbrockcoin
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
For your listening pleasure, Fuck World Trade!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 05, 2017, 10:58:04 PM |
|
BULLISH for BTC? Either way fuck you Trump https://imgur.com/tL7Jzqjhmm dont know how to show images here
|
|
|
|
|