Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[TooDumbForBitcoin]

Some blockchain.info exchange acquisiti....oh god I've fallen asleep.

laughed, thanks.

[creekbore]

A well written article, if it were written about something else. Global warming comes to mind.

That's an interesting article: there are no doubts there's gong to be a major financial storm pretty soon as the sins of the recent past catch up with the global market, however whether BT will 'save' us is pretty dubious.

However, parallels with global warming are not accurate, it's a pity so many sceptics and deniers inhabit this forum but I imagine the US media has a lot to do with this (as well as your education system).

I'm on a ferry on the Tasman strait and can't be bothered producing all the academic references.  But even the 'skeptic' scientists who were employed by the corporate PR companies have jumped ship -- the evidence is now overwhelming.  Hopefully, a few more super-storms will hit the east coast, wake you from your insular torpor.

But loving the new, aggressive JorgeStolfi.

As for the market....well, I can see some choppy water ahead: volume seems low, the bid order sum is reducing and I have no idea how we managed to breach 700 but I can't see that happening again until the constant flow of negative sentiment recedes.

[nrd525]

BFX sentiment index has gone rather bullish.  Could be a good counter-indicator, as when it was negative we went from 400 to 700.

[adamstgBit]

looks like we still got a few bears that think they know better,
bears prepare to wake up dazed and confused as you look upon other flag pole formation and price at 741.POWNED!!!!

 

[spooderman]

So anyone wanna tell me wtf is wrong with stamp? I don't want this to be a tiny problem no one notices apart from in a tiny part of this forum I never see that is indicative of some sort of bullshit. To be honest I already feel like taking my btc out of there. (Obviously most of them aren't in there, but I leave a few in for tarding).

[Vigil]

A well written article, if it were written about something else. Global warming comes to mind.

That's an interesting article: there are no doubts there's gong to be a major financial storm pretty soon as the sins of the recent past catch up with the global market, however whether BT will 'save' us is pretty dubious.

However, parallels with global warming are not accurate, it's a pity so many sceptics and deniers inhabit this forum but I imagine the US media has a lot to do with this (as well as your education system).

I'm on a ferry on the Tasman strait and can't be bothered producing all the academic references.  But even the 'skeptic' scientists who were employed by the corporate PR companies have jumped ship -- the evidence is now overwhelming.  Hopefully, a few more super-storms will hit the east coast, wake you from your insular torpor.

But loving the new, aggressive JorgeStolfi.

As for the market....well, I can see some choppy water ahead: volume seems low, the bid order sum is reducing and I have no idea how we managed to breach 700 but I can't see that happening again until the constant flow of negative sentiment recedes.

No. There have been now two separate events where climate scientists have been busted doctoring data. Their warming models have failed repeatedly. You have no way to prove that current storms have anything to do with any sort of warming event. We just had one of the coldest summers and winters on record. The recent expedition by the global warmers were stuck in record ice caps as they attempted to document the shrinking ice caps.

[Vigil]

On the one-day charts there appears to be a coming cross. Wouldn't this imply the price to travel higher a bit? Or can there be discontinuities in the 1d MA?

[bb113]

A well written article, if it were written about something else. Global warming comes to mind.

That's an interesting article: there are no doubts there's gong to be a major financial storm pretty soon as the sins of the recent past catch up with the global market, however whether BT will 'save' us is pretty dubious.

However, parallels with global warming are not accurate, it's a pity so many sceptics and deniers inhabit this forum but I imagine the US media has a lot to do with this (as well as your education system).

I'm on a ferry on the Tasman strait and can't be bothered producing all the academic references.  But even the 'skeptic' scientists who were employed by the corporate PR companies have jumped ship -- the evidence is now overwhelming.  Hopefully, a few more super-storms will hit the east coast, wake you from your insular torpor.

But loving the new, aggressive JorgeStolfi.

As for the market....well, I can see some choppy water ahead: volume seems low, the bid order sum is reducing and I have no idea how we managed to breach 700 but I can't see that happening again until the constant flow of negative sentiment recedes.

No. There have been now two separate events where climate scientists have been busted doctoring data. Their warming models have failed repeatedly. You have no way to prove that current storms have anything to do with any sort of warming event. We just had one of the coldest summers and winters on record. The recent expedition by the global warmers were stuck in record ice caps as they attempted to document the shrinking ice caps.

Go find the original data from the Magellan Probe. From this you can get the temperature and pressure at various elevations on Venus. From that you can get the temperature at each pressure. Compare the temperatures on venus to the temperatures on earth at equivalent pressure. The relationship between the two is exactly proportional to the square root of planet's relative distances from the sun, exactly as predicted by the inverse square law and stefan-boltzman law. There is no room for greenhouse effect in explaining this data as far as I can tell.

--END OT

[virtualfaqs]

looks like we still got a few bears that think they know better,
bears prepare to wake up dazed and confused as you look upon other flag pole formation and price at 741.POWNED!!!!

 

This looks like the same scenario as when I traded in December. It's bouncing between 650 and 700.  Well, I'll wait until 680 to 700 and sell. Then buy back at 650.    End up going to sleep. Sold at 700. Wake up at 750. 

[adamstgBit]

A well written article, if it were written about something else. Global warming comes to mind.

That's an interesting article: there are no doubts there's gong to be a major financial storm pretty soon as the sins of the recent past catch up with the global market, however whether BT will 'save' us is pretty dubious.

However, parallels with global warming are not accurate, it's a pity so many sceptics and deniers inhabit this forum but I imagine the US media has a lot to do with this (as well as your education system).

I'm on a ferry on the Tasman strait and can't be bothered producing all the academic references.  But even the 'skeptic' scientists who were employed by the corporate PR companies have jumped ship -- the evidence is now overwhelming.  Hopefully, a few more super-storms will hit the east coast, wake you from your insular torpor.

But loving the new, aggressive JorgeStolfi.

As for the market....well, I can see some choppy water ahead: volume seems low, the bid order sum is reducing and I have no idea how we managed to breach 700 but I can't see that happening again until the constant flow of negative sentiment recedes.

No. There have been now two separate events where climate scientists have been busted doctoring data. Their warming models have failed repeatedly. You have no way to prove that current storms have anything to do with any sort of warming event. We just had one of the coldest summers and winters on record. The recent expedition by the global warmers were stuck in record ice caps as they attempted to document the shrinking ice caps.

Go find the original data from the Magellan Probe. From this you can get the temperature and pressure at various elevations on Venus. From that you can get the temperature at each pressure. Compare the temperatures on venus to the temperatures on earth at equivalent pressure. The relationship between the two is exactly proportional to the square root of planet's relative distances from the sun, exactly as predicted by the inverse square law and stefan-boltzman law. There is no room for greenhouse effect in explaining this data as far as I can tell.

--END OT

global warming  ?!

ahhhh quickly buy all the bitcoins!

 

[Walsoraj]

A well written article, if it were written about something else. Global warming comes to mind.

..

But loving the new, aggressive JorgeStolfi.

..

I bet the aggressive Jorge could solve the Voynich manuscript in a single weekend.

[JorgeStolfi]

Go find the original data from the Magellan Probe. From this you can get the temperature and pressure at various elevations on Venus. From that you can get the temperature at each pressure. Compare the temperatures on venus to the temperatures on earth at equivalent pressure. The relationship between the two is exactly proportional to the square root of planet's relative distances from the sun, exactly as predicted by the inverse square law and stefan-boltzman law. There is no room for greenhouse effect in explaining this data as far as I can tell.

Is that above or below the clouds?  (Below the clouds there should be little greenhouse effect anyway, methinks, since little light gets down there. And above the clouds the shorter wavelengths should be refleted off to space without conversion to infrared, so I would expect no greenhouse effect either.)

[JorgeStolfi]

But loving the new, aggressive JorgeStolfi.

Not agressive, just informative. Like a warning at the zoo, "do not  feed the bear, especially with your hand."

[derpinheimer]

OH WHALE, WHERE ARE YOUUU?!

Hes coming, I promise! I sent them an invitation, see here:

Hes ready to blow a huge load all over those bitcoins. (Of cash, sicko)

[Walsoraj]

But loving the new, aggressive JorgeStolfi.

Not agressive, just informative. Like a warning at the zoo, "do not  feed the bear, especially with your hand."

Warning signs would be completely unnecessary if you started your slumber posts with, "STFU I'M TALKING NOW!" Followed by a dinosaur chart. And lastly, your data and analysis.

[adamstgBit]

looks like we still got a few bears that think they know better,
bears prepare to wake up dazed and confused as you look upon other flag pole formation and price at 741.POWNED!!!!

 

This looks like the same scenario as when I traded in December. It's bouncing between 650 and 700.   Well, I'll wait until 680 to 700 and sell. Then buy back at 650.   End up going to sleep. Sold at 700. Wake up at 750.  

yup looks like a lot of bears are heading off to bed...

656.GoodNight!

[bb113]

Go find the original data from the Magellan Probe. From this you can get the temperature and pressure at various elevations on Venus. From that you can get the temperature at each pressure. Compare the temperatures on venus to the temperatures on earth at equivalent pressure. The relationship between the two is exactly proportional to the square root of planet's relative distances from the sun, exactly as predicted by the inverse square law and stefan-boltzman law. There is no room for greenhouse effect in explaining this data as far as I can tell.

Is that above or below the clouds?  (Below the clouds there should be little greenhouse effect anyway, methinks, since little light gets down there. And above the clouds the shorter wavelengths should be refleted off to space without conversion to infrared, so I would expect no greenhouse effect either.)

It works for Earth troposphere pressures (200-1000 mbar) which overlaps the cloud layer. It is slightly off within the cloud layer. Anyway you seem to be proposing an alternative reason there is no affect of CO2 on venus's temperature, and thus no evidence for runaway greenhouse effect.

[JorgeStolfi]

I bet the aggressive Jorge could solve the Voynich manuscript in a single weekend.

I tried that approach once, and it took me less than an hour.  It shocked my voynichologist colleagues, who did not know that side of my character, but the manuscript didn't even flinch.  Tough mystery indeed.

[keithers]

and we are back to 666 on stamp.   Bitcoin loves it there...it is like returning home...lol

[jojo69]

that ponzicoin banner ad is lol