You believe that Musk is the enlightened one, when it comes to bitcoin allocation strategies?
No, in wealth acquisition & management strategies. What you are talking about is but a sliver of a subset of that. And Microstrategy is underwater in their BTC investment. So what is Saylor actually good at besides being a cheerleader on social media?
If you might recall that we are in a bitcoin thread, and surely Musk has not faired too well in his communicating anything other than a gambling approach to bitcoin, along with his seemingly ongoing distractions with shitcoins (namely Doggie coin), and so your attempt to defend that twat makes you appear as a Musk worshiper.. when he hardly deserves any fanfare in bitcoin circles.
And yeah, maybe he deserves some credit for his various contributions to society outside of the bitcoin topic, but we are talking about bitcoin here.. not about worshipping some seemingly self-absorbed attention-whore narcisist. Sure, we could go as far as including shitcoins into our analysis of Musk's past comments and behaviors as they might related to bitcoin, too, and hopefully you are not investing into bitcoin (or shitcoins) in accordance with Musk proclamations or his various all over the place behaviors in contrast to taking an approach to bitcoin (and shitcoins) that would be more aligned with how Saylor acts and/or talks about matters related to bitcoin (and shitcoins too)..
More directly in response to your question, I think that Saylor has been good at quickly identifying BTC's investment thesis and articulating such investment thesis very well - including other educative attempts that he has been making including a conference that he held early on into his bitcoin journey (February 2021, I believe), and he has been good at being consistent and investing into bitcoin in a way that seems consistent with his idea of bitcoin as a long-term investment.
I have had some criticisms of Saylor from the start in which I had been regularly asserting my belief that Saylor was overly aggressive with his allocation into bitcoin, so in that regard, he seemed to have been sending a message in regards to the benefits of hoarding bitcoin and never spending, which surely might fit his cashflow and assets scenario well, but surely some aspects of his seemingly overly aggressive approach seems to have had decent chances of leading to errors when others (especially newbies) attempt to follow the same kind of practices when their cashflow and/or access to credit may well likely not be as good as Saylor's.
Another thing that a lot of us longer term bitcoiners have come to realize is that BTC HODLers/accumulators do not necessarily need to take real aggressive investment stances into bitcoin in order to have potentials benefit quite greatly from bitcoin, so long as the investment timeline is longer 4-10 years or even preferably longer if the HODLer/accumulator might be a newbie investor, then there tends to be some practicalities in not wanting to be over doing the investments into bitcoin (such as overly leveraging) in the early stages of the investment into bitcoin because that may well end up rising to the level of gambling rather than seriously striving to build a long-term investment portfolio involving BTC.
For sure, no one should be following the investment strategies of anyone else unless their circumstances were similar to that other person, so I have some difficulties blaming Saylor in the event that some newbie bitcoin investors might have ended up trying to follow similar strategies as Saylor and ending up getting burnt by overly investing in those similar kinds of ways. In that regard, everyone is responsible for planning and creating his/her own BTC investment strategy that is tailored to his/her personal circumstances.
Also, currently even if Saylor's overall BTC portfolio is in the red (which it seems to be since his average cost per BTC is in the lower $30ks), he still seems to be in quite a decent position, even though in our Monday morning quarter-backing we may well be able to identify some areas in which he may well have played the whole investing into bitcoin matter better... yet I doubt that the mere fact that after the fact, we can point out some better ways that the matter could have been played amounts to evidence that Saylor really played his whole bitcoin approach badly...
In other words, there is a decently wide range of reasonableness in terms of exercising discretion regarding these kinds of investment matters, and how to play them.
If you had not noticed, on a fairly regular basis Musk presents himself like a self-absorbed attention-seeking child, and yeah, maybe he is a "fun" billionaire, but he is annoying at the same time... at least in the way that he presents his emotional maturity in terms of how he has been inconsistently playing bitcoin and how he has been pumping that piece of crap coin.. aka dogggie coin. .. and we could even contrast Musk's presentation of emotional maturity to Saylor's presentation of the same, and it should be pretty clear to anyone who is an adult that Musk would not stand hardly any chance to measure up to Saylor in the arena of his presentation of emotional maturity (or lack thereof).
Poll
