ckpool.org CLOSED

[-ck]

222.2  

After 30 blocks I have our average diff at 104.61
If we get a solve here at 240.4 that would bring us to 108.99 average. Not bad even in the face of a frustrating 240 and counting diff
source http://ckpool.org/blocks/

Make sure not to include the stale blocks in your calculations otherwise those shares are counted twice.

[1714153853]

1714153853

[1714153853]

1714153853

[Fugio]

222.2  

After 30 blocks I have our average diff at 104.61
If we get a solve here at 240.4 that would bring us to 108.99 average. Not bad even in the face of a frustrating 240 and counting diff
source http://ckpool.org/blocks/

Make sure not to include the stale blocks in your calculations otherwise those shares are counted twice.

orphans and stales not included. See you changed the phrase from orphan to stale. A bit more pc   

[-ck]

orphans and stales not included. See you changed the phrase from orphan to stale. A bit more pc   

That was me manually changing them only recently. I didn't feel orphan was descriptive enough since the pool already knew they were stale blocks anyway.

[ComputerGenie]

I keep 2 running columns "actual" (what we found and the network accepted) and "would be" (what the total would be if everything we've ever found were accepted).

When I count orphans and stales, in order to get a "would be" count, I use

Code:

nextBlockDiff = nextBlockDiff - staleBlockDiff

that way the two are "correctly" divided.

[-ck]

Yeah that's all well and good but where the fuck is our next block?

[ComputerGenie]

Yeah that's all well and good but where the fuck is our next block?

I think the big purple dog ate it.  

[philipma1957]

Yeah that's all well and good but where the fuck is our next block?

well  a long mean terrible count can happen


13,000,000,000,000  + is not  that  bad


below is lifted from a block made elsewhere on July 1st


16,222,898,491,003      319.506%         0.959   the .959  means a 1 in 20 chance


We have not had a block as bad as 320%  so we are due

[-ck]

Time to fire up the BBQ and break out a bottle of red then...

[pavesi]

Yeah that's all well and good but where the fuck is our next block?

I think the big purple dog ate it.  

I'm thinking you haven't been planting enough..  Maybe some dandelion's, so your constantly in that garden of yours!

[ComputerGenie]

I'm thinking you haven't been planting enough..  Maybe some dandelion's, so your constantly in that garden of yours!

I can plant all I like, but 100F days and no rain or clouds make for shit crops. 

[philipma1957]

I'm thinking you haven't been planting enough..  Maybe some dandelion's, so your constantly in that garden of yours!

I can plant all I like, but 100F days and no rain or clouds make for shit crops. 

yeah  my fig tree  is suffering from too much heat and sun (lack of rain)

[minefarmbuy]

Our hydrangea's are looking a little dusty here. Although my new pot plant is taking well, bout to harvest one that has a nitrogen deficiency before it hermaphrodites.

It's also the wife and I's second year anny today. Maybe a block as a gift would be a nice present?

[filthyjason]

Am I the only one not able to resolve pool.ckpool.org for the past 10 days or so? I've switched over to using the depool.ckpool.org entry. Not seeing any A / CNAME record for this even on the ns12/13 zoneedit servers

[ComputerGenie]

Am I the only one not able to resolve pool.ckpool.org for the past 10 days or so? I've switched over to using the depool.ckpool.org entry. Not seeing any A / CNAME record for this even on the ns12/13 zoneedit servers

Code:

$ dig +short pool.ckpool.org
45.59.68.75

It would seem the answer is "yes" 

[jsays]

Am I the only one not able to resolve pool.ckpool.org for the past 10 days or so? I've switched over to using the depool.ckpool.org entry. Not seeing any A / CNAME record for this even on the ns12/13 zoneedit servers

Code:

$ dig +short pool.ckpool.org
45.59.68.75

It would seem the answer is "yes" 

Working here, seeing same IP as CG...

Code:

$ nslookup pool.ckpool.org
Non-authoritative answer:
Name:	pool.ckpool.org
Address: 45.59.68.75

[filthyjason]

Am I the only one not able to resolve pool.ckpool.org for the past 10 days or so? I've switched over to using the depool.ckpool.org entry. Not seeing any A / CNAME record for this even on the ns12/13 zoneedit servers

Code:

$ dig +short pool.ckpool.org
45.59.68.75

It would seem the answer is "yes" 

Thanks! It seems a recent Palo Alto Networks threatID update was blocking it, I had logging off so I wasn't seeing it

for anyone that cares:
http://www.dotat.xyz/panthreatvault204194556.png

[-ck]

Thanks! It seems a recent Palo Alto Networks threatID update was blocking it, I had logging off so I wasn't seeing it

for anyone that cares:
http://www.dotat.xyz/panthreatvault204194556.png

That's just ridiculous... It was bad enough when they kept flagging cgminer as a fucking trojan.

[evade_57]

"Wildfire"

The Andromeda Strain came to mind......

[filthyjason]

That's just ridiculous... It was bad enough when they kept flagging cgminer as a fucking trojan.

No shit, the exact logged error was "( name-of-threatid eq 'Suspicious DNS Query (generic:pool.ckpool.org)' )" Odd they didn't flag the depool.ckpool.org entry too. At least doing a bypass was easy, but annoying. It flagged it in the Spyware category.

[jsays]

Nothing fancy tonight...
Beef tacos (with American trimmings) and pina coladas from a mix!