[ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees

[nhamoitruonghoc]

the resistance line is broken, begins growth

Triangle pattern. The time of blossom to come soon.
I call it like a unavoidable, and unstoppable rise.

[Bitbobb]

there are pluses in everything, sellers have ended, now it is possible to make the price more expensive than bitcoin, and will not fall

Wont you need buyers for that?

Roger

keep dreamin'

[D1jay]

the resistance line is broken, begins growth

Triangle pattern. The time of blossom to come soon.
I call it like a unavoidable, and unstoppable rise.

Well out of the shady bias post and debate going back and forth here on this intelligent thread     These is what interest me though, if your TA is anything near %70 accurate, then i hope good things await us in the next coming weeks or probably months
Let me for now breath a fresh air with this little information even though there is %100 chance it could be false sooo, lets prepare for the upcoming rise

[Bitbobb]

the resistance line is broken, begins growth

Triangle pattern. The time of blossom to come soon.
I call it like a unavoidable, and unstoppable rise.

Well out of the shady bias post and debate going back and forth here on this intelligent thread     These is what interest me though, if your TA is anything near %70 accurate, then i hope good things await us in the next coming weeks or probably months
Let me for now breath a fresh air with this little information even though there is %100 chance it could be false sooo, lets prepare for the upcoming rise

the fact you only care about spot price proves you have no clue what BitCoin is about.  BitCoin is not some investment ponzi.  Maybe that is what ABC coin is going for IDK. 

Intelligence is relative.

[alevlaslo]

USD price line too

if bitcoin falls to 1000, then BCH will not fall lower than now

ETH may drop to $ 10, LTC to $ 4, but BCH may not fall below $ 75 because nobody bought it cheaper

[alevlaslo]

Toomim’s analysis further explains that if each transaction was around 400 bytes and the block was 500MB, it could be encoded into 1.9MB of data or a “99.618% reduction in size.” Interestingly, the Bitcoin Core (BTC) and Bitcoin Satoshi’s Vision (BSV) networks cannot utilize the Xthinner concept. Toomim explained that both protocols would need to upgrade in order to reap the protocol’s compression benefits. “BTC also lacks CTOR/LTOR, which means [it] won’t work as well and would require substantial modifications to work at all,” Toomim remarked on the forum. The BSV network does not have lexicographic transaction ordering capabilities either, making Xthinner unobtainable to BSV developers. https://news.bitcoin.com/bch-developer-unveils-xthinner-scaling-protocol-claims-to-compress-blocks-by-99/

[Bitbobb]

Toomim’s analysis further explains that if each transaction was around 400 bytes and the block was 500MB, it could be encoded into 1.9MB of data or a “99.618% reduction in size.” Interestingly, the Bitcoin Core (BTC) and Bitcoin Satoshi’s Vision (BSV) networks cannot utilize the Xthinner concept. Toomim explained that both protocols would need to upgrade in order to reap the protocol’s compression benefits. “BTC also lacks CTOR/LTOR, which means [it] won’t work as well and would require substantial modifications to work at all,” Toomim remarked on the forum. The BSV network does not have lexicographic transaction ordering capabilities either, making Xthinner unobtainable to BSV developers. https://news.bitcoin.com/bch-developer-unveils-xthinner-scaling-protocol-claims-to-compress-blocks-by-99/

um good lol.  

devs lol.

     they act like CTOR is an upgrade.  it isn't.  And it is only part of a bigger plan to f*** BCH in the same way BTC got f***'d.  Highly interconnected mesh?  sorry that is not BitCoin.

BSV is removing the stuff these idiot devs added in what amounts to crimes against humanity.  So glad all you ponzi idiots and dev worshipers are gone to some altcoin.  

[Bitbobb]

USD price line too

if bitcoin falls to 1000, then BCH will not fall lower than now

ETH may drop to $ 10, LTC to $ 4, but BCH may not fall below $ 75 because nobody bought it cheaper

So you are saying that the people whom bought BCH at 75 usd are too stupid to sell when the price drops lower than 75??  Wow great fundamentals your coin has.  Yeah it is true that when people find they have been scammed they dig in further to ignore reality...  I am just kinda shocked to hear you claim that as an algo for your coin.  You realize you literally just admitted in a backhanded way that BCH is backed by nothing other than scamming right?

[Bitbobb]

https://live.keyport.tv/

[broadhurst]

https://live.keyport.tv/

Will Bitmain continue propping up Bcash?  Do the small fry bag holders regret not selling before the fork ?  Are Bcash and SVcash cancelling each other out and having a race to the bottom? Is Satoshi shaking his head and saying to himself "these guys are obsessed with my white paper, they need medical help"

These are the questions that must be asked. 

[alevlaslo]

Toomim’s analysis further explains that if each transaction was around 400 bytes and the block was 500MB, it could be encoded into 1.9MB of data or a “99.618% reduction in size.” Interestingly, the Bitcoin Core (BTC) and Bitcoin Satoshi’s Vision (BSV) networks cannot utilize the Xthinner concept. Toomim explained that both protocols would need to upgrade in order to reap the protocol’s compression benefits. “BTC also lacks CTOR/LTOR, which means [it] won’t work as well and would require substantial modifications to work at all,” Toomim remarked on the forum. The BSV network does not have lexicographic transaction ordering capabilities either, making Xthinner unobtainable to BSV developers. https://news.bitcoin.com/bch-developer-unveils-xthinner-scaling-protocol-claims-to-compress-blocks-by-99/

um good lol.  

devs lol.

     they act like CTOR is an upgrade.  it isn't.  And it is only part of a bigger plan to f*** BCH in the same way BTC got f***'d.  Highly interconnected mesh?  sorry that is not BitCoin.

BSV is removing the stuff these idiot devs added in what amounts to crimes against humanity.  So glad all you ponzi idiots and dev worshipers are gone to some altcoin.  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg49443840#msg49443840

[Bitbobb]

https://live.keyport.tv/

Will Bitmain continue propping up Bcash?  Do the small fry bag holders regret not selling before the fork ?  Are Bcash and SVcash cancelling each other out and having a race to the bottom? Is Satoshi shaking his head and saying to himself "these guys are obsessed with my white paper, they need medical help"

These are the questions that must be asked. 

the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin

[nutildah]

https://live.keyport.tv/

Will Bitmain continue propping up Bcash?  Do the small fry bag holders regret not selling before the fork ?  Are Bcash and SVcash cancelling each other out and having a race to the bottom? Is Satoshi shaking his head and saying to himself "these guys are obsessed with my white paper, they need medical help"

These are the questions that must be asked. 

the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin

Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance.

[jbreher]

the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin

Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance.

If for no other reason, because the experiment as satoshi originally envisioned it is worth carrying to logical conclusion.

Look at it from this angle for a moment: Satoshi's original invention, aligning the best interests of the individual with the best interests of the system as a whole, unleashed this entire ecosystem. In the design of Bitcoin, he/she/they accomplished what all of humanity had previously been unable to do.

I really don't have a strong aversion to carrying out multiple parallel experiments (that may be an egregious simplification, but the difference is nuanced and inappropriate for the scope of this reply). But should we not carry out the experiment as set forth in the design that led to this entire 'Cambrian Explosion' (there's an overused term) of innovation?

From my perspective, abandoning the experiment as envisioned by its progenitor is pure folly.

[Globb0]

But these projects are entrusted with peoples funds. Not just for trying something out.

[Bitbobb]

the USA is still an experiment much like the wheel.

[nutildah]

the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin

Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance.

If for no other reason, because the experiment as satoshi originally envisioned it is worth carrying to logical conclusion.

Look at it from this angle for a moment: Satoshi's original invention, aligning the best interests of the individual with the best interests of the system as a whole, unleashed this entire ecosystem. In the design of Bitcoin, he/she/they accomplished what all of humanity had previously been unable to do.

I really don't have a strong aversion to carrying out multiple parallel experiments (that may be an egregious simplification, but the difference is nuanced and inappropriate for the scope of this reply). But should we not carry out the experiment as set forth in the design that led to this entire 'Cambrian Explosion' (there's an overused term) of innovation?

From my perspective, abandoning the experiment as envisioned by its progenitor is pure folly.

Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine.

I'm just saying the general public - the market that both BCH and SV are trying to penetrate - don't care about what the whitepaper says. They in large don't even want bitcoin at all. However, BTC has always led the pack and all altcoins have been largely dependent on its success -- this dynamic is unlikely to change in the near future (2-5 years).

[jbreher]

the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin

Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance.

If for no other reason, because the experiment as satoshi originally envisioned it is worth carrying to logical conclusion.

Look at it from this angle for a moment: Satoshi's original invention, aligning the best interests of the individual with the best interests of the system as a whole, unleashed this entire ecosystem. In the design of Bitcoin, he/she/they accomplished what all of humanity had previously been unable to do.

I really don't have a strong aversion to carrying out multiple parallel experiments (that may be an egregious simplification, but the difference is nuanced and inappropriate for the scope of this reply). But should we not carry out the experiment as set forth in the design that led to this entire 'Cambrian Explosion' (there's an overused term) of innovation?

From my perspective, abandoning the experiment as envisioned by its progenitor is pure folly.

Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine.

No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit.

[hv_]

the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin

Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance.

If for no other reason, because the experiment as satoshi originally envisioned it is worth carrying to logical conclusion.

Look at it from this angle for a moment: Satoshi's original invention, aligning the best interests of the individual with the best interests of the system as a whole, unleashed this entire ecosystem. In the design of Bitcoin, he/she/they accomplished what all of humanity had previously been unable to do.

I really don't have a strong aversion to carrying out multiple parallel experiments (that may be an egregious simplification, but the difference is nuanced and inappropriate for the scope of this reply). But should we not carry out the experiment as set forth in the design that led to this entire 'Cambrian Explosion' (there's an overused term) of innovation?

From my perspective, abandoning the experiment as envisioned by its progenitor is pure folly.

Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine.

No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit.

... ant Ctor, and DSV,  ... whatever hole ABC loves to add to protocol / allow / change original econimicsto stifle the on-chain scaling ... 

[hv_]

https://live.keyport.tv/

Will Bitmain continue propping up Bcash?  Do the small fry bag holders regret not selling before the fork ?  Are Bcash and SVcash cancelling each other out and having a race to the bottom? Is Satoshi shaking his head and saying to himself "these guys are obsessed with my white paper, they need medical help"

These are the questions that must be asked.  

the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin

Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance.

The general public should not, exactly as we do not care about smtp - but this is because it does not change and is on topic / purpose -

A protocol MUST be stable and simple (= scalable)  and clear to be 'ignored by public'
-> Industry / cyber risk whatch dogs take care .  There you 'll get the mass adoption - ONLY that way.

The white paper is the guide for the paper dogs do check if the protocol is doing what it should.

The tech impl must be to spec - or rekt

Bitcoin has two layers: Econimics AND tech -  if u fiddle with the tech and do not understand the dependencies up-hill -> you ll risk the entire eco system (and create an ALT coin like SegwitCoin). But do not sell that as Bitcoin.