nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 8285
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 03:53:50 AM |
|
the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin
Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance. If for no other reason, because the experiment as satoshi originally envisioned it is worth carrying to logical conclusion. Look at it from this angle for a moment: Satoshi's original invention, aligning the best interests of the individual with the best interests of the system as a whole, unleashed this entire ecosystem. In the design of Bitcoin, he/she/they accomplished what all of humanity had previously been unable to do. I really don't have a strong aversion to carrying out multiple parallel experiments (that may be an egregious simplification, but the difference is nuanced and inappropriate for the scope of this reply). But should we not carry out the experiment as set forth in the design that led to this entire 'Cambrian Explosion' (there's an overused term) of innovation? From my perspective, abandoning the experiment as envisioned by its progenitor is pure folly. Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine. I'm just saying the general public - the market that both BCH and SV are trying to penetrate - don't care about what the whitepaper says. They in large don't even want bitcoin at all. However, BTC has always led the pack and all altcoins have been largely dependent on its success -- this dynamic is unlikely to change in the near future (2-5 years).
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 08:04:03 AM |
|
the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin
Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance. If for no other reason, because the experiment as satoshi originally envisioned it is worth carrying to logical conclusion. Look at it from this angle for a moment: Satoshi's original invention, aligning the best interests of the individual with the best interests of the system as a whole, unleashed this entire ecosystem. In the design of Bitcoin, he/she/they accomplished what all of humanity had previously been unable to do. I really don't have a strong aversion to carrying out multiple parallel experiments (that may be an egregious simplification, but the difference is nuanced and inappropriate for the scope of this reply). But should we not carry out the experiment as set forth in the design that led to this entire 'Cambrian Explosion' (there's an overused term) of innovation? From my perspective, abandoning the experiment as envisioned by its progenitor is pure folly. Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine. No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit.
|
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
hv_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 08:20:39 AM |
|
the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin
Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance. If for no other reason, because the experiment as satoshi originally envisioned it is worth carrying to logical conclusion. Look at it from this angle for a moment: Satoshi's original invention, aligning the best interests of the individual with the best interests of the system as a whole, unleashed this entire ecosystem. In the design of Bitcoin, he/she/they accomplished what all of humanity had previously been unable to do. I really don't have a strong aversion to carrying out multiple parallel experiments (that may be an egregious simplification, but the difference is nuanced and inappropriate for the scope of this reply). But should we not carry out the experiment as set forth in the design that led to this entire 'Cambrian Explosion' (there's an overused term) of innovation? From my perspective, abandoning the experiment as envisioned by its progenitor is pure folly. Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine. No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit. ... ant Ctor, and DSV, ... whatever hole ABC loves to add to protocol / allow / change original econimicsto stifle the on-chain scaling ...
|
Carpe diem - understand the White Paper and mine honest. Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
|
|
|
hv_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 08:30:57 AM |
|
Will Bitmain continue propping up Bcash? Do the small fry bag holders regret not selling before the fork ? Are Bcash and SVcash cancelling each other out and having a race to the bottom? Is Satoshi shaking his head and saying to himself "these guys are obsessed with my white paper, they need medical help" These are the questions that must be asked. the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance. The general public should not, exactly as we do not care about smtp - but this is because it does not change and is on topic / purpose - A protocol MUST be stable and simple (= scalable) and clear to be 'ignored by public' -> Industry / cyber risk whatch dogs take care . There you 'll get the mass adoption - ONLY that way. The white paper is the guide for the paper dogs do check if the protocol is doing what it should. The tech impl must be to spec - or rekt Bitcoin has two layers: Econimics AND tech - if u fiddle with the tech and do not understand the dependencies up-hill -> you ll risk the entire eco system (and create an ALT coin like SegwitCoin). But do not sell that as Bitcoin.
|
Carpe diem - understand the White Paper and mine honest. Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 08:34:27 AM |
|
the only group following the whitepaper is the BSV coin
Why do you think the general public cares about what's in the whitepaper? I'm genuinely curious. Seems like its just a talking point without substance or relevance. If for no other reason, because the experiment as satoshi originally envisioned it is worth carrying to logical conclusion. Look at it from this angle for a moment: Satoshi's original invention, aligning the best interests of the individual with the best interests of the system as a whole, unleashed this entire ecosystem. In the design of Bitcoin, he/she/they accomplished what all of humanity had previously been unable to do. I really don't have a strong aversion to carrying out multiple parallel experiments (that may be an egregious simplification, but the difference is nuanced and inappropriate for the scope of this reply). But should we not carry out the experiment as set forth in the design that led to this entire 'Cambrian Explosion' (there's an overused term) of innovation? From my perspective, abandoning the experiment as envisioned by its progenitor is pure folly. Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine. No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit. ... ant Ctor, and DSV, tru dat
|
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 8285
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 09:45:13 AM |
|
Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine.
No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit. ... ant Ctor, and DSV, tru dat You guys are missing the point. The general public, which your fork of a fork is trying to appeal to, don't care about what was in the original white paper. It's a talking point aimed at crypto enthusiasts who might be on the fence, and are easily manipulated. The average world citizen doesn't care about your interpretation of the white paper, they just want a product that works and is usable. Technologies advance, adopt, evolve. Hence, SegWit and LN. Bitcoin Cash has big blocks yet far less transactions per day than BTC, and SV has even bigger blocks and even fewer transactions. You can continue to think, "yeah, well, that will change in the future." But I just don't see that happening. More likely BTC will just continue to evolve to meet user demand and its knockoffs will continue to flounder.
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine.
No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit. ... ant Ctor, and DSV, tru dat You guys are missing the point. The general public, which your fork of a fork is trying to appeal to, don't care about what was in the original white paper. It's a talking point aimed at crypto enthusiasts who might be on the fence, and are easily manipulated. The average world citizen doesn't care about your interpretation of the white paper, they just want a product that works and is usable. Technologies advance, adopt, evolve. Hence, SegWit and LN. Bitcoin Cash has big blocks yet far less transactions per day than BTC, and SV has even bigger blocks and even fewer transactions. You can continue to think, "yeah, well, that will change in the future." But I just don't see that happening. More likely BTC will just continue to evolve to meet user demand and its knockoffs will continue to flounder. the Bitcoin whitepaper proposes a specific economicmic model that does not parallel with the lightning network as you can see if you read the first page of the whitepaper. The lightning network is literally, an off chain solution that has nothing to do with hash power. Hash power is what backs the bitcoin economy, lightning network takes that away by proposing ‘2nd layer’ (a dummy name for third party) solutions. We are talking about two completely different experiments here. So for some, what ‘constitutes’ bitcoin is a document, not a ticker symbol ruled by the likes of a third party exchange.
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 8285
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 11:13:22 AM |
|
the Bitcoin whitepaper proposes a specific economicmic model that does not parallel with the lightning network as you can see if you read the first page of the whitepaper. The lightning network is literally, an off chain solution that has nothing to do with hash power. Hash power is what backs the bitcoin economy, lightning network takes that away by proposing ‘2nd layer’ (a dummy name for third party) solutions.
We are talking about two completely different experiments here.
Lightning Network isn't a "3rd party"; its an independent network of people who voluntarily agree to participate in it, for very little (if any) compensation. Yes, its an off-chain solution, and if it helps make bitcoin more usable then so be it. Nobody cares about rules you are arbitrarily imposing on the Bitcoin Network. So for some, what ‘constitutes’ bitcoin is a document, not a ticker symbol ruled by the likes of a third party exchange.
Yes, and they are all already invested in BCH and SV.
|
|
|
|
gembitz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 01:58:35 PM |
|
Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine.
No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit. ... ant Ctor, and DSV, tru dat You guys are missing the point. The general public, which your fork of a fork is trying to appeal to, don't care about what was in the original white paper. It's a talking point aimed at crypto enthusiasts who might be on the fence, and are easily manipulated. The average world citizen doesn't care about your interpretation of the white paper, they just want a product that works and is usable. Technologies advance, adopt, evolve. Hence, SegWit and LN. Bitcoin Cash has big blocks yet far less transactions per day than BTC, and SV has even bigger blocks and even fewer transactions. You can continue to think, "yeah, well, that will change in the future." But I just don't see that happening. More likely BTC will just continue to evolve to meet user demand and its knockoffs will continue to flounder. the Bitcoin whitepaper proposes a specific economicmic model that does not parallel with the lightning network as you can see if you read the first page of the whitepaper. The lightning network is literally, an off chain solution that has nothing to do with hash power. Hash power is what backs the bitcoin economy, lightning network takes that away by proposing ‘2nd layer’ (a dummy name for third party) solutions. We are talking about two completely different experiments here. So for some, what ‘constitutes’ bitcoin is a document, not a ticker symbol ruled by the likes of a third party exchange. fake satoshi and company goal is to destroy the real bitcoin ...get over it! :\ ===> these crooks need jail time imho weee
|
©2021*MY POSTS ARE STRICTLY FOR NOVELTY AND/OR PRESERVATION/COLLECTING PURPOSES ONLY!*It should not be regarded as investment/trading advice.*advocate to promote sharing and free software for the bitcoin community* #EFF #FSF #XTZ ===> START WITH NOTHING AND BUILD IT INTO SOMETHING!
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 8285
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 02:20:22 PM Last edit: January 28, 2019, 03:14:36 PM by nutildah |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitbobb
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 03:01:53 PM |
|
One of good news recent days is Bitcoin Cash and DASH might make a partnership in the future (as Roger Ver disclosed). The news mentioned in the ANN topic of DASH project. proof roger does not understand cash vs. money lol. I guess he needs to go back to where he learned about economics to study more ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine.
No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit. ... ant Ctor, and DSV, tru dat You guys are missing the point. The general public, which your fork of a fork is trying to appeal to, don't care about what was in the original white paper. It's a talking point aimed at crypto enthusiasts who might be on the fence, and are easily manipulated. The average world citizen doesn't care about your interpretation of the white paper, they just want a product that works and is usable. Technologies advance, adopt, evolve. Hence, SegWit and LN. Bitcoin Cash has big blocks yet far less transactions per day than BTC, and SV has even bigger blocks and even fewer transactions. You can continue to think, "yeah, well, that will change in the future." But I just don't see that happening. More likely BTC will just continue to evolve to meet user demand and its knockoffs will continue to flounder. the Bitcoin whitepaper proposes a specific economicmic model that does not parallel with the lightning network as you can see if you read the first page of the whitepaper. The lightning network is literally, an off chain solution that has nothing to do with hash power. Hash power is what backs the bitcoin economy, lightning network takes that away by proposing ‘2nd layer’ (a dummy name for third party) solutions. We are talking about two completely different experiments here. So for some, what ‘constitutes’ bitcoin is a document, not a ticker symbol ruled by the likes of a third party exchange. fake satoshi and company goal is to destroy the real bitcoin ...get over it! :\ ===> these crooks need jail time imho weee Gemmybitzzzzzzzz, giving him free rent is not a crime. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
|
|
|
|
mrRen_
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 05:31:23 PM |
|
Hurray, BTC has 21K unconfirmed transactions again! Thats soo usefull when you wan't to transact !!!! STUPID 1megabyte supporters!!!
|
|
|
|
cvdesty
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 512
Merit: 20
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 06:05:33 PM |
|
fake satoshi and company goal is to destroy the real bitcoin ...get over it! :\ ===> these crooks need jail time imho weee
I believe he believes what he is doing is right but what he has done has caused great harm to the crypto market in general. I don't think he cares that most of us have lost money. He comes across as selfish, mean-spirited, and narcissistic in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Bitbobb
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 06:58:20 PM |
|
fake satoshi and company goal is to destroy the real bitcoin ...get over it! :\ ===> these crooks need jail time imho weee
I believe he believes what he is doing is right but what he has done has caused great harm to the crypto market in general. I don't think he cares that most of us have lost money. He comes across as selfish, mean-spirited, and narcissistic in my opinion. And what exactly do you think he has done lol? Craig has systematically been working to save BitCoin since day 1. Jihan WU gas-lighted him and then stabbed him in the back in order to cause first btc/bch split and again his moron devs et al split bch/bsv now. Yet in spite of this Craig is fighting for the innovation known as bitcoin to have a chance in this world. it seemed very mean-spirited and selfish in my opinion but maybe you believe you are doing right IDK.. But why do people who like to say things about Craig only have emotional items to complain about? Meanwhile actual bad actions like chain splits have been caused by JiHam and Ver and they get a pass because they say please and thank you once in a while in public? I think your standard is way off for real life money. Money and wealth is not based upon pretty please it is based upon real things not emotional reactions. BTC and BCH are now in the hands of bad actors and all anyone can say about Craig is that he hurts your feelings? BSV PLS
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 08:02:05 PM |
|
Its quickly abandoning itself. We already have a bitcoin, its called bitcoin, and its doing just fine.
No. Satoshi's Bitcoin did not include the abomination we call SegWit. ... ant Ctor, and DSV, tru dat You guys are missing the point. The general public, which your fork of a fork is trying to appeal to, don't care about what was in the original white paper. I understand the points you are making, I just find them underwhelming. I do not disagree with your immediately preceding statement. However _I_ care about what was in the original white paper. Can you describe to me why is it that you believe the cruft that the current Core handlers have added is objectively better than the original protocol that they cast overboard? It's a talking point aimed at crypto enthusiasts who might be on the fence,
No, it is far more than a talking point. It is a concrete technical difference between BTC and BSV. BTC has abandoned the original design, well before it revealed any flaws (i.e., none known to this day). and are easily manipulated.
Sez you. I might throw your comment back at your camp. The average world citizen doesn't care about your interpretation of the white paper, they just want a product that works and is usable.
The average world citizen should not need to care about the white paper. Just as they don't care about the technical details of how the credit card systems work. But such systems need be technically sound. I agree that they just want a product that works and is usable. And when the next step function wave of adoption occurs, BTC will once again experience an interminable backlog of tx volume, with soaring tx fees. At which point it will 'work' only in the vaguest sense, and will be all-but-unusable. At which point, the wisdom of having stayed with the original protocol design will be revealed.
|
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2019, 08:05:30 PM |
|
One of good news recent days is Bitcoin Cash and DASH might make a partnership in the future (as Roger Ver disclosed). The news mentioned in the ANN topic of DASH project. Cruddy article provides no link to source. Seems merely Dash hopium shill injection.
|
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 8285
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 29, 2019, 04:11:12 AM |
|
And when the next step function wave of adoption occurs, BTC will once again experience an interminable backlog of tx volume, with soaring tx fees. At which point it will 'work' only in the vaguest sense, and will be all-but-unusable. At which point, the wisdom of having stayed with the original protocol design will be revealed.
Again, the basis for your rationale depends on things you believe _will_ happen, and so far have yet to happen. Despite BTC's tx fee woes that plagued it a year ago its still by far the dominant coin in terms of popularity and BCH's market share has only decreased since then. BCH has become a tiny fraction of BTC in terms of price since Dec 2017. There's no reason to believe things will change, especially since BCH supporters are now divided into two firmly entrenched camps intent on reducing the price of the other to zero. Merchants don't want to have to set up multiple wallets to accept multiple coins -- they want one coin: bitcoin. Everything else is just an altcoin.
|
|
|
|
D1jay
Copper Member
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 29, 2019, 06:11:16 AM |
|
the resistance line is broken, begins growth ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradingview.com%2Fx%2F9eG4qZXV%2F&t=665&c=yer-_f_mgnlw4A) Triangle pattern. The time of blossom to come soon. I call it like a unavoidable, and unstoppable rise. Well out of the shady bias post and debate going back and forth here on this intelligent thread ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) These is what interest me though, if your TA is anything near %70 accurate, then i hope good things await us in the next coming weeks or probably months Let me for now breath a fresh air with this little information even though there is %100 chance it could be false ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) sooo, lets prepare for the upcoming rise ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) the fact you only care about spot price proves you have no clue what BitCoin is about. BitCoin is not some investment ponzi. Maybe that is what ABC coin is going for IDK. Intelligence is relative. Lol! Please spare me the technology mumble jumble, and i can see you are a hip of clues about how btc technology works, so tell me, what good is technology without monetary value alongside? Do you buy technology with your poo ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) or you need money to do it? Show me which technology that is for free? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Everything in this life revolves around money - price, btc is no exception. so yes, am more concerned about the price for now, ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
Globb0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2053
Free spirit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 29, 2019, 08:11:46 AM |
|
Show me which technology that is for free? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Maybe you are describing both the past and the future. Everything was controlled, perhaps in the future more things can be free'er. Lets hope so
|
|
|
|
drmutz
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 30, 2019, 07:41:12 AM |
|
Hello Folks, I have just updated the crypto-docker project at https://github.com/bostontrader/crypto-docker. Among other things, fans of of BCH might be interested in the following: With crypto-docker you can build docker images that contain the BCH binaries built from a recent commit of https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc using Alpine Linux. You can choose to build an image without debug symbols, but with optimization, resulting in a rather small image of about 200 MB. This is built with QT5 and can be viewed from a VNC viewer on the host system. Or you can choose to build an image with debug symbols and no optimization, resulting in a larger image. But this image includes gdb and gdbgui which enables you to debug the executables using gdb and a browser on your host system. Enjoy!
|
|
|
|
|