### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable

[chrysophylax]

Done

tanx mate ...

btw - the perceived 5% less hashrate you mentioned ( assuming you are comparing it to spmod ) ... where is that shown? ...

is that poolside? ... or the actual miner? ...

#crysx

[killerelite]

Sir , I want to be a part of this closed beta if possible , Thanks

[chrysophylax]

Sir , I want to be a part of this closed beta if possible , Thanks

hi ...

what cards do you have and what operating system? ...

#crysx

[guzi4guzi]

 [10:54:56]Failed to connect to stratum
| .chainworksindustries.com port 2000: T
| imed out
| [10:54:56]Retry in 30s
| [10:55:39]stratum_subscribe timed out
| [10:55:39]Retry in 30s

Server down !

[Hamond]

Yes , server itf down 

[guzi4guzi]

Now it's okay Server is Up

[m0nkz]

Server is up but no transactions/earnings for over an hour?

[huyhoang]

is this just down again, I just keep lost connection recently

[Boulevard2005]

No earning again???

[huyhoang]

no earning since 1 hour ago.

same here!!!, look like very slow than normal

[maxmad_x]

Done

tanx mate ...

btw - the perceived 5% less hashrate you mentioned ( assuming you are comparing it to spmod ) ... where is that shown? ...

is that poolside? ... or the actual miner? ...

#crysx

No I am just saying that "IF CWI miner shows 5% less _SP mod".. I am not saying that's the truth. I am alluding to the fact that SP code is closed source so visible hashrate does not mean anything until it is proven by testing it for a long long time.

[chrysophylax]

Done

tanx mate ...

btw - the perceived 5% less hashrate you mentioned ( assuming you are comparing it to spmod ) ... where is that shown? ...

is that poolside? ... or the actual miner? ...

#crysx

No I am just saying that "IF CWI miner shows 5% less _SP mod".. I am not saying that's the truth. I am alluding to the fact that SP code is closed source so visible hashrate does not mean anything until it is proven by testing it for a long long time.

thats what i was trying to work out ...

because most times - most pools will never really give an accurate projection of hashrate ...

but now that he is blocking our pool from the spmod - its a massive plus ... as we have really shown him up - and he is one angry little boy ...

we are nearing the end of the week - and still a few things need to be ironed out in the next test ... so lets see how stable it is - and how functionally positive CWIgm-0.9.9 will be ...

tanx for your support ...

#crysx

[abudfv2008]

Done

tanx mate ...

btw - the perceived 5% less hashrate you mentioned ( assuming you are comparing it to spmod ) ... where is that shown? ...

is that poolside? ... or the actual miner? ...

#crysx

No I am just saying that "IF CWI miner shows 5% less _SP mod".. I am not saying that's the truth. I am alluding to the fact that SP code is closed source so visible hashrate does not mean anything until it is proven by testing it for a long long time.

thats what i was trying to work out ...

because most times - most pools will never really give an accurate projection of hashrate ...

but now that he is blocking our pool from the spmod - its a massive plus ... as we have really shown him up - and he is one angry little boy ...

we are nearing the end of the week - and still a few things need to be ironed out in the next test ... so lets see how stable it is - and how functionally positive CWIgm-0.9.9 will be ...

tanx for your support ...

#crysx

It is good of course, but meanwile sp has released spmod8 and it shows 60Mh/s on 1080ti.
IF they are real it is very good improvement, so as soon as someone share it with community you will loose miners and hashrate on you pool. Meanwile only 13days left to halving? so each day is in great value.

[chrysophylax]

Done

tanx mate ...

btw - the perceived 5% less hashrate you mentioned ( assuming you are comparing it to spmod ) ... where is that shown? ...

is that poolside? ... or the actual miner? ...

#crysx

No I am just saying that "IF CWI miner shows 5% less _SP mod".. I am not saying that's the truth. I am alluding to the fact that SP code is closed source so visible hashrate does not mean anything until it is proven by testing it for a long long time.

thats what i was trying to work out ...

because most times - most pools will never really give an accurate projection of hashrate ...

but now that he is blocking our pool from the spmod - its a massive plus ... as we have really shown him up - and he is one angry little boy ...

we are nearing the end of the week - and still a few things need to be ironed out in the next test ... so lets see how stable it is - and how functionally positive CWIgm-0.9.9 will be ...

tanx for your support ...

#crysx

It is good of course, but meanwile sp has released spmod8 and it shows 60Mh/s on 1080ti.
IF they are real it is very good improvement, so as soon as someone share it with community you will loose miners and hashrate on you pool. Meanwile only 13days left to halving? so each day is in great value.

well ...

this is where we differ in the most extraordinary way ...

we aim to never bring out a product - no matter how much more hashrate we have - if we KNOW it is unstable ...

he will - and doesnt care ... spmod#33675 ... he really doesnt give a damn ... so its not ours to say we are in competition for hashrate ... we never have been - and for now - wont be ...

stability and ease of use ... we are building a miner - not a hashing machine ... and its still in beta ...

you want to use spmod#666 on our pool? ... i can show you how ... just to prove whether the hashrate is as its stated ... its reasonably easy and wont take a genius to do it ...

as always tho - we do agree that with signatum - there is a limited time ... but we wont be pushed to provide an unstable miner ... not any the cost of users crashing consistently OR having problems in any way ... im not saying that the next test miner IS having these issues - i AM saying there are a few issues with it - and we will try and minimize the headaches for any user ... the beta testing is NOT the alpha testing that we do internally ...

i know a lot of you will not be happy that we are not playing rune stenslands game - but we refuse to be pushed and shoved just for a hashwar ... we have PROVEN that we have better hashrates - and PROVEN we have a better miner ... now let us build something that will be worthy of having on your systems and mining the hell outta the coins ...

we will bring a quality product - that we hope will surpass expectation in the stability and ease of use stakes ... after that - we will work on the optimization ...

remember - almost ANY mining application can work on our pool - even the spmod ones with a small amount of work ...

#crysx

[abudfv2008]

chrysophylax
You ideas are good. But what had to be done a week ago is finetuning of difficulty setting on the pool. Still everyone get 0.97diff - it is better then 2.5 but I don't like to see that picture with no shares for 4 minutes (actually more)
https://ibb.co/nC6u1a
I really don't understand what is difficult in doing that.

The miner is stable as it is. Hashrate is what to be improved (if you can do that) as far as the clock of POW tik-tak-tik-tak.

I get very strange power usage on DNR
https://ibb.co/nfHyBa
https://ibb.co/neR3cF
2 identical GPU, same clocks, same hashrate.

[cradge]

@crys

I appreciate the level of qa you want for the miner guys,
But here's just a heads up, signatum only have pow until 100k blocks then it will go pos. As of writing its already almost on half of it.

[abudfv2008]

chrysophylax
I see that you finally managed to make diff setting based on Rig hashrate.
Thank you. Good job.  

P.S. Still some finetuning is possible:
As I understand 100+Mh - get 0.97
And lower HR get 0.28 or 0.56 (70+Mh?)
Still 5*1060 and 6*1080 get the same 0.97diff but it is 107MH/s vs 242MH/s difference.
IMHO something like this is more adequate:
>150 = 0.96
>100 = 0.64
>70 = 0.32
>20 = 0.16
<20 = 0.08

[KL0nLutiy]

When will be 0.9.9 release?

[bel123]

0.9.9 release please Stability, easy to use is ok but everybody first always see on mhs and $

What to use in bat file to test latest version ccminer on your pool?

[chrysophylax]

chrysophylax
You ideas are good. But what had to be done a week ago is finetuning of difficulty setting on the pool. Still everyone get 0.97diff - it is better then 2.5 but I don't like to see that picture with no shares for 4 minutes (actually more)
https://ibb.co/nC6u1a
I really don't understand what is difficult in doing that.

The miner is stable as it is. Hashrate is what to be improved (if you can do that) as far as the clock of POW tik-tak-tik-tak.

I get very strange power usage on DNR
https://ibb.co/nfHyBa
https://ibb.co/neR3cF
2 identical GPU, same clocks, same hashrate.

i bet you are using netdiff / temp control parameters ...

take them off and see it process then ...

#crysx