### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable

[abudfv2008]

Anyone know why we got 19 orphan blocks in a row?

When? I can only see 1 orphan block in the last 70 blocks. Or are you not talking about BTX pool?

--ypsi

He is speaking about Signatum
http://pool.chainworksindustries.com/sigt/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks
86727 - 86840 are orfans
And some other earlier. 86559 8638 86303 86263 ....

[renozi]

Anyone know why we got 19 orphan blocks in a row?

When? I can only see 1 orphan block in the last 70 blocks. Or are you not talking about BTX pool?

--ypsi

He is speaking about Signatum
http://pool.chainworksindustries.com/sigt/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks
86727 - 86840 are orfans
And some other earlier. 86559 8638 86303 86263 ....

Yeah, sorry I was talking about SIGT pool. Just reading about the attack now.

"Someone hitting the chain with millions of tiny txs. Floods the seed nodes, they need time to catch up. Not mining different chains, the seed nodes are behind, so that other pool is getting stale blocks. That's the word from Doc."

[blockbasher]

Can anyone give me a little help on mining Bitcore with the miner?   I am running fine on sigt but when I change the coin to btx or bitcore, it simply doesnt run and goes to the pause line of the batch file.     Is there anything else specific that needs to be done?   I simply left everything the same that works fine with sigt and changed the coin name from sigt to btx.    Thanks!

[blockbasher]

Can anyone give me a little help on mining Bitcore with the miner?   I am running fine on sigt but when I change the coin to btx or bitcore, it simply doesnt run and goes to the pause line of the batch file.     Is there anything else specific that needs to be done?   I simply left everything the same that works fine with sigt and changed the coin name from sigt to btx.    Thanks!

If you bother to read 6 posts above yours you see that I already wrote that the CWI miner doesn't support BTX yet. You have to use ccminer or something else.

--ypsi

No worries.  I read at least 30 previous pages but didn't read the latest page.  My apologies.   It does list btx as an option in the readme that comes with the miner, so I didn't think that the included documentation that came with the miner was not accurate and assumed it was just my syntax

[Boriss]

Bitcore comes /planned/ with version 9.9 not 9.8

[Warsaar]

del

[binoalien]

Skunkhash

5 x gtx1070 / 55% Power Limit
1 x gtx1080ti / 72% Power Limit

ccminer 2.2.1  / 186.5 MHS
CWIgm 0.9.8 / 192 MHS

[abudfv2008]

The project is dead?
Again for several hours the sigt pool hashrate is 50-100Mh/s. My H/s was reported as 0.67Mh while it is 200.

[xcougarx]

"Insert Quote
Again for several hours the sigt pool hashrate is 50-100Mh/s. My H/s was reported as 0.67Mh while it is 200."

On sigt I see quite odd numbers reported but the payments are coming along without issue is my summary if I reconcile the below:

* The pool luck is 10-50x better than normal for several hours
* Blocks are actually found
* Pool total hash and reported hash for my worker are extra low
* Overall daily earnings are reasonable for me despite weird hash stats past 3-4 hours.

[maxip]

Looks like the SIGT hybrid blocks seem to be broken ? Anyway, not mining the last few hundred blocks.

[killerelite]

Yeah Sigt seems broken no block found after hybrib POS ,anyways its going to go full POS in 1 day max

[gurumeditation]

Yeah Sigt seems broken no block found after hybrib POS ,anyways its going to go full POS in 1 day max

Nothing broken. PoS started and pushed up the global diff because the network weight is super high, so in order to keep the same block time, difficulty has to increase a lot.
You can still mine, but the diff jumped to 252,352 (I went from ~500 coins/day to 1.5 estimated). So you'd better switch to another coin.

[Boriss]

All SIGT pools are almost empty because of diff jump

ps. any news about 9.9 version

[kapsel]

@Chrys

Something is wrong with the BTX pool. The sharerate is just a fraction of what it should be. Please take a look at this.

--ypsi

I can confirm that, all of my rigs are down they cannot connect to stratum.

[rednoW]

Zed's dead, baby, Zed's dead )))

[gurumeditation]

@Chrys

Something is wrong with the BTX pool. The sharerate is just a fraction of what it should be. Please take a look at this.

--ypsi

I can confirm that, all of my rigs are down they cannot connect to stratum.

Back online and running fine here.

[gurumeditation]

Signatum mining period is over.
Will the pool will be replaced by another one (maybe Altcom, because same algo ?) ?

[kapsel]

The stratum for BTX pool seems to be down again, if this continues I will have to leave this pool for something else, even though I really like this pool otherwise.

[Aiekseyka]

Can some give me miner?

[chrysophylax]

The stratum for BTX pool seems to be down again, if this continues I will have to leave this pool for something else, even though I really like this pool otherwise.

read earlier posts ...

we work on the coding of the stratum and systems continuously ... in such periods where the stratum is down momentarily ( few minutes at a time ) - its usually because we needed to reset it ... times when its down for minutes at a time - its because we have implemented new code to the stratum or the backend systems ... if there are long periods of downtime - i will always post to warn you at least hours in advance ...

we have been working so heavily in the backend - there has been very little time for me to come out and post much at all ... but i will soon ...

we have our new pool server - and have been building the base of the os / platform for it ... next week - we will be building new pools for which to migrate to on the new server ...

again tho - i will publish all that needs to be soon enough ... and it will all be on the main CWI-Thread ... not here ...

CWIgm-0.9.9 has had major setbacks - but is almost finished ... this version IS the platform we will be building most of the future versions from ... CWIgm-0.9.9 has been coded so that it is more modular ( though not as complete as we would like ) so that it will be  a far sight easier to 'addon' to ... we are still a way off what we would like CWIgm to be - but getting much closer as time goes on ... this is why it has taken so long ... as its being designed and built - not copied and messed with ...

so do what you please with your mining efforts - as we understand ... we are miners too ... ...

but take into account that we are not building 'just' a pool - or 'just' a miner - or 'just' a coin ... we are building the platform that IS the basis of the CWI-EcoSystem as a whole ... nothing less ...

#crysx