Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 07:35:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Bitcoin Forum > Alternate cryptocurrencies > Mining (Altcoins) > ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 »
« previous topic next topic »
  Print  
Author Topic: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable  (Read 67708 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
astronyu
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 04:19:13 PM
 #381
Quote from: jenifive on August 10, 2017, 04:12:36 PM
                     _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 382.05
CPU:1.72%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [19:11:52]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 6000 | NetDiff: 21344.5            | Block:      32386 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 143.177                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      1.6 | Shares: 4.8     | Rej: 0%   | Speed:  117.47MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.07MH/s|
1.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.86MH/s|
2.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 0       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.07MH/s|
3.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.19MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:53C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
1.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:53C | F:66% | P:112W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
2.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:54C | F:66% | P:110W | I: 24.0 | Core:1864Mhz |
3.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:58C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1869Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[19:08:57]Mean netDiff: 20523.9        |
[19:08:57]Target:000000009FFF6000      |
[19:09:36]Mean netDiff: 20523.9        |
[19:09:56]Mean netDiff: 20531.5        |
[19:10:00]Share: d65fa244              |
[19:10:09]Mean netDiff: 20631.1        |
[19:11:31]Share: 29f19124              |
[19:11:34]Share: 53bddeea              |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:spiete    | Conn:0d 00:02:55 | Latency:50ms


On spmod 5 had 111 hashrate

Here i have 117

You're on hidiff, try --lodiff
1715369726
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715369726

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715369726
1715369726
Reply with quote  #2
1715369726
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715369726
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715369726

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715369726
1715369726
Reply with quote  #2
1715369726
Report to moderator
kleito
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 04:34:07 PM
 #382
CPU:0.78%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [13:32:58]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 22797.1            | Block:      32405 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 88.5133                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:        1 | Shares: 48      | Rej: 2.53807% | Speed:   77.03M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : Shares: 12.5    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   19.09MH/s|
1.Zotac GTX 1060 6GB         : Shares: 5       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   19.47MH/s|
2.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : Shares: 18.75   | Rej: 0.25 | Speed:   19.32MH/s|
3.GeForce GTX 1060 6GB       : Shares: 11.75   | Rej: 1    | Speed:   19.02MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : T:59C | F:70% | P: 80W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
1.Zotac GTX 1060 6GB         : T:63C | F:75% | P: 82W | I: 24.0 | Core:1916Mhz |
2.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : T:64C | F:75% | P: 81W | I: 24.0 | Core:1868Mhz |
3.GeForce GTX 1060 6GB       : T:65C | F:75% | P: 82W | I: 24.0 | Core:1830Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[13:30:24]Mean netDiff: 21600.9        | [12:53:11][GPU2]:Duplicate share
[13:30:26]Share: 16c56141              | [13:19:41][GPU3]:Job not found (=stale
[13:30:45]Share: 3066cd17              | )
[13:30:47]Share: 94c5e99a              |
[13:31:25]Share: 335f288d              |
[13:31:44]Mean netDiff: 21884.5        |
[13:31:47]Share: 66bae883              |
[13:32:39]Share: 0070d29e              |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:kleito85  | Conn:0d 00:39:50 | Latency:245ms


is good?


bat
cwigm -c sigt -u *** -p ** --lodiff --max-temp=70

bat conf help me
kabi123
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 04:45:12 PM
 #383
how to close this CWIgm miner?
if i use hard way ( X in window) nvidia drivers crash or i lose connetions to gpu...
i cant find anything in manual/readmy file...

ctrl+c( soft way) dontwork, Q dontwork, esc dontwork...
kleito
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 04:57:28 PM
 #384
Quote from: kleito on August 10, 2017, 04:34:07 PM
CPU:0.78%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [13:32:58]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 22797.1            | Block:      32405 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 88.5133                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:        1 | Shares: 48      | Rej: 2.53807% | Speed:   77.03M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : Shares: 12.5    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   19.09MH/s|
1.Zotac GTX 1060 6GB         : Shares: 5       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   19.47MH/s|
2.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : Shares: 18.75   | Rej: 0.25 | Speed:   19.32MH/s|
3.GeForce GTX 1060 6GB       : Shares: 11.75   | Rej: 1    | Speed:   19.02MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : T:59C | F:70% | P: 80W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
1.Zotac GTX 1060 6GB         : T:63C | F:75% | P: 82W | I: 24.0 | Core:1916Mhz |
2.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : T:64C | F:75% | P: 81W | I: 24.0 | Core:1868Mhz |
3.GeForce GTX 1060 6GB       : T:65C | F:75% | P: 82W | I: 24.0 | Core:1830Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[13:30:24]Mean netDiff: 21600.9        | [12:53:11][GPU2]:Duplicate share
[13:30:26]Share: 16c56141              | [13:19:41][GPU3]:Job not found (=stale
[13:30:45]Share: 3066cd17              | )
[13:30:47]Share: 94c5e99a              |
[13:31:25]Share: 335f288d              |
[13:31:44]Mean netDiff: 21884.5        |
[13:31:47]Share: 66bae883              |
[13:32:39]Share: 0070d29e              |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:kleito85  | Conn:0d 00:39:50 | Latency:245ms


is good?


bat
cwigm -c sigt -u *** -p ** --lodiff --max-temp=70

bat conf help me

new bat cong
cwigm -c sigt -u **** -p *** --lodiff --max-temp=70 -i 25 -s 20 -N 10 --mean-net-diff=1.15
 
good?
jenifive
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 390
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 05:10:50 PM
 #385
Quote from: astronyu on August 10, 2017, 04:19:13 PM
Quote from: jenifive on August 10, 2017, 04:12:36 PM
                    _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 382.05
CPU:1.72%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [19:11:52]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 6000 | NetDiff: 21344.5            | Block:      32386 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 143.177                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      1.6 | Shares: 4.8     | Rej: 0%   | Speed:  117.47MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.07MH/s|
1.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.86MH/s|
2.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 0       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.07MH/s|
3.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.19MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:53C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
1.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:53C | F:66% | P:112W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
2.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:54C | F:66% | P:110W | I: 24.0 | Core:1864Mhz |
3.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:58C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1869Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[19:08:57]Mean netDiff: 20523.9        |
[19:08:57]Target:000000009FFF6000      |
[19:09:36]Mean netDiff: 20523.9        |
[19:09:56]Mean netDiff: 20531.5        |
[19:10:00]Share: d65fa244              |
[19:10:09]Mean netDiff: 20631.1        |
[19:11:31]Share: 29f19124              |
[19:11:34]Share: 53bddeea              |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:spiete    | Conn:0d 00:02:55 | Latency:50ms


On spmod 5 had 111 hashrate

Here i have 117

You're on hidiff, try --lodiff

is there are a difference?
chrysophylax (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091


--- ChainWorks Industries ---


View Profile WWW
August 10, 2017, 05:50:03 PM
 #386
Quote from: shubaduba on August 10, 2017, 12:34:36 PM
After removing -s setting everything is perfect.


Only problem now is too high stratum difficulty.
It is about 20x higher above normal value.

I will keep mining with this issue, but I hope that you will make a step towards.
Would be great if you lower diff by 5 times or something like that.



great ...

one thing fixed ...

if you are pushing all your hashrate through ONE worker - the diff will be huge if you have a number of cards ...

you have the lodiff port configured and you are mining fine ... the stratum diff seems to be ok - but it will push pretty hard to try and get it equalized to a decent diff level for your miner ...

there are many factors that cause this - the aggressiveness of the stratum is only one factor - all machines mining through the one worker is another ... though you are showing ONE machine ... so its hit that maximum diff on that port ...

more tweaking i guess ...

im glad at least one thing is sorted now Tongue ...

#crysx
CWI-Thread (theFORUM) - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1563601 . CWI-WebSite (theSITE) - https://chainworksindustries.com/ . CWI-Shop (theSHOP) - https://chainworksindustries.com/theSHOP.html .
zhulick
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 06:01:57 PM
 #387
i've tried the usual -p d=x (eg, -p d=0.25 for 64 at the pool) to manually set the worker diff, but that didn't work.

is there another command that would accomplish the same thing, or is it not one of the settings that i can't control from my side at this moment ?

i checked the help file, didn't see anything that would do it.
ArtG
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 06:10:02 PM
 #388
  VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
CPU:2.19%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [21:09:41]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 18472.9            | Block:      32495 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 380.801                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      1.6 | Shares: 177     | Rej: 0%   | Speed:  316.26MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 38.85   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   52.37MH/s|
1.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 39.1    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   51.82MH/s|
2.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 25.95   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   53.46MH/s|
3.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 26.05   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   52.91MH/s|
4.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 20.15   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   53.23MH/s|
5.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 26.9    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   51.78MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:63C | F:94% | P:209W | I: 25.0 | Core:1844Mhz |
1.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:64C | F:94% | P:205W | I: 25.0 | Core:1855Mhz |
2.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:54C | F:68% | P:210W | I: 25.0 | Core:1870Mhz |
3.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:66C | F:94% | P:220W | I: 25.0 | Core:1900Mhz |
4.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:63C | F:92% | P:215W | I: 25.0 | Core:1885Mhz |
5.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:69C | F:95% | P:210W | I: 25.0 | Core:1872Mhz
ArtG
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 07:31:39 PM
 #389
Quote from: khaclub on August 10, 2017, 07:17:38 PM
I don't know how to download the cwigm for testing. Saw it on post#2 but I don't get it
you need to PM TS and indicate GPUs and OS.
UNICLIFE
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 08:06:37 PM
 #390
Stats: -i 22 1070 32Mh/s, 1060 6gb 20Mh/s, good informative ui
jenifive
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 390
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 08:46:45 PM
 #391
This CWigm miner is showing more hashrate on software but less on the pool and fluctuate a lot. Sp5 is getting me more coins per hour on pool.nm.
Switched back. Dont trust this miner calculations anymore.
cradge
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 10:28:27 PM
 #392
Quote from: jenifive on August 10, 2017, 08:46:45 PM
This CWigm miner is showing more hashrate on software but less on the pool and fluctuate a lot. Sp5 is getting me more coins per hour on pool.nm.
Switched back. Dont trust this miner calculations anymore.

Can you show us youre tests done? i.e screenshots, data, test procedure before you arrived to this conclusion?
nfr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 10, 2017, 11:21:11 PM
 #393
                     ________            ___  _______
                     \_   ___  \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \     \/\  \/ \/  /  /    \   ___ /         \
     _________\ \     \____ \       /|  \      \_\    \   Y Y   \  __________
                       \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                                 \/                          \/        \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
CPU:   0%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [06:06:53]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000   | NetDiff: 20466.4               | Block:            32781 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum  | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 118.404                             |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:      0 | Diff:           1 | Shares: 98.25   | Rej: 0%  | Speed:    109.17MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti         : Shares: 48.25   | Rej: 0     | Speed:      54.22MH/s|
1.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti         : Shares: 50       | Rej: 0     | Speed:      54.99MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti         : T:68C | F:100% | P:244W | I: 25.0 | Core:1911Mhz
1.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti         : T:63C | F:98% | P:241W | I: 25.0 | Core:1919Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[06:03:12]Share: b53a4086               |
[06:04:00]Share: 9ac54741               |
[06:04:28]Share: 5c988496               |
[06:04:40]Mean netDiff: 23133.5        |
[06:04:41]Mean netDiff: 23259.8        |
[06:05:03]Share: 04424645               |
[06:06:20]Mean netDiff: 23184.2        |
[06:06:21]Share: 050b4b81               |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:nfr             | Conn:0d 01:00:55 | Latency:167ms


gpu0                           gpu1
PL = 100%                   PL = 100%
core = +205                 core = +137
memory = +147             memory = +147
Boulevard2005
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 11, 2017, 12:56:11 AM
 #394
May be pool down again, don't receive coin for more hour, very sad
astronyu
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 11, 2017, 01:07:23 AM
 #395
Quote from: Boulevard2005 on August 11, 2017, 12:56:11 AM
May be pool down again, don't receive coin for more hour, very sad

Looks like pool is fine over here.
cradge
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 11, 2017, 02:02:31 AM
 #396
Quote from: cradge on August 10, 2017, 02:26:58 AM
11 hours running,
I have not encountered any issue yet.
I also noticed that this miner is more efficient compared to other miner software out there.

  • tdp 85%
  • coreclock 130
  • memory -502
  • temp at 61c
  • fan at 68%

Screenshot:
https://i.imgur.com/BJE4QKI.png

                     _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
CPU:0.62%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [10:30:22]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 14325.5            | Block:      31600 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 232.528                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      2.5 | Shares: 1511.25 | Rej: 1.08002% | Speed:  162.14M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 473.5   | Rej: 6    | Speed:   53.08MH/s|
1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 525     | Rej: 7.5  | Speed:   54.35MH/s|
2.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 512.75  | Rej: 3    | Speed:   54.49MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:59C | F:66% | P:238W | I: 24.0 | Core:1932Mhz |
1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:61C | F:68% | P:228W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
2.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:65C | F:72% | P:222W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[10:26:25]Share: 3aa75b9e              | [02:45:50][GPU1]:Invalid nonce
[10:26:30]Mean netDiff: 18032.2        | [03:50:17][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:26:40]Mean netDiff: 17903.9        | )
[10:27:05]Share: e19d06a6              | [06:35:11][GPU0]:Invalid nonce
[10:27:10]Mean netDiff: 17822.9        | [07:14:05][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:27:40]Mean netDiff: 17752.4        | )
[10:28:20]Mean netDiff: 17690.9        | [08:44:51][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:29:30]Mean netDiff: 17534.8        | )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:-----    | Conn:0d 11:16:23 | Latency:287ms

update, after some tweaks miner can get 55 to 57 mh/s for an 1080 ti

  • tdp 88%
  • coreclock 135
  • memory -502
  • temp at 65c
  • fan at 72%
  • intensity 26.5
enkayz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 100

hashbag.cc


View Profile WWW
August 11, 2017, 02:48:25 AM
 #397
i like the gui Smiley
hashbag.cc - where do you put your hash? region based stratums available now: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2044808.new
xixou
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 11


View Profile
August 11, 2017, 04:33:15 AM
 #398
Works very great with 4 gtx 1070 under win10, thank you!
Faster than ccminer sp for skunk/sigt.
shubaduba
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


mine safe o/


View Profile
August 11, 2017, 04:44:36 AM
 #399
I use different workers for each rig.
According this log, 2 GTX 1070 cards managed to send 1 share in 4 minutes!
As you see, this is lowdiff port.
Actually, my cards were not working more than 80% of time since pool did not receive any shares from this rig.
So actual hashrate is not 58.68 MH. It is like 5x times lower.
The only way to keep using this pool and miner is restarting miner every 5 minutes so diff will not raise that much.
Otherwise this miner is just wasting our mining hashrates.

                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 385.12
CPU:   0%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [11:39:48]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 23114              | Block:      33101 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 55.7378                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      1.6 | Shares: 135.2   | Rej: 0%   | Speed:   58.68MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1070          : Shares: 54.65   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.03MH/s|
1.Gigabyte GTX 1070          : Shares: 80.55   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.51MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Gigabyte GTX 1070          : T:62C | F:47% | P:130W | I: 25.0 | Core:1883Mhz |
1.Gigabyte GTX 1070          : T:66C | F:52% | P:130W | I: 25.0 | Core:1921Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[11:35:10]Mean netDiff: 26120.7        |
[11:35:47]Mean netDiff: 26167.2        |
[11:36:07]Mean netDiff: 26303.4        |
[11:37:21]Share: 765dde97              |
[11:38:47]Mean netDiff: 26236.2        |
[11:39:08]Mean netDiff: 26244.5        |
[11:39:30]Mean netDiff: 26462.3        |
[11:39:48]Mean netDiff: 26472.4        |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:shubaduba | Conn:0d 03:05:17 | Latency:91ms
pr0ximus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 142
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 11, 2017, 05:14:24 AM
 #400
Looks amazing. I would like to contribute by beta testing too. PMed you chrysophylax. Smiley
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 »
  Print  
Bitcoin Forum > Alternate cryptocurrencies > Mining (Altcoins) > ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable
 « previous topic next topic »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!