Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 02:59:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 »
  Print  
Author Topic: The Blocks Factory - Multicoin pool  (Read 198074 times)
slayer10000
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 02:31:00 PM
Last edit: June 15, 2017, 02:41:07 PM by slayer10000
 #1301

my current hardware set up is win10, 16gb, with i7(forget whatverson) and R9 390 AMD vid card
it hashs at around 2-3 Gh/s what it tells me(other miners run at 1.25gh to 780 Mhs). runs at between 66 to 71c temp wise which is fine. so ya not sure
also i put it on dynamic settings which put it at around 9 but i was running at 12 no problems
also i ran it for about 5 hours last night before my power went out(transformer went down)
What algo and miner are you using? I'm running 390X's using sgminer on Groestl algo getting around 50 MH/s per card.

running Scrypt on Cgminer so ya still new to all this so you will have to bear with me
but ya it was going solid at 3.026 Gh/s connected and getting blocks from the pool
maybe its all messed up and thats why its not showing anything and a high hash rate hahah
1710817152
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710817152

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710817152
Reply with quote  #2

1710817152
Report to moderator
1710817152
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710817152

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710817152
Reply with quote  #2

1710817152
Report to moderator
1710817152
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710817152

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710817152
Reply with quote  #2

1710817152
Report to moderator
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 04:20:19 PM
 #1302

Scrypt is the realm of ASIC and has been for years - you need to reconfigure your miner software to use skein or groetsl (if either of those work on AMD hardware, you might need a different miner version).

 There is NO BLOODY WAY you were getting an actual 3+ Gh/s scrypt mining rate from any GPU, I'd estimate a R9 390X actual Scypt hashrate would be closer to 1 Mh/s (perhaps a little over).


I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
slayer10000
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 05:15:36 PM
 #1303

Scrypt is the realm of ASIC and has been for years - you need to reconfigure your miner software to use skein or groetsl (if either of those work on AMD hardware, you might need a different miner version).

 There is NO BLOODY WAY you were getting an actual 3+ Gh/s scrypt mining rate from any GPU, I'd estimate a R9 390X actual Scypt hashrate would be closer to 1 Mh/s (perhaps a little over).



haha ya i was like this doesnt seem correct and so i will go to skein or groetsl and see if that works and hopefully that does and see if it reads on the website. cause once that works then i know i am good
supermega
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 05:56:53 PM
 #1304

Hey guys, having an issue with withdrawals on this pool that I'm wondering if anyone else has run into.
I just finished setting up a wallet on Bitrrex.com for DGB. Copied the address. Logged into my theblocksfactory account, and set the auto payout transaction to 1000 DGB ( at the time i had 16** DGB ) in my account.
It processed immediately and in the transaction window there is a tx ID along with the wallet address.

If i search either of those things on digiexplorer I get back " No transaction found ".

Its been about 30 minutes now which seems pretty long by DGB standards.

Anyone else having issues?


Of course, naturally, the second i post this everything goes through.
riccochet704
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 07:15:51 PM
 #1305

Scrypt is the realm of ASIC and has been for years - you need to reconfigure your miner software to use skein or groetsl (if either of those work on AMD hardware, you might need a different miner version).

 There is NO BLOODY WAY you were getting an actual 3+ Gh/s scrypt mining rate from any GPU, I'd estimate a R9 390X actual Scypt hashrate would be closer to 1 Mh/s (perhaps a little over).



haha ya i was like this doesnt seem correct and so i will go to skein or groetsl and see if that works and hopefully that does and see if it reads on the website. cause once that works then i know i am good


If you go groestl use sgminer, get the updated kernel. I dropped memory clocks on the cards as low as they would go, upped GPU clocks as high as they would go on stock voltage. I've not messed with skein.
slayer10000
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2017, 10:53:30 PM
 #1306

Scrypt is the realm of ASIC and has been for years - you need to reconfigure your miner software to use skein or groetsl (if either of those work on AMD hardware, you might need a different miner version).

 There is NO BLOODY WAY you were getting an actual 3+ Gh/s scrypt mining rate from any GPU, I'd estimate a R9 390X actual Scypt hashrate would be closer to 1 Mh/s (perhaps a little over).



haha ya i was like this doesnt seem correct and so i will go to skein or groetsl and see if that works and hopefully that does and see if it reads on the website. cause once that works then i know i am good


If you go groestl use sgminer, get the updated kernel. I dropped memory clocks on the cards as low as they would go, upped GPU clocks as high as they would go on stock voltage. I've not messed with skein.

ok thank you i seem to have got it working but not sure how to update the kernel (newbie here)
though i have read on other forms my set up it better suited with mining skein but i havent found a miner yet that works and the one on the web site doesnt exist any more
and what % of rejected do most people shoot for?
also side note on why it was showing up at 3+ gh was just due to the miner thats all haha
slayer10000
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 04:12:24 AM
 #1307

Scrypt is the realm of ASIC and has been for years - you need to reconfigure your miner software to use skein or groetsl (if either of those work on AMD hardware, you might need a different miner version).

 There is NO BLOODY WAY you were getting an actual 3+ Gh/s scrypt mining rate from any GPU, I'd estimate a R9 390X actual Scypt hashrate would be closer to 1 Mh/s (perhaps a little over).



haha ya i was like this doesnt seem correct and so i will go to skein or groetsl and see if that works and hopefully that does and see if it reads on the website. cause once that works then i know i am good


If you go groestl use sgminer, get the updated kernel. I dropped memory clocks on the cards as low as they would go, upped GPU clocks as high as they would go on stock voltage. I've not messed with skein.

so i got it running at around 21 Mh/s so i believe thats not too bad temp at 56c and I at 19
so is this good or think it should be running better?
joeriiv
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 02:09:57 PM
 #1308

Hey there,

I lost my 4 digit PIN code to my blocks factroy account
How to recover this pin code?
Can't find a support page on the site...
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 03:08:25 PM
 #1309


If you go groestl use sgminer, get the updated kernel. I dropped memory clocks on the cards as low as they would go, upped GPU clocks as high as they would go on stock voltage. I've not messed with skein.

so i got it running at around 21 Mh/s so i believe thats not too bad temp at 56c and I at 19
so is this good or think it should be running better?

 I suspect it's not too bad, given how old the GPU in the R9 39x cards are (same GPU as the R9 29x cards after all).

 For perspective, I think I was pulling 45-50 Mh/s ballpark on my "testing" GTX 1070 rig per card though.

 I strongly suspect that the R9 290(x)/390(x) are best off mining ETH or it's spinoffs at this time.


I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
slayer10000
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 03:51:21 PM
 #1310


If you go groestl use sgminer, get the updated kernel. I dropped memory clocks on the cards as low as they would go, upped GPU clocks as high as they would go on stock voltage. I've not messed with skein.

so i got it running at around 21 Mh/s so i believe thats not too bad temp at 56c and I at 19
so is this good or think it should be running better?

 I suspect it's not too bad, given how old the GPU in the R9 39x cards are (same GPU as the R9 29x cards after all).

 For perspective, I think I was pulling 45-50 Mh/s ballpark on my "testing" GTX 1070 rig per card though.

 I strongly suspect that the R9 290(x)/390(x) are best off mining ETH or it's spinoffs at this time.


ya i was looking at mining eth but it doesnt seem as stright forward as digi mining for setting up and mining
i tried a few times and failed haha
slayer10000
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 16, 2017, 09:39:27 PM
 #1311


If you go groestl use sgminer, get the updated kernel. I dropped memory clocks on the cards as low as they would go, upped GPU clocks as high as they would go on stock voltage. I've not messed with skein.

so i got it running at around 21 Mh/s so i believe thats not too bad temp at 56c and I at 19
so is this good or think it should be running better?

 I suspect it's not too bad, given how old the GPU in the R9 39x cards are (same GPU as the R9 29x cards after all).

 For perspective, I think I was pulling 45-50 Mh/s ballpark on my "testing" GTX 1070 rig per card though.

 I strongly suspect that the R9 290(x)/390(x) are best off mining ETH or it's spinoffs at this time.


so i changed my driver to the 15.12 verson was running the 17 and it doubled in speeded so thats a big help there
WhaleOrNot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 136
Merit: 100

I'm Embarrassed to be here


View Profile
June 17, 2017, 12:33:24 AM
 #1312

Dear Blocks Factory,

Please consider adding VRM (Verium) to your mining selection. Right now mining is highly centralized and the mining community needs options.

https://github.com/VeriumReserve/verium

Verium Specs
Proof of Work-Time
Difficulty dependent blocktime (Max ~6.2 minutes, minimum 15 seconds)
Rewards: Blocktime dependent rewards (~Reward halving every minute decrease in blocktime till 10x VRC supply parity, then variable ~3% disinflation)
Algo: scrypt² (N of 1024² or 128MB per thread)
Block 1: 564,705 VRM minted for ICO participants who purchased VRM using VRC
Minimum Transaction Fee: 0.2 VRM (High commodity transaction fee paid to miners)
RPC Port: 33987, P2Port: 36988
Confirmations: 30, Maturity: 100

Due to its unique Algo, many pool's are unable to figure out how to set it up. This is a CPU mined coin and is currently gaining a lot of attention, however current pool reliability is a bit sporadic. The coin is currently traded on Bittrex.

https://vericoinandveriuminvite.herokuapp.com/ is the slack if you have questions.

Thank you for your consideration.

slayer10000
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 17, 2017, 04:34:43 AM
 #1313

Dear Blocks Factory,

Please consider adding VRM (Verium) to your mining selection. Right now mining is highly centralized and the mining community needs options.

https://github.com/VeriumReserve/verium

Verium Specs
Proof of Work-Time
Difficulty dependent blocktime (Max ~6.2 minutes, minimum 15 seconds)
Rewards: Blocktime dependent rewards (~Reward halving every minute decrease in blocktime till 10x VRC supply parity, then variable ~3% disinflation)
Algo: scrypt² (N of 1024² or 128MB per thread)
Block 1: 564,705 VRM minted for ICO participants who purchased VRM using VRC
Minimum Transaction Fee: 0.2 VRM (High commodity transaction fee paid to miners)
RPC Port: 33987, P2Port: 36988
Confirmations: 30, Maturity: 100

Due to its unique Algo, many pool's are unable to figure out how to set it up. This is a CPU mined coin and is currently gaining a lot of attention, however current pool reliability is a bit sporadic. The coin is currently traded on Bittrex.

https://vericoinandveriuminvite.herokuapp.com/ is the slack if you have questions.

Thank you for your consideration.



thanks looking into this it seems its mined via a vault program they made so its only cpu mined and currently it looks like they want to try and keep it away from gpu mining
the set up is a pain in the butt cause they seemed to messed things in the program
nUm81
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 11


View Profile WWW
June 17, 2017, 08:13:13 AM
Last edit: June 17, 2017, 08:27:18 AM by nUm81
 #1314

Hello,

Recently started to mine some DGB on the pool, so far happy with everything.

Just one suggestion, could you look at alternatives for the way the stats are displayed?

Its quite difficult to actually see the amount of coins in the payout history as they are displayed as images rather then actual data.  Even a table with the actual figures listed by day would be more helpful.  I like to distribute my earnings each day across the miners that were mining to track the ROI for each unit.  Its a bit hard to do when you have to estimate the value looking at the graphs.

Might i suggest looking at https://www.highcharts.com/ or something similar to allow the data to be more useful?

Cheers,

nUm81


Cheers - nUm - SnowGem Dev
Website- https://snowgem.org/ | Join our Discord | Reddit
shitobu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 17, 2017, 09:41:31 PM
 #1315

Is there any mod/admin here?
I just changed my password for something with over 30 chars. But the password to log in is limited to not even half of it, lol.
I just can't log in now because my password is too long.

Then I tried to recover through my email but or I forgot what email I used or it is totally bugged.

Please any mod help me recover my account!
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
June 19, 2017, 08:07:47 AM
 #1316

For the R9 series, 15.12 remains the "go-to" driver version - nothing later is more efficient, a LOT of the later drivers give worse results.
I honestly don't think AMD bothers testing the "Relive" series on the R9 cards, since they want you to move to the RX series and Vega instead of sticking with 3+ year old card designs.



I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
comp
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 19, 2017, 03:49:19 PM
 #1317

I have two cards in the system. 1 has a monitor connected. With cgminer i can only mine on the card that has the monitor connected to it no matter what I do. The card that has no monitor connected to it will drop however in speed. from ETH 30mhs to about 4, when I switch monitor back and restart that card stars to mine with normal speed again.

Checked with -d gpmap and all that. Doesn't work. Other miners than cgminer do not have the problem

Want to keep mining DGB with lower speed card while the other crunches ETH
riccochet704
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 19, 2017, 06:20:56 PM
 #1318

For the R9 series, 15.12 remains the "go-to" driver version - nothing later is more efficient, a LOT of the later drivers give worse results.
I honestly don't think AMD bothers testing the "Relive" series on the R9 cards, since they want you to move to the RX series and Vega instead of sticking with 3+ year old card designs.

I run the latest 17.6.2 drivers and don't really see much difference going back to 15.12. I'm running 390X's.
slayer10000
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 19, 2017, 08:37:38 PM
 #1319

For the R9 series, 15.12 remains the "go-to" driver version - nothing later is more efficient, a LOT of the later drivers give worse results.
I honestly don't think AMD bothers testing the "Relive" series on the R9 cards, since they want you to move to the RX series and Vega instead of sticking with 3+ year old card designs.

I run the latest 17.6.2 drivers and don't really see much difference going back to 15.12. I'm running 390X's.

when i run the 15.12 on Groestl i get about 41 MHS if i run anything else its 21 and i have a 390
shitobu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 19, 2017, 10:02:09 PM
 #1320

Is there any mod/admin here?
I just changed my password for something with over 30 chars. But the password to log in is limited to not even half of it, lol.
I just can't log in now because my password is too long.

Then I tried to recover through my email but or I forgot what email I used or it is totally bugged.

Please any mod help me recover my account!
Bump, please t_t
can a mod send me a PM or anything
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!