|
Stuartuk
|
 |
July 30, 2013, 01:44:49 PM |
|
Guys, the 120,000 shares were mine. I made a deal with Ken. Because he is so busy, I paid him a VERY high premium to have my shares transferred from BF to BTCT. The premium went directly to the company. I advise everyone with less than 120,000 shares not to do this, as the price was very high and wouldn't be worth it for most shareholders. I paid him $5000, which went directly to the company.
I did get immediately on the horn and called Kens office. I was transferred to his cell and asked what was going on with this 120k dump. It was explained to me that a serious investor had made a deal to him in fiat to transfer those over to Btct. I guess now as we see that was Volcanic. When talking to him I could tell he was on the road (can hear the wind), and asked where he was headed to, while apologizing for calling after hours. He had told me he was on the road to meet with the engineering firm. I had asked how many hours were left in the drive and he stated 4-5 hours. Thanks for the update Streets.  Yes thank you. now will everyone please stop pissing and moaning and go back to constantly refreshing BTCT! Your welcome. I called Ken back to get some more clarification. The shares removed from BF will be pulled down tonight after he is done driving and can get on his laptop. Currently BF sits at 6,241,329 shares, should see this drop by 120k I would imagine no later than tomorrow. For those interested, look at BF share count, it is 6,121,877 If I was interested I'd read it myself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
|
July 30, 2013, 01:51:51 PM |
|
re: VE
lets remember the discrepancy between BF price and BTC-C price is caused by there being 4x fewer shares on the BTC-C exchange. So any transfer from BF to BTC-C will help narrow the price difference which is a good thing. The BF price more accurately reflects market value and having a small supply on BTC-C makes bubbles followed by crashes more likely. Not good for long term shareholder confidence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
vlaoou321
|
|
July 30, 2013, 02:13:10 PM |
|
re: VE
lets remember the discrepancy between BF price and BTC-C price is caused by there being 4x fewer shares on the BTC-C exchange. So any transfer from BF to BTC-C will help narrow the price difference which is a good thing. The BF price more accurately reflects market value and having a small supply on BTC-C makes bubbles followed by crashes more likely. Not good for long term shareholder confidence.
Some people may deliberately low prices |
|
|
|
|
snowdropfore
|
|
July 30, 2013, 02:33:34 PM |
|
that sounds a good news
|
|
|
|
|
vlaoou321
|
|
July 30, 2013, 02:35:22 PM |
|
Hi Guys,
I recently traveled to California for a nice vacation and to meet up with some companies such as Terrahash, HashFast, and also some local bitcoiners. While planning this trip I also tried to meet up with Ken but I arrived the day he was leaving I believe. However, one of the bitcoiners that I knew up here who wishes to remain anonymous is also a Silicon-Valley based engineer and in my opinion very well versed in the world of ASICs, was able to meet up with Ken for me.
I asked him to give me an overview of how he felt about Ken and the ASIC project he is working on in a nutshell. He confirmed with me that Ken is the real deal and that based on the conversation that was had, he doesn’t see any reason to think otherwise.
Now I know this might not sound like much but in my opinion if Ken can make this particular Engineer come to this conclusion then us shareholders should be in a very good position.
I’ll leave it at that and if Ken reads this he can confirm that he did indeed have a meeting with the Engineer on Friday.
This is looking even better guys!
Thank you for your information |
|
|
|
|
drdanishkhan
|
|
July 30, 2013, 02:40:29 PM |
|
Hi Guys,
I recently traveled to California for a nice vacation and to meet up with some companies such as Terrahash, HashFast, and also some local bitcoiners. While planning this trip I also tried to meet up with Ken but I arrived the day he was leaving I believe. However, one of the bitcoiners that I knew up here who wishes to remain anonymous is also a Silicon-Valley based engineer and in my opinion very well versed in the world of ASICs, was able to meet up with Ken for me.
I asked him to give me an overview of how he felt about Ken and the ASIC project he is working on in a nutshell. He confirmed with me that Ken is the real deal and that based on the conversation that was had, he doesn’t see any reason to think otherwise.
Now I know this might not sound like much but in my opinion if Ken can make this particular Engineer come to this conclusion then us shareholders should be in a very good position.
I’ll leave it at that and if Ken reads this he can confirm that he did indeed have a meeting with the Engineer on Friday.
This is looking even better guys!
To the mooooooon  |
BTC tip jar 1LrwjfQ41DA9u8PLcQBLp7CueoWotdKshq
|
|
|
alphabet
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2013, 02:48:19 PM
Last edit: July 30, 2013, 03:02:57 PM by alphabet |
|
Hi Guys,
I recently traveled to California for a nice vacation and to meet up with some companies such as Terrahash, HashFast, and also some local bitcoiners. While planning this trip I also tried to meet up with Ken but I arrived the day he was leaving I believe. However, one of the bitcoiners that I knew up here who wishes to remain anonymous is also a Silicon-Valley based engineer and in my opinion very well versed in the world of ASICs, was able to meet up with Ken for me.
I asked him to give me an overview of how he felt about Ken and the ASIC project he is working on in a nutshell. He confirmed with me that Ken is the real deal and that based on the conversation that was had, he doesn’t see any reason to think otherwise.
Now I know this might not sound like much but in my opinion if Ken can make this particular Engineer come to this conclusion then us shareholders should be in a very good position.
I’ll leave it at that and if Ken reads this he can confirm that he did indeed have a meeting with the Engineer on Friday.
This is looking even better guys!
I don't doubt you but it is important for people to remember that anyone could have said the exact same thing with zero actual positive information who just wants to pump the price up a little bit more. Again I have no reason to disbelieve you but i urge people to not react on unconfirmed news even if it is news you want to here. |
|
|
|
|
Subcide
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
July 30, 2013, 03:06:29 PM |
|
Hence his indirect request that Ken confirms the meeting took place, I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
alphabet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2013, 03:23:59 PM |
|
Hence his indirect request that Ken confirms the meeting took place, I guess.
Partly why this is believable as any deception would be relatively short lived. I wasn't trying to cast this claim into doubt though but rather I was trying to give a more general warning against someone trying to inflate or deflate the price of a security with no evidence. |
|
|
|
|
burnside
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
Lead Blockchain Developer
|
|
July 30, 2013, 03:57:27 PM |
|
It's better to not give out your API key. True, it's read-only, but it also grants access to the CSV's of your trade history. (PM me if you want to change it now...) The better way to do a public portfolio is to turn it on in the account settings. Then on the main account page a new URL will show up that will give you your public portfolio link. Cheers. |
|
|
|
|
|
LordMeowMeow
|
|
July 30, 2013, 04:03:17 PM |
|
Why would someone who is endorsing another want to remain anonymous?
|
|
|
|
|
|
vlaoou321
|
|
July 30, 2013, 04:11:16 PM |
|
Oh wow. Panic down
|
|
|
|
joele
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 30, 2013, 04:32:17 PM |
|
Oh wow. Panic down
It means, it's the best time to buy. |
|
|
|
|
|
lophie
|
|
July 30, 2013, 04:37:35 PM |
|
Oh wow. Panic down
It means, it's the best time to buy. All in, Now lets see the cards  |
Will take me a while to climb up again, But where is a will, there is a way...
|
|
|
|
bobboooiie
|
|
July 30, 2013, 04:40:03 PM |
|
Oh wow. Panic down
It means, it's the best time to buy. Is it ? There are 2 new competitors about to go to IPO. Both of them seems to be same or better as ActM and in earlier dates too. |
|
|
|
|
dexX7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 30, 2013, 04:44:11 PM |
|
Ouch..   |
|
|
|
|
bobboooiie
|
|
July 30, 2013, 04:47:50 PM |
|
Oh wow. Panic down
It means, it's the best time to buy. Is it ? There are 2 new competitors about to go to IPO. Both of them seems to be same or better as ActM and in earlier dates too. Which two? BTCGarden and Labcoin |
|
|
|
|
|
KCBitcoin
|
|
July 30, 2013, 04:59:05 PM |
|
BTCGarden wants 35% of the network. AM has at least 20%.
What's going to be left?
Also both BTCGarden and Labcoin seem to be at a more advanced stage of development and have more than ONE employee.
Wooops.
LOL... owned. |
|
|
|
|
limbaugh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 30, 2013, 05:02:59 PM |
|
LOL... owned.
Ha the party is over folks, move along... |
|
|
|
|
Rozal
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2013, 05:05:18 PM |
|
Looks like the kids organized a little market manipulation and came on this thread. cute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
