jedimstr
|
|
January 19, 2014, 03:52:21 PM |
|
I mine with the same address since August. http://www.middlecoin.com/reports/1GNj4fWef5ekNksnkZHbj68YhDc3VEmgL2.htmlAnd my payouts are great for my hashpower... This stupid conspiracy theory about "old timer" accounts not being paid as much as "new" accounts is worth as much as any of the other countless stupid statements from tealbagger... A whole lot of nothing. Surprised his Blackmailing/Extortionist/Scamming/Stealing ass hasn't been banned from BitcoinTalk already. Hey Teabagger... I thought you were going to release H2O's private info (you know, Blackmail and Extortion). Whatever happened to that? It's been weeks since your self-appointed and threatened deadline? Oh wait, Nevermind, I have you on ignore like all intelligent people should. Go back to your tinfoil hat making and scamming. i have similar hashrate as you (cgminer says 2.95Mh/s, but i have about 3-4% rejects) and i am getting lower rewards, how is that possible? i like middlecoin, but it sucks that same hashrates are getting very different rewards. my address is: http://middlecoin.com/reports/1D6dxMt74AxsyP2hZjv3frb3QJGtpKdAJs.htmlI used to get 5% rejects... Dialed down my intensity from 20 to 19 per card and CGMiner shows slightly lower Hashrates but also rejects around 1% now. On site it shows higher accepted Hashrate. So you may want to tweak your settings a bit. Also, which servers are you connected to? My rig is pointed to USEast with USWest and EU as failover backups. I also have Qos setup on my router to prioritize the ports for mining. I'm also on a fairly high speed FiOS connection (75/35). So all of that factors in to my accepted/rejected rate.
|
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
|
January 19, 2014, 04:10:50 PM |
|
Not real certain about that. Payoff looks great, but the immatures are falling. Don't know if that's a manifestation of mining coins with faster confirmation rates, or just lower mining profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
LPCobris
|
|
January 19, 2014, 04:16:12 PM |
|
Anyone using GUIMiner Here?
I have some questions about how to use some parameters with middlecoin...
LPC
|
|
|
|
zneww
|
|
January 19, 2014, 04:17:24 PM |
|
Doge keeps getting harder and harder to mine. I.E. less payouts. Just go mine a good doge pool for awhile and then come back to middlecoin when you want.
|
|
|
|
sykal
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
January 19, 2014, 04:22:14 PM |
|
i have abut 20% more unexchanged, so not worried-
|
|
|
|
alanlee87
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2014, 05:41:49 PM |
|
how close should WU be to actual hashrate?
|
|
|
|
Alexoc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2014, 05:45:04 PM |
|
hasrate x 0,92 = WU If you are close to this value than it's good.
|
|
|
|
zSprawl
|
|
January 19, 2014, 05:55:53 PM |
|
i have abut 20% more unexchanged, so not worried-
Aww yeah, love it when the blue goes down a little but red line shoots up like it just did... $$$
|
BTC: 1EyCRbT3YeskViEtH9KfRLpjdR2nsrrcW6
|
|
|
fyff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2014, 06:03:28 PM |
|
hasrate x 0,92 = WU If you are close to this value than it's good.
Can you elaborate on that? Why .92?
|
|
|
|
ButterBread
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 19, 2014, 06:04:17 PM |
|
how close should WU be to actual hashrate?
Ideally it would be the same? I've encountered a lot of material that advises if WU is less than 90% of your hashrate you should fiddle a bit with thread concurrency and intensity settings. It would be better to settle for a slightly lower hashrate with less rejections if that results in a bigger WU. When I sum up my WU on different rigs, it is pretty close to the accepted hashrate as reported by middlecoin. So I guess WU is the one to look out for, not hashrate.
|
|
|
|
jam3zs
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
January 19, 2014, 06:19:04 PM |
|
how close should WU be to actual hashrate?
Ideally it would be the same? I've encountered a lot of material that advises if WU is less than 90% of your hashrate you should fiddle a bit with thread concurrency and intensity settings. It would be better to settle for a slightly lower hashrate with less rejections if that results in a bigger WU. When I sum up my WU on different rigs, it is pretty close to the accepted hashrate as reported by middlecoin. So I guess WU is the one to look out for, not hashrate. 99.5% baby.
|
|
|
|
jam3zs
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
January 19, 2014, 06:26:20 PM |
|
On this subject, Someone a few pages back wrote this: if there is no HW errors, disconnects...etc everyone should have 99+% efficiency after few hour (difficulty does NOT matter!) more hash u have mean less time to balancing out luck/unluck at higher difficulty but there is no way to be "unlucky" all the time and getting bad efficiency without any reason!
Work Unit = shares / minute @ difficulty 1 (diff1 = 2^16 at scrypt coins) HRA = average hash rate (kHs)
efficiency = WU * 65536 / 60 / 1000 / HRA (*100 to get res. as %)
after 1+ week mining i (stil) have more than 99% efficiency on all rig 1h ago restarted my solo card desktop PC = 110% efficiency atm.. and will go down to ~100%
but using that equation (but taking my WU from sgminer) my efficiency comes out at 101.03% for me. but how can you be more than 100% efficient?
|
|
|
|
ButterBread
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 19, 2014, 06:42:29 PM |
|
but how can you be more than 100% efficient?
Re. the calculation of efficiency, looking at the formula I would guess it has something to do with the way HRA is calculated? But that's just science and mathematics. The shared wisdom in this thread offers us three alternative explanations : 1) "it's just a display issue, will be fixed soon" (tm) 2) the asic farmer has left the building, resulting in mo' moneyz fo' us 3) he who has true faith in the rock, may become super-efficient.
|
|
|
|
alanlee87
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2014, 07:25:50 PM |
|
Today is looking like another good payout. I'm still getting a good amount more than just mining DOGE directly. With my 4.5 MH/s, I would get around .052 BTC. I received .059 yesterday. I'm already at .044 today with .031 in unexchanged. Whatever H20 is doing, it's working . I don't care what we're mining, as long as I'm making around the same/more than the highest scrypt coin, I'm happy .
|
|
|
|
opsach
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2014, 07:37:04 PM |
|
my wu is also around 101%..just optimized today from aprox 85%
and i need to mention that for a last 2h i have 0% of rejected shares
|
|
|
|
zSprawl
|
|
January 19, 2014, 07:39:29 PM |
|
WU factors in luck as well, hence why you can be over 100%, but over time, it will steady. If it steadies to around 92%, you are good. If it is over, I'd push intensity faster because I'd be able to squeeze a little juice out. If my reject rates are over 2% and the ratio is less than 92%, I'd dial intensity back to find that sweet spot.
|
BTC: 1EyCRbT3YeskViEtH9KfRLpjdR2nsrrcW6
|
|
|
kopam
|
|
January 19, 2014, 07:56:04 PM |
|
my wu is also around 101%..just optimized today from aprox 85%
and i need to mention that for a last 2h i have 0% of rejected shares
How did you optimize that ? My WU is about 90% after 5 days of mining on all my rigs, and they all have different settings as they have different cards. 280x are with 13 intensity but they still have 90% WU, 290's are with 20 intensity and high thread concurrency and have again the same WU ( 90% of the hashrate ). So even after a very long period of time ( 5+ days each rig is running with no disconnects or power loss ) i can no get more then 90% WU, in the same time it seems it is pretty much stable around that number for all rigs i have.
|
|
|
|
opsach
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2014, 08:09:30 PM |
|
my wu is also around 101%..just optimized today from aprox 85%
and i need to mention that for a last 2h i have 0% of rejected shares
How did you optimize that ? My WU is about 90% after 5 days of mining on all my rigs, and they all have different settings as they have different cards. 280x are with 13 intensity but they still have 90% WU, 290's are with 20 intensity and high thread concurrency and have again the same WU ( 90% of the hashrate ). So even after a very long period of time ( 5+ days each rig is running with no disconnects or power loss ) i can no get more then 90% WU, in the same time it seems it is pretty much stable around that number for all rigs i have. i've 3x 280x what i've done my cards was undervolt..so i rised on 1100-1163v second thing, i put gpu-engine 1020-1060,1020-1060,1020-1060 (from stock clock until 1060 for each card) tird i had mem clock at 1250, i've put back to 1500,1500,1500 and last thing thread concurrency on 8192,8192,8192 intesity is on 13 and i testing powertune but there is no difference, 20 or -20 same thing...i didnt see any changes
|
|
|
|
|