FrankieSaysRelax
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
January 21, 2014, 01:08:33 AM |
|
Anyway, look up my old posts on the subject. No need to keep commenting.
I did, you're the politically (in)correct "chinaman" guy Quick recap : you started mining 2 weeks ago and then your unique view on the interplay of the market + this pool's size + the "chinaman"s enormous hashing power, convinced the "chinaman" to leave this pool? To go where? To mine elsewhere for less profit? I don't get it. (also, maybe he's simply no longer listed in the stats but still mining away) I didn't claim to convince him of anything. It wasn't as profitable for him as mining litecoins. He posted that in the same place he posted he had 4000mhs. If he is not being listed, than h20 is being dishonest and reporting inaccurately but I am giving him the benefit of the doubt. He doesn't even need a pool with the amount of power he has. He's paying 0% fees mining litecoins. That alone is 3.5%+ margin. Anyway, a new miner is on with about 200mhs who has only been on 5 days. It could be the commotion going on in this thread earlier about the newer addresses being more profitable lead him to try this under a lower load to see what's going on. His decision is going to be profit-driven.
|
|
|
|
grendel25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
|
|
January 21, 2014, 01:51:08 AM |
|
Finally saw some nice action in my unexchanged. Unexchanged dropped over a third from about .017 to about .011. Looks like I'll get a pay out to make up for the one I barely missed yesterday :-)
|
|
|
|
Caze
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
January 21, 2014, 01:53:41 AM |
|
Hmm, unexchanged 179 and balance 241. Forget the moon, we're going to Mars and beyond.
|
|
|
|
ButterBread
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 21, 2014, 01:55:35 AM |
|
He doesn't even need a pool with the amount of power he has. He's paying 0% fees mining litecoins. That alone is 3.5%+ margin.
The diff between MC and solo LC is less than 3.5%?
|
|
|
|
Red- Beard
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
January 21, 2014, 01:59:48 AM |
|
Maybe this has been asked before, but I'm not about to read 340 pages of posts to find out.
What happens when our difficulty is at 1024 but the network difficulty is at say, 300? Does that mean that we're missing out on valid shares (and potentially blocks) that meet a difficulty of 300 to 1023?
I just don't get how we can only accept shares that are (significantly) higher in difficulty than the difficulty of the coin we're mining.
|
|
|
|
FrankieSaysRelax
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:06:35 AM |
|
Maybe this has been asked before, but I'm not about to read 340 pages of posts to find out.
What happens when our difficulty is at 1024 but the network difficulty is at say, 300? Does that mean that we're missing out on valid shares (and potentially blocks) that meet a difficulty of 300 to 1023?
I just don't get how we can only accept shares that are (significantly) higher in difficulty than the difficulty of the coin we're mining.
when difficulty increase from 512 to 1024, you get 1/2 of the shares but they are worth 2x as much.
|
|
|
|
Cryptos2go
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:09:13 AM |
|
Maybe this has been asked before, but I'm not about to read 340 pages of posts to find out.
What happens when our difficulty is at 1024 but the network difficulty is at say, 300? Does that mean that we're missing out on valid shares (and potentially blocks) that meet a difficulty of 300 to 1023?
I just don't get how we can only accept shares that are (significantly) higher in difficulty than the difficulty of the coin we're mining.
This thread is only 340 pages because stupid DODGE coin is beating us by 200 pages. If people had their dam priorities right this thread would have 1024 pages.
|
|
|
|
foodies123
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:13:23 AM |
|
what the fuck my stats showed .204 (0.007 - 0.099 - 0.098)btc and in 10 minutes they went to .128 (0.003 0.017 0.108)
|
nope
|
|
|
BobNash
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:21:43 AM |
|
Maybe this has been asked before, but I'm not about to read 340 pages of posts to find out.
What happens when our difficulty is at 1024 but the network difficulty is at say, 300? Does that mean that we're missing out on valid shares (and potentially blocks) that meet a difficulty of 300 to 1023?
I just don't get how we can only accept shares that are (significantly) higher in difficulty than the difficulty of the coin we're mining.
coin difficulty based on 2^32 til share difficulty based on 2^16
|
|
|
|
phrozenspite
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:22:25 AM |
|
what the fuck my stats showed .204 (0.007 - 0.099 - 0.098)btc and in 10 minutes they went to .128 (0.003 0.017 0.108)
Coingeeks chart isn't showing and i saw this on the main part of the forum. if we've been mining a lot of DOGE it might not be showing because of Cryptsy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=425156.0
|
|
|
|
foodies123
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:23:20 AM |
|
what the fuck my stats showed .204 (0.007 - 0.099 - 0.098)btc and in 10 minutes they went to .128 (0.003 0.017 0.108)
Coingeeks chart isn't showing and i saw this on the main part of the forum. if we've been mining a lot of DOGE it might not be showing because of Cryptsy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=425156.0I don't look at the chart, only on the main page.
|
nope
|
|
|
phrozenspite
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:26:38 AM |
|
what the fuck my stats showed .204 (0.007 - 0.099 - 0.098)btc and in 10 minutes they went to .128 (0.003 0.017 0.108)
Coingeeks chart isn't showing and i saw this on the main part of the forum. if we've been mining a lot of DOGE it might not be showing because of Cryptsy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=425156.0I don't look at the chart, only on the main page. yeah, my point is that if the chart isn't showing something probably isn't working right with the middlecoin page data at the moment
|
|
|
|
Shaban
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:29:03 AM |
|
My unexchanged just went from .09 to .01, and my balance went from .084 to .098. Unexchanged went down .08 and my exchanged only went up .014?
|
|
|
|
pitobread
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:31:07 AM |
|
Anyone else's unexchanged drop like a stone? I had .033 and now I have .004 and it didn't go into my balance
|
|
|
|
foodies123
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:33:08 AM |
|
not the only one it seems ...
|
nope
|
|
|
kb24mvp
Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:36:49 AM |
|
Same issue,
Had ~.06 in unexchanged.... dropped to .015 and only .017 went into balance!
so suddenly lost a lot....
|
|
|
|
realrover
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:38:22 AM |
|
Anyone else's unexchanged drop like a stone? I had .033 and now I have .004 and it didn't go into my balance Yes, same here. Couple of hours ago I had about 0.17 btc combined, now about 0.11. Is it normal guys?
|
|
|
|
bitter_miner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:38:37 AM |
|
Same issue,
Had ~.06 in unexchanged.... dropped to .015 and only .017 went into balance!
so suddenly lost a lot....
don't freak out.. looks like it's just from payout and stats not updating to reflect..
|
|
|
|
Catswold
|
|
January 21, 2014, 02:39:26 AM |
|
Stats are flat and the payout has just occurred. Patience. Mine dropped from .016 to .0047. I suspect is will be shifted into our balances once the stats settle.
|
|
|
|
|
|