KYC of bounty hunters

[nak02]

I agree with some project that the headhunter presents his KYC form and the only way to receive our award, such as INS Ecosystem, I think because of any country's legislation the requirement is simply to seize a passport or a driver's license and provide some of your own information.

That is right, besides we already have so many bounty hunters that are actually scam and spam that is why it might be advisable to have KYC in every bounty so it can lessen scam people.

[katak mercat]

I do not mind if I have to do the kyc as they ask, the problem is when the project scam, I am very annoyed with such a project

[Crypto-capitalist]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

I think that if they require KYC they have to pay you in ETH

[roetsaty]

 a good idea is to create a service for KYC. And already this service will give confirmation for ico, and you will not be considered a bot, but at the same time projects will not receive your data, they will receive only confirmation from the KYC project.

[bit..what?]

I do not mind if I have to do the kyc as they ask, the problem is when the project scam, I am very annoyed with such a project

That's why i do not like kyc, since you can never be sure that the project does not end up in a scam.
In itself i would not mind kyc, but because of all the scams i am against kyc and renounce projects with kyc.

[crypto freelance]

For me, KYC is the right thing, because it excludes all the moshenics and bots. A good idea.

[Alfiah]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

I think it is good. so there will no more cheater and multiple account join. but some times it is bad, because the developer ask me passport and bill but I don't have.

[gazilla]

Personally, I think it is up to the "them" how they decide to do it. However, I do think that if they decide to make bounty hunters do KYC, they should notify them before they actually join the bounty campaign, so that they know the requirements, and NOT at the end of the campaign, as they usually do.

[cellanadalam]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

it is good i think, because many people try to abuse in bounty program. but also complicated especially for bounty which must send passport, because not all people have a passport, not like personal identity.

[maduranga]

it will good for make low particpants count by removing bot accounts and multi accounts, by that, jenuine participants like us will can get more high rewards but, i personally dont like to give anyone info about me for KYC, i think KYC is not nessasary if we done our work corecttly they just have to do pay for us because we are not investors

[auy]

This is very bad, I do not want to send photos of my passport to unknown people. Organizers can use this information for personal purposes, other ICOs for example.

[arthurgrand]

Definitely the only advantage in KYC, which I see, is the truncation of multi-accounts. I do not want to trust anyone with my documents. I sincerely won't want to trust my details with every ico I'm bounty hunting.

[Umkar]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

I believe that such actions are at least the abuse of their rights by the ICO team. We do not know who is represented by the ICO team, photos in the ICO project documents can be embedded any and we have already seen that this sometimes happens. The ICO team does not provide any of its documents. Thus, our identification data and copies of documents unknown to us are required from us.

We also do not indicate on what legal basis these data demand from us. We, as participants in the signature campaign, are not investors, we can not be suspected of laundering dirty money, financing terrorism and other bad deeds. In the country of my stay there is a law on the protection of personal data of citizens and this case does not fall under the necessity of providing me with my identification data.

If we are required to provide our identification data when joining the ICO project signature campaign, we should have the right to choose. That is, about such a need must be indicated in the conditions of such accession, and not after the end of the ICO, when our work is done and we expect its payment by tokens.

The requirement to provide your personal data in circumstances where a certain part of bounty hunters definitely refuses to do this can be considered a fraud on the part of the ICO team, that is, the seizure of property by deception or abuse of trust. If certain individuals refuse to provide their personal data, the tokens of these persons will be assigned by the ICO team. Therefore, if before signing up for the campaign the signatures were not warned about the possibility of conducting a KYC check, then such a requirement after the completion of our work is fraudulent, fraudulent.

[Brigalabdis]

Definitely the only advantage in KYC, which I see, is the truncation of multi-accounts. I do not want to trust anyone with my documents. I sincerely won't want to trust my details with every ico I'm bounty hunting.

It is also what i think but what if someone do create others info to his other account?  I also didn't know why some campaign need this kind of thing.  I didn't encounter any campaign who need KYC before getting some bounty or getting paid.  But it is not good because we need to hide our identity for our safety, right?

[sherwinaze]

 I think KYC for bounty hunters are not good  but I think they implement KYC because there's so many bounty hunters abusive in joining campaign like doble account in one campaign so  if they have KYC they noticed who join double account.

[Betszkie12]

The bounty given or is received by the bounty hunters are not so big enough that it could be used for illegal activities  and maybe KYC is not really needed at all most of the time. It is a danger on the part of the bounty hunters to expose their identities as it be could be used by hackers to make crimes online.

[furfurol]

I don't want to give my KYC to anyone. In many telegram groups, I can see a lot of people selling KYC materials. Maybe these KYC materials are the ones you submitted to the ICO team.
This sounds terrible, so I won't take any ICO project that requires KYC data.

I'm afraid then you can stay without work and good projects. I have been meeting more and more bounty where KYC is needed, and this tendency is growing. Our task is only to put up with this and follow the rules

[catokathy]

Bounty hunters do not need this type of a procedure. But i also met few cases that asking KYC documents for bounties and airdrops. But it is very dangerous for giving KYC documents for them.

[rudyrista123]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

think it's good and not hard to do. although there is little concern if our data is sent to another party. if there is no bad purpose and precisely to make sure the truth of the data is not a problem for me.

[Darker45]

Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.

I don't think it is necessary for the bounty hunters to undergo KYC. The bounty hunters will only receive a little portion of the tokens sold or minted. It is not that significant actually. What I agree with the KYC implementation is that it will cover those who invested in any ICO with a significant amount. Those who invested with little amounts can even be exempted from such process.