Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Humpert]

For me ICO Ratings is a good guide that we can check if an ICO is good to invest or not, its still best to make our own research and dig more deeper with the project and team before we invest because no matter how big the ratings are if they want to scam us we can't do anything about it.

[1713877250]

1713877250

[1713877250]

1713877250

[1713877250]

1713877250

[1713877250]

1713877250

[MAsterCoiner]

ICO ratings are not done in proper ways. How can we verify that ICO ratings were done in a democratic manner and based on right pieces of information?

 
BTCBTCBTCBTC
BTCBTC
BTC

[lutcor]

No, of course not, because many services have already proved that they are bought by many projects, and maybe even that they just do not make the right forecasts, it seems to me that such services are useless, but I can be mistaken, therefore I can not know for sure.

[startorr]

No, of course not, because many services have already proved that they are bought by many projects, and maybe even that they just do not make the right forecasts, it seems to me that such services are useless, but I can be mistaken, therefore I can not know for sure.

You can just use ico ratings as reference but as always, with every investment you have to do your own research and do not forget to perform due diligence on what your investing in. Keep in mind that there are inherent risk even though we think that a certain project is bery promising.

[explosion]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I don't believe ICOrating and ICObench. I think projects pay these resources for getting a high rating, that's because I don't have any idea how some bad projects get big rating.

[louisBSAS]

First of all, I trust my feelings after reading the basic documents of the project and viewing their site. Secondly, I draw attention to the project team, the schedule of their meetings and public events. Next, I look at the address of the main wallet where the payments are made. The rating of course, too, I look but it does not have a decisive influence on my decision.

[petir.bay]

These are good websites to check good ongoing ICO but I do not rely on this much I just check these websites to find good ICO after that I do more research on the ICO which I have found from there. I check their websites read Whitepaper and research each and everything about that project then only I invest in that ICO.

[Afrizky R]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

ICO rating can not be trusted completely because it is a website that collects data from various sources, this can not be a guide to take steps in choosing ICO on the web.
sometimes there is a permanent ICO rating to raise the prestige of an ICO in order to attract a lot of people to buy it, preferably if you can browse for an ICO you want to follow and see and understand yourself from whitepapernya and you can judge for yourself whether it is a good program to the future

do not be influenced by the whisper from the outside or whatever it is that makes you become unsure

[CatDaddy]

Good question, to some extent, yest I trust these ratings, but in the same time I am always doing my research.

[Valermos]

I think you can trust them only partially, as many people want to pump and promote their ICOs with the usage of such ratings. But also I don't believe that a complete scam project can be at the top of a rating.

[Vizzoy]

Most of people are checking ico ratings as one of their reference on where they will choose to invest, but for me ico ratings is just a guide and I am not really believing on how they rate some icos. But is still depends with the investors how they will believe this ratings.

[marydarli]

Verasity Online Video Paid Subscriptions Built Directly Into Verasity. Verasity Supports their favourite Creators so they can keep making the videos they love. See More

[triasel]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

for me itself, ico rating is just as a refferer for short detail info about that ICO, high rating ICO at first time is not always a good one, you might found one ICO at first week it got at first page of icobench with a good rating, but eventually if the tokensale are good or even soldout, it rating will keep or even more great than before, but if not its rating will decrease.

instead of just see on ico rating website, i prefer to ask some friend about the ICO

ICO rating not really give guarantee for us to choose a good ICO, as you say that sometimes the ICO with a good rating can't reach they softcap. for me the ICO rating just for other references not for as the main reason for to choose a good ICO. i suggest you to doing research by yourself.

[1C6fV5DtakfKANLJ8GUV7hCaA]

I believe in ratings at a 50% rate. I also do my own research of the team. Chances are these websites only get paid to give ICOs some made up rating.

[hajimasan]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

no , I don't believe at such sites in actual because not every time you will  get the real reviews because in this time everyone is looking to make more and more money and don't see towards the other People whether they are facing loss or not or they are getting hurt in any way , here I mean to say that many reviews sites are offering Thier high price to give high rate on Thier site  , just for money only .
So here we should always remain -ve also with positivity , and make analysis yourself whether any ICO is really a worthful or not otherwise you will only loss your money .
In this field in every thing you should make analysis yourself in everything otherwise you may face big loss .

[Daydream 61]

In my opinion, I don't like ico rating. The authority can easily change the rating point. They can personalized their rating. So don't make decisions to see high rating ico.

[Candice]

I don't quite understand what the ICO rating standard is, and now it seems that most of the projects have higher scores.

[maximum1z1z2]

We can trust them but not 100%. Atleast you need do your own research before trust that the ICO are LEGIT. But it's good for newbies which want to invest their money in ICO and don't know anything about it.

[Trixie28]

Yes, I believe in ICO rating because this is the measly one of the references in choosing a good project by its popularity on media. But never just do some hope by just checking always their rating you can do your own research of course. Others are not reliable sources but to ensure the correct information you are the one do that.

[bitcoinbox]

One of those ICO rating website advertised DENARO recently and it turned to be a scam.
So I'm not sure it is a good idea to fully trust the ICO rating websites although I still think they can provide useful information on upcoming ICOs.