Sending in fake ID for KYC

[Zten]

I know few services which can help you to pass KYC with fake ID. It's easy and the cost of this service very low

im interested, can you tell me more information about these services and where to get these fake ID-s to pass KYC.

[Kamidzy7]

Can not ride so it is better to recommend to send only a real document,and of course he decides, I can say that I sent the real docks and remove the problems with the check, and than talk poro fake

[Temibest2]

I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do.  It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles.  How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information?  Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data?  How rampant do you think this is?  How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it.  Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.

NOT FAIR.

This baffles me if they are really verifying any documents for KYC at all. Because if someone with fake ID could be verified, it means no verification was actually carried out.

[KobbyD]

Sending personal data is obviously risky. But people do it because they want their money and don't know how to forge fake ones.
Everybody hates KYC, both bounty hunters and investors. KYC will not stay long. It will fade out gradually.

[seymenyunus16]

If you send false data during KYC, then do not be surprised if false tokens are sent to you. It should be determined whether you play the rules of regulators and pass KYC, or simply do not participate in similar projects. Because of the uncertain behavior and fussiness of the masses - regulators need to be.

[iaxakov]

Sending personal data is obviously risky. But people do it because they want their money and don't know how to forge fake ones.
Everybody hates KYC, both bounty hunters and investors. KYC will not stay long. It will fade out gradually.

Agreed. Many people don't like it. But KYC does not intersect with the anonymity of the token itself. Nothing prevents us from duplicating wallets to further cover up traces. Secondly, each ICO has its own database, which they eventually destroy or sell. The second option does not scare me personally, because in our country, even state institutions are engaged in this.

[Blackpanther399]

I believe it is unethical for people to forge or use fake identities when trying to verify for kyc. Its not a good thing in anyway as this is against the rules as regards kyc.

Another thing is, projects should also find a way to spot these menace so that real people can invest into the projects

[madhukk]

Today you need a few different accounts in good ICO and the only way to participate will be sending fake data for at least some of your accounts. And its very funny when some projects decline real docs for some reasons (why? just get my money - all your legal advisers is a circus) while fake docs been taken without any problems.

[george_hured]

Those who understand how to do this and those who actively use it, I want to say that this is not very good, but on the other hand, it is safe for you, because very often people owners of this database just sell data to third-party resources.

[Yemmy4eva]

It could be painful to see people cheat the system and get away with it, but, I have to say I understand the fake ID ish when it comes to KYC.
I really dont get why it's that important because most times the data sent in is not even available online and I still have no idea how they verify it.

My main concern is the issue of identity theft. It's a very serious issue. Anyone can come up with a project and gather people's passports and do whatever they like with it.
Your ID could be left at a crime scene, or it could even be used to rig votes politically.
It gives me chills when I think about it
I'd rather stay away

[jwelkem]

I simply was raised to speed on gatherings of individuals sending in counterfeit/Photoshopped ID's by filtering open records to overcome the KYC procedure and it apparently is anything but difficult to do. It creates the impression that numerous individuals sent in counterfeit documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no problems. How do these organizations confirm individuals if all they need to go on is open data? Did they even truly check the ID's or would they say they were essentially gathered the information? How uncontrolled do you think this is? What number of us are finished simpletons for turning in our reports when others just faked it. Presently they have our information and the general population who faked it are as yet secure.

[Rajatkatyal]

It is really bad choice dear. because sending fake id for kyc is just sacm according to me. if you can't provide right id and right documents for the kyc to the bounty campaigns then you can't get any toknes and some times you might get rejected from campaign.

[kahrde]

a serious discussion of such a pressing problem in the forum.Who is afraid to send documents-do not send.who sends fake documents to a crook and a thief.Here because of such people the others also are afraid to send documents for KYC check.who can tell me how your documents without your presence can have some value.

[CRYPTOGANGSTERs]

KYC seems to me now made only for a tick. In fact, your passport data is not sent anywhere. Perhaps in the future it will be a more serious verification process, but not now.

[cold beer]

KYC is a terrible thing to downfall on all cryptos. Because of it, i think there will be a big backlash one day, and one ICO will be found out to be selling/have their user's IDs stolen (if it hasn't occured already) it will happen soon enough.

[minhkhoa1990]

I think sending fake kyc is risky. I'm a bounty maker, I do not want to bet my fancy by sending fake kyc.

[kristinkamal01]

I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do.  It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles.  How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information?  Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data?  How rampant do you think this is?  How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it.  Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.

NOT FAIR.

I think, on the one hand, such checks are good, since those people who want to trample someone, but it is bad for those who submit their personal data

[cardoyasilad]

Actually it's really hard to determine if it's a valid ID or not here in our country you can make your own ID's that looks like a legit ones.

[tessaphin]

It is your choice to pretend or not. If you invest heavily and require a KYC, will you fake and risk your investment by freezing or sending the original ID and risk getting your identity stolen, It's different for everyone but for me I prefer my money stolen than my identity.

[odranoel]

Not all bounty program needed KYC for the reason that i don't why? But based on my experienced because i already tried with KYC needed i do it simple but not a fake identification for me not to encounter any problem later. And KYC is not hard to comply with so no reason to fake it.