FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest

[TheQuin]

I mean for case 2 is another 10 new users, so let say it is a Non abusive.

Obviously, if it is 10 different people then it isn't abuse. You're trying to make complicated arguments about something that is very simple. Don't self-refer and don't play more than one free roll per hour. That's it.

[1714838463]

1714838463

[1714838463]

1714838463

[1714838463]

1714838463

[FinneysTrueVision]

Does disabling lottery tickets also disable them for the Multiply BTC game? I have the option to disable lottery tickets turned on so I receive Reward Points instead, but I just checked the lottery page and it says that I have 7 tickets. I had always assumed that disabling lottery tickets disabled them for the entire website. The only information I could find on the site mentions that lottery is disabled for faucet claims but says nothing about tickets earned from wagering.

[TheQuin]

Does disabling lottery tickets also disable them for the Multiply BTC game? I have the option to disable lottery tickets turned on so I receive Reward Points instead, but I just checked the lottery page and it says that I have 7 tickets. I had always assumed that disabling lottery tickets disabled them for the entire website. The only information I could find on the site mentions that lottery is disabled for faucet claims but says nothing about tickets earned from wagering.

It does only replace lottery tickets with reward points for free rolls not wagering.

[mannek23]

any1 wants buy freebitco.in acc with 141 referral and bonus of 0.28265318 BTC for playing MULTIPLY BTC
PM me

[Chris314]

any1 wants buy freebitco.in acc with 141 referral and bonus of 0.28265318 BTC for playing MULTIPLY BTC
PM me

If you don't precise the real balance of the account, nobody will buy. An account with 0 in balance and 141 inactive referrals is worth nothing, whatever the amount you can get in multiply BTC bonus.

[Betwrong]

~

The problem is, this second account might be flagged erroneously and you might end up losing your income generating account. I would not have to risk that, if I could just configure a percentage of my total balance for a specific purpose. That should not be too difficult to code?

This could be seen as a "budget" tool for beginners and you can give people the option to turn this on or off. <Like the options under the referral section for the distribution of the rewards>  

I agree with what Kakmakr is saying here. It would be more convenient for users if they could keep the money intended for income generation on the same account were they make freerolls, play lottery and play multiply games. Of course people can do what they want with their own money, but it should be made difficult for them to start playing with the invested money. For example, transferring the money from "SAVE" account to "PLAY" account should be possible only with email confirmation.

[jackg]

@thequin, is it possible to bring back something like the mining permalink so it’s possible to see ones ballance and ones interest without having that faff of logging in every time you want to view it?

It’ll mean there’s less download needed when roaming too...

[TheQuin]

@thequin, is it possible to bring back something like the mining permalink so it’s possible to see ones ballance and ones interest without having that faff of logging in every time you want to view it?

It’ll mean there’s less download needed when roaming too...

How would you secure that? It didn't matter with mining as all anyone could do with it was mine for you. With this, they could see your balance and that could make your account a target for hacking.

[jackg]

@thequin, is it possible to bring back something like the mining permalink so it’s possible to see ones ballance and ones interest without having that faff of logging in every time you want to view it?

It’ll mean there’s less download needed when roaming too...

How would you secure that? It didn't matter with mining as all anyone could do with it was mine for you. With this, they could see your balance and that could make your account a target for hacking.

I thought they could see your balance before couldn’t they?

Or am I mistaken here? I always thought it was somewhere on the mining page just rom the link. It doesn’t have to be an easy to guess link, it could be something like freebitco.in/depositaddress it’ll still save the faff with 2fa...

[TheQuin]

I thought they could see your balance before couldn’t they?

Or am I mistaken here? I always thought it was somewhere on the mining page just rom the link. It doesn’t have to be an easy to guess link, it could be something like freebitco.in/depositaddress it’ll still save the faff with 2fa...

IIRC it only showed the total you had earned from mining. I'll mention it to wetsuit but it seems like it might introduce a vulnerability to me.

[Kakmakr]

~

The problem is, this second account might be flagged erroneously and you might end up losing your income generating account. I would not have to risk that, if I could just configure a percentage of my total balance for a specific purpose. That should not be too difficult to code?

This could be seen as a "budget" tool for beginners and you can give people the option to turn this on or off. <Like the options under the referral section for the distribution of the rewards>  

I agree with what Kakmakr is saying here. It would be more convenient for users if they could keep the money intended for income generation on the same account were they make freerolls, play lottery and play multiply games. Of course people can do what they want with their own money, but it should be made difficult for them to start playing with the invested money. For example, transferring the money from "SAVE" account to "PLAY" account should be possible only with email confirmation.

It is not even a different Bitcoin address, but rather a ledger entry on the Freebitco.in web interface. So it should not be a train smash to implement this.   

I used to channel some of my income from my referral network via the web interface to reward my best referrals, so Freebitco.in already have the tools developed for that, so they can just adapt that function and add that to the total income, to manage the "budget" that are used for the different functions on the site. 

As you said, it is our money and we should be able to manage it better. 

[broke_tradah]

"Our Money".  Folks,  NONE of it is "your money".  You done sent it to freebitco,  so it's now THEIR BTC (btc isnt money btw,  its a digital asset).  It does not matter if you have BTC in your balance or not,  it's not yours.  Regardless of whether or not you deposited it.  What you're seeing is just a MySQL entry in a database.  The BTC you sent in is now in someone else's wallet and is rightfully theirs,  not yours (same goes for an exchange as well,  especially the anonymous ones,  and freebitco is every bit anonymous).  So dont be to surprised when they are less than forthcoming with common sense items such as management of anything you think you own but really do not.  They have no interest in your best interests at all and only care that you lose everything somehow.  Either by mistakes, gambling,  or giving them some dumb excuse to zero your balance (2 accounts for example).  Thats it,  that is all this place cares about.  This is the reason why a lot of "common sense" items are missing.  They are missing on purpose.  Its not some oversight or lack of time to develop.

[jackg]

"Our Money".  Folks,  NONE of it is "your money".  You done sent it to freebitco,  so it's now THEIR BTC (btc isnt money btw,  its a digital asset).  It does not matter if you have BTC in your balance or not,  it's not yours.  Regardless of whether or not you deposited it.  What you're seeing is just a MySQL entry in a database.  The BTC you sent in is now in someone else's wallet and is rightfully theirs,  not yours (same goes for an exchange as well,  especially the anonymous ones,  and freebitco is every bit anonymous).  So dont be to surprised when they are less than forthcoming with common sense items such as management of anything you think you own but really do not.  They have no interest in your best interests at all and only care that you lose everything somehow.  Either by mistakes, gambling,  or giving them some dumb excuse to zero your balance (2 accounts for example).  Thats it,  that is all this place cares about.  This is the reason why a lot of "common sense" items are missing.  They are missing on purpose.  Its not some oversight or lack of time to develop.

True dat.

It’s not your money. If wetsuit exit scams it’s not like you’ll ever realistically be able to get your investment back (most crypto companies still exit scam and do it in clever ways so you can’t grt your funds back en if their identity is known)...

[STT]

Not sure why thats a point, BTC is fungible so the coin doesnt have to be exact ownership or unique and like almost every website the storage is not kept with the users wallet but thats the same alot of places.   Every company has a common interest with customers but there is also the case of if its really immediately required, he already responded that using two accounts is feasible so long as not relying on taking advantage.    I get people would just like clarity and the option of the singular account but its hardly a great negative argument to make

[broke_tradah]

The point is that there are BTC technologies that can be used to fix the "bearer is owner and king" problem.  It's been brought up 100s of times and dozens of other sites that use this have been given as examples.  It forces wetback and thequack into an accountability problem in that they would then be held accountable for every transaction that is made (which currently does not exist.  at all. in any form).  If they want to move capitol from a cold wallet to a hot wallet,  someone needs to be asked to do so.  If the reverse is true,  someone should STILL be asked to sign and do so.  If they are hacked,  hacker would have to get permission from everyone to steal anything.  If wetback and thequack wanted to exit scam, they'd literally have to ask permission to do it.  If have to ask what I'm referring to,  then you should probably just quit crypto now while you still can because you are not equipped to handle the sphere as it is currently.  Come back in about 30 years when it's all click-n-go.

[jackg]

The point is that there are BTC technologies that can be used to fix the "bearer is owner and king" problem.  It's been brought up 100s of times and dozens of other sites that use this have been given as examples.  It forces wetback and thequack into an accountability problem in that they would then be held accountable for every transaction that is made (which currently does not exist.  at all. in any form).  If they want to move capitol from a cold wallet to a hot wallet,  someone needs to be asked to do so.  If the reverse is true,  someone should STILL be asked to sign and do so.  If they are hacked,  hacker would have to get permission from everyone to steal anything.  If wetback and thequack wanted to exit scam, they'd literally have to ask permission to do it.  If have to ask what I'm referring to,  then you should probably just quit crypto now while you still can because you are not equipped to handle the sphere as it is currently.  Come back in about 30 years when it's all click-n-go.

WIth the sum they have, You'd want a few wallets with a 4-of-5 multisig at least (two individuals being queeny and wetty and then three more random entities). But then you're still stuck with a dilemma. Anyone who wants to get involed in what is essentially a deep onion gambling business (for all intents and purposed - sure it's on the light web but that's just because it's no longer as well censored and there are a lot of deep onion sites with more morals)...

Anyway, this would still lead to an unreasonable vulnerability unless the money was stored in somewhere like an actual UK business and they got a license for it (whihc they're not going to do for some reason?) - there are gambling sites that run of bitcoin which have licenses now as far as I can tell, I don't know why freebitco.in doesn't go in and try to get one or at least should've got one before it was illegal not to (I'm guessing they're from the uk otherwise why would they use the BVI to hideout).

[MRS7]

  Today I noticed that the daily interest paid day by day is missing! I enjoyed seeing that because it made feel secure seeing my daily interest paid. Now, I have to write my final balance down, then check my balance to see if it was added. Please add it back.  I have been a year long member or longer.

ACCOUNT BALANCE  0.09 674671

DAILY INTEREST 0.00001060 BTC

MONTHLY INTEREST (30d) 0.00031857 BTC

YEARLY INTEREST (365d) 0.00394775 BTC

[Thirdspace]

Today I noticed that the daily interest paid day by day is missing! ...

it's just a display glitch or minor server hiccup, happened a few times before
and if you check under stats tab, all personal stats are missing too
but I believe all member data/stats are just fine, stored, updated (server side) and backup properly

[TheQuin]

Today I noticed that the daily interest paid day by day is missing! ...

it's just a display glitch or minor server hiccup, happened a few times before
and if you check under stats tab, all personal stats are missing too
but I believe all member data/stats are just fine, stored, updated (server side) and backup properly

Yes, the stats server had an issue. It just needed rebooting. It doesn't affect anything other than historical data being temporarily off-line.

[STT]

The point is that there are BTC technologies that can be used to fix the "bearer is owner and king" problem.

Ok yea I get that point and its common to a ton of websites, I dont really disagree with you and its something everyone needs to consider when they leave the blockchain to deposit with a website.  
 This is not just crypto though, its kinda similar to a deposit with a bank, there is a real systemic risk where that deposit makes the customer a creditor.   Heres a good video I watched on this type of larger problem ignored by most, it might at some point count when all banks are affected by the same factors like 2008 demonstrated, in places like Cyprus it wasnt theoretical:
https://youtu.be/EC0G7pY4wRE?t=346

   I noticed every comment you make is on this website and this thread in criticism but this company is no bad actor in crypto sector so I'm not sure why your so dedicated to the cause.     Its not a recent startup, its donkeys years old its not really a risk but fair enough its a factor of risk to consider.   I have been exit scammed a few times in crypto, never large amount not that I have amounts large to lose but I never expect longevity as yea it happens.    I have also had that in my normal gambling and FIAT setup, they had my ID but wanted more ID and so on.    KYC can be used to scam and theres all sorts of tricks used so I get the general idea that maintaining ownership is a positive feature for any setup

I gave you a merit anyway but Im not agreeing especially theres anything negative to criticise about Freebitco but its a point to remember in general