KYC at end of bounty campaign

[marydarli]

Verasity Token Sales is Live. Can Us Citizen Participate In Verasity Token Sales and Airdrop? See Answers to The Most Asked Questions Ahead Of Verasity Token Sales

[1715266085]

1715266085

[1715266085]

1715266085

[1715266085]

1715266085

[1715266085]

1715266085

[Last follen star]

I think it's bad to change the conditions at the end of the bounty. Perhaps it's requirements of exchanges where tokens will be listed.

[morozo]

Of course it will be more honest to announce the KYC at the beginning of the company. But you yourself can ask the manager about it before you take part . Often you can get an answer, and if the manager does not answer, then this is the reason for doubt.

That's a good idea, willl do that in the future, thanks.

[lemonscentedbreeze]

What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.

Is this fair?

Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.

What do you think?

I don't have a problem with kyc requirements from bounty campaigns as long as it is stated at the initial stage of the campaign and not at the end because for me its an act of deceit to change and include an important requirements suddenly.

[alberdina]

This I think is indeed less fair because the retrieval of gifts using this in the KYC and announce when the campaign is over is not at the beginning of the campaign. Of course, the participant's bounty hunter has not had time to prepare their data. And also there are still some participants when charging but they still also do not qualify.

[air_droper]

I don't participate in bounty campaigns if I have to pass KYC. I don't want to give my personal information to anyone. I do not support projects that report the need for KYC after the bounty! I think that it is necessary to warn in advance! it will be fair to the participants who do not pass KYC. in this case, they will not spend their time to participate.

[bitcoinbox]

Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.

What do you think?

I 100% agree with you! If KYC is mandatory at the end of the campaign, it MUST be stated clearly right at the beginning.
Yes it would be a great thing that bounty managers changing the rules regarding this issue.

[Godday]

bounty campaign that is currently using kyc in my opinion is very good because it is used to anticipate the increasing number of users who do fraud for it the existence of kyc can reduce it

[chengyinoing01]

At the end of the campaign, ICO should specify whether KYC checks will be available.

They can eventually change the rules, even if they ask the bounty hunter about kyc, but I think most of them will still submit their kyc because they don't want to lose the bounty.

[gabagandalf]

If the project is serious, kyc should not be a problem. I think only for cheaters with 2 or more accounts is it a problem. for me it makes no difference, with or without kyc.

[rajkr]

Yes it is common issue, afeter bounty  end they ask for KYC.Simply it can be done in starting of bounty when they aaked for form filling. A person identity should  be verified in earlier  stage.

[criptoman83]

I think KYC will be everywhere now, we just need to adapt.  If desired, you can find the "desired document" on the black market. It is really annoying. to pass KYC . But in general, it's not such a big problem. I, for example, passed KYC on the old passport (a little work with photoshop and it worked. ) This is if you feel paranoid about giving your real identity.

[sodiik]

a little bit inconvenient but I think that's okay if the goal is good. But are you not worried if the identity of KYC will one day be used by irresponsible parties?

[msycitizen]

For me applying this kind of process is ok, but  its kind of a tricky for all the bounties you are join in. It is also limits the scam process of other members.

[beezunus]

I think if they change the rules to do KYC at the end of the program then it is not fair for the bounty hunter, if they want us to do KYC then it should be explained in the rules at the beginning of the program

[Crypto_Wanderer]

I have nothing against the identification KYC. It helps to get rid of multi-accounts in bounty campaigns, which accordingly increases the rewards for honest participants. Only the fact that it will be necessary to pass the KYC is better reported before the start of the campaign bounty.

[ailyn30]

It is right and fair if they want to make " know your customer" for the purpose that they are paying a real person and not a bot..

[senin]

I consider the requirement of the ICO team to pass a KYC check to the participants of the ICO signature campaign at the end of the ICO campaign by the usual kind of fraud. Even at the stage of ICO completion there is no sense in such a check, except for the purpose of non-payment of earned tokens by signatory campaign participants. In addition, the very requirement to undergo such verification at any stage of the ICO I also consider illegal, as the ICO signatory campaign participants are not investors in the ICO project and can not launder dirty money. In this case, we advertise the ICO project and the ICO team pays for services. Therefore, they must pass the KYC test before us, and not vice versa. They must prove that their money is clean. In the purity of our services, I think, no one doubts.

[inyakizuryel]

What do you think about bounty campaigns that announce their KYC check at the end of the campaign? Many bounty hunters simply don't want to do that and the bounty managers or the ICO teams get free promotion for their projects.

Is this fair?

Every bounty thread should clearly state, wether there will be a KYC or not. We should ask the admins for changing the rules regarding this issue.

What do you think?

That is unprofessional move by the ICO, on the first place if they have KYC on their bounty hunters they have to make sure that they told everyone about that before they start the bounty, but KYC for me is a BIG NO because we have to be anonymous here and we don't need to expose our real identities.

[sale.kripta]

This is absolutely not right, when at the end of the bounty the companies are required to undergo identification. These conditions should all be known at the beginning of the start of the company bounty.