|
VanBreuk
|
 |
February 12, 2014, 08:15:30 PM |
|
wolfe?
  |
|
|
|
|
|
wesleyh
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:17:59 PM |
|
Got the email too, hopefully it's of use to CFB! |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:18:19 PM |
|
How long would it take to add support for two types of Assets, fixed and variable, along with the ability to change the amount of variable Asset?
If there was an Asset type field, with 0 for current one, 1 for dynamic, then we can always add other types later with new properties.
I have a solution for fully automated gateways, but it requires people to trust the hardware + software that operates it, so the simpler the code is, the easier for people to understand that the code is clean.
Not very long assuming that community approved the changes and the coder is familiar with Nxt source code. |
|
|
|
|
BitcoinForumator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:18:22 PM |
|
wolfe?
Good photoshopping |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:21:05 PM |
|
Regarding scripting: is this supposed to only apply to transactions? Perhaps accounts itself could be scripted in the same way?
Instead of separate account control, just make it so that it's possible to set an account one script. Each outbound transaction would have to be accepted by the script.
It would solve several problems at the same time: complicated escrow/multisig, account security (only allow one withdrawal address), allow a form of 2 factor authentication, allow pooled bets on assets/currencies on decentralized exchange, inheritance, possibly other things I didn't think about
Or was it supposed to apply to accounts from the start?
A script is just a transaction. But it can send other transactions. Even ones that invoke it again. |
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:21:21 PM |
|
@CFB - what is the nr of decimals allowed after comma for price?
2? or unlimited?
2 How long would it take to add support for two types of Assets, fixed and variable, along with the ability to change the amount of variable Asset? If there was an Asset type field, with 0 for current one, 1 for dynamic, then we can always add other types later with new properties. I have a solution for fully automated gateways, but it requires people to trust the hardware + software that operates it, so the simpler the code is, the easier for people to understand that the code is clean. this would be a nice addition. i was just planning on releasing as many assets as there are above ground ounces of silver in the world just to be safe. (big aspirations i know ) and only sell what i have in reserve. for this reason though i would put variable assets on the back burner for a while. crowd funding functionality is MUCH more important. |
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited? |
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:22:15 PM |
|
Got the email too, hopefully it's of use to CFB! should compare both implementations now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iruu
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:23:55 PM |
|
A script is just a transaction. But it can send other transactions. Even ones that invoke it again.
That's how bitcoin does it, but why not apply it to accounts also? |
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:24:08 PM
Last edit: February 12, 2014, 08:35:04 PM by Anon136 |
|
thats amazing. did you do that? *edit* im posting this in the doge coin thread. |
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited? |
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:24:55 PM |
|
A script is just a transaction. But it can send other transactions. Even ones that invoke it again.
That's how bitcoin does it, but why not apply it to accounts also? Script already has a full access to the account. |
|
|
|
|
BitcoinForumator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:26:19 PM |
|
@VanBreuk - go post this in the Doge thread, show your work, you have skills.
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:26:35 PM |
|
The dog is so cute that for a moment I wanted to trade all my nxts for dogecoins... |
|
|
|
|
BitcoinForumator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:28:39 PM |
|
The dog is so cute that for a moment I wanted to trade all my nxts for dogecoins... VanBreuk - that's like the best photoshop i've seen ever regarding Doge - the Doge community photoshoppers have nothing on you. |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:30:31 PM |
|
Got the email too, hopefully it's of use to CFB!
Me too  The glorious three. |
|
|
|
|
Damelon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:33:12 PM |
|
wolfe?
This is great and you should feel great! I love it! Edit: I also love the collar of the Nxt wolfe. |
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:33:20 PM |
|
@VanBreuk - go post this in the Doge thread, show your work, you have skills.
i did that already. if he posts it ill delete my post to give proper attribution. |
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited? |
|
|
|
|
SkillRoad
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:35:15 PM |
|
wolfe?
This is great and you should feel great! I love it! dear friends |
|
|
|
|
|
VanBreuk
|
|
February 12, 2014, 08:39:12 PM |
|
@VanBreuk - go post this in the Doge thread, show your work, you have skills.
Guys, I'm glad you like it, but the only think I added were the collars and the medallions, quickly. I found the wolf face already done, no attribution for me here. It was just a meme after anon136's idea, it just made too much sense. Definitely the medallions I could improve, but the props for the wolf go to some doge anon. |
|
|
|
|
|
