Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 10:46:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 [550] 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 ... 661 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread  (Read 1276347 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
deliciousowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 432
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 19, 2015, 08:44:07 AM
 #10981

Here are some (slightly) technical questions from Reddit, answered by core dev PhantomPhreak. I've heard a few of these in person too, so I tried to put them in a more 'readable' format for future use:

http://coinedtalk.com/xcp-core-developer-talks-tech/
http://www.reddit.com/r/counterparty_xcp/comments/2w6nbs/technical_knowledge/

sphericon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 327
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 19, 2015, 09:31:45 AM
 #10982

I'm getting an error trying to login to Counterwallet. I tried all three servers that I know about (cw01-03) but they all gave the same result which was:

"No counterparty servers are currently available. Please try again later. ERROR: The server is not fully caught up to the blockchain. Please logout and try later. (Most likely this message is due to the server being updated.)"

Devs are looking into it. Should be resolved shortly....

This may be the issue...

Code:
GET https://counterwallet.io/js/sprintf.min.map; 404 (Not Found)

pankogulo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100

Counterparty General Manager


View Profile WWW
February 19, 2015, 10:33:13 AM
 #10983

I'm getting an error trying to login to Counterwallet. I tried all three servers that I know about (cw01-03) but they all gave the same result which was:

"No counterparty servers are currently available. Please try again later. ERROR: The server is not fully caught up to the blockchain. Please logout and try later. (Most likely this message is due to the server being updated.)"

Devs are looking into it. Should be resolved shortly....

Counterwallet is live.

xnova
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 390
Merit: 254

Counterparty Developer


View Profile
February 19, 2015, 10:41:57 AM
 #10984

I'm getting an error trying to login to Counterwallet. I tried all three servers that I know about (cw01-03) but they all gave the same result which was:

"No counterparty servers are currently available. Please try again later. ERROR: The server is not fully caught up to the blockchain. Please logout and try later. (Most likely this message is due to the server being updated.)"

Devs are looking into it. Should be resolved shortly....

Counterwallet is live.

And updated to the latest major updates. There appears to be a good speed boost (at least for me).


Visit the official Counterparty forums: http://counterpartytalk.org
qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011


View Profile
February 19, 2015, 04:42:36 PM
 #10985

When this issue will be fixed cause Poloniex has no ETA for fixing FLDC deposits ? They said it's on Counterparty side.
PhantomPhreak (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 300

Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder


View Profile
February 19, 2015, 08:58:57 PM
 #10986

When this issue will be fixed cause Poloniex has no ETA for fixing FLDC deposits ? They said it's on Counterparty side.

I'm working with him now to resolve the technical issues.
alicea
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 501



View Profile
February 19, 2015, 11:15:14 PM
Last edit: February 20, 2015, 12:05:40 AM by alicea
 #10987

Counterparty is a really good thing, anyway it doesn't work as it should... I'd prefer more simple and less innovative, but working fine. Anyway less scamming should be, too.

nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3024
Merit: 8125



View Profile WWW
February 20, 2015, 08:21:27 AM
 #10988

I just successfully moved both SJCX and XCP out of Poloniex, just in case if you're wondering if that's working now. It was for me anyway.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011


View Profile
February 20, 2015, 08:24:17 AM
Last edit: February 20, 2015, 12:26:14 PM by qqqq
 #10989

FLDC deposit on Poloniex is ok now. Thanks.
Evil-Knievel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168



View Profile
February 20, 2015, 09:47:41 AM
Last edit: April 17, 2016, 07:52:12 PM by Evil-Knievel
 #10990

This message was too old and has been purged
pankogulo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 100

Counterparty General Manager


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2015, 02:55:05 PM
 #10991

New Counterparty update is live on the site: XCP Available on Bittrex, Technical Q&A, New Product Developments http://counterparty.io/news/counterparty-update-feb-20/

yampi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 433
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 01:04:51 AM
 #10992

Looks like counterparty has a problem getting normalized balances of compressed addresses.

Uncompressed address:
Code:
{
  "jsonrpc":"2.0",
  "id":0,
  "method":"get_normalized_balances",
  "params":{
    "addresses":[
      "16P8vY1gVspGG8JeeWK8MSYzX4B9yqcJbF"
    ]
  }
}
Gives response:
Code:
{
    "jsonrpc": "2.0",
    "result": [],
    "id": 0
}

Compressed:
Code:
{
  "jsonrpc":"2.0",
  "id":0,
  "method":"get_normalized_balances",
  "params":{
    "addresses":[
      "12ze3N3Qeet6ji82rw8JqaepTL9uUxihFX"
    ]
  }
}
Gives response:
Code:
{
    "jsonrpc": "2.0",
    "id": 0,
    "error": {
        "message": "Invalid params",
        "code": -32602
    }
}
PhantomPhreak (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 300

Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 01:00:01 PM
 #10993

Looks like counterparty has a problem getting normalized balances of compressed addresses.

Uncompressed address:
Code:
{
  "jsonrpc":"2.0",
  "id":0,
  "method":"get_normalized_balances",
  "params":{
    "addresses":[
      "16P8vY1gVspGG8JeeWK8MSYzX4B9yqcJbF"
    ]
  }
}
Gives response:
Code:
{
    "jsonrpc": "2.0",
    "result": [],
    "id": 0
}

Compressed:
Code:
{
  "jsonrpc":"2.0",
  "id":0,
  "method":"get_normalized_balances",
  "params":{
    "addresses":[
      "12ze3N3Qeet6ji82rw8JqaepTL9uUxihFX"
    ]
  }
}
Gives response:
Code:
{
    "jsonrpc": "2.0",
    "id": 0,
    "error": {
        "message": "Invalid params",
        "code": -32602
    }
}

Looking into it. See https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterpartyd/issues/720
BitThink
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 21, 2015, 03:18:55 PM
 #10994

Bter is online again. Preparing for CNY, USD, NXT withdrawing now. For those who have XCP there,  it is better to keep a close eye on it to see when could xcp be withdrawn. Good luck.
Anotheranonlol
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 504


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 05:41:47 PM
 #10995

Bter is online again. Preparing for CNY, USD, NXT withdrawing now. For those who have XCP there,  it is better to keep a close eye on it to see when could xcp be withdrawn. Good luck.


XCP will be one of the next ones to be enabled for withdrawals, according to support

delulo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 441
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 06:37:17 PM
 #10996

I have invested in Counterparty (quite a bit!). Here is the issue I have with Counterparty's investor relations policy:

If I don't know what your long term vision is, what your position is on various challenges blockchain technology faces (securing a public ledger in an effective and efficient way at scale (POW is not made to do that), counterparty free pegged assets) and what your perspective is on various technologies (proof of stake, proof of work, delegates proof of stake, market pegged assets)) then I don't know whether XCP is a good long term investment. I want to be a loyal long term investor but need some visionary basis regarding the technological challenges (besides the things you do very well: forming alliances, professional daily PR management).

This is not a request to get 10 visionary articles next week regarding your perspective where blockchain and decentralized exchange technology will go in the next 5 years but it is a polite request for the above in general!
amesterdamer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 334
Merit: 251

Designer and CryptoCurrency Enthusiast.


View Profile
February 22, 2015, 01:28:31 AM
 #10997



Versus

weex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1102
Merit: 1014



View Profile
February 22, 2015, 04:41:02 AM
 #10998

Looks like they operate trains in Portugal. I don't think there'll be much confusion there.
deliciousowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 432
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 22, 2015, 10:22:24 AM
 #10999

I have invested in Counterparty (quite a bit!). Here is the issue I have with Counterparty's investor relations policy:

If I don't know what your long term vision is, what your position is on various challenges blockchain technology faces (securing a public ledger in an effective and efficient way at scale (POW is not made to do that), counterparty free pegged assets) and what your perspective is on various technologies (proof of stake, proof of work, delegates proof of stake, market pegged assets)) then I don't know whether XCP is a good long term investment. I want to be a loyal long term investor but need some visionary basis regarding the technological challenges (besides the things you do very well: forming alliances, professional daily PR management).

This is not a request to get 10 visionary articles next week regarding your perspective where blockchain and decentralized exchange technology will go in the next 5 years but it is a polite request for the above in general!

Isn't that entirely up to Bitcoin miners and core developers? POW, POS, DPOS... thats for the Bitcoin network to decide. Counterparty can adapt if necessary.

Pegged assets are possible using smart contracts/shellingcoin/etc...

And its difficult to predict the future of Bitcoin in the next 5 weeks let alone years. Smiley

delulo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 441
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 22, 2015, 12:29:11 PM
 #11000

I have invested in Counterparty (quite a bit!). Here is the issue I have with Counterparty's investor relations policy:

If I don't know what your long term vision is, what your position is on various challenges blockchain technology faces (securing a public ledger in an effective and efficient way at scale (POW is not made to do that), counterparty free pegged assets) and what your perspective is on various technologies (proof of stake, proof of work, delegates proof of stake, market pegged assets)) then I don't know whether XCP is a good long term investment. I want to be a loyal long term investor but need some visionary basis regarding the technological challenges (besides the things you do very well: forming alliances, professional daily PR management).

This is not a request to get 10 visionary articles next week regarding your perspective where blockchain and decentralized exchange technology will go in the next 5 years but it is a polite request for the above in general!

Isn't that entirely up to Bitcoin miners and core developers? POW, POS, DPOS... thats for the Bitcoin network to decide. Counterparty can adapt if necessary.

Pegged assets are possible using smart contracts/shellingcoin/etc...

And its difficult to predict the future of Bitcoin in the next 5 weeks let alone years. Smiley
Quote
Isn't that entirely up to Bitcoin miners and core developers? POW, POS, DPOS... thats for the Bitcoin network to decide. Counterparty can adapt if necessary.
Miners would never kill their revenue stream and change to something that does not involve mining.
Bitcoin devs do not seem to include economic realities into their judgement but perceive themselves as the guards of satoshis vision (in a very narrow non future/scale proof way).

Quote
Pegged assets are possible using smart contracts/shellingcoin/etc...
I doubt that someone would make that effort without being compensated. So the counterparty team would have to take it upon themselves. There are many ways to achieve stable counterparty free assets (vitalik's schellingcoin, bitshares' bitassets etc). I'd just like to know what vision the counterparty team has here.

Quote
And its difficult to predict the future of Bitcoin in the next 5 weeks let alone years.
That is mainly because the future (price) involves a lot of market irrationality. What any tech entrepreneur can do is to lay down how he/she thinks what the market's demand is, what the fundamental economic and technical building blocks are he/she wants to put together to meet that demand. Then if the market is rational in the way proposed by the tech entrepreneur then market forces should drive up the value of his/her project.
Pages: « 1 ... 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 [550] 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 ... 661 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!