|
sphericon
|
|
February 19, 2015, 09:31:45 AM |
|
I'm getting an error trying to login to Counterwallet. I tried all three servers that I know about (cw01-03) but they all gave the same result which was:
"No counterparty servers are currently available. Please try again later. ERROR: The server is not fully caught up to the blockchain. Please logout and try later. (Most likely this message is due to the server being updated.)"
Devs are looking into it. Should be resolved shortly.... This may be the issue... GET https://counterwallet.io/js/sprintf.min.map; 404 (Not Found)
|
|
|
|
pankogulo
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
Counterparty General Manager
|
|
February 19, 2015, 10:33:13 AM |
|
I'm getting an error trying to login to Counterwallet. I tried all three servers that I know about (cw01-03) but they all gave the same result which was:
"No counterparty servers are currently available. Please try again later. ERROR: The server is not fully caught up to the blockchain. Please logout and try later. (Most likely this message is due to the server being updated.)"
Devs are looking into it. Should be resolved shortly.... Counterwallet is live.
|
|
|
|
xnova
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 390
Merit: 254
Counterparty Developer
|
|
February 19, 2015, 10:41:57 AM |
|
I'm getting an error trying to login to Counterwallet. I tried all three servers that I know about (cw01-03) but they all gave the same result which was:
"No counterparty servers are currently available. Please try again later. ERROR: The server is not fully caught up to the blockchain. Please logout and try later. (Most likely this message is due to the server being updated.)"
Devs are looking into it. Should be resolved shortly.... Counterwallet is live. And updated to the latest major updates. There appears to be a good speed boost (at least for me).
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
February 19, 2015, 04:42:36 PM |
|
When this issue will be fixed cause Poloniex has no ETA for fixing FLDC deposits ? They said it's on Counterparty side.
|
|
|
|
PhantomPhreak (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:58:57 PM |
|
When this issue will be fixed cause Poloniex has no ETA for fixing FLDC deposits ? They said it's on Counterparty side.
I'm working with him now to resolve the technical issues.
|
|
|
|
alicea
|
|
February 19, 2015, 11:15:14 PM Last edit: February 20, 2015, 12:05:40 AM by alicea |
|
Counterparty is a really good thing, anyway it doesn't work as it should... I'd prefer more simple and less innovative, but working fine. Anyway less scamming should be, too.
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3150
Merit: 8519
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
February 20, 2015, 08:21:27 AM |
|
I just successfully moved both SJCX and XCP out of Poloniex, just in case if you're wondering if that's working now. It was for me anyway.
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
February 20, 2015, 08:24:17 AM Last edit: February 20, 2015, 12:26:14 PM by qqqq |
|
FLDC deposit on Poloniex is ok now. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Evil-Knievel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
|
|
February 20, 2015, 09:47:41 AM Last edit: April 17, 2016, 07:52:12 PM by Evil-Knievel |
|
This message was too old and has been purged
|
|
|
|
|
yampi
|
|
February 21, 2015, 01:04:51 AM |
|
Looks like counterparty has a problem getting normalized balances of compressed addresses. Uncompressed address: { "jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":0, "method":"get_normalized_balances", "params":{ "addresses":[ "16P8vY1gVspGG8JeeWK8MSYzX4B9yqcJbF" ] } } Gives response: { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": [], "id": 0 } Compressed: { "jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":0, "method":"get_normalized_balances", "params":{ "addresses":[ "12ze3N3Qeet6ji82rw8JqaepTL9uUxihFX" ] } } Gives response: { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 0, "error": { "message": "Invalid params", "code": -32602 } }
|
|
|
|
PhantomPhreak (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
|
|
February 21, 2015, 01:00:01 PM |
|
Looks like counterparty has a problem getting normalized balances of compressed addresses. Uncompressed address: { "jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":0, "method":"get_normalized_balances", "params":{ "addresses":[ "16P8vY1gVspGG8JeeWK8MSYzX4B9yqcJbF" ] } } Gives response: { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": [], "id": 0 } Compressed: { "jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":0, "method":"get_normalized_balances", "params":{ "addresses":[ "12ze3N3Qeet6ji82rw8JqaepTL9uUxihFX" ] } } Gives response: { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 0, "error": { "message": "Invalid params", "code": -32602 } } Looking into it. See https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterpartyd/issues/720
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 21, 2015, 03:18:55 PM |
|
Bter is online again. Preparing for CNY, USD, NXT withdrawing now. For those who have XCP there, it is better to keep a close eye on it to see when could xcp be withdrawn. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
Anotheranonlol
|
|
February 21, 2015, 05:41:47 PM |
|
Bter is online again. Preparing for CNY, USD, NXT withdrawing now. For those who have XCP there, it is better to keep a close eye on it to see when could xcp be withdrawn. Good luck.
XCP will be one of the next ones to be enabled for withdrawals, according to support
|
|
|
|
delulo
|
|
February 21, 2015, 06:37:17 PM |
|
I have invested in Counterparty (quite a bit!). Here is the issue I have with Counterparty's investor relations policy:
If I don't know what your long term vision is, what your position is on various challenges blockchain technology faces (securing a public ledger in an effective and efficient way at scale (POW is not made to do that), counterparty free pegged assets) and what your perspective is on various technologies (proof of stake, proof of work, delegates proof of stake, market pegged assets)) then I don't know whether XCP is a good long term investment. I want to be a loyal long term investor but need some visionary basis regarding the technological challenges (besides the things you do very well: forming alliances, professional daily PR management).
This is not a request to get 10 visionary articles next week regarding your perspective where blockchain and decentralized exchange technology will go in the next 5 years but it is a polite request for the above in general!
|
|
|
|
|
weex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1102
Merit: 1014
|
|
February 22, 2015, 04:41:02 AM |
|
Looks like they operate trains in Portugal. I don't think there'll be much confusion there.
|
|
|
|
deliciousowl
|
|
February 22, 2015, 10:22:24 AM |
|
I have invested in Counterparty (quite a bit!). Here is the issue I have with Counterparty's investor relations policy:
If I don't know what your long term vision is, what your position is on various challenges blockchain technology faces (securing a public ledger in an effective and efficient way at scale (POW is not made to do that), counterparty free pegged assets) and what your perspective is on various technologies (proof of stake, proof of work, delegates proof of stake, market pegged assets)) then I don't know whether XCP is a good long term investment. I want to be a loyal long term investor but need some visionary basis regarding the technological challenges (besides the things you do very well: forming alliances, professional daily PR management).
This is not a request to get 10 visionary articles next week regarding your perspective where blockchain and decentralized exchange technology will go in the next 5 years but it is a polite request for the above in general!
Isn't that entirely up to Bitcoin miners and core developers? POW, POS, DPOS... thats for the Bitcoin network to decide. Counterparty can adapt if necessary. Pegged assets are possible using smart contracts/shellingcoin/etc... And its difficult to predict the future of Bitcoin in the next 5 weeks let alone years.
|
|
|
|
delulo
|
|
February 22, 2015, 12:29:11 PM |
|
I have invested in Counterparty (quite a bit!). Here is the issue I have with Counterparty's investor relations policy:
If I don't know what your long term vision is, what your position is on various challenges blockchain technology faces (securing a public ledger in an effective and efficient way at scale (POW is not made to do that), counterparty free pegged assets) and what your perspective is on various technologies (proof of stake, proof of work, delegates proof of stake, market pegged assets)) then I don't know whether XCP is a good long term investment. I want to be a loyal long term investor but need some visionary basis regarding the technological challenges (besides the things you do very well: forming alliances, professional daily PR management).
This is not a request to get 10 visionary articles next week regarding your perspective where blockchain and decentralized exchange technology will go in the next 5 years but it is a polite request for the above in general!
Isn't that entirely up to Bitcoin miners and core developers? POW, POS, DPOS... thats for the Bitcoin network to decide. Counterparty can adapt if necessary. Pegged assets are possible using smart contracts/shellingcoin/etc... And its difficult to predict the future of Bitcoin in the next 5 weeks let alone years. Isn't that entirely up to Bitcoin miners and core developers? POW, POS, DPOS... thats for the Bitcoin network to decide. Counterparty can adapt if necessary. Miners would never kill their revenue stream and change to something that does not involve mining. Bitcoin devs do not seem to include economic realities into their judgement but perceive themselves as the guards of satoshis vision (in a very narrow non future/scale proof way). Pegged assets are possible using smart contracts/shellingcoin/etc... I doubt that someone would make that effort without being compensated. So the counterparty team would have to take it upon themselves. There are many ways to achieve stable counterparty free assets (vitalik's schellingcoin, bitshares' bitassets etc). I'd just like to know what vision the counterparty team has here. And its difficult to predict the future of Bitcoin in the next 5 weeks let alone years. That is mainly because the future (price) involves a lot of market irrationality. What any tech entrepreneur can do is to lay down how he/she thinks what the market's demand is, what the fundamental economic and technical building blocks are he/she wants to put together to meet that demand. Then if the market is rational in the way proposed by the tech entrepreneur then market forces should drive up the value of his/her project.
|
|
|
|
|