[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[MasterMined710]

I've added a few more trolls to my ignore list today bringing the total to over 20 in the last 48 hours. Thanks to illodin, tok, minotaur and everybody else here fighting them!

I hope we keep the Darkcoin "D" logo as there is a ton of great artwork/Memes associated with it...

[droptable]

I've added a few more trolls to my ignore list today bringing the total to over 20 in the last 48 hours. Thanks to illodin, tok, minotaur and everybody else here fighting them!

I hope we keep the Darkcoin "D" logo as there is a ton of great artwork/Memes associated with it...

yea.
the (special) D is important.
and it will be recognizable even if the name is changed.

[njs811]

I've added a few more trolls to my ignore list today bringing the total to over 20 in the last 48 hours. Thanks to illodin, tok, minotaur and everybody else here fighting them!

I hope we keep the Darkcoin "D" logo as there is a ton of great artwork/Memes associated with it...

So is anyone who disagrees with you a troll? I had legitimate concerns. Is my voice not allowed to be heard?

[hashinfo.ru]

gut you!

[dotnetmin]

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

[njs811]

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

[flowerpots]

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

According to https://drk.mn/masternodes.html we have 2323 active masternodes, so we did not lose 200...

[TaoOfSaatoshi]

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

I don't think we lost a single node. We are still well above 2300. You guys are really running out of ideas.
EDIT : Well played Flowerpots! Beaten by a smidge!

[RenegadeMan]

I've added a few more trolls to my ignore list today bringing the total to over 20 in the last 48 hours. Thanks to illodin, tok, minotaur and everybody else here fighting them!

I hope we keep the Darkcoin "D" logo as there is a ton of great artwork/Memes associated with it...

So is anyone who disagrees with you a troll? I had legitimate concerns. Is my voice not allowed to be heard?

This is honestly the first I am hearing about a re-branding... I am a bit disappointed.  

Just Lol

Have you no shame? You've been caught out lying. You've come in here claiming "Oh....I've only just heard....I'm disappointed...."

You're wasting everyone's time trying to start the whole branding discussion all over again from the beginning yet you're over on Spreadcointalk saying "Hey guys, Darkcoin's changing their name.....we should leverage off this....yeah, this could be our great moment...."

It's just dishonest, lame and true troll behaviour.

If you're invested in DRK then add to DRK's success by taking part honestly and positively; not like some snake in the grass.

[Artoodeetoo]

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

No need at all to lower the cost, considering the income, the cost is fine...

[Lyricz]

The name-change was one of the best dessicion ever.
Now this coin can start to get big.

I also think that for the most people darkcoins sounds like something from the ubderground and illegal.
Of course, if you are a 15 year old boy i sounds much cooler to your friends then Dcash, but thats's not all, ...now it's time to go and make buissines.

I bought yesterday my first 500 DRK, ....thanks for the nice price ...looking expectant to the near future.

Are there any date for the officially name-change?  (Exchanges, Wallet,..)

[njs811]

Have you no shame? You've been caught out lying. You've come in here claiming "Oh....I've only just heard....I'm disappointed...."

You're wasting everyone's time trying to start the whole branding discussion all over again from the beginning yet you're over on Spreadcointalk saying "Hey guys, Darkcoin's changing their name.....we should leverage off this....yeah, this could be our great moment...."

It's just dishonest, lame and true troll behaviour.

If you're invested in DRK then add to DRK's success by taking part honestly and positively; not like some snake in the grass.


[/quote]

First of all, I did just hear about it. And I am disappointed. I think Darkcoin got its name from being anonymous and that's what people wanted. It fulfilled a need. Secondly referring to a coin as "Dash" is cause for concern. I would never insist that anyone call there coin; dash, dodge, ditch, run away, get out, leave, etc. Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity. I think DRK would be making a terrible mistake by changing there name and I for one have no problem profiting off of fools.  Fourthly here is my positive contribution: Do not change the name, it would be foolish.

[LiteMine]

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

I don't think we lost a single node. We are still well above 2300. You guys are really running out of ideas.
EDIT : Well played Flowerpots! Beaten by a smidge!

2305 MN's on my 0.11.1.25

Holding strong   Why do they bother lying?

[kointrend]

Darkcoin's CNY market has been opened at https://bter.com/trade/drk_cny , deposit at https://bter.com/myaccount/deposit/DRK … , withdraw at https://bter.com/myaccount/withdraw/DRK …

[dotnetmin]

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

I don't think we lost a single node. We are still well above 2300. You guys are really running out of ideas.
EDIT : Well played Flowerpots! Beaten by a smidge!

@tao, nobody is running out of any ideas. For me it is a fact the we are close under 2100 MN.
Use the function masternode count on your own MN and you will see the number.
The number you can see on any website is maybe not correct.

I do not see a problem with comming down the number of nodes. Some guys did panic and sold their coins so it is normal that the number is going down. It also normal that it needs some time until the new owners are
online with nodes again.

Dont start again the discussion with lowering the 1k coins needed for set up a node.
The 1k is a perfect selection. Still more than 40% of the whole supply is invested on the long term solution.

[illodin]

First of all, I did just hear about it. And I am disappointed. I think Darkcoin got its name from being anonymous and that's what people wanted. It fulfilled a need. Secondly referring to a coin as "Dash" is cause for concern. I would never insist that anyone call there coin; dash, dodge, ditch, run away, get out, leave, etc. Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity. I think DRK would be making a terrible mistake by changing there name and I for one have no problem profiting off of fools.  Fourthly here is my positive contribution: Do not change the name, it would be foolish.

How would you profit off of fools in this case exactly?

[njs811]

First of all, I did just hear about it. And I am disappointed. I think Darkcoin got its name from being anonymous and that's what people wanted. It fulfilled a need. Secondly referring to a coin as "Dash" is cause for concern. I would never insist that anyone call there coin; dash, dodge, ditch, run away, get out, leave, etc. Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity. I think DRK would be making a terrible mistake by changing there name and I for one have no problem profiting off of fools.  Fourthly here is my positive contribution: Do not change the name, it would be foolish.

How would you profit off of fools in this case exactly?

Have you not read my Spreadcoin contribution page? It's all anyone can talk about. Turns out everyone here can psychoanalyze my motives based off of my post. 

[RenegadeMan]

Have you no shame? You've been caught out lying. You've come in here claiming "Oh....I've only just heard....I'm disappointed...."

You're wasting everyone's time trying to start the whole branding discussion all over again from the beginning yet you're over on Spreadcointalk saying "Hey guys, Darkcoin's changing their name.....we should leverage off this....yeah, this could be our great moment...."

It's just dishonest, lame and true troll behaviour.

If you're invested in DRK then add to DRK's success by taking part honestly and positively; not like some snake in the grass.

First of all, I did just hear about it. And I am disappointed. I think Darkcoin got its name from being anonymous and that's what people wanted. It fulfilled a need. Secondly referring to a coin as "Dash" is cause for concern. I would never insist that anyone call there coin; dash, dodge, ditch, run away, get out, leave, etc. Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity. I think DRK would be making a terrible mistake by changing there name and I for one have no problem profiting off of fools.  Fourthly here is my positive contribution: Do not change the name, it would be foolish.

So you're "invested" in Darkcoin....

Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity.

....and you're looking to "Capitalize" on this situation which sounds awfully like you're looking to grab hold of Darkcoin's old name and leverage off all the hard work that's gone into that? Yes?

I think you have the mindset of a domain name squatter.

No wonder Spread's not working out very well with this low-down, poverty/theft based mindset.

You can be quite sure that Evan Duffield and the Foundation will take numerous steps to ensure Darkcoin's name change will not expose the existing IP and brand cache to rogue elements like that.

Maybe you should head back on over to Spread because I don't think your intentions here are even remotely honourable and you've clearly been caught out.

EDIT: fixed your quote/quote problem.

[njs811]

Have you no shame? You've been caught out lying. You've come in here claiming "Oh....I've only just heard....I'm disappointed...."

You're wasting everyone's time trying to start the whole branding discussion all over again from the beginning yet you're over on Spreadcointalk saying "Hey guys, Darkcoin's changing their name.....we should leverage off this....yeah, this could be our great moment...."

It's just dishonest, lame and true troll behaviour.

If you're invested in DRK then add to DRK's success by taking part honestly and positively; not like some snake in the grass.

First of all, I did just hear about it. And I am disappointed. I think Darkcoin got its name from being anonymous and that's what people wanted. It fulfilled a need. Secondly referring to a coin as "Dash" is cause for concern. I would never insist that anyone call there coin; dash, dodge, ditch, run away, get out, leave, etc. Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity. I think DRK would be making a terrible mistake by changing there name and I for one have no problem profiting off of fools.  Fourthly here is my positive contribution: Do not change the name, it would be foolish.

So you're "invested" in Darkcoin....

Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity.

....and you're looking to "Capitalize" on this situation which sounds awfully like you're looking to grab hold of Darkcoin's old name and leverage off all the hard work that's gone into that? Yes?

I think you have the mindset of a domain name squatter.

No wonder Spread's not working out very well with this low-down, poverty/theft based mindset.

You can be quite sure that Evan Duffield and the Foundation will take numerous steps to ensure Darkcoin's name change will not expose the existing IP and brand cache to rogue elements like that.

Maybe you should head back on over to Spread because I don't think your intentions here are even remotely honourable and you've clearly been caught out.


[/quote]

Why the hell would I grab Darkcoin's name? If Darkcoin dumped it that would give us no leverage.

[dotnetmin]

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

I don't think we lost a single node. We are still well above 2300. You guys are really running out of ideas.
EDIT : Well played Flowerpots! Beaten by a smidge!

2305 MN's on my 0.11.1.25

Holding strong   Why do they bother lying?

I did not try to lie. I only post my result of masternode count. Its now 2087.
To double check i did delete my peers.dat and did start the ./darkcoind again
Will post results soon while over time the number is growing slowly over time