The job interview analogy is a sales pitch. You don't need to be so desperate to sell yourself when you got the goods and nobody else does. Seems like we already went over that. Sales pitches are for shitcoins
No, just trying to use an analogy to display that I'm not having the argument you're pretending to have with me... But that's too many times you've gone your own way instead of paying attention. Is there a point to the argument you're having with yourself? Will you every notice or acknowledge the rather different topic I've presented instead of your own made-up angry bit?
I do like your point of dark being avoiding the criminals in high places though, I can see that applying. And the monopoly market-share point is also valid. Not what I was focusing on... But still valid points. I woke up with a boner this morning. A valid point as well, but not related...
I just don't care that much about this conversation anymore... I've said what I wanted to say (with little interest from anyone), and you're talking about something else... I'm tired. Buying some more DRK once my BTC confirms, then going to bed.
You continue to say and reference how bad the name is and invoke RapeYourDaughterCoin on different posts and
how the anonymous features should not be showcased. Most everything I said was about the relevance of the name to adoption and criminal perception even if you couldn't follow. gday...
You lie.
I believe anonymity should be showcased. But in a way that demonstrates that it's not any more anonymous than cash, because that it the point being failed in propaganda already.
The bottom line is that the word 'dark' does not mean what you're pretending it means. You and I understand the meaning you're using, but the rest of the world already sees it as CrimeCoin and using the word Dark only solidifies it as such. You're subscribing tot he idea that all attention is good attention, but you're wrong.
"Just as anonymous as the cash that has existed for centuries." is the idea you're claiming, but you're advertising "Money for Crime!" instead. It seems like an attention-geting scheme, but not a good one. If I want to draw attention to myself or my product, in this case, a cryptocoin, I don't walk up to a cop and shout "hey look at me, free methamphetamine for everybody!"
I'm not suggesting a new name at this point. It's already been changed. I'm saying that this name is a dead albatross and effort will need to be made to explain what Dark means in the context WE want it to be seen, not the way the pre-existing shadow has already been cast. If you don't make that effort, then it will be, by default, seen in the light already cast on all cryptocurrencies; as CrimeCoin and ScamCoin and RapeTYourDaughterCoin and MtGoxFuckedUsAllCoin. If you want to use the word Dark in a completely different way than most people use it, then you'r going to have to say something about it in an infographic, like the one a few pages back that fails to do so... Emphasize it's anonymity through parallels with things already viewed as benign, not by making it sound like a bad thing.
I don't buy hand lotion that advertises it's uncanny ability to strip flesh from bone. Neither would you... The Media and Politicians are taking the "If you have nothing to hide, then you don't care if we're spying on you" approach. You need to counter that, not make it worse.
