[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[coins101]

FUD

The State of the Union

Old schedule...

- RC2 (magic numbers changed to darkcoin, DGW3) : May 14th
- RC2 (masternode payments) : May 25th
- RC3 (10 DRK limit and denominated change) : June 14th
- After this, I'll find someone to vet the code and open source.
- RC4 (Bugs, security issues)
- Testing, then opensource

The masternode issues and the 3rd fork for the 25th actually messed up the schedule. I've been rewriting much of the code masternode technology (released yesterday, if you haven't updated please do!)

There's still some oddities with the election voting system that I'm going to tackle this next week. This I'll start working again on RC3 .

Improvements over this mixing solution are due to include the following features:

* Master Nodes These nodes handle the mixing through random selection -

They are responsible for being the authority of what goes into the joined transaction each session.

eduffield, 21 February 2014 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5282966#msg5282966

* I2P:

I'm implementing I2P into the masternodes. We're going to have our own private network just for DarkSend.

eduffield, 10 May 2014. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6643662#msg6643662

* Ring signatures are going to be implemented in V2.

I will begin development immediately after I opensource V1.

eduffield, 12 May 2014. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6686819#msg6686819

While ring signatures present their own compatibility problems with the core DarkSend and Master Node network, the lead developer has consider the issues and is seeking to implement adaptations:

Ring Signatures, RC3 Progress Report 22 May 2014

I've had some substantial progress on DarkSend and have figured out how to make our existing system as secure as ring signatures. Vastly improved security, no bloat (from the ring signatures) and without actually having to trust new cryptography (it hasn't been extensively tested like what DarkSend uses) . So I think it'll give us a HUGE advantage in the coming months. More to come soon, I'm going to start implementing this tomorrow.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6864666#msg6864666

*IP obfuscation 12 May 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6694377#msg6694377



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=579976.msg6335710#msg6335710



https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=19955.0


http://www.wired.com/2014/05/darkcoin-is-booming/


http://www.coindesk.com/true-anonymity-darkcoin-king-altcoins/

Like Bitcoin, only more private

[1714886184]

1714886184

[1714886184]

1714886184

[1714886184]

1714886184

[1714886184]

1714886184

[1714886184]

1714886184

[1714886184]

1714886184

[techsolution]

I just realized that most of the darkcoins like 90+% are owned by less then 1000 people .

so who made a profit:)

[Terzo]

I just realized that most of the darkcoins like 90+% are owned by less then 1000 people .

I just realised that 90% of the FUD is posted by less than 10 trolls.

I'm not trolling. Actually i belong to this 1000 people . Anyway you can check and comment this link: http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/#!rich

[georgem]

UPDATE YOUR WALLETS.

IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE ALREADY UPDATED, CHECK YOUR VERSION.

IF YOU DON'T HAVE

Stable version (v0.9.4.6)

My wallet says "v0.9.4.6-unk-beta"

is this ok I think?

Before I send DRK to my wallet I always download the newest wallet. Has worked out fine so far.

[aclass]

I can bet the actual number is quite higher though.... You see ... top "holders" like Mintpal and Cryptsy are not ppl. Step back and think again

I just realized that most of the darkcoins like 90+% are owned by less then 1000 people .

Oh? Did you make some kind of survey yourself? Don´t  link the block explorer. Its the list of accounts, not people.
I can bet that the actual number is much smaller.

[Kergekoin]

I just realized that most of the darkcoins like 90+% are owned by less then 1000 people .

Oh? Did you make some kind of survey yourself? Please dont link the block explorer. Its the list of accounts, not people.
I can bet that the actual number is much smaller.

Lol that makes me bag holder .

Some ignorants still cant tell the difference between account and actual people.
I own 6 accounts of one and 3 accounts of another coin. Does that mean im 9 people? Cool.

[techsolution]

I can bet the actual number is quite higher though.... You see ... top "holders" like Mintpal and Cryptsy are not ppl. Step back and think again

I just realized that most of the darkcoins like 90+% are owned by less then 1000 people .

Oh? Did you make some kind of survey yourself? Don´t  link the block explorer. Its the list of accounts, not people.
I can bet that the actual number is much smaller.

so, lets see how many people will loose money:(

[thefrog]

As Darkcoin grows, so does the need for reliable, reputable pools to help keep the growing network distributed, and trusted.

HashFaster has opened a Darkcoin pool @ http://dark.hashfaster.com - Currently 1.5% PPLNS, and will lower to 1% when hashrate reaches over 1GH.

Just like the other 20 pools we run, the pool is super stable, DDoS protected, and ran by the original Crypto Mining Network (https://www.google.com/#q=crypto+mining+network)

Hope you enjoy mining with us.

ZC

I think more miners should use p2pool construct. As this is the truly decentralized mining then, with no single point of failure.

and its even much easier to use, as you don't have to register anywhere, just use a wallet address and that's it.

[luke997]

so, lets see how many people will loose money:(

If you can't look more than 1 day in future, I suggest to sell and move to any other RandomCoin.

If you can, have a look at the development and progress over past 5 months and relax.

[Ed4252]

Do you think coinkite will ever add Darkcoin?

[Severinian]

Is it safe to use http://paper.darkcoin.io/? How can I be sure that it doesn't steal my private key? Or that someone else can get the same one? (You don't have a lot of seconds of moving your mouse around before it's finished)

[coin-swap]

DRK is listed at Coin-Swap.net

Markets
DRK/BTC
DRK/DOGE


Attention Miners: AUTO-SELL
Miners! We have an auto-sell feature so you can set your mining pool address to your order address at Coin-Swap. This will continue to add what you mine to a single order instead of having an order open for each deposit. You can change the price of your order without having to cancel and create a new order. Simply change the price!

Attention Pool operators: Easier order management
Want to offer your payouts in BTC? Want less headache managing your orders? Contact us for more information and special rates.

How to get started at Coin-Swap
Please read our Quick Start guide to help you get started!

Contact Us
If you have any problems or questions about setting up an order please feel free to contact us! coinswapnet at gmail.com or #coin-swap on Freenode.

Ian

[Joshuar]

Evan promised "ring signatures in V2"
Yesterday he had to back peddle and admit it couldn't be done on a Bitcoin fork. You can't trust this kind of behaviour.

Darksend is closed source, no one with half a brain would trust closed source software. I can't wait to see the math on a whitepaper.

If Evan ever comes up with something groundbreaking (will not happen) the Bitcoin devs can copy and implement it. On the other hand, they can never copy cryptonote based coins.

Well , Evan said, that he has something better than ring signatures. But if you like cryptonote there is many clones  . I can tell you cryptonote can't survive a day of heavy trading and many transactions like DARKCOIN .The bloat of the cryptonote chain will be indefinite

Cryptonote has a variety of issues that would make it incapable of surviving for long..

The bloating and scaling issues are very severe, along with the fact that just about anyone can simply fork Bytecoin, and make there own Cryptonote coin, just like the devs of Monero, HoneyPenny, Quazarcoin, and FantomCoin did(all bytecoin clones).

They're all the same and have the exact same features and code since they're forked from Bytecoin, with just different names, no innovation=no future.

[organizer]

so, lets see how many people will loose money:(

If you can't look more than 1 day in future, I suggest to sell and move to any other RandomCoin.

If you can, have a look at the development and progress over past 5 months and relax.

RandomCoin!!! I LOVE IT... i'll launch it Tuesday, i'll mention possibly implementing anonymous transactions and ONLY have 1% premine! IM RICH!

[ImI]

If Evan ever comes up with something groundbreaking (will not happen) the Bitcoin devs can copy and implement it. On the other hand, they can never copy cryptonote based coins.

they won't. like has been said before bitcoin wont add anon-features into the protocol. if they do all achievements in terms of gov acceptance will be lost and bitcoin will be illegal in a matter of months.

[Terzo]

Lets's pump the price ! 

[techsolution]

so, lets see how many people will loose money:(

If you can't look more than 1 day in future, I suggest to sell and move to any other RandomCoin.

If you can, have a look at the development and progress over past 5 months and relax.

where is dev and progress? as i said before do nto suggest to other people for ur own profits:)

[coins101]

so, lets see how many people will loose money:(

If you can't look more than 1 day in future, I suggest to sell and move to any other RandomCoin.

If you can, have a look at the development and progress over past 5 months and relax.

where is dev and progress? as i said before do nto suggest to other people for ur own profits:)

More FUD

FUD

The State of the Union

Old schedule...

- RC2 (magic numbers changed to darkcoin, DGW3) : May 14th
- RC2 (masternode payments) : May 25th
- RC3 (10 DRK limit and denominated change) : June 14th
- After this, I'll find someone to vet the code and open source.
- RC4 (Bugs, security issues)
- Testing, then opensource

The masternode issues and the 3rd fork for the 25th actually messed up the schedule. I've been rewriting much of the code masternode technology (released yesterday, if you haven't updated please do!)

There's still some oddities with the election voting system that I'm going to tackle this next week. This I'll start working again on RC3 .

Improvements over this mixing solution are due to include the following features:

* Master Nodes These nodes handle the mixing through random selection -

They are responsible for being the authority of what goes into the joined transaction each session.

eduffield, 21 February 2014 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5282966#msg5282966

* I2P:

I'm implementing I2P into the masternodes. We're going to have our own private network just for DarkSend.

eduffield, 10 May 2014. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6643662#msg6643662

* Ring signatures are going to be implemented in V2.

I will begin development immediately after I opensource V1.

eduffield, 12 May 2014. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6686819#msg6686819

While ring signatures present their own compatibility problems with the core DarkSend and Master Node network, the lead developer has consider the issues and is seeking to implement adaptations:

Ring Signatures, RC3 Progress Report 22 May 2014

I've had some substantial progress on DarkSend and have figured out how to make our existing system as secure as ring signatures. Vastly improved security, no bloat (from the ring signatures) and without actually having to trust new cryptography (it hasn't been extensively tested like what DarkSend uses) . So I think it'll give us a HUGE advantage in the coming months. More to come soon, I'm going to start implementing this tomorrow.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6864666#msg6864666

*IP obfuscation 12 May 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6694377#msg6694377



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=579976.msg6335710#msg6335710



https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=19955.0


http://www.wired.com/2014/05/darkcoin-is-booming/


http://www.coindesk.com/true-anonymity-darkcoin-king-altcoins/

Like Bitcoin, only more private

[coins101]

Cryptonote has a variety of issues that would make it incapable of surviving for long..

The bloating and scaling issues are very severe, along with the fact that just about anyone can simply fork Bytecoin, and make there own Cryptonote coin, just like the devs of Monero, HoneyPenny, Quazarcoin, and FantomCoin did(all bytecoin clones).

They're all the same and have the exact same features and code since they're forked from Bytecoin, with just different names, no innovation=no future.

Cryptonote has just one issue that is holding it back - its shit

[techsolution]

Lets's pump the price ! 

for what?