[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[Minotaur26]

here it is
http://pastebin.aquilenet.fr/?adf6ae11d55baf22#t9LpvsROUMe+AFIPRPfy2uRg5gv2CNCllWAIl1D9+HU=
tltr for me lazy crackhead
dindn't buy back anyways
this price is so fake ...
isn't it ?

No it is not fake, the price is very solid and has been very stable.  Those chat logs are actually really reassuring, there is nothing but good things about Evan's competence and integrity there I really don't know what you are talking about. It seems like you are trying to spin something positive into a bad thing.

You found out because Evan decided to do a public statement about InternetApe no longer being involved with the project, that shows transparency. It is the same thing as when companies let go of an important employee. In this case I think Kyle was a little distressed but in the end he was cool.

We humans love drama, in this case I must say my dramatic side was dissapointed there wasnt anything special there, if anything I think Evan made the right decision, we move on.

[McHammer]

here it is
http://pastebin.aquilenet.fr/?adf6ae11d55baf22#t9LpvsROUMe+AFIPRPfy2uRg5gv2CNCllWAIl1D9+HU=
tltr for me lazy crackhead
dindn't buy back anyways
this price is so fake ...
isn't it ?

No it is not fake, the price is very solid and has been very stable.  Those chat logs are actually really reassuring, there is nothing but good things about Evan's competence and integrity there I really don't know what you are talking about. It seems like you are trying to spin something positive into a bad thing.

You found out because Evan decided to do a public statement about InternetApe no longer being involved with the project, that shows transparency. It is the same thing as when companies let go of an important employee. In this case I think Kyle was a little distressed but in the end he was cool.

We humans love drama, in this case I must say my dramatic side was dissapointed there wasnt anything special there, if anything I think Evan made the right decision, we move on.

i agree on everything except the price thing
maybe the price is managed very solid yea ...
still convinced there is a bot controlling the price

[Kai Proctor]

i agree on everything except the price thing
maybe the price is managed very solid yea ...
still convinced there is a bot controlling the price

Yeah right ... Because you sold all your coins and were hoping to buy back in cheaper.

i sold

wondering when the dump comes

[McHammer]

and i'm still waiting on that rebuy, yes
imo the price could go down 100% in 1 day darkcoin stylez
(or 100% up in one day ....)
bot induced panic on an "event" like this , why not?
feels too risky to buy back at these times .. still im only speculating...
you dont know either ... but you are holding atm as i see
drk has hurt me many times ... beeing a 100% believer is dumb and dangerous
its all about $$$

[splawik21]

... beeing a 100% believer is dumb and dangerous

...not beeing a believer is dumb and dangerous.
Where any invencion and its project would arrive if not a strong believe?

[Kai Proctor]

and i'm still waiting on that rebuy, yes
imo the price could go down 100% in 1 day darkcoin stylez
(or 100% up in one day ....)
bot induced panic on an "event" like this , why not?
feels too risky to buy back at these times .. still im only speculating...
you dont know either ... but you are holding atm as i see
drk has hurt me many times ... beeing a 100% believer is dumb and dangerous

Speculating or trying to manipulate the price by spreading BS ? 

[McHammer]

and i'm still waiting on that rebuy, yes
imo the price could go down 100% in 1 day darkcoin stylez
(or 100% up in one day ....)
bot induced panic on an "event" like this , why not?
feels too risky to buy back at these times .. still im only speculating...
you dont know either ... but you are holding atm as i see
drk has hurt me many times ... beeing a 100% believer is dumb and dangerous

Speculating or trying to manipulate the price by spreading BS ?  

where did i spread BS ?
can you prove price is not manipulated ?
no
can you prove the opposite?
no
as i said im speculating ... just my opinion hardcore fanboy

[splawik21]

interesting moment
http://scr.hu/1ame/hetcf

[tungfa]

come on
McHammer is high on my Troll list,
so please do not quote him with that nonsense !!
 

[McHammer]

"that nonsense"
WHICH NONSENSE?
if you are not even considering price manipulations you are STUPID or a hypocrit/lying
totally not realistic a market like dark has no major players

[Kai Proctor]

where did i spread BS ?
can you prove price is not manipulated ?
no
can you prove the opposite?
no
as i said im speculating ... just my opinion hardcore fanboy

Can you prove it is ? You are the one making bold statements, why do I have to prove anything ?
And please stop with "fanboy this" "fanboy that" it irks me, are you 12 ?

[raganius]

Are you into the Dark, and speak a language other than English? Would you be good at translating official announcements?

Join DARKCOIN WORLDWIDE!

https://twitter.com/TaoOfSatoshi/status/543489662560378880?s=09

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoin-worldwide.3214/

Serious Volunteers only!

You can count on me as a volunteer for the necessary (Brazilian) Portuguese translations.

It's an honour for me to help the Darkcoin community.

[MyFarm]

Acquisitions have to come from capital. Everyone in crypto should agree that generating a super block of coins is out of question.

Why?

Creating additional shares in a business is very common practice.  And if done properly and used in a beneficial manner, investors are ok with share dilution because they understand it will lead to greater value of their existing shares.

Now, if you were acquiring a coin, what you care most about is the developer(s).  As such, you would set very strict vesting intervals to ensure that the dev continued to work on the coin and reach set goals.  

Creating shares and currency are two very different things. One is equity, one is capital. Sure, if you are treating Darkcoin as an investment, then I could see your logic, but at its core, it's currency/commodity and creating something from nothing sets poor precedence. People that understand crypto enjoy the fact that reward structure shouldn't be changing at a whim. Having the kind of centralization aspect of deciding "oh hey, we should absorb this coin by creating 1 million new coins" is ridiculous. It completely changes what crypto stands for. I wasn't against the idea of the SDC merger, I was against the idea of changing the reward structure via superblock. It's completely off the table, regardless of opportunity, to issue new coins. I was against the airdrop back in March/April as well.

You make good points and I am enjoying the debate.

The problem I see and the mistake that most people in cryptocurrency circles make, is thinking of these coins as pure currency like dollars.  Instead of dollars, you want Darkcoin.  Instead of the Federal Reserve, you want the free market.  

With dollars, there is an entity that says, "THIS is the means of exchange" and there hasn't been any real competition for hundreds of years.  With cryptocurrency, there is new competition every single day.  At some point developers of a coin may say, "We're done except for critical bug fixes" but we've begun a new era of currency/economic exchange.  Technology is progressing at an ever-increasing rate and that top 10 coin that is "Done" today will be nothing in 3, 5, or 10 years because technological innovations will make it obsolete and new coins will take over.  In order for a coin to continue to dominate, it will have to adapt to changing technology, economic situations, and governmental regulation (not saying they have to comply with regulations of course but it will affect cryptocurrencies).

In order to compete, a coin needs top developers who are creative innovators, strong business acumen, and a militant community of supporters.  Because of the low burden of entry and enormous potential reward in cryptocurrency, many good developers who enter the field are going to want to start their own coin which will lead to brain dilution.  Through the strategic use of acquisition, those developers can be brought under a single umbrella.  Without it, a coin WILL be passed sooner or later.  Look at the number of developers behind Ripple and the kind of people in charge there.  As more money pours into cryptocurrency and it becomes a bigger industry, there WILL be business seasoned/hardened executives leading coin development initiatives.  And I guarantee you they will be doing strategic acquisitions and the big money investors/hedge fund types will love it.  Taking the means to acquire coins off the table would be an enormous mistake.

There's a reason companies like Google and Apple buy up tons of small companies each year.  Occasionally it's for the technology, but the vast majority of the time it's for the developers.  If either company stopped and said, "We're done" they understand that, despite their positions today, with the way technology is advancing, they would be nothing within a short time.

[McHammer]

where did i spread BS ?
can you prove price is not manipulated ?
no
can you prove the opposite?
no
as i said im speculating ... just my opinion hardcore fanboy

Can you prove it is ? You are the one making bold statements, why do I have to prove anything ?
And please stop with "fanboy this" "fanboy that" it irks me, are you 12 ?

did i ever said i can ?
no ?
drkfanboyfaggot
always the same , in every thread, you write something critical and all faggots like you come to attack me
doesnt matter im writing 10 times im speculating
whining bitch

[Kai Proctor]

where did i spread BS ?
can you prove price is not manipulated ?
no
can you prove the opposite?
no
as i said im speculating ... just my opinion hardcore fanboy

Can you prove it is ? You are the one making bold statements, why do I have to prove anything ?
And please stop with "fanboy this" "fanboy that" it irks me, are you 12 ?

did i ever said i can ?
no ?
drkfanboyfaggot
always the same , in every thread, you write something critical and all faggots like you come to attack me
doesnt matter im writing 10 times im speculating
whining bitch

Sorry did I say 12 ? 6 it is. 

[McHammer]

go all in with your life savings
drk is a 100% sure thing
trololol

i would never get attacked on a post like this

[Propulsion]

go all in with your life savings
drk is a 100% sure thing
trololol

i would never get attacked on a post like this

I just took out a loan to do all this. Thanks for the advice!

[TanteStefana2]

So last night my husband was telling me about how the Federal Reserve was created.  What a story!  I just googled it, and if anyone is interested, here it is:
http://www.jekyllislandhistory.com/federalreserve.shtml

It was formed so that they could control the economy and keep the ups and downs under control, LOL.  They've done a great job since 1907, don't you think?     

[stonehedge]

Don't rent these farms, 100 Gh/s and 70 Gh/s x11, they look fake.

https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/13743/

https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/13751/


I can't find any x11 coins where these are parked so they are most likely fake, still I'm sure someone is going to lose BTC on these 

Just to confirm that I am currently renting one of these farms (so nobody else has too ) and I think I know who it is.

Steer clear.  You'll get 5Ghs for a few minutes and then 30,000 invalid shares in a few seconds getting you booted from the pool you are using.

They aren't responding to comms either.  I have good contacts with the miningrigrentals team and I have a feeling that these rigs have been banned by them before.

[Cryptosis]

So last night my husband was telling me about how the Federal Reserve was created.  What a story!  I just googled it, and if anyone is interested, here it is:
http://www.jekyllislandhistory.com/federalreserve.shtml

It was formed so that they could control the economy and keep the ups and downs under control, LOL.  They've done a great job since 1907, don't you think?     

The kicker is most people know nothing of the fed or how it was created or how it's not even a federal entity, it's privately owned by a board of elite bankers. The sad thing is even if most people knew they wouldn't care as long as their dollar still buys what they need/want. Change will only come when inflation dilutes the buying power to such a point that most won't be able to survive. In the states it seems that is becoming a reality daily.