wawaderwaran
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
February 12, 2014, 02:56:45 AM |
|
Finally got it working. Changes in your conf file
rpcport=28332 port=9337
And in your bat file
127.0.0.1:28332
Oh, strange. It worked for me the way it was though ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
EdwardWitten
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
February 12, 2014, 02:56:52 AM |
|
So are you guys running with ,inasne # of threads or only one thread per CPU?
|
|
|
|
gatra (OP)
|
|
February 12, 2014, 02:58:33 AM |
|
@BChydro Are you new to mining ? These are khash per thread. Of course they don't vary with the number of threads ...
If you're using more threads than number of cores your cpu has, mining speed per thread should decrease. That instance has 32 cores, mining speed should max out at 32 threads. But the client reports the exact same speed per thread, even when I stuff 32 threads per core (1024 threads) That makes no sense. That happens only in the first round when threads are initialized and tested. Leave it running 10 seconds and you'll see that if you have more threads than cores and you keep adding threads then each one starts going slower and the total mining speed does not improve.
|
|
|
|
paulthetafy
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:01:50 AM |
|
There has to be an optimised miner here - im not getting anywhere near what I should be with 4000 cores on it. (Yes cores).
Who is mining this with a large farm and what stats are you getting?
|
|
|
|
krneki
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:01:55 AM |
|
is these ok ?mining with not the best computer and don't know if these is ok or do i have any chance for smth ?  { "blocks" : 1206, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 2, "errors" : "", "generate" : true, "genproclimit" : -1, " hashespersec" : 40506958,"pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false }
|
|
|
|
cocoxxx
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:06:58 AM |
|
have any pool?? hard to mine
|
ShareCoin:SV4bDxoaex4DoBxCMfAMbHyxV8hhuSXLBa
|
|
|
Al_Bundy
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:08:18 AM |
|
Can't get wallet to connect with these nodes: addnode=194.97.156.59 addnode=76.102.71.50 addnode=79.135.200.61 addnode=162.248.98.162 addnode=64.79.107.5 addnode=192.241.129.169 addnode=173.193.48.174 addnode=107.170.26.188 addnode=67.225.172.77 addnode=198.144.180.117 addnode=198.144.180.118 addnode=213.239.207.114:28333 addnode=108.161.145.12:28333 addnode=198.98.52.244:28333 addnode=198.98.52.244:28333 addnode=54.198.193.96:28333 addnode=162.243.118.47:28333 addnode=54.237.23.244:28333 addnode=107.170.32.187:28333 addnode=95.138.166.126:28333
Any others I can try?
|
|
|
|
mmiaow
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:10:14 AM |
|
Can't get wallet to connect with these nodes: ... Any others I can try?
addnode=188.165.216.59 addnode=194.97.156.59 addnode=141.70.81.135 addnode=195.154.211.220 addnode=81.84.254.209 addnode=195.154.189.241 addnode=64.79.106.198 addnode=54.244.163.107 addnode=69.4.239.48 addnode=54.213.38.6 addnode=188.226.159.167 addnode=194.97.156.59 addnode=76.102.71.50 addnode=79.135.200.61 addnode=162.248.98.162 addnode=64.79.107.5 addnode=192.241.129.169 addnode=173.193.48.174 addnode=188.165.216.59:28333 addnode=194.97.156.59:28333 addnode=162.218.208.166:59945 addnode=5.83.137.131:38486 addnode=89.182.2.122:41312 addnode=195.47.113.76:39958 addnode=193.66.139.206:40381 addnode=193.87.208.3:46531 addnode=5.83.137.130:18047 addnode=144.76.225.167:56948 addnode=85.17.164.246:38590 addnode=37.128.134.156:57262 addnode=193.87.208.3:51571 addnode=193.87.208.30:59797 addnode=193.87.208.30:60328 addnode=193.166.139.206:37144 addnode=107.170.46.235:53304 addnode=106.187.91.40:28333 addnode=188.226.159.167:28333 addnode=54.213.38.6:28333 addnode=69.4.239.48:28333 addnode=54.244.163.107:28333 addnode=64.79.106.198:28333 addnode=195.154.189.241:39183 addnode=81.84.254.209:37117 addnode=195.154.211.220:50606 addnode=147.70.81.135:45041 From my conf, just replace your original ones, duplicated entries may exist.
|
|
|
|
Al_Bundy
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:13:22 AM |
|
Thank you sir.
Still no go. Number of connections briefly changes from 0 to 1 and back to 0. And repeat for a while Weird.
|
|
|
|
dinominant
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:14:17 AM |
|
There has to be an optimised miner here - im not getting anywhere near what I should be with 4000 cores on it. (Yes cores).
Who is mining this with a large farm and what stats are you getting?
I though I had a lot of cores going at ~100. I had problems getting more then ~100 threads mining on a single riecoind instance, so in desperation I switched to solomining on each host. I'll have to merge the wallets later, but I am getting about 500000 to 1200000 knumbers/s (per host) and from the few wallets I am monitoring I have found zero blocks.
|
|
|
|
micryon
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:16:40 AM |
|
There has to be an optimised miner here - im not getting anywhere near what I should be with 4000 cores on it. (Yes cores).
Who is mining this with a large farm and what stats are you getting?
I though I had a lot of cores going at ~100. I had problems getting more then ~100 threads mining on a single riecoind instance, so in desperation I switched to solomining on each host. I'll have to merge the wallets later, but I am getting about 500000 to 1200000 knumbers/s (per host) and from the few wallets I am monitoring I have found zero blocks. I had the same problem as you did.. but i ended up just just solomining on each host using the same wallet.. It seems to work..
|
VTC: Vi5NxyF6FPCCEQDrsDcA34P8pXe1Yck21y PDR: PP3EQsV3oX9bBkjpsnESguMHz3tfMqHXhy PlanetDollar
|
|
|
paulthetafy
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:19:29 AM |
|
There has to be an optimised miner here - im not getting anywhere near what I should be with 4000 cores on it. (Yes cores).
Who is mining this with a large farm and what stats are you getting?
I though I had a lot of cores going at ~100. I had problems getting more then ~100 threads mining on a single riecoind instance, so in desperation I switched to solomining on each host. I'll have to merge the wallets later, but I am getting about 500000 to 1200000 knumbers/s (per host) and from the few wallets I am monitoring I have found zero blocks. Edit: yes I solo mine on each host. Much easier. the easiest approach so this is to use the same copy of wallet.dat on each instance. you should generate is with more keys first though (launch riecoind -keypool=<n> ). I usually suggest 1000, though in practice with this coin 100 should be plenty (thats 100 blocks mined per instance before wallet deviation). That's the way I approach it anyway. I'm still convinced there is an opimised miner out there. I should be getting blocks every 14 mins now, and I'm not. I have had 4 blocks since launch with 4000 cores
|
|
|
|
Al_Bundy
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:22:02 AM |
|
Thank you sir.
Still no go. Number of connections briefly changes from 0 to 1 and back to 0. And repeat for a while Weird.
Sample of my debug log: 2014-02-12 03:17:44 trying connection 64.79.106.198:28333 lastseen=358937.5hrs 2014-02-12 03:17:44 connected 64.79.106.198:28333 2014-02-12 03:17:44 send version message: version 10070001, blocks=0, us=74.73.87.245:28333, them=64.79.106.198:28333, peer=64.79.106.198:28333 2014-02-12 03:17:45 socket closed I appreciate your suggestions. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Walking Glitch
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Amateur Professional
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:22:17 AM |
|
There has to be an optimised miner here - im not getting anywhere near what I should be with 4000 cores on it. (Yes cores).
Who is mining this with a large farm and what stats are you getting?
I'm mining 64 cores since before the diff had hit 100, and I have still to find a block.
|
|
|
|
dinominant
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:24:03 AM |
|
There has to be an optimised miner here - im not getting anywhere near what I should be with 4000 cores on it. (Yes cores).
Who is mining this with a large farm and what stats are you getting?
I though I had a lot of cores going at ~100. I had problems getting more then ~100 threads mining on a single riecoind instance, so in desperation I switched to solomining on each host. I'll have to merge the wallets later, but I am getting about 500000 to 1200000 knumbers/s (per host) and from the few wallets I am monitoring I have found zero blocks. Edit: yes I solo mine on each host. Much easier. the easiest approach so this is to use the same copy of wallet.dat on each instance. you should generate is with more keys first though (launch riecoind -keypool=<n> ). I usually suggest 1000, though in practice with this coin 100 should be plenty (thats 100 blocks mined per instance before wallet deviation). That's the way I approach it anyway. I'm still convinced there is an opimised miner out there. I should be getting blocks every 14 mins now, and I'm not. I have had 4 blocks since launch with 4000 cores I had a wallet with 10000 keys pre-generated prior to the launch but I didn't have it distributed to the various hosts, and with all the attempts at restarting riecoind I didn't trust it's integrity. Also, what's to say each host is not testing the same pseudoprimes? How are the candidate numbers chosen and how is the PRNG seeded? Is it seeded with your receiving address and the previous block hash? If so, then you might have 4000 hosts all testing the exact same numbers.
|
|
|
|
avesdude
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:27:35 AM |
|
I get nothing but timeouts too. Can't sync.
|
|
|
|
paulthetafy
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:30:49 AM |
|
There has to be an optimised miner here - im not getting anywhere near what I should be with 4000 cores on it. (Yes cores).
Who is mining this with a large farm and what stats are you getting?
I though I had a lot of cores going at ~100. I had problems getting more then ~100 threads mining on a single riecoind instance, so in desperation I switched to solomining on each host. I'll have to merge the wallets later, but I am getting about 500000 to 1200000 knumbers/s (per host) and from the few wallets I am monitoring I have found zero blocks. Edit: yes I solo mine on each host. Much easier. the easiest approach so this is to use the same copy of wallet.dat on each instance. you should generate is with more keys first though (launch riecoind -keypool=<n> ). I usually suggest 1000, though in practice with this coin 100 should be plenty (thats 100 blocks mined per instance before wallet deviation). That's the way I approach it anyway. I'm still convinced there is an opimised miner out there. I should be getting blocks every 14 mins now, and I'm not. I have had 4 blocks since launch with 4000 cores I had a wallet with 10000 keys pre-generated prior to the launch but I didn't have it distributed to the various hosts, and with all the attempts at restarting riecoind I didn't trust it's integrity. Also, what's to say each host is not testing the same pseudoprimes? How are the candidate numbers chosen and how is the PRNG seeded? Is it seeded with your receiving address and the previous block hash? If so, then you might have 4000 hosts all testing the exact same numbers. THAT is a very very good point. Checking the source now. also I am using an image to replicate across my farm. that might not be helping things (though has been fine for other coins)
|
|
|
|
see360
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:31:36 AM |
|
6456 seconds down, only 703,000 seconds (8 days, 3 hours) to go :-) i7 3820 @ 3.6 GHz, So far I've only tried this with minerd.
|
|
|
|
6strings
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:33:13 AM |
|
At this difficulty, I think a price of at least 0.005-0.01 each seems sensible. They are HARD to mine
0.006-0.008 is where i'd put it. this is difficult to mine. holy hell with what im throwing at it i expected much more. awesome though.
|
|
|
|
gatra (OP)
|
|
February 12, 2014, 03:34:46 AM |
|
I'll leave you some nodes and go to sleep...
addnode=107.170.26.188 addnode=107.170.32.187:28333 addnode=107.170.37.13 addnode=107.170.40.168:28333 addnode=108.161.145.12:28333 addnode=162.243.118.47:28333 addnode=162.243.208.55 addnode=162.248.98.162 addnode=173.193.48.174 addnode=182.32.194.1 addnode=192.241.129.169 addnode=194.97.156.59:28333 addnode=195.47.113.76:28333 addnode=198.144.180.117 addnode=198.144.180.118 addnode=198.98.52.244:28333 addnode=213.239.207.114:28333 addnode=5.83.137.130:28333 addnode=5.83.137.131:28333 addnode=54.197.67.63 addnode=54.198.193.96:28333 addnode=54.204.214.12 addnode=54.234.17.173 addnode=54.237.23.244:28333 addnode=62.210.141.204:28333 addnode=64.79.107.5 addnode=67.225.172.77 addnode=76.102.71.50 addnode=77.172.93.38:28333 addnode=79.135.200.61 addnode=81.27.206.10:28333 addnode=95.138.166.108 addnode=95.138.166.126:28333 addnode=98.121.202.169
|
|
|
|
|