[ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record

[o3u]

WTS 100 riecoin for 1 BTC

PM me, you send first, or escrow (which you pay.)

[1714904766]

1714904766

[1714904766]

1714904766

[sang]

WTS 600 RIE - PM with Offers. Can sell in smaller lots.

[halabibk]

how much

[Hampuz]

Selling 300 Riecoin, Pm me your offer! Can sell 50 as smallest sell

[truckythin]

Selling 300 Riecoin, Pm me your offer! Can sell 50 as smallest sell

Trust: -4: -1 / +0(0)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!   

[Hampuz]

Selling 300 Riecoin, Pm me your offer! Can sell 50 as smallest sell

Trust: -4: -1 / +0(0)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!   

Well, only one neg rep, you can watch what it is, it aint nothing to do with trading .  But i agree with you,

[truckythin]

hi gatra,

any news on optimized miner?

[Vorksholk]

Selling up to 500 RIC @ 0.009 BTC each. If you are trusted, I can send small amounts first. Otherwise, we can either use trusted escrow, or we can send in small amounts with you starting.

[rim12]

WTS 2.69 riecoin for 27 maxcoin best price around
u send first at small increments or we use trusted escrow, u pay fees

[happicow]

If you ever get around to releasing the p2pool code, let me know.  I have a server ready to go.

[makevoid]

Selling 10-25-50 RIC @ 0.009 BTC each. If you are trusted, I can send small amounts first. Otherwise, we can either use trusted escrow, or we can send in small amounts with you starting. (proof: http://uploads.makevoid.com/riecoin_first_block.png)

[vinani]

I would like to offer 50RIC for the private build of optimized rminerd version that increase perm to 80%

PM me

[dxas1]

need a pool!!!

[gatra]

How to calculate network scanrate or processing power ("hashrate" does not apply: we are not hashing, we are scanning ranges of numbers in search for prime sextuplets):

scanrate = pow( diff * ln(2), 6 ) * 0.05780811 / 150

Where diff is the difficulty as shown in "getwork", currently 776
so scanrate is 9.3 TeraNumbers per second
Divide that by your total knumbers (careful with units: T vs K) per second and you get how many systems like yours would comprise the total network.

I guess 40000 i5 with 4 cores @ 2.6MHz each, or 160000 cores?

Please check the math and correct me if I'm wrong.

This is the reverse of what is calculated in riecoin_time_to_block() in scanriecoin.c in the cpuminer.

Have in mind that scanrate SHOULD ALWAYS BE COMPARED AT THE SAME DIFFICULTY. Since the scanrate decreases as difficulty increases. So it's ok for relative measurements of common difficulty, but has to be normalized if you want to compare at different prime sizes (difficulties).

If in the future we go from 9 to, say, 5 it doesn't mean the network grew or shrinked, it means nothing if values are not normalized for difficulty. Theoretical normalization for difficulty is possible but hard and would introduce errors. The easy way to do it is to actually measure in practice, relative to your PC. Like I did: currently it's about 160K cores and that's the value that's comparable in time.

[jl777]

does anybody know how many have been mined so far?

[paulthetafy]

How to calculate network scanrate or processing power ("hashrate" does not apply: we are not hashing, we are scanning ranges of numbers in search for prime sextuplets):

scanrate = pow( diff * ln(2), 6 ) * 0.05780811 / 150

Where diff is the difficulty as shown in "getwork", currently 776
so scanrate is 9.3 TeraNumbers per second
Divide that by your total knumbers (careful with units: T vs K) per second and you get how many systems like yours would comprise the total network.

I guess 40000 i5 with 4 cores @ 2.6MHz each, or 160000 cores?

Please check the math and correct me if I'm wrong.

This is the reverse of what is calculated in riecoin_time_to_block() in scanriecoin.c in the cpuminer.

Have in mind that scanrate SHOULD ALWAYS BE COMPARED AT THE SAME DIFFICULTY. Since the scanrate decreases as difficulty increases. So it's ok for relative measurements of common difficulty, but has to be normalized if you want to compare at different prime sizes (difficulties).

If in the future we go from 9 to, say, 5 it doesn't mean the network grew or shrinked, it means nothing if values are not normalized for difficulty. Theoretical normalization for difficulty is possible but hard and would introduce errors. The easy way to do it is to actually measure in practice, relative to your PC. Like I did: currently it's about 160K cores and that's the value that's comparable in time.

That's a pretty insane number.  How does it account for those who have modded the miner with significant performance increases?  My guess is that there are a select few out there with significantly optimized miners that are mining the lions share of blocks and skewing these figures

[rim12]

i dont think there are alot of ppl with modified miners out there, diff and blocks are opening slowly and diff isnt going wild at all, just coin is super hard to mine

[truckythin]

i dont think there are alot of ppl with modified miners out there, diff and blocks are opening slowly and diff isnt going wild at all, just coin is super hard to mine

not true, with some miner with super optimized that can increase performance to 100-200% plus lot of cores can kick out all small miners out of the game...

[keepwalking1234]

WTS  600 RIE =3.6 BTC

PM me your offer!

[luigi1111]

Hello! WTS 33 RIC at .009 per. PM me other bids if you want.