DuskNetwork (OP)
Copper Member
Member
 Offline
Activity: 474
Merit: 21
|
 |
October 11, 2018, 08:02:25 AM |
|
I have seen other similar project using that vesting strategy, it doesn't guarantee a stable price, but at least give some breathing space to small investors.
Well if team doesn't have a vesting period but they believe the project, they won't sell. Still, it is a guarantee for investors that founders won't dump at day one. Doesn't have a big impact if they are trustworthy. The team has their tokens locked for 12 months + 12 month vesting period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DuskNetwork (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 474
Merit: 21
|
|
October 11, 2018, 08:05:38 AM |
|
I hope the team will be able to clarify this aspect - very large bonuses can ruin the project as soon as the first listing will be appears.
I too feel it may lead to a wrong type of promotion because once the token is listed, the early investors or those who got large bonuses may try to cash their profit out. Everyone is subject to the SbS vesting mechanism. No one received any bonusses and the team has their tokens locked for 12 months + 12 months of vesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
sambuddha
|
|
October 11, 2018, 08:06:50 AM |
|
Looks like security token offerings are stepping in the limelight lately. Which is kind of weird when we had a period where almost every crypto project desperately tried to avoid their token being labeled a security. What has happened that security tokens are seen more favorably now?
Security tokens are much more profitable for investors, especially in the red market. Everyone wants to receive dividends)) |
|
|
|
|
cevap
Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
www.Zercados.com
|
|
October 11, 2018, 10:27:40 AM |
|
Looks like security token offerings are stepping in the limelight lately. Which is kind of weird when we had a period where almost every crypto project desperately tried to avoid their token being labeled a security. What has happened that security tokens are seen more favorably now?
Security tokens are much more profitable for investors, especially in the red market. Everyone wants to receive dividends)) Security tokens are definitely more preferable for investors, but they demand much more from the team. There are more rules for security tokens to comply with to avoid problems with regulative authorities, maybe that's why many projects wanted to keep their tokens as utility tokens. |
|
|
|
bitcoinbulk
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Ternion | Hybrid Crypto Exchange with fiat gateway
|
|
October 11, 2018, 11:31:26 AM |
|
I have seen other similar project using that vesting strategy, it doesn't guarantee a stable price, but at least give some breathing space to small investors.
Well if team doesn't have a vesting period but they believe the project, they won't sell. Still, it is a guarantee for investors that founders won't dump at day one. Doesn't have a big impact if they are trustworthy. It's a touch subject to tackle. The team should obviously be able to sell come coins so that they can get paid for their hard work but obviously no one wants to see the price dumped. |
|
|
|
king_of_alts
Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
|
|
October 11, 2018, 12:11:54 PM |
|
I have seen other similar project using that vesting strategy, it doesn't guarantee a stable price, but at least give some breathing space to small investors.
Well if team doesn't have a vesting period but they believe the project, they won't sell. Still, it is a guarantee for investors that founders won't dump at day one. Doesn't have a big impact if they are trustworthy. It's a touch subject to tackle. The team should obviously be able to sell come coins so that they can get paid for their hard work but obviously no one wants to see the price dumped. I think in startup business most early investors and founders have a vesting period. It is a best practice strategy as it eliminates moral hazard. |
|
|
|
|
DuskNetwork (OP)
Copper Member
Member
Offline
Activity: 474
Merit: 21
|
|
October 11, 2018, 12:28:19 PM |
|
I have seen other similar project using that vesting strategy, it doesn't guarantee a stable price, but at least give some breathing space to small investors.
Well if team doesn't have a vesting period but they believe the project, they won't sell. Still, it is a guarantee for investors that founders won't dump at day one. Doesn't have a big impact if they are trustworthy. It's a touch subject to tackle. The team should obviously be able to sell come coins so that they can get paid for their hard work but obviously no one wants to see the price dumped. I think in startup business most early investors and founders have a vesting period. It is a best practice strategy as it eliminates moral hazard. Everyone is subject to the SbS vesting mechanism. No one received any bonusses and the team has their tokens locked for 12 months + 12 months of vesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
pynetx
|
|
October 11, 2018, 01:11:42 PM |
|
Looks like security token offerings are stepping in the limelight lately. Which is kind of weird when we had a period where almost every crypto project desperately tried to avoid their token being labeled a security. What has happened that security tokens are seen more favorably now?
The real purpose of crypto is to avoid the government's unnecessary involvement but, bitcoin is not able to get out of their shadows. That's why my bet is on something anonymous. |
|
|
|
|
|
belechau
|
|
October 11, 2018, 01:18:11 PM |
|
Actually, evictions can be considered in projects without purpose, without actual use, or in projects with exacerbated rewards, I do not see this in Dusk, if it really happens, it will be the result of discontinued work. From the way the project is promising and everything they crave for the currency, it is very difficult to believe in this possibility, because even the bonuses granted will be valued and maintained, I believe |
|
|
|
|
o48o
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1174
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
October 11, 2018, 01:46:20 PM |
|
Looks like security token offerings are stepping in the limelight lately. Which is kind of weird when we had a period where almost every crypto project desperately tried to avoid their token being labeled a security. What has happened that security tokens are seen more favorably now?
The real purpose of crypto is to avoid the government's unnecessary involvement but, bitcoin is not able to get out of their shadows. That's why my bet is on something anonymous. The "real purpose" is debatable. If that were the case, then why would the people be so excited about the ETF or any government go ahead. There's a purpose for anonymity, but i don't think we have to forget the government's part in the adoption. |
| ..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄
██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████
██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀
██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██
██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████
██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀
██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██
▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄
█ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌
█ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █
█ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌
█ ██████████ █ ▐ █
█ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌
█ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █
█ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌
█ █▐ █
█ █▐▐▌
█ █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄
██ ▐█▌ ██
████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀ █████████████ ▀███
██ ███████████ ██
▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀
▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████ ███████▀
▀█████▄ ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
|
zgrdyg
|
|
October 11, 2018, 03:27:30 PM |
|
Looks like security token offerings are stepping in the limelight lately. Which is kind of weird when we had a period where almost every crypto project desperately tried to avoid their token being labeled a security. What has happened that security tokens are seen more favorably now?
Security tokens are much more profitable for investors, especially in the red market. Everyone wants to receive dividends)) I do prefer the security tokens too, i am earning some money while i am sitting on my desk. |
|
|
|
|
iad_xo
|
|
October 11, 2018, 05:30:20 PM |
|
is DUSK going to work with Hardware wallets to further secure all users (multi-factor auth)?
|
|
|
|
|
kraterion
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 616
Merit: 145
🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀
|
|
October 11, 2018, 05:48:20 PM |
|
Looks like security token offerings are stepping in the limelight lately. Which is kind of weird when we had a period where almost every crypto project desperately tried to avoid their token being labeled a security. What has happened that security tokens are seen more favorably now?
The real purpose of crypto is to avoid the government's unnecessary involvement but, bitcoin is not able to get out of their shadows. That's why my bet is on something anonymous. The "real purpose" is debatable. If that were the case, then why would the people be so excited about the ETF or any government go ahead. There's a purpose for anonymity, but i don't think we have to forget the government's part in the adoption. They're excited by ETF, Bakkt, etc...because price is likely to go up and maybe more adoption if governements are fine with people accepting bitcoin as a method of payment |
|
|
|
|
bitcoin-shark
|
|
October 11, 2018, 05:56:19 PM |
|
Looks like security token offerings are stepping in the limelight lately. Which is kind of weird when we had a period where almost every crypto project desperately tried to avoid their token being labeled a security. What has happened that security tokens are seen more favorably now?
The real purpose of crypto is to avoid the government's unnecessary involvement but, bitcoin is not able to get out of their shadows. That's why my bet is on something anonymous. The "real purpose" is debatable. If that were the case, then why would the people be so excited about the ETF or any government go ahead. There's a purpose for anonymity, but i don't think we have to forget the government's part in the adoption. regardless of the real purpose and possible interference from the various governments, I prefer that no one can follow my transactions with the crypto, that's why I will always follow with interest the projects as dusk... |
|
|
|
aveon
Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
|
|
October 11, 2018, 06:11:34 PM |
|
Looks like security token offerings are stepping in the limelight lately. Which is kind of weird when we had a period where almost every crypto project desperately tried to avoid their token being labeled a security. What has happened that security tokens are seen more favorably now?
Security tokens are much more profitable for investors, especially in the red market. Everyone wants to receive dividends)) I do prefer the security tokens too, i am earning some money while i am sitting on my desk. I guess any token is capable of doing that, the question is only if the parental project is successful or not. |
|
|
|
|
omwibya
Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
|
|
October 11, 2018, 07:32:02 PM |
|
is DUSK going to work with Hardware wallets to further secure all users (multi-factor auth)?
I think that depends on the manufacturers of the wallets. if it becomes popular then you can expect so. |
|
|
|
MrDongyy
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 22
|
|
October 11, 2018, 07:36:13 PM |
|
If a transition from the classic model of fundraising for blockchain projects, namely initial coin offerings or ICOs, to STOs, actually happens, the Dusk Network would be one of the first platforms for such a use case. The team is highly experienced in blockchain development as they have served Fortune 500 companies in their own blockchain development projects. However, as their GitHub is not public, it is hard to validate the actual progress of the project for now Proof: https://hacked.com/ico-analysis-dusk-network/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Trrrt
|
|
October 11, 2018, 10:24:59 PM |
|
Yes i think the team of dusk network is one of the most important thing to understand here. Projects need a solid team to be sucessfull, especially in crypto world where projects are risky and hard to manage and deliver. A serious team is needed to earn the trust of investors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rigorous
|
|
October 11, 2018, 10:51:21 PM |
|
If a transition from the classic model of fundraising for blockchain projects, namely initial coin offerings or ICOs, to STOs, actually happens, the Dusk Network would be one of the first platforms for such a use case. The team is highly experienced in blockchain development as they have served Fortune 500 companies in their own blockchain development projects. However, as their GitHub is not public, it is hard to validate the actual progress of the project for now Proof: https://hacked.com/ico-analysis-dusk-network/Nice Dusk gets some coverage, I guess... but you do not really need to be a genius blockchain expert reviewer to figure that out. |
|
|
|
|
|
