mkimid
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Have A Nice Day
|
 |
February 19, 2015, 08:56:51 PM |
|
Currently someone could jump on the network with a big hashrate and gobble up 20 blocks until the difficulty goes up and then leave the other miners to struggle with the higher difficulty. Wash rinse repeat. right?
It could be a wise decision. Any drawbacks though?
+1 It makes the block time is stretched by 120-130% (36-39 sec) this problem is happening due to the overall network hash is just 60-80MHPS, |
Have a nice day
|
|
|
mkimid
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Have A Nice Day
|
|
February 19, 2015, 09:00:49 PM |
|
Currently someone could jump on the network with a big hashrate and gobble up 20 blocks until the difficulty goes up and then leave the other miners to struggle with the higher difficulty. Wash rinse repeat. right?
It could be a wise decision. Any drawbacks though?
Yeah that's the exact concern that I have. 20 block retargeting allows drop in miners to clean house and then leave smaller miners to pick up the pieces. As far as I know, there aren't any drawbacks to DGW3. If I can get everything up and going in time, I will release BTQ-r19 and have the DGW3 start at block 1,000,001. How about supporting some internal explorer and rebuild using btc core 0.10? Addtionally - memory pool list view for transaction - latest block list usng blockindex map (block track information) Just an idea, |
Have a nice day
|
|
|
Hilux74
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 912
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 20, 2015, 05:41:34 PM |
|
ASIC coming soon for X-series algorithm coins!! This would also include Quark algorithm coin!
ASIC for X11, X13, X15 is very easy since they are a linear sequence of calculations, so regardless if 11, 13 or 15 rounds they always happen in the same sequence. Quark algo has random hashing rounds so it is much harder to make an ASIC, not impossible but it would be much much more difficult than the X series algos so I do not believe it woud be included on ASIC hardware designed for X series. I'll believe it when I see it. |
|
|
|
|
mkimid
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Have A Nice Day
|
|
February 20, 2015, 06:38:07 PM |
|
ASIC coming soon for X-series algorithm coins!! This would also include Quark algorithm coin!
ASIC for X11, X13, X15 is very easy since they are a linear sequence of calculations, so regardless if 11, 13 or 15 rounds they always happen in the same sequence. Quark algo has random hashing rounds so it is much harder to make an ASIC, not impossible but it would be much much more difficult than the X series algos so I do not believe it woud be included on ASIC hardware designed for X series. I'll believe it when I see it. There is two type of design, modula or hardwire. I think, modula design will be better for the flexibility. And, even in hardwire structure, Quark algo can be processed as whole types of algorithm. And just select the valid data in end stages. Such as A - (B or C) - D ASIC can designed to thru A - B (v) C (v) D And, (v) will decide to use the pre-processed data or post-post processed data But, to support multiple algorothim, They designed common input matrix mux and output maxtrix mux with feed back bus, And, control the mux and path using small logic I think, not much complex, just some algo has requipred too many gates that is only issues |
Have a nice day
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2015, 11:58:11 PM |
|
Happy 1 Year to BitQuark!!!! Don't forget, if you're mining at http://www.WeMineBTQ.com and you find block 1,000,000 you will receive 10,000 BTQ's!!!! |
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
February 23, 2015, 05:38:18 AM |
|
Currently someone could jump on the network with a big hashrate and gobble up 20 blocks until the difficulty goes up and then leave the other miners to struggle with the higher difficulty. Wash rinse repeat. right?
It could be a wise decision. Any drawbacks though?
Yeah that's the exact concern that I have. 20 block retargeting allows drop in miners to clean house and then leave smaller miners to pick up the pieces. As far as I know, there aren't any drawbacks to DGW3. If I can get everything up and going in time, I will release BTQ-r19 and have the DGW3 start at block 1,000,001. How about supporting some internal explorer and rebuild using btc core 0.10? Addtionally - memory pool list view for transaction - latest block list usng blockindex map (block track information) Just an idea, If you know of anyone who is willing to transition BitQuark over to core 0.10, I will pay them 25,000 BTQ |
|
|
|
|
ZeroFossilFuel
|
|
March 14, 2015, 01:00:07 PM |
|
Yeah that's the exact concern that I have. 20 block retargeting allows drop in miners to clean house and then leave smaller miners to pick up the pieces. As far as I know, there aren't any drawbacks to DGW3. If I can get everything up and going in time, I will release BTQ-r19 and have the DGW3 start at block 1,000,001.
Any news for this? And IMHO, you probably won't see too much activity at Owler for two reasons. 1) The photo. Not exactly CEO material. 2) YASMSTWYT (Yet Another Social Media Site To Waste Your Time) that requires registration. I for one am on YASMSTWYT overload. My 2BTQ. |
|
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
March 14, 2015, 06:19:08 PM |
|
Yeah that's the exact concern that I have. 20 block retargeting allows drop in miners to clean house and then leave smaller miners to pick up the pieces. As far as I know, there aren't any drawbacks to DGW3. If I can get everything up and going in time, I will release BTQ-r19 and have the DGW3 start at block 1,000,001.
Any news for this? And IMHO, you probably won't see too much activity at Owler for two reasons. 1) The photo. Not exactly CEO material. 2) YASMSTWYT (Yet Another Social Media Site To Waste Your Time) that requires registration. I for one am on YASMSTWYT overload. My 2BTQ. Haven't got the DGW3 added yet, but we are currently testing BitQuark Core 0.10 edition. So far everything is looking good!  I may also release a 64 bit client as well. I'll keep you guys posted! |
|
|
|
|
ZeroFossilFuel
|
|
March 15, 2015, 05:27:22 AM |
|
So who found block 1,000,000  |
|
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2015, 07:45:21 PM |
|
So who found block 1,000,000 I forgot to pull my rig offline and so I found the 1,000,000th block. So What I'm going to do is award the 10k BTQ's to the finder of block 1,000,001 which was the user ID hamtaro. |
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2015, 11:31:01 PM |
|
The new BitQuark Core 0.10.0 will have both 32 bit & 64 bit clients, as well as an installer!
|
|
|
|
|
ZeroFossilFuel
|
|
March 16, 2015, 11:19:23 PM |
|
The new BitQuark Core 0.10.0 will have both 32 bit & 64 bit clients, as well as an installer!
Can you describe briefly for this numbscull what the benefit of Core 0.10.0 will be for BTQ?? |
|
|
|
|
mkimid
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Have A Nice Day
|
|
March 17, 2015, 02:17:15 AM |
|
The new BitQuark Core 0.10.0 will have both 32 bit & 64 bit clients, as well as an installer!
Can you describe briefly for this numbscull what the benefit of Core 0.10.0 will be for BTQ?? I think, there is no practical major benefit now, due to the low transaction numbers. (1) fixed all known security issues from bitcoin v0.8.x & v0.9x (2) relativeley smaller and faster and lighter (especially for large transaction) (3) more flexible and secure multi signature supports, and compatible with 3rd party bitcoin multisig codes (4) more secure handling of priv key while sending coin by mutil address spending (5) single public hash key mining for solo miner using getwork no more waste with temporary keys (6) better fork handing and detections (7) better update code flow ~ |
Have a nice day
|
|
|
|
ZeroFossilFuel
|
|
March 19, 2015, 10:21:27 PM |
|
Thank you. I'm only now just noticing that my BTC wallet is already at 0.10. Shows how much attention I pay such things.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lordmick
|
|
April 05, 2015, 08:58:22 PM |
|
problem with my perso wallet...
16:56:02

{
"" : 0.99684000,
"don" : 0.00000000,
"fee" : 0.00000000,
"mypool" : 0.00000000,
"p2pool" : 0.00000000
}
16:56:05

getinfo
16:56:05

{
"version" : 80318,
"protocolversion" : 70001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 796.50000000,
"blocks" : 1058256,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 130.40980039,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1427336060,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
April 05, 2015, 09:37:57 PM |
|
What seems to be the problem?
|
|
|
|
|
lordmick
|
|
April 05, 2015, 09:42:24 PM |
|
"balance" : 796.50000000, and I don't have it in any accounts olso have this....  |
|
|
|
|
|
BitQuark (OP)
|
|
April 05, 2015, 09:53:57 PM |
|
"balance" : 796.50000000, and I don't have it in any accounts olso have this.... Hmmm..interesting. Have you tried dumping your private keys for each address and then rename you wallet.dat to wallet.bak.dat then load a new wallet.dat and add you private keys? This is a sure way to fix the stuck transactions. |
|
|
|
|
lordmick
|
|
April 06, 2015, 02:26:45 AM |
|
"balance" : 796.50000000, and I don't have it in any accounts olso have this.... Hmmm..interesting. Have you tried dumping your private keys for each address and then rename you wallet.dat to wallet.bak.dat then load a new wallet.dat and add you private keys? This is a sure way to fix the stuck transactions. just did a dump and import.. waitting for rescan all blockchain.. will see.. |
|
|
|
|
|
