doobadoo
|
|
October 14, 2011, 03:03:20 AM Last edit: October 14, 2011, 03:17:56 AM by doobadoo |
|
http://184.107.145.244/Litecoin pool. Consider it experimental right now , and toss a core on it and register real quick. It worked perfectly on the testnet. Now it's giving me a longpool every minute exactly, and I haven't had a share in 15 minutes from one computer. Stats are all reset and it is pointed to the production server. Give me some feedback and I'll go from there. i registered and logged in. but when i log in again on the web it says that address is not registered..wtf? fixed. minerd is chomping along with 2 threads 1.7kh/s... where do i see my shares? update: website worker stats show no connections. where are my hashes going....? this pool might not be legit
|
"It is, quite honestly, the biggest challenge to central banking since Andrew Jackson." -evoorhees
|
|
|
wknight
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 889
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin calls me an Orphan
|
|
October 14, 2011, 03:19:46 AM |
|
that pool is broken.. the guy that runs it gave up
|
Mining Both Bitcoin and Litecoin.
|
|
|
grod
|
|
October 14, 2011, 03:21:17 AM |
|
OK.. BTC-E has spoken .. keep mining those coins! support: WKNiGHT, start the weekend! litcoind and fairbrixd
Just saw your chat. I'm all because we'll be subject to the same pump and dump crew as the other shitcoins. OTOH, I get to take my winnings from dumping TBX and SC and get some cheap litecoins, so all might be good in the end.
|
|
|
|
doobadoo
|
|
October 14, 2011, 03:21:31 AM |
|
that pool is broken.. the guy that runs it gave up
good info...has any one else set up a pool. i went from 1.2kh/s to 1.7 with that minerd tricked out for core2
|
"It is, quite honestly, the biggest challenge to central banking since Andrew Jackson." -evoorhees
|
|
|
wknight
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 889
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin calls me an Orphan
|
|
October 14, 2011, 03:34:07 AM |
|
that pool is broken.. the guy that runs it gave up
good info...has any one else set up a pool. i went from 1.2kh/s to 1.7 with that minerd tricked out for core2 I have been working on one on the side.. but not done.. still lots to do.. i am sure someone will open a pool soon enough.
|
Mining Both Bitcoin and Litecoin.
|
|
|
acostanza
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
October 14, 2011, 03:35:21 AM |
|
that pool is broken.. the guy that runs it gave up
What are you referring to? I'm mining at this, albeit beta, pool: http://184.107.145.244 and it is working. Proof, go here: http://184.107.145.244/stats.php I'm Goldie and my shares are showing up on my workers page. Unless it's some extremely elaborate ruse, it seems to be working as well as any other pool I've seen. At least at the moment.
|
|
|
|
doobadoo
|
|
October 14, 2011, 03:47:13 AM |
|
yes i see you on the stats page. but i didn't see myself there even though everything seemed to be running fine for about 15 minutes of mining. did i give up too soon? only thing i can think of is that my config of minerd is off: minerd.exe --algo scrypt --s 6 --threads 2 --url http://184.107.145.244:8332 --userpass Lxxx_1:1 btw what is the --s flag?
|
"It is, quite honestly, the biggest challenge to central banking since Andrew Jackson." -evoorhees
|
|
|
doobadoo
|
|
October 14, 2011, 03:50:27 AM |
|
minerd is chomping along with 2 threads 1.7kh/s... where do i see my shares?
update: website worker stats show no connections. where are my hashes going....? this pool might not be legit
from worker details link under account details tab { "User":{ "username":"LWzVwFMx4cFPpBQ4tw4VjE5pnebMUaViwZ_1", "currSpeed":"0", "status":"Disconnected" } , "User":{ "username":"LWzVwFMx4cFPpBQ4tw4VjE5pnebMUaViwZ_2", "currSpeed":"0", "status":"Disconnected" } , "User":{ "username":"LWzVwFMx4cFPpBQ4tw4VjE5pnebMUaViwZ_3", "currSpeed":"0", "status":"Disconnected" } , "User":{ "username":"LWzVwFMx4cFPpBQ4tw4VjE5pnebMUaViwZ_4", "currSpeed":"0", "status":"Disconnected" } , "User":{ "username":"LWzVwFMx4cFPpBQ4tw4VjE5pnebMUaViwZ_5", "currSpeed":"0", "status":"Disconnected" } , "User":{ "username":"LWzVwFMx4cFPpBQ4tw4VjE5pnebMUaViwZ_6", "currSpeed":"0", "status":"Disconnected" } , "User":{ "username":"LWzVwFMx4cFPpBQ4tw4VjE5pnebMUaViwZ_7", "currSpeed":"0", "status":"Disconnected" } , "User":{ "username":"LWzVwFMx4cFPpBQ4tw4VjE5pnebMUaViwZ_8", "currSpeed":"0", "status":"Disconnected" } , "User":{ "username":"LWzVwFMx4cFPpBQ4tw4VjE5pnebMUaViwZ_9", "currSpeed":"0", "status":"Disconnected" } }
|
"It is, quite honestly, the biggest challenge to central banking since Andrew Jackson." -evoorhees
|
|
|
doobadoo
|
|
October 14, 2011, 04:05:28 AM |
|
that pool is broken.. the guy that runs it gave up
What are you referring to? I'm mining at this, albeit beta, pool: http://184.107.145.244 and it is working. Proof, go here: http://184.107.145.244/stats.php I'm Goldie and my shares are showing up on my workers page. Unless it's some extremely elaborate ruse, it seems to be working as well as any other pool I've seen. At least at the moment. block explorer of this pool paying out or it didn't happen
|
"It is, quite honestly, the biggest challenge to central banking since Andrew Jackson." -evoorhees
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
October 14, 2011, 04:08:02 AM |
|
Can someone post a zip of the output of ./autogen.sh? I can't get it to work right on my system ~/old/Lolcust-Tenebrix-miner-2c6f867>./autogen.sh configure.ac: installing `./install-sh' configure.ac: installing `./missing' compat/jansson/Makefile.am: installing `./depcomp' configure.ac:4: installing `./config.guess' configure.ac:4: installing `./config.sub' Makefile.am: installing `./INSTALL' Makefile.am: installing `./compile' configure.ac:96: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation.
I can compile the bitcoin version of cpuminer just fine with its pregenerated ./configure, so I'm assuming the problem occurs with autogen.
|
1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
|
|
|
Bobnova
|
|
October 14, 2011, 04:18:53 AM |
|
That's exactly what autogen says on my system. I posted the fixes to get it to compile in the TBX thread.
|
BTC: 1AURXf66t7pw65NwRiKukwPq1hLSiYLqbP
|
|
|
acostanza
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
October 14, 2011, 04:22:22 AM |
|
that pool is broken.. the guy that runs it gave up
What are you referring to? I'm mining at this, albeit beta, pool: http://184.107.145.244 and it is working. Proof, go here: http://184.107.145.244/stats.php I'm Goldie and my shares are showing up on my workers page. Unless it's some extremely elaborate ruse, it seems to be working as well as any other pool I've seen. At least at the moment. block explorer of this pool paying out or it didn't happen No, it didn't happen yet. I haven't paid anything out. So, look, I'm just saying my rig seems to be working on this pool. Maybe I'm throwing away a couple bucks on electrons. I'll pay out when I get something worth a payout. Till then my settings, that work are: minerd.exe --algo scrypt --s 6 --threads 6 --url http://184.107.145.244:8332 --userpass Lh6aWBUnpxR7F1srHwYt8z4u8koHU65CFj_1:1 CD to your minerd.exe folder and replace everything after 'userpass' with your miner deets. Give it a go, or post back something more useful. This is what I got going on my 6 (humble) Opteron cores, and I'm mining Ltc, as far as I can tell.
|
|
|
|
acostanza
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
October 14, 2011, 04:51:55 AM |
|
yes i see you on the stats page. but i didn't see myself there even though everything seemed to be running fine for about 15 minutes of mining. did i give up too soon? only thing i can think of is that my config of minerd is off: minerd.exe --algo scrypt --s 6 --threads 2 --url http://184.107.145.244:8332 --userpass Lxxx_1:1 btw what is the --s flag? Dunno about --s and I'm having the same thing happen to me now. My cores are 100% but nothing shows on the pool. Admin, any thoughts? I'll fire it up now and then to keep trying it, but there seems to be a problem with workers staying, or getting, into the pool. For reference, I was good for about 4 hours prior to about 12:30 AM EST.
|
|
|
|
worldinacoin
|
|
October 14, 2011, 05:22:55 AM |
|
Same here my CPU is 100%, a bit concerned if it will shorten the life of the CPU?
|
|
|
|
3phase
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 313
Merit: 251
Third score
|
|
October 14, 2011, 05:37:33 AM |
|
Yeap the exchange will be useful, but I guess a pool will also be equally useful as it seems to be so hard to mine a block now, I suspect a pool is strongly needed.
I second that, please no exchanges. Exchanges would paint a big fat hairy bullseye on this coin. Not being able to profit from imploding the network provides more security than having 2.5Mhash we're cruising at. Did you see where the owner of btcguild submitted 500,000 IP addresses to bothunters? Think about that for a minute. Right now both tenebrix and litecoin are cruising along at around 1000 CPUs mining each. Yeah, we may have more, but no, having 30% more CPUs than tenebrix isn't going to save us. If there was significant money up for grabs (and seeing how this is the best CPU-mined alternative cryptocurrency it may also get the most BTC offered for it) what do you think would happen? Let's get established first. This is the alternative currency most aligned with the goals and views of the broader bitcoin community, there's no reason we can't get more nodes than are currently mining bitcoins joining with spare cycles. THEN get an exchange. Exchange on day 1 is only required for pump-and-dump scamcoins with gargantuan premines (ixc, sc, tbx, sc2...) I completely agree we're going to need a few pools on board before too long. Another 4x difficulty increase in 55 blocks. How I wish the majority would listen to what you say...
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
October 14, 2011, 05:58:06 AM |
|
I got it to compile, but this bothers me.. it shouldn't be this consistent, should it? [2011-10-14 01:57:18] thread 2: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:19] thread 3: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:20] thread 4: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:22] thread 5: 12136 hashes, 2.40 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:22] thread 0: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:23] thread 1: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:23] thread 2: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:24] thread 3: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:26] thread 4: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:27] thread 5: 12136 hashes, 2.40 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:28] thread 0: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:29] thread 1: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:29] thread 2: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:30] thread 3: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec
|
1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 14, 2011, 07:22:09 AM |
|
I got it to compile, but this bothers me.. it shouldn't be this consistent, should it? [2011-10-14 01:57:18] thread 2: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:19] thread 3: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:20] thread 4: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:22] thread 5: 12136 hashes, 2.40 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:22] thread 0: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:23] thread 1: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:23] thread 2: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:24] thread 3: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:26] thread 4: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:27] thread 5: 12136 hashes, 2.40 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:28] thread 0: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:29] thread 1: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:29] thread 2: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec [2011-10-14 01:57:30] thread 3: 12136 hashes, 2.41 khash/sec
[2011-10-14 18:18:54] thread 0: 2184 hashes, 2.15 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:18:54] thread 1: 2184 hashes, 2.16 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:18:54] thread 2: 2184 hashes, 2.17 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:18:55] thread 0: 2184 hashes, 2.15 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:18:55] thread 1: 2184 hashes, 2.15 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:18:56] thread 2: 2184 hashes, 2.17 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:18:56] thread 0: 2184 hashes, 2.15 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:18:59] thread 1: 2184 hashes, 2.16 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:18:59] thread 2: 2184 hashes, 2.14 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:18:59] thread 0: 2184 hashes, 2.16 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:19:00] thread 1: 2184 hashes, 2.16 khash/sec [2011-10-14 18:19:00] thread 2: 2184 hashes, 2.15 khash/sec
Hmm seems similar to my best one One thing I have noticed is that minerd hits DNS really hard. (my DNS server at home is using a full CPU to deal with 3 of them)
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 14, 2011, 07:30:21 AM |
|
yes i see you on the stats page. but i didn't see myself there even though everything seemed to be running fine for about 15 minutes of mining. did i give up too soon? only thing i can think of is that my config of minerd is off: minerd.exe --algo scrypt --s 6 --threads 2 --url http://184.107.145.244:8332 --userpass Lxxx_1:1 btw what is the --s flag? That is: how many seconds between requesting new work from the daemon (or pool if one ever exists) That time needs to be less than the average block time early on (well it needed to be for the first 6000 to 8000 bocks anyway) Now it would be fine being 5-10 like most people set it to.
|
|
|
|
coblee (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1654
Merit: 1351
Creator of Litecoin. Cryptocurrency enthusiast.
|
|
October 14, 2011, 07:41:22 AM |
|
I did another block hash lock at the last difficulty change at block 10080. Please get latest source, compile, and run it. Windows client: https://github.com/downloads/coblee/litecoin/litecoin-windows-client-40104.zipI've asked twobits to help build windows daemon. Coming soon. This should be the last update for a while now. The diff will catch up to the network hashrate and we should be pretty good.
|
|
|
|
ripper234
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003
Ron Gross
|
|
October 14, 2011, 07:43:59 AM |
|
I did another block hash lock at the last difficulty change at block 10080. Please get latest source, compile, and run it. Windows client: https://github.com/downloads/coblee/litecoin/litecoin-windows-client-40104.zipI've asked twobits to help build windows daemon. Coming soon. This should be the last update for a while now. The diff will catch up to the network hashrate and we should be pretty good. Where can I see a graph of the difficulty?
|
|
|
|
|