|
Matoking
|
 |
February 06, 2012, 09:04:39 AM |
|
p2pool doesn't seem to be connecting to any peers. I've gotten it working with Bitcoin though.
|
|
|
|
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!
|
|
February 06, 2012, 09:35:43 AM |
|
p2pool doesn't seem to be connecting to any peers. I've gotten it working with Bitcoin though.
I put 200kH to Litecoin P2Pool and it is working like a charm... |
|
|
|
|
|
Matoking
|
|
February 06, 2012, 09:44:15 AM |
|
Well I got it working sort of.
Now, when it finished loading shares, it gives a never-ending stream of exceptions.ZeroDivisionError errors.
EDIT:
Deleted contents of data/litecoin/, let's see if it works now. Yep, it seems to work now.
|
|
|
|
|
TradersEdgeDice
|
|
February 06, 2012, 01:47:44 PM |
|
@EskimoBob: Click below. I'm accepting it. It seems much more friendly to merchants than BTC. BTC is treated like gold as if ever one is going to be a ghetto fabulous quazillionaire if they get just one coin.
Maybe litecoin will be fucked beyond all recognition from speculation 12 months from now but it seems to be starting off on the right foot.
|
|
|
|
Tomatocage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
|
|
February 07, 2012, 05:04:48 AM |
|
LTCs are a bargain right now considering they're trading for less than what it costs to mine them... at least for my system anyway. Sometimes I wish I still worked in a computer lab with access to a few dozen desktop machines.
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Bitcoiner
|
|
February 08, 2012, 04:50:14 AM |
|
Would anyone be interested in a LiteJack21 Blackjack service?
|
|
|
|
btc_artist
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 102
Bitcoin!
|
|
February 08, 2012, 02:16:52 PM |
|
Would anyone be interested in a LiteJack21 Blackjack service?
Sure, why not? You should be able to reuse most of the code from the other 2 sites, no? |
BTC: 1CDCLDBHbAzHyYUkk1wYHPYmrtDZNhk8zf
LTC: LMS7SqZJnqzxo76iDSEua33WCyYZdjaQoE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
btc_artist
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 102
Bitcoin!
|
|
February 10, 2012, 08:43:35 PM |
|
Rumors with absolutely no proof, and the rumor-spreader will personally benefit from decreased trust in Litecoin.. hmmmm...... :rolleyes: |
BTC: 1CDCLDBHbAzHyYUkk1wYHPYmrtDZNhk8zf
LTC: LMS7SqZJnqzxo76iDSEua33WCyYZdjaQoE
|
|
|
|
Mousepotato
|
|
February 10, 2012, 08:58:27 PM |
|
I don't understand why you'd waste valuable GPU bandwidth to mine Litecoins, if Bitcoins yield more profit.
|
Mousepotato
|
|
|
|
StewartJ
|
|
February 11, 2012, 12:01:46 AM |
|
LOL you both need to fix your quoting I only said one line in all that: Lucky that crypto's don't all charge any fees ... oh hang on  ... As soon as a bank charges a fee (even a small one like I get charged) it's suddenly a greedy bank ... so I guess ALL exchanges are greedy also since they charge more than my bank transfer costs? ... Yes many banks are greedy and many charge ridiculous fees, but, well, find a way around it This is getting way off topic but for start, read this: http://truecostofcredit.com/558231 and http://credit-card-processing-review.toptenreviews.com/v2/If LTC can do it for <0.0N LTC flat ... sounds like a good deal to me. Now, if we can build LTC "marketing" based on hard facts like numbers - how Panucci's Pizza can save 5K USD in transaction fees per year - then people get curious and start adapting LTC for real life use. If Mr Panucci can buy flour for LTC, he has no need to go and feed the exchange or the bank. LTC has 2 enemies at the moment: 1) unstable price 2) nonexisting real life use BTC is no better but I like to buy coffee for BTC from http://bitbrew.net/ Hopefully they start accepting LTC soon. If you really give shit about LTC, find a way how to spend it (exchange for goods and services) or convince your favourite shop keeper to accept it as a way to transfer funds. Eskimo, we need your ideas in the Litecoin Development thread as well: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63092And thanks for your words of encouragement, S. |
|
|
|
|
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!
|
|
February 11, 2012, 04:08:14 AM |
|
RUMORS?!?! AhaHaHaHaHAH!! Come on... Coming from CoinHunter... No credit. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitinvestor
|
|
February 11, 2012, 04:05:48 PM
Last edit: February 11, 2012, 05:26:18 PM by Bitinvestor |
|
Coblee, when I do "git clone https://github.com/coblee/litecoin.git" I get this output: Cloning into litecoin... remote: Counting objects: 9176, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (3598/3598), done. Receiving objects: 23% (2111/9176), 1.25 MiB | 385 KiB/s It stops at 23% and does not continue. Is this a problem with github or am I doing something wrong? EDIT: It works now. |
Those who cause problems for others also cause problems for themselves.
|
|
|
|
Hunterbunter
|
|
February 14, 2012, 01:14:05 AM |
|
Basing it on bitcoins and making it CPU friendly was a smart move. Is the generation process something that can never be done in OpenCL/CUDA? or will someone eventually write that code and mess things up?
One of the things that I don't quite understand is why you chose 2.5minute block time. One of the main problems for bitcoins are in real-time transactions - was that like the lowest technically feasible time for true transactions to propagate the network or something?
|
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
February 14, 2012, 03:17:10 AM |
|
Basing it on bitcoins and making it CPU friendly was a smart move. Is the generation process something that can never be done in OpenCL/CUDA? or will someone eventually write that code and mess things up?
One of the things that I don't quite understand is why you chose 2.5minute block time. One of the main problems for bitcoins are in real-time transactions - was that like the lowest technically feasible time for true transactions to propagate the network or something?
The faster you make the block chain, the more quickly it grows in size... To keep it from becoming massive, you need to choose a reasonable block time size. GG proved that you can have insanely high block generation rates, but I think you still potentially risk clutter by having it too large. Scrypt is difficult for GPUs to perform, so far no one has really proved a faster GPU miner |
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns |
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
February 14, 2012, 10:17:22 PM |
|
Not sure if anyone is paying attention, but the number of "Other" miners has fallen to nearly 40%, and it seems the bulk of people are now mining in pools. I think the golden era of litecoin may be coming.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns |
|
|
|
idev
|
|
February 16, 2012, 10:29:33 PM |
|
the mac version seems to crash instantly when trying to launch the program ?
|
|
|
|
|
coblee (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1654
Merit: 1354
Creator of Litecoin. Cryptocurrency enthusiast.
|
|
February 17, 2012, 01:38:31 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
StewartJ
|
|
February 18, 2012, 04:36:43 PM |
|
Having a minor issue with the Litecoin client.
I recently installed litecoin-windows-client-0.5.0.9 on Windows 7. What I had done to install was unzip the file onto my Win Desktop and
in the folder, double clicked the executable.
Unlike the bitcoin client, it did not create a program entry in Windows /program menu, so I had to make a shortcut to the executable.
Also Litecoin does not appear in my Windows Program Lists, unlike the Bitcoin Client which does.
Now I would like to uninstall Litecoin client from this PC for now, how do I go about that? I have already secured my Litecoin wallet.
I do see the Litecoin installation under the Windows "Roaming" directories, similar to Bitcoin, but I have no clue as to uninstalling it.
Thanks,
Stew
|
|
|
|
|
|
