Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2016, 06:05:58 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 426 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers  (Read 828915 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
dmcurser
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 502


View Profile
November 03, 2011, 02:19:05 AM
 #81

Ok issue seems funny if I have all my miners pointed at btc one of them randomly has a connection issue but if I point.t one at another pool. I have no issue does anyone have and suggestion on what to do I really.don't want to have to spilt up mi.ers like that

1Q7TPBHHVmGCvqffYHpXCCBgbcBQ4NwXdW
1481047558
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481047558

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481047558
Reply with quote  #2

1481047558
Report to moderator
1481047558
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481047558

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481047558
Reply with quote  #2

1481047558
Report to moderator
1481047558
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481047558

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481047558
Reply with quote  #2

1481047558
Report to moderator
Transactions can optionally carry transaction fees. Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get the fee. The Bitcoin client will sometimes force you to pay a fee when it thinks that no miner will accept your transaction otherwise.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
November 03, 2011, 03:16:54 AM
 #82

Ok issue seems funny if I have all my miners pointed at btc one of them randomly has a connection issue but if I point.t one at another pool. I have no issue does anyone have and suggestion on what to do I really.don't want to have to spilt up mi.ers like that

Since they are all on one machine use CG Miner or Ufasoft miner.  Both of these mining programs will use all three GPU's at once.  So it will be one miner using the three cards.  With CG Miner you can configure it to use multiple pools if you like.
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


I heart thebaron


View Profile
November 03, 2011, 07:25:09 AM
 #83

Since they are all on one machine use CG Miner
CGMiner FTW !

dmcurser
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 502


View Profile
November 03, 2011, 09:26:16 AM
 #84

ok i dont mean to sound like a noob but i was trying like hell to get cgminer to work last night and to no avail no matter how hard i tryed and youtube had no walkthroughs lol so if you guys would be as so kind to help with a walk through i would love it lol. bc no matter what i tried i got no server found host name rong or work not mad blah blah blah so plz help much appreciated

edit after sleep i tryed it again an i got it to work yay lol

1Q7TPBHHVmGCvqffYHpXCCBgbcBQ4NwXdW
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 03, 2011, 02:14:09 PM
 #85

I will be adding the following features tomorrow:

1) Permanent Wallet Lock
2) Permanent Email Lock
3) Automatic Payouts [may be Saturday instead of Friday]
4) Pool Block History
5) Pool Speed/Performance History


I originally didn't think much of adding a Pool Block History, since its irrelevant to the users income.  However, I was reminded in IRC this morning that by not showing our blocks it isn't transparent regarding merged mining (or lack thereof).

Merged mining is still eventually planned.  The big problem with merged mining is the increase in BTC stale rates due to extra long polls.  It may take 0-2 seconds for a long poll to finish being issued to all miners, and it may take an extra 0-1 second for a miner to react to it depending on their latency.  Merged mining more than doubles the rate of long polls, meaning there is a higher risk of BTC stales.

I think I have been very clear in the past that I am not a fan of namecoin.  I understand the niche, but I don't think it has much future.  Because of this view, my priority has always been BTC, and I will not implement MM unless it has a close to 0% effect on BTC hashing.


The good news is that shadders is close to finishing an update to PoolServerJ, which fixes the biggest limitation pools have had:  Speed of generating work at long polls.  Even with JoelKatz' patches, bitcoind can vary randomly, producing anywhere from 500 (worst case scenario) to ~5000 getwork/second.  Generally due to the overhead of the initial block chain update within bitciond, the client normally produces around 1500-2000 getwork/second for a moment after a new block.

The next version of PoolServerJ will be generating the work within the pool software, which will drastically speed up the ability to send out thousands of getworks once a new block is found on the network.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 04, 2011, 01:57:09 AM
 #86

Item 1 finished early.  Wallet Lock is now active, and is replacing the previous 24 hour Payout Lock feature.  By enabling Wallet Lock, you are PERMANENTLY locking your bitcoin address in your account.  This means even if you are hacked, an attacker cannot do anything to your account other than change your worker names or email address (unless that is locked, which should be available in the next few minutes).

UPDATE:  Email lock has now been added as well.  If you combine these two security features, your account cannot be drained.  At worst, somebody who has your login/password could mess with your worker names, or continually reset your account password if they have access to your email.  However, they cannot change the email, so you will ALWAYS be able to change your password back, and they can't change the wallet under any circumstances with Wallet Lock.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


I heart thebaron


View Profile
November 04, 2011, 02:43:41 AM
 #87

Awesome security features. I am using both.

ancow
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 373


View Profile WWW
November 04, 2011, 03:46:48 AM
 #88

Wallet Lock is now active, and is replacing the previous 24 hour Payout Lock feature.

Do you think you could keep the 24h payout lock as an alternative? I don't like the idea of locking my wallet as it means that I will have to create a new account, should I want to use a different wallet address for whatever reason (e.g. if I lost my wallet to a lightning strike; and no, I can't afford backup that will withstand lightning...)
I also may want to change my email address in the future. I use a webmail provider, and should they ever decide to change their policy or demand money for their service, I won't be able to stay with them.
I really don't want to have to create a new account and the 24h payout lock was a nice alternative for me.

BTC: 1GAHTMdBN4Yw3PU66sAmUBKSXy2qaq2SF4
Crypt_Current
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


Shame on everything; regret nothing.


View Profile
November 04, 2011, 08:20:07 PM
 #89

Do you have plans to implement merged mining?

Now that profit is extremely low and NMC price falling to 0.01 BTC I ask you this "What is the point, considering it is such a pain and may impact on BTC mining ?"



I won't mine at any pool that doesn't have merged mining implemented, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

10% off at CampBX for LIFE:  https://campbx.com/main.php?r=C9a5izBQ5vq  ----  Authorized BitVoucher MEGA reseller (& BTC donations appreciated):  https://bitvoucher.co/affl/1HkvK8o8WWDpCTSQGnek7DH9gT1LWeV5s3/
LTC:  LRL6vb6XBRrEEifB73DiEiYZ9vbRy99H41  NMC:  NGb2spdTGpWj8THCPyCainaXenwDhAW1ZT
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
November 04, 2011, 08:30:58 PM
 #90

Do you have plans to implement merged mining?

Now that profit is extremely low and NMC price falling to 0.01 BTC I ask you this "What is the point, considering it is such a pain and may impact on BTC mining ?"



I won't mine at any pool that doesn't have merged mining implemented, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

And I'm considering not mining at any pool that does implement Merged Mining, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Eveofwar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
November 04, 2011, 08:39:19 PM
 #91

Do you have plans to implement merged mining?

Now that profit is extremely low and NMC price falling to 0.01 BTC I ask you this "What is the point, considering it is such a pain and may impact on BTC mining ?"



I won't mine at any pool that doesn't have merged mining implemented, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

And I'm considering not mining at any pool that does implement Merged Mining, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
Sam

And I'm considering not mining at any pool that doesn't implement a proportional payout method, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
CyberPhunk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124


View Profile
November 04, 2011, 08:54:27 PM
 #92

Anyone other miners idling like crazy atm?

*edit*

Hmm, seems to have fixed itself, now.

List of client download mirrors / Older Catalyst drivers/SDK
13dRbbqBpfZEmZiXXdLM4NKNoJYsgHbuFJ  <- might as well, in case someone feels generous. Wink
LoupGaroux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420



View Profile
November 05, 2011, 03:35:29 AM
 #93

Do you have plans to implement merged mining?

Now that profit is extremely low and NMC price falling to 0.01 BTC I ask you this "What is the point, considering it is such a pain and may impact on BTC mining ?"



I won't mine at any pool that doesn't have merged mining implemented, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

And I'm considering not mining at any pool that does implement Merged Mining, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
Sam

And I'm considering not mining at any pool that doesn't implement a proportional payout method, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

And I'm considering not dining at any pool that doesn't have hot waitresses, and cheap drinks.

Seriously, it's an open market. Find a pool that fits your flavor instead of bitching about this one not changing to fit your specific needs. Features are suggested and decided on, and implemented or not at the pace the pool operator chooses. We are guests in his world, and should show due respect.

54Gh/s bASIC Bitcoin Mining Devices
Pre-Order Yours Today!     
Only $1069.99 ! @ http://www.BitcoinASIC.com


Look^^ I'm selling my soul too!
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 05, 2011, 04:35:06 AM
 #94

It's been long overdue, but automatic payouts have finally been added to the pool.  They're implemented slightly different than what you may be used to:

1) Set your automatic payment threshold either through the My Account page, or the sidebar.
2) Only whole numbers are accepted.  Set it to '0' to disable the automatic payouts.

Automatic payouts are processed every hour.  If your unpaid rewards are equal to or greater than your threshold, you will be paid the amount you set.  This is different from some pools, where an automatic payout might be your full balance once it crosses the threshold.  I chose this method because it allows users to keep their wallets clean with whole numbers for timed payouts, and people using automatic payouts are planning on continuing to mine (otherwise they'd just cash out and leave).  You always have the option for an instant payout which includes your full balance.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Think for yourself


View Profile
November 05, 2011, 04:51:39 AM
 #95

Do you have plans to implement merged mining?

Now that profit is extremely low and NMC price falling to 0.01 BTC I ask you this "What is the point, considering it is such a pain and may impact on BTC mining ?"



I won't mine at any pool that doesn't have merged mining implemented, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

And I'm considering not mining at any pool that does implement Merged Mining, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
Sam

And I'm considering not mining at any pool that doesn't implement a proportional payout method, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

And I'm considering not dining at any pool that doesn't have hot waitresses, and cheap drinks.

Seriously, it's an open market. Find a pool that fits your flavor instead of bitching about this one not changing to fit your specific needs. Features are suggested and decided on, and implemented or not at the pace the pool operator chooses. We are guests in his world, and should show due respect.

You forgot to add "and I'm sure I'm not the only one."  Smiley
But point taken and I fully agree.
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


I heart thebaron


View Profile
November 05, 2011, 08:23:30 AM
 #96

Oh Oh....it just got really quiet in here as all my fans spin down....lol

<EDIT>
...and 10 seconds later, it's LOUD again....hehe

eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 05, 2011, 10:22:05 PM
 #97

Added Pool Block History page, API for it will be coming soon as well so web services can scrape our block data.

Regarding bitlane's post, yes, there was about 15 seconds of downtime last night for a pool restart.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
November 06, 2011, 01:11:13 AM
 #98

Added Pool Block History page, API for it will be coming soon as well so web services can scrape our block data.

Regarding bitlane's post, yes, there was about 15 seconds of downtime last night for a pool restart.

MM coming soon I assume then ?
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2011, 03:17:45 AM
 #99

Added Pool Block History page, API for it will be coming soon as well so web services can scrape our block data.

Regarding bitlane's post, yes, there was about 15 seconds of downtime last night for a pool restart.

MM coming soon I assume then ?

Not until shadders releases the final PSJ which includes built in work generation for merged mining.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2011, 06:52:54 AM
 #100

Shares are still being logged right now, don't panic.  Looks like daylight savings time is messing with the speed calculations, should clear up shortly.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 426 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!