[ICO ENDED] Jarvis Network - bridge legacy and digital finance

[lunnatic]

glad to see the ICO ended, I want to ask when the jarvis plan will be listed on the stock exchange. and what is the price per token

I myself am also curious about when they will register the jarvis on the stock exchange and I hope the team can answer it immediately because we are all waiting for an answer from the team that is important to remain patient first

[1714560433]

1714560433

[sockpuppet1911]

glad to see the ICO ended, I want to ask when the jarvis plan will be listed on the stock exchange. and what is the price per token

I myself am also curious about when they will register the jarvis on the stock exchange and I hope the team can answer it immediately because we are all waiting for an answer from the team that is important to remain patient first

As a side note, can we stop talking about stock exchanges, they are just exchanges, none of them is handling any stocks.
And about that exchange... you guys have to wait some more, it's planned to be listed in Q4

[tyoA7X]

glad to see the ICO ended, I want to ask when the jarvis plan will be listed on the stock exchange. and what is the price per token

if the ICO price, Jarvis has a value of 1 = 0.1 USD, whether for the price later when entering the market I myself cannot expect that high value, with only getting 1.5 million USD maybe JARVIS will have a value of half of the ICO price

[xsantana]

glad to see the ICO ended, I want to ask when the jarvis plan will be listed on the stock exchange. and what is the price per token

if the ICO price, Jarvis has a value of 1 = 0.1 USD, whether for the price later when entering the market I myself cannot expect that high value, with only getting 1.5 million USD maybe JARVIS will have a value of half of the ICO price

Too bad, if the price at launch is below the ICO price,
I hope the developer will make another sale, so that the price of the token is as stable as the beginning of the ICO, within a month I am sure the public sales target can be achieved, with the amount of 2 million USD

[lkjhg]

glad to see the ICO ended, I want to ask when the jarvis plan will be listed on the stock exchange. and what is the price per token

if the ICO price, Jarvis has a value of 1 = 0.1 USD, whether for the price later when entering the market I myself cannot expect that high value, with only getting 1.5 million USD maybe JARVIS will have a value of half of the ICO price

Too bad, if the price at launch is below the ICO price,
I hope the developer will make another sale, so that the price of the token is as stable as the beginning of the ICO, within a month I am sure the public sales target can be achieved, with the amount of 2 million USD

I really hope the team can overcome this and of course it is quite surprising for the team if during the launch below the ICO price the most important thing is to continue supporting their team to work optimally

[Midaktai]

glad to see the ICO ended, I want to ask when the jarvis plan will be listed on the stock exchange. and what is the price per token

if the ICO price, Jarvis has a value of 1 = 0.1 USD, whether for the price later when entering the market I myself cannot expect that high value, with only getting 1.5 million USD maybe JARVIS will have a value of half of the ICO price

Too bad, if the price at launch is below the ICO price,
I hope the developer will make another sale, so that the price of the token is as stable as the beginning of the ICO, within a month I am sure the public sales target can be achieved, with the amount of 2 million USD

Let's just look at whether the price at launch is below the ICO price or not keep monitoring its development and I'm sure the team must have thought about it so that the price of the token is as stable as the start of the ICO

[sockpuppet1911]

Too bad, if the price at launch is below the ICO price,
I hope the developer will make another sale, so that the price of the token is as stable as the beginning of the ICO, within a month I am sure the public sales target can be achieved, with the amount of 2 million USD

I remember having this attitude on the 2015-16 cycle. There were too many scam icos and people got bored of pump and dumps. Then the tables turned and icos started to make money again and all my friends jumped on every ico on 2017. Now that same loss of interest happened again. I think it's time for money making icos again.

[jtalk]

We have some projects example which locked tokens and put their heads downs to develop the platforms or products. In the end when after few months or couple years when they launched saw huge appreciation and got listed on big exchanges as well. If they are willing to work and deliver first then we should give them time anyway token is not going to see value in present situation. Better let them locked and wait for.

[scolary23]

Too bad, if the price at launch is below the ICO price,
I hope the developer will make another sale, so that the price of the token is as stable as the beginning of the ICO, within a month I am sure the public sales target can be achieved, with the amount of 2 million USD

I remember having this attitude on the 2015-16 cycle. There were too many scam icos and people got bored of pump and dumps. Then the tables turned and icos started to make money again and all my friends jumped on every ico on 2017. Now that same loss of interest happened again. I think it's time for money making icos again.

You mean that ICO will now become again popular for the investor? Of course, there is a certain cyclical nature here, but I don’t think so.
I think that now most of the interest is spent on fundraising using popular and reliable platforms.

[sockpuppet1911]

You mean that ICO will now become again popular for the investor? Of course, there is a certain cyclical nature here, but I don’t think so.
I think that now most of the interest is spent on fundraising using popular and reliable platforms.

No, i meant less popular overall and more profitable. There will be few gems that are sold out though.

[ningrum]

Too bad, if the price at launch is below the ICO price,
I hope the developer will make another sale, so that the price of the token is as stable as the beginning of the ICO, within a month I am sure the public sales target can be achieved, with the amount of 2 million USD

I remember having this attitude on the 2015-16 cycle. There were too many scam icos and people got bored of pump and dumps. Then the tables turned and icos started to make money again and all my friends jumped on every ico on 2017. Now that same loss of interest happened again. I think it's time for money making icos again.

You mean that ICO will now become again popular for the investor? Of course, there is a certain cyclical nature here, but I don’t think so.
I think that now most of the interest is spent on fundraising using popular and reliable platforms.

ICO will not be as popular as in 2016-2017 then, in 201-2020 it looks like the IEO will become popular,
if Jarvis starts the IEO in some big markets it might be much better

[rahmat86]

Too bad, if the price at launch is below the ICO price,
I hope the developer will make another sale, so that the price of the token is as stable as the beginning of the ICO, within a month I am sure the public sales target can be achieved, with the amount of 2 million USD

I remember having this attitude on the 2015-16 cycle. There were too many scam icos and people got bored of pump and dumps. Then the tables turned and icos started to make money again and all my friends jumped on every ico on 2017. Now that same loss of interest happened again. I think it's time for money making icos again.

You mean that ICO will now become again popular for the investor? Of course, there is a certain cyclical nature here, but I don’t think so.
I think that now most of the interest is spent on fundraising using popular and reliable platforms.

ICO will not be as popular as in 2016-2017 then, in 201-2020 it looks like the IEO will become popular,
if Jarvis starts the IEO in some big markets it might be much better

I think jarvis will start the IEO with second token is JNT (utility one), team said price JRT after launch not below price ico.
I wonder how team manage to people not dump at exchange ?

[Smitty Werben Man Jensen]

Too bad, if the price at launch is below the ICO price,
I hope the developer will make another sale, so that the price of the token is as stable as the beginning of the ICO, within a month I am sure the public sales target can be achieved, with the amount of 2 million USD

I remember having this attitude on the 2015-16 cycle. There were too many scam icos and people got bored of pump and dumps. Then the tables turned and icos started to make money again and all my friends jumped on every ico on 2017. Now that same loss of interest happened again. I think it's time for money making icos again.

You mean that ICO will now become again popular for the investor? Of course, there is a certain cyclical nature here, but I don’t think so.
I think that now most of the interest is spent on fundraising using popular and reliable platforms.

ICO will not be as popular as in 2016-2017 then, in 201-2020 it looks like the IEO will become popular,
if Jarvis starts the IEO in some big markets it might be much better

I think jarvis will start the IEO with second token is JNT (utility one), team said price JRT after launch not below price ico.
I wonder how team manage to people not dump at exchange ?

It is quite interesting that the team itself said that the price of JRT after launching would not be that ico and to make it clearer, let's just look after it was launched, hopefully what the team said could really materialize

[scolary23]

You mean that ICO will now become again popular for the investor? Of course, there is a certain cyclical nature here, but I don’t think so.
I think that now most of the interest is spent on fundraising using popular and reliable platforms.

No, i meant less popular overall and more profitable. There will be few gems that are sold out though.

It is clear, in general, yes. The market is saturated with recurring projects, therefore, this trend is quite predictable. Indeed, the original, in its structure, projects, is becoming less and less. Therefore, the interest to ICO becomes smaller. And IEO is a kind of new breath for projects that want to have the attention of investors. I think that surely this trend has affected Jarvis. And I think that if the team will to initiate the IEO, then this would be a more confident fundraising for the development of the project.

[GrosWesh]

It is quite interesting that the team itself said that the price of JRT after launching would not be that ico and to make it clearer, let's just look after it was launched, hopefully what the team said could really materialize

Token could be launched at a higher price than ico's price then suddenly rise or...dump. Launch price means nothing to me, market will react at people will.

[pynetx]

It is quite interesting that the team itself said that the price of JRT after launching would not be that ico and to make it clearer, let's just look after it was launched, hopefully what the team said could really materialize

Token could be launched at a higher price than ico's price then suddenly rise or...dump. Launch price means nothing to me, market will react at people will.

You are right because bounty pool was quite high I am expecting a huge dump before the price recover. But, it won't be a wise move in the longer term.

[Jarvis Edge]

Happy Friday everyone!

We had an amazing AMA session with Pascal couple of weeks ago, where he explained the technical side of the hybrid exchange and presented our new roadmap and user acquisition strategy.

If you are interested but do not have the time to watch the full video, we made a small article detailing the key points of the stream.

Link: https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/ama-digest-a5add9bf1af

[denam]

This AMA answered many questions which were raising in minds of people including mine. I think the approach to develop first and then list token on external and internal exchange has weight. I would prefer to wait if this may make the tokens much more valuable. It is very good AMA and everyone should have look at it.

[coin-investor]

Happy Friday everyone!

We had an amazing AMA session with Pascal couple of weeks ago, where he explained the technical side of the hybrid exchange and presented our new roadmap and user acquisition strategy.

If you are interested but do not have the time to watch the full video, we made a small article detailing the key points of the stream.

Link: https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/ama-digest-a5add9bf1af

Keep it up, as long as you update all your channels about the development of this project, people will keep supporting you, but it is ok to list the coin to a minor exchange for now, while you develop your products, then after the products are there, you can go for a big exchange, this is a good start and there will be momentum.

[Smitty Werben Man Jensen]

Happy Friday everyone!

We had an amazing AMA session with Pascal couple of weeks ago, where he explained the technical side of the hybrid exchange and presented our new roadmap and user acquisition strategy.

If you are interested but do not have the time to watch the full video, we made a small article detailing the key points of the stream.

Link: https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/ama-digest-a5add9bf1af

Keep it up, as long as you update all your channels about the development of this project, people will keep supporting you, but it is ok to list the coin to a minor exchange for now, while you develop your products, then after the products are there, you can go for a big exchange, this is a good start and there will be momentum.

What you say is true there is nothing wrong if for now registering a coin in a small exchange first and after growing it might be possible to register a coin in a big exchange and I think it all takes time