[ICO ENDED] Jarvis Network - bridge legacy and digital finance

[PS92]

Since everyone can contribute to a github repository maybe if they manage to build a good community they can speed up things with a community driven development

Is Jarvis code opensource atm?

[1714552839]

1714552839

[1714552839]

1714552839

[1714552839]

1714552839

[Token Williams]

Since everyone can contribute to a github repository maybe if they manage to build a good community they can speed up things with a community driven development

of course everything will run well and quickly if what is targeted can be achieved easily, but what makes long-running jar is the problem of selling ico, which has not met the target, so this will make it longer than the one in estimate

Can you rephrase what you were trying to say? I have no idea what your comment means. Are you saying they haven't met their target?

Maybe he / she is referring on recent poor performances of ICO's that forced most project members to prolong or extend the ICO period which could also result in a longer development phase.

2017 really did a number on the ico market..........

[viljy]

Tomorrow, we will close the presale

https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/its-still-better-to-buy-during-the-ico-than-on-an-exchange-here-s-why-cfb37486d828

From this article, we can conclude that your tokens cease to be impersonal. That is, tokens acquire the properties of some preferred and ordinary shares, as payments will be differentiated depending on the period of purchase of tokens by the owners. You consider using token standard erc721 in order to organize this rather complicated system of payments. But it seems to me that this excessive complication is not the best solution in this case...

We are open to receive any input from the community so if you can tell us more about your point of view, it will be very appreciated

Initially we wanted to whitelist address within the smartcontract. It is the easiest solution at the moment. The idea of the token comes with the idea that this token would be an asset that could be transmitted.

How is it possible to do this? To exchange tokens, each pack of these holders for 1 token ERC721? And they will all have different returns and different prices. But how can they then be divided into parts if the holder wants to sell the part? Or maybe I didn't quite get the idea.

[mandibleclaw]

Since everyone can contribute to a github repository maybe if they manage to build a good community they can speed up things with a community driven development

They could get some ideas and feedback for the community but its hard to attract big crowds nowadays and also everyone is a crypto guru suddenly so you have to be careful who is giving you ideas.

Usually code speaks for developers themselves, there's no chit-chat involved when we speak about coders, they usually gain respect with the work they do

[Frank37]

Since everyone can contribute to a github repository maybe if they manage to build a good community they can speed up things with a community driven development

Is Jarvis code opensource atm?

You can find all here:

https://gitlab.com/jarvis-exchange


And they have a prototype for transpiling Java and Python into Javascript.

https://github.com/JarvisEdge

[sockpuppet1911]

How much leverage are you offering? One of the main things that Bitmex is luring gamblers in is that ridiculous 100x. I mean it's hard to try to trade with that and still keep your money, but it seem to be a good way for an exchange to target some potential new clients.

[Noruka]

Since everyone can contribute to a github repository maybe if they manage to build a good community they can speed up things with a community driven development

of course everything will run well and quickly if what is targeted can be achieved easily, but what makes long-running jar is the problem of selling ico, which has not met the target, so this will make it longer than the one in estimate

Can you rephrase what you were trying to say? I have no idea what your comment means. Are you saying they haven't met their target?

Maybe he / she is referring on recent poor performances of ICO's that forced most project members to prolong or extend the ICO period which could also result in a longer development phase.

Maybe that is what he / she / it was trying to say (to be politically correct). Jarvis is being developed as we speak and they are not going to prolong the ICO I think. Of course it takes more time to develop with less funds.

[Juse14]

Just want to ask gan, did jarvis have some bounty campaign running for their project. Want to be participated on Bounty Jarvis, i cant find it for the thread bounty. maybe someone can give me for the link. Thanks

[Jarvis Edge]

Just want to ask gan, did jarvis have some bounty campaign running for their project. Want to be participated on Bounty Jarvis, i cant find it for the thread bounty. maybe someone can give me for the link. Thanks

Hello Juse the ICO bounty will be over in one week. The bounty is here > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5065193.msg47680318#msg47680318 But there will be many more bounties after

There is one to incentivize people to use our partner Celsius : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/jarvis-and-celsius-network-team-up-to-bring-p2p-lending-and-borrowing-of-digital-assets-to-b8c0aaa76c6f

[Jarvis Edge]

so the team has limited funds available but they are already working on the new wallet, i am curious to know new updates on this topic...

They will release the wallet first and then they will focus on the exchange platform.

Yes, actually we plan to launch many things in the coming 3 to 4 months, we will update the roadmap soon.

[Jarvis Edge]

How much leverage are you offering? One of the main things that Bitmex is luring gamblers in is that ridiculous 100x. I mean it's hard to try to trade with that and still keep your money, but it seem to be a good way for an exchange to target some potential new clients.

Hello,

Up to 100 on Forex, and 5 on crypto.

[bitcoin-shark]

so the team has limited funds available but they are already working on the new wallet, i am curious to know new updates on this topic...

They will release the wallet first and then they will focus on the exchange platform.

Yes, actually we plan to launch many things in the coming 3 to 4 months, we will update the roadmap soon.

so let's say that in 4 months time we would have a working wallet that we can try, it seems to me great, i wait for the updated roadmap...

[Sozialtourist]

Yes, actually we plan to launch many things in the coming 3 to 4 months, we will update the roadmap soon.

so let's say that in 4 months time we would have a working wallet that we can try, it seems to me great, i wait for the updated roadmap...

Does this mean that the platform should be (almost) fully functional by the end of July at the latest? Or are there then still some essential parts to be completed.

[Token Williams]

Tomorrow, we will close the presale

https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/its-still-better-to-buy-during-the-ico-than-on-an-exchange-here-s-why-cfb37486d828

From this article, we can conclude that your tokens cease to be impersonal. That is, tokens acquire the properties of some preferred and ordinary shares, as payments will be differentiated depending on the period of purchase of tokens by the owners. You consider using token standard erc721 in order to organize this rather complicated system of payments. But it seems to me that this excessive complication is not the best solution in this case...

We are open to receive any input from the community so if you can tell us more about your point of view, it will be very appreciated

Initially we wanted to whitelist address within the smartcontract. It is the easiest solution at the moment. The idea of the token comes with the idea that this token would be an asset that could be transmitted.

How is it possible to do this? To exchange tokens, each pack of these holders for 1 token ERC721? And they will all have different returns and different prices. But how can they then be divided into parts if the holder wants to sell the part? Or maybe I didn't quite get the idea.

Maybe try one of those new ERC-tokens companies like Polymath and Harbor are offering. Will try to find their respective ERC-numbers

[PS92]

Tomorrow, we will close the presale

https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/its-still-better-to-buy-during-the-ico-than-on-an-exchange-here-s-why-cfb37486d828

From this article, we can conclude that your tokens cease to be impersonal. That is, tokens acquire the properties of some preferred and ordinary shares, as payments will be differentiated depending on the period of purchase of tokens by the owners. You consider using token standard erc721 in order to organize this rather complicated system of payments. But it seems to me that this excessive complication is not the best solution in this case...

We are open to receive any input from the community so if you can tell us more about your point of view, it will be very appreciated

Initially we wanted to whitelist address within the smartcontract. It is the easiest solution at the moment. The idea of the token comes with the idea that this token would be an asset that could be transmitted.

How is it possible to do this? To exchange tokens, each pack of these holders for 1 token ERC721? And they will all have different returns and different prices. But how can they then be divided into parts if the holder wants to sell the part? Or maybe I didn't quite get the idea.

Maybe try one of those new ERC-tokens companies like Polymath and Harbor are offering. Will try to find their respective ERC-numbers

https://blog.polymath.network/erc-1400-a-library-of-interoperable-security-token-standards-4c4e632cdfbc

[mandibleclaw]

Maybe try one of those new ERC-tokens companies like Polymath and Harbor are offering. Will try to find their respective ERC-numbers

While those ones are using tokens issued on the ethereum's blockchain, Swarm for example is using a different approach, its standard, SRC20 tokens, are issued on the Stellar's blockchain

[matjas]

Hopefully the devs could fast tract its development and that no major issues arise to slow it down and if this happens, I'm very positive we can see concrete results 3 -4 months from now.

I believe they could stick to their plans especially since we are seing some glances of possible bullish market incoming in the next few months, this would be a perfect timing for Jarvis.

[bitcoin-shark]

if the team were to meet the deadlines and release the wallet in about 4 months and then soon the exchange, and with some strategic partnership (polymath?) it would become the reference exchange for the world of crypto, the one that was missing so far...

[levyashin]

I like how transparent your website is about the funds gathered so far. Most of the ico is not sharing the results and they are telling always blockchain will bring more transparency to the market but they act in the opposite.

[Dimosscolorist]

Hopefully the devs could fast tract its development and that no major issues arise to slow it down and if this happens, I'm very positive we can see concrete results 3 -4 months from now.

I believe they could stick to their plans especially since we are seing some glances of possible bullish market incoming in the next few months, this would be a perfect timing for Jarvis.

I do not think that the team should hope for the bull run in the near future, no catalyst can be seen for this. I think they feel right, counting on harsh conditions in the near future.
I'm also waiting for the bulls, probably like everything, but it seems to me that they are still far away.