✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆

[SwC_Poker]

SOON

[1714801837]

1714801837

[vavvio]

Site suggestions:

A option to show or hide balance, or have the balance switched so its in the cashier when you're playing in front of others.

A hand replayer similar to pokerstars where you can scroll through hands and go straight to the hand you want to view instead of clicking every hand to see one particular hand and maybe a highest to smallest pot view option.

Option to filter more than one stake.

Option to filter more then one game format.

Option to filter more then one seat.

Thx.

[Betwrong]

I was planning to play in 3 yesterday's satellites for the The BIG BTC!, but, unfortunately, couldn't make it to be online in the proper time. Congrats to all the 10 winners! Even the 10th place was awarded with a pretty good prize, 0.025 BTC! 95 players were enrolled this time, and considering that most of them were good players, it was surely not that easy to finish in the top 10.

[tokeweed]

Nice to haves:
Allow editing notes in replayer
Add street buttons in replayer (click in street to move to start of street)
Give some reward for krill 50, as far as I can tell you get nothing for it now (no rake improvement and no freerolls)
Make the color labeling a bit more distinct in the UI

And whatever feature Stars would be good to have at SWC.    No seriously.  Stars has still by far the best UI experience in the business.  I seem to play more hours in there than any other poker site.

[vavvio]

Why doesn't swcpoker get more traffic? I know i now bitcoin and anonymous owners, but no one is saying to deposit your whole bankroll on the site, deposit the amount of buyins you need to play and if you need more it takes less than 15 minutes to deposit more, is there a reason swcpoker don't have a rep on 2+2 and push their site more answer players questions? does it have anything to do with the legal bs? or is it more -> small poker site less hassle from the government as in they won't bother them, or is it if they become a bigger traffic site governments might take a interest and try to shut them down again? I see this question asked a lot by many players, could someone explain the reasoning why they don't advertise more?

I like the site and be cool to see more traffic and why i ask, but if this post is in anyway -EV for the site delete it.

[Betwrong]

~
Give some reward for krill 50, as far as I can tell you get nothing for it now (no rake improvement and no freerolls)
~

Yeah, having something for 50 Krill would be really nice, cause right now I'm approaching this mark.



I think another cash game with stakes 1/2 can get me there.

~ I seem to play more hours in there than any other poker site.

Me too! Great site. I used to play on betcoinpoker, but they have changed recently, and I don't like the current layout and disappearance of numerous daily tournaments. SWC poker is great in this regard, every time you visit the site you can either make a late registration or register for a tournament that will start in several minutes.

[BTCevo]

Why doesn't swcpoker get more traffic? I know i now bitcoin and anonymous owners, but no one is saying to deposit your whole bankroll on the site, deposit the amount of buyins you need to play and if you need more it takes less than 15 minutes to deposit more, is there a reason swcpoker don't have a rep on 2+2 and push their site more answer players questions? does it have anything to do with the legal bs? or is it more -> small poker site less hassle from the government as in they won't bother them, or is it if they become a bigger traffic site governments might take a interest and try to shut them down again? I see this question asked a lot by many players, could someone explain the reasoning why they don't advertise more?

I like the site and be cool to see more traffic and why i ask, but if this post is in anyway -EV for the site delete it.

Not just swcpoker but every poker sites have this kind of problem because first it takes times when we played. Second, you really need many players to make sure it will generate more money, the money flow will be good. If you compare to other games like dice then it is really hard to tell. But swcpoker do have big members before they relaunch. You should checked on their past history

[SwC_Poker]

We know our players want a bigger poker room and we want that too. SwC believes the path to a bigger site starts with improving the software. To capture a bigger share of the market our product must improve so when new players first play it there are no bugs. We will introduce Leaderboards soon and we will continue to run the promotions we are running today, but our focus will be on building better software, not marketing.

[mitchr4]

Why doesn't swcpoker get more traffic? I know i now bitcoin and anonymous owners, but no one is saying to deposit your whole bankroll on the site, deposit the amount of buyins you need to play and if you need more it takes less than 15 minutes to deposit more, is there a reason swcpoker don't have a rep on 2+2 and push their site more answer players questions? does it have anything to do with the legal bs? or is it more -> small poker site less hassle from the government as in they won't bother them, or is it if they become a bigger traffic site governments might take a interest and try to shut them down again? I see this question asked a lot by many players, could someone explain the reasoning why they don't advertise more?

I like the site and be cool to see more traffic and why i ask, but if this post is in anyway -EV for the site delete it.

Not just swcpoker but every poker sites have this kind of problem because first it takes times when we played. Second, you really need many players to make sure it will generate more money, the money flow will be good. If you compare to other games like dice then it is really hard to tell. But swcpoker do have big members before they relaunch. You should checked on their past history

I was an old player since they changed their name to SwC Poker. At that time, many poker players were seen from full tables, but did not know why Poker enthusiasts were decreasing, indeed this does not apply to SwC but other poker sites. It is possible that the emergence of several new Casino sites has made them switch to other games.

[tokeweed]

We know our players want a bigger poker room and we want that too. SwC believes the path to a bigger site starts with improving the software. To capture a bigger share of the market our product must improve so when new players first play it there are no bugs. We will introduce Leaderboards soon and we will continue to run the promotions we are running today, but our focus will be on building better software, not marketing.

Oh ok...  Thanks for making that clear.  But at least expand the BBJ to the 5/10 - 10/20 tables please.  That should help get more traffic to those stakes.

[Crypt0xxx]

Hello SwC_Poker  !
One question please...
Is it possible to download hand history of played hands ? Thanks.

[tokeweed]

^  I think you need to email them and make a request.

Anyway, I noticed that there's fewer traffic at the site now.  What happened?  I think making it harder to win the BBJ and expanding it down up to 2/4 might do the trick.  IMHO.

At least try it.

[SkyReVo]

^  I think you need to email them and make a request.

Anyway, I noticed that there's fewer traffic at the site now.  What happened?  I think making it harder to win the BBJ and expanding it down up to 2/4 might do the trick.  IMHO.

At least try it.

I don't have much skin in the game as I don't play NLHE much, but here's my perspective on why they might not want to lower the BBJ limits:

- They make like 20-50% of the rake they make off usual cashgame tables already, since you don't pay extra rake for the BBJ. If you lower that to 2/4, the absolute amount of rake they'd make would be absolutely miniscule and probably don't cover costs. Also, the BBJ would fill much more slowly.

- The games as of now are incredibly soft, and it is because lower stake people take shots to sit at these tables. If you lower the BBJ limit, the 25/50 games dry up and move lower. A shot at the BBJ tables costs $12 right now to participate in a ~$6000 jackpot.

- And lastly, it would be kind of unfair to the people contributing at the (much) higher stakes to share their chances at the jackpot with the (more frequent, because massively +EV) lower tables.

[tokeweed]

^

The BBJ tables should take extra rake.

That's the thing.  The rec players go broke much faster taking shots at 25/50.  You don't want that.  You want them to stay for as long as possible at lower stakes...  Attracting more traffic from there since it's more likely other rec players will rather play low than high.

And wait, a shot at 25/50 is 12 bucks?  BTC is at 12k.

[SkyReVo]

^

The BBJ tables should take extra rake.

That's the thing.  The rec players go broke much faster taking shots at 25/50.  You don't want that.  You want them to stay for as long as possible at lower stakes...  Attracting more traffic from there since it's more likely other rec players will rather play low than high.

And wait, a shot at 25/50 is 12 bucks?  BTC is at 12k.

No, it should not take extra rake, the concept is absolutely brilliant. What keeps lower stake players from sitting non-BBJ tables at lower stakes?

You can sit the BBJ tables with 1k chips ($12)

[shtako]

The only thing I would change with the bad beat jackpot is to make bad beat tables for plo as well. No limit hold em is incredible boring.

[yeakewIbet]

desktop version bugs

When you select the stakes filter -> low stakes,  it doesn't show tables below 10/20 , to show these tables you need to select freerolls which likely confuses players and they might not even see players sitting at 1/2 to 10/20 tables which means less traffic.

Also doesn't display folded hand while action is still between other players.

[tokeweed]

^

The BBJ tables should take extra rake.

That's the thing.  The rec players go broke much faster taking shots at 25/50.  You don't want that.  You want them to stay for as long as possible at lower stakes...  Attracting more traffic from there since it's more likely other rec players will rather play low than high.

And wait, a shot at 25/50 is 12 bucks?  BTC is at 12k.

No, it should not take extra rake, the concept is absolutely brilliant. What keeps lower stake players from sitting non-BBJ tables at lower stakes?

You can sit the BBJ tables with 1k chips ($12)

What?  And encourage everybody who can't afford a buy in at those stakes to short stack?  Lol.  That's gonna make the quality of the games go down.

[SkyReVo]

^

The BBJ tables should take extra rake.

That's the thing.  The rec players go broke much faster taking shots at 25/50.  You don't want that.  You want them to stay for as long as possible at lower stakes...  Attracting more traffic from there since it's more likely other rec players will rather play low than high.

And wait, a shot at 25/50 is 12 bucks?  BTC is at 12k.

No, it should not take extra rake, the concept is absolutely brilliant. What keeps lower stake players from sitting non-BBJ tables at lower stakes?

You can sit the BBJ tables with 1k chips ($12)

What?  And encourage everybody who can't afford a buy in at those stakes to short stack?  Lol.  That's gonna make the quality of the games go down.

STRONGLY disagree. And again, there are options who can't afford to pay $12 to play NLHE on site, the BBJ needs to be somewhat exclusive.

[SkyReVo]

Quick idea: Let people win multiple BigBTC tickets and then give them away to other players.

No downside I can see to SWC (except for a bit more organisational effort), more sats would probably run and more people would get the chance to play for free/cheap.

Also, QoL request: Please show the regged SNGs/tourneys as "In Game" in cashier and reflect in total balance. I keep getting mini heart attacks when I forget I'm regged and open the cashier.