FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread

[fuguebtc]

This is also an experiment for FIFA, for many years the top directives of FIFA thought that the world cup awarded to South Korea and Japan was a mistake and there were claims there will never be another world cup with multiple hosts, however they seem to have changed their mind due to the increase on the number of teams and matches, as this increase made way harder for a single country to have all the stadiums necessary to host the world cup, and while this would not have a problem for the US, they are using this world cup to see if this model can work and from now on multiple hosts could become the norm.

I am not in favor of having multiple hosts. One of the few positives from the 2022 FIFA World Cup was that it was hosted by a single country and therefore the fans didn't faced much difficulty in traveling and arranging accommodation. It is going to be a nightmare for the fans in 2026, as they need to travel thousands of miles to watch their favorite teams playing. Some of the matches are being scheduled in one extreme of the continent, and others are being scheduled in the other extreme. I am not sure how this is going to work out.

This doesn't make sense because there is no difference at all in terms of distances when the USA hosts the World Cup 2026 alone. Do you really think it matters whether you have to go from Houston to Washington or whether Canada and Mexico are involved? Visa and stuff could be an issue, but that is probably no different when a Mexican wants to go to Qatar or Canada.

Having several hosts can be beneficial for so many reasons as well and I think it is rather a decision that emphasizes inclusion than exclusion. Having the support of a nation like the USA to host the World Cup is good for Mexico as I am sure there will also be a lot of cooperation on the security concepts as well, which is something that can't be neglected at all these days (sadly).

I personally am not a big supporter of the players to travel around during the World Cup. The players should be concentrating on how to play well instead of traveling from one country to another. And we all know that there can be a lot of problems with having multiple hosts of the World Cup. So why even go through that trouble?

Less traveling is going to make sure that the players are not tired and actually are concentrating on playing well in the World Cup matches. And something very famous right now going on in the West is rape allegations against the players. That is definitely going to happen less in my opinion if the players are not travelling from one country to another every other day.

[1715285857]

1715285857

[1715285857]

1715285857

[Sithara007]

I personally am not a big supporter of the players to travel around during the World Cup. The players should be concentrating on how to play well instead of traveling from one country to another. And we all know that there can be a lot of problems with having multiple hosts of the World Cup. So why even go through that trouble?

Less traveling is going to make sure that the players are not tired and actually are concentrating on playing well in the World Cup matches. And something very famous right now going on in the West is rape allegations against the players. That is definitely going to happen less in my opinion if the players are not travelling from one country to another every other day.

Also, you need to take into account that USA and Canada are two of the largest countries in terms of surface area. And in many cases, the teams would be travelling from one extreme of the continent to other. And given the tight schedule of world cup, there will be hardly 3-4 days gap between the matches and this can leave the players as well as the fans exhausted. For 2030 FIFA World Cup, four of the South American countries are also planning to host the event jointly. But in their case, the area is not as large as that in case of USA/Canada.

[nullama]

~snip~
I personally am not a big supporter of the players to travel around during the World Cup. The players should be concentrating on how to play well instead of traveling from one country to another. And we all know that there can be a lot of problems with having multiple hosts of the World Cup. So why even go through that trouble?

Less traveling is going to make sure that the players are not tired and actually are concentrating on playing well in the World Cup matches. And something very famous right now going on in the West is rape allegations against the players. That is definitely going to happen less in my opinion if the players are not travelling from one country to another every other day.

Yeah, I also think it's simpler and better to have a single country hosting the world cup.

But based on the next world cup, and the following bids, we will be looking at multi-country world cups for at least a decade or so.

It's just the new normal. Also, there will be more countries in the competition, whether we like it or not.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I have posted this before. The decision to grant the hosting rights to Qatar for the 2022 world cup was a grave mistake from the part of FIFA. There were issues related to poor treatment being meted out to the construction workers, as well as issues regarding discrimination against certain sections of the visitors. Even in 2018, Russia hosted the tournament without any major issues. But that was not the case with Qatar in 2022. Hopefully the 2026 edition would be an occasion where the visitors and fans are treated with respect.

I hope this is the case as this was the most common complain fans had about the Qatar world cup, however there are things that could easily go wrong, the public security at Mexico is low and fans could face some dangers if going there, and while the US will host most of the games there could be some issues there as well, as visas could be difficult to get if migratory laws get harsher and the possibility of an attack against the stadiums will always be there.

I would guess that Mexico ones will not get all that much visitors, not as many as USA ones to be fair. I think it's obvious that we are going to end up seeing USA to get the most visitors out of all three nations and they are going to do fine. This is of course not guaranteed, but I bet that it's not going to be a big deal and we should be seeing trouble on the long run.

This is of course a trouble when you consider that it's going to end up with a cultural resemblance as well, there are tons of western nations going to world cup, and most of the time it's either Latin American or European teams that wins it, and that means cultures are quite close enough, for clothing, drinking, acting, everything will be pretty similar.

Well, with respect to Qatar, things can be very ambiguous, some say yes, it was a mistake, but why was it Qatar and not another country? Was there a lot of money there for them not to take away the world headquarters from this country? Why did FIFA become a blind eye, of course many say that human rights are biased in these countries, but there are countries that also violate human rights and continue walking without saying anything, the Qatari workers are unfortunate, It is something that should not have happened, but who are we to get into the rules, laws of that country and tell them what is right and what is wrong? I don't think we will have that right, as I have said before, if a country chooses to be the headquarters of the world, that country has its customs, it has its rules, and it is the one that hosts an event, the people and the fans, and players have to stick to the rules of that country, there is nothing to do there, if things are like that, you simply have to respect, there are many things that you like and others that you do not like, but after all, that country is sovereign, It has its own laws and FIFA knew that.

Now the new world cup with these 3 countries , it would be Excellent if they could include some good games from Europe from European countries, because I do not consider that Mexico will have few people, it is a common country and like all, of course there are some customs that are Different , and that are usually seen with the naked eye, but it is a different country, nothing else in its language and everything, but it must be taken into Consideration that Mexico is a very Beautiful country, that it has a lot to know and that it has a lot to do with the things that exist, it has a lot of history, compared to the USA, the USA is a developed country, it is quite obvious that the people there will cause more emotion, it has a lot to entertain themselves, and apart from the Disney parks and all those things, they are quite Striking, obviously you also have to do and grow to know Something,  your security is superior, in Mexico things have to be Better, with more Security.

I think the main reason for FIFA to choose three countries instead of one country is that we are going to have more teams in the tournament and this can put any host under more pressure, however, America had enough potential to host the 2026 World Cup by themselves and even now when we are going to have three countries hosting the world cup, still America will host most of the games and the other two teams are just co-hosting this tournament.

That is the part of the reason why they choose these three countries to host the next world cup, I mean that their move is understandable because they wanted a much bigger arena with guaranteed audience when they present their new format this coming 2026 with more games and teams added. As we all know, having the games in North America means that almost every fellow in this world can watch it and that's their goal.

Other than that, the most obvious reason why FIFA chose America-Canada-Mexico to host the 2026 World Cup is that these three countries bid and won the bid together. It's a business after all and in every business, there's always a motive behind the reason. Just like how the Qatar was rumored to won the bid because they have bought some of the people in the FIFA council to guarantee a spot to host a world cup event.

Well these things are very true, in fact I still remember when I was little and I saw the World Cup in USA94, which was a great event, I remember that back then I started to fill my panini album, it was quite an emotion, for me the main thing was to be able to fill that album before the World Cup started, in fact when that World Cup started everything was very nice, I remember the opening ceremony, everything was something great, I remember that earlier that year the final was very exciting, I really didn't like soccer in the USA not at all, but I remember very good players who did well, among those Lalas, and at that time the design of the USA fields seemed strange to me, especially the soccer goals, they had a design that was too right, in itself it was different, because I was used to seeing coaches of a different style, their different goals, at that time I really liked what some teams like Romania and Sweden were doing, they showed very elegant football, at that time they still played football and there was the Brazilian stars of the moment like Romario and Bebeto who shattered any defense, I liked how they understood each other, it was an impressive duo.

Those memories of that World Cup are very vague but at the same time very strong, Italy's performance was impressive, Baggio was a great player who did very well for me but was not lucky enough to score that decisive goal, all these things are The ones that I remember from that World Cup, currently I really like that the USA, Canada, and Mexico have been made, I like it and I'm curious about how the Canadians are going to do it since I haven't seen very striking football there, but I know that I'm sure they will show a very good football, and it's that Canada has a somewhat cold climate, I'll be happy to see some games that fall snow, to see how some players will perform, especially those who are used to hot climates and who have no interaction With the snow, I really expect a lot from this tournament, that it be much better than all the others that have happened.

[Hirose UK]

~snip~
I personally am not a big supporter of the players to travel around during the World Cup. The players should be concentrating on how to play well instead of traveling from one country to another. And we all know that there can be a lot of problems with having multiple hosts of the World Cup. So why even go through that trouble?

Less traveling is going to make sure that the players are not tired and actually are concentrating on playing well in the World Cup matches. And something very famous right now going on in the West is rape allegations against the players. That is definitely going to happen less in my opinion if the players are not travelling from one country to another every other day.

Yeah, I also think it's simpler and better to have a single country hosting the world cup.

But based on the next world cup, and the following bids, we will be looking at multi-country world cups for at least a decade or so.

It's just the new normal. Also, there will be more countries in the competition, whether we like it or not.

Apart from being simpler and able to provide good efficiency, it will also improve the smooth running of the World Cup because using multiple countries as the host of the World Cup can cause conflicts that can occur at any time and each team must adapt in every place that will be used with the weather conditions of each country is different and not all players can easily adapt to these differences.

It's that on the other hand there is a positive impact with the multi-country hosting the World Cup, namely being able to develop the football industry for two countries at once and being able to provide financial benefits for the people of the two countries.

[mirakal]

This is also an experiment for FIFA, for many years the top directives of FIFA thought that the world cup awarded to South Korea and Japan was a mistake and there were claims there will never be another world cup with multiple hosts, however they seem to have changed their mind due to the increase on the number of teams and matches, as this increase made way harder for a single country to have all the stadiums necessary to host the world cup, and while this would not have a problem for the US, they are using this world cup to see if this model can work and from now on multiple hosts could become the norm.

I am not in favor of having multiple hosts. One of the few positives from the 2022 FIFA World Cup was that it was hosted by a single country and therefore the fans didn't faced much difficulty in traveling and arranging accommodation. It is going to be a nightmare for the fans in 2026, as they need to travel thousands of miles to watch their favorite teams playing. Some of the matches are being scheduled in one extreme of the continent, and others are being scheduled in the other extreme. I am not sure how this is going to work out.

This doesn't make sense because there is no difference at all in terms of distances when the USA hosts the World Cup 2026 alone. Do you really think it matters whether you have to go from Houston to Washington or whether Canada and Mexico are involved? Visa and stuff could be an issue, but that is probably no different when a Mexican wants to go to Qatar or Canada.

Having several hosts can be beneficial for so many reasons as well and I think it is rather a decision that emphasizes inclusion than exclusion. Having the support of a nation like the USA to host the World Cup is good for Mexico as I am sure there will also be a lot of cooperation on the security concepts as well, which is something that can't be neglected at all these days (sadly).

I personally am not a big supporter of the players to travel around during the World Cup. The players should be concentrating on how to play well instead of traveling from one country to another. And we all know that there can be a lot of problems with having multiple hosts of the World Cup. So why even go through that trouble?

Less traveling is going to make sure that the players are not tired and actually are concentrating on playing well in the World Cup matches. And something very famous right now going on in the West is rape allegations against the players. That is definitely going to happen less in my opinion if the players are not travelling from one country to another every other day.

I understand but I think that there's only few people who are against travelling because we know that even if it will happen in one same country, the players along with its staff will still have to face the trouble in having fatigue and stress because they will still travel from one place to another and have some preparation before they can play to their sport. There's literally no difference at all and instead it will be their time to rest as there's sure no training whenever they are travelling. These players are already accustomed with travelling and these things comes in a package whether they like it or not.

[FanEagle]

Anthony situation is a weird one, if it was real then I would understand him being dropped from the national team, but if it is a lie? Then why would Brazil suffer from some woman's lie? Anthony is a player that helps his team win games, he plays good, he is talented and he definitely could create his own possessions, so he is someone they really would need.

I am not saying that do not drop him if he did it, if he really hurt his ex girlfriend not only he should be dropped from the nation team, but he should be let go from United and just be jailed overall, hurting someone is not acceptable no matter how big your name is. But there is zero proof about that so far, and that is not going to be ok to just lie about it.

[Slow death]

In recent times it has been normal to see many cases of famous players involved in cases of attacks against women, it seems to me that this may be related to the fact that players, because they earn a lot of money and fame, look at women as a simple worthless object and that It is also combined with the fact that most women run after famous soccer players because they have money, so this created conditions for players to look at women as worthless objects, I have seen many cases of Brazilian players, when they go playing in Europe and achieving fame and a lot of money has been involved in many controversies involving attacks on women

Only in the last 5 years have I heard cases of Neymar who was accused of assault against a woman who apparently later discovered that the sex case was consensual, there was the case of Robinho who is also accused of rape, then there was also the case of the player Daniel Alves who was also arrested and accused of sexual rape, now there is this case of Anthony who, based on the information he sees circulating, it seems to me that it is not something small, it seems more that the guy has some guilt at least in the matter of verbal aggression, I don't know if it really crossed the line from verbal aggression to physical aggression

but one thing is certain: players need to have psychological support in their teams, because it seems that earning a lot of money and having a lot of fame is making them lose moral and ethical values and without these values they have constantly been involved in scandals and today Nowadays, clubs live on sponsorship and image, which is why they cannot associate themselves with a player with a bad image, mainly because fans do not forgive cases involving sexual assault.

[Sithara007]

I understand but I think that there's only few people who are against travelling because we know that even if it will happen in one same country, the players along with its staff will still have to face the trouble in having fatigue and stress because they will still travel from one place to another and have some preparation before they can play to their sport. There's literally no difference at all and instead it will be their time to rest as there's sure no training whenever they are travelling. These players are already accustomed with travelling and these things comes in a package whether they like it or not.

Traveling within the United States is unlike doing that in any other country. USA stretches for more than 4,000 km from East to West. Traveling that much distance in an aeroplane will take at least half a day (adding in the time required for airport transfers and security checks). Traveling by road or rail is going to take even more time. And for the 2026 edition, it is further complicated by the fact that apart from US, Canada and Mexico are also hosting some of the matches. Fans need to deal with huge distances and several languages and cultures.

[Zlantann]

Anthony situation is a weird one, if it was real then I would understand him being dropped from the national team, but if it is a lie? Then why would Brazil suffer from some woman's lie? Anthony is a player that helps his team win games, he plays good, he is talented and he definitely could create his own possessions, so he is someone they really would need.

I am not saying that do not drop him if he did it, if he really hurt his ex girlfriend not only he should be dropped from the nation team, but he should be let go from United and just be jailed overall, hurting someone is not acceptable no matter how big your name is. But there is zero proof about that so far, and that is not going to be ok to just lie about it.

I am against punishment before investigation. Gabriela Cavallin, Anthony's girlfriend claims that she has proof that the player engaged in domestic violence against her. But Anthony denies such allegation and claims his innocence. We have seen many of these cases dropped because of a lack of evidence. My argument is that the player should be allowed to engage in his profession until he is found guilty.  His engagement in foosball will not affect investigations, so he shouldn't have been dropped from the match against Bolivia and Peru. He should not be punished before the investigation because he may be innocent. But this is an opportunity for Gabriel Jesus to be part of the national team.

[nullama]

~snip~
Apart from being simpler and able to provide good efficiency, it will also improve the smooth running of the World Cup because using multiple countries as the host of the World Cup can cause conflicts that can occur at any time and each team must adapt in every place that will be used with the weather conditions of each country is different and not all players can easily adapt to these differences.

It's that on the other hand there is a positive impact with the multi-country hosting the World Cup, namely being able to develop the football industry for two countries at once and being able to provide financial benefits for the people of the two countries.

And it's not only in two countries, the next World Cup will be played in three different countries: US, Canada, Mexico.

And there's a South American bid that includes four countries: Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

I really wish they select that one because it will be the 100th anniversary, and the first one was in Uruguay. It would be epic to go back to it.

[Strongkored]

Anthony situation is a weird one, if it was real then I would understand him being dropped from the national team, but if it is a lie? Then why would Brazil suffer from some woman's lie? Anthony is a player that helps his team win games, he plays good, he is talented and he definitely could create his own possessions, so he is someone they really would need.

I am not saying that do not drop him if he did it, if he really hurt his ex girlfriend not only he should be dropped from the nation team, but he should be let go from United and just be jailed overall, hurting someone is not acceptable no matter how big your name is. But there is zero proof about that so far, and that is not going to be ok to just lie about it.

I am against punishment before investigation. Gabriela Cavallin, Anthony's girlfriend claims that she has proof that the player engaged in domestic violence against her. But Anthony denies such allegation and claims his innocence. We have seen many of these cases dropped because of a lack of evidence. My argument is that the player should be allowed to engage in his profession until he is found guilty.  His engagement in foosball will not affect investigations, so he shouldn't have been dropped from the match against Bolivia and Peru. He should not be punished before the investigation because he may be innocent. But this is an opportunity for Gabriel Jesus to be part of the national team.

The reason used by the football federation is to protect the player, and actually, it makes sense because he will get a lot of pressure from the media so that it will probably affect his performance and if they lose you can imagine the blame will be placed on the player who is in trouble.
I agree with you that he should still be able to play but problems in personal life can really affect a player's mentality, and it was better for Anthony to accept that protesting would only get him in bigger trouble
This is good for Gabriel Jesus because he can prove himself to be a good player and the right choice for Brazil, and also Brazil is full of talented players it's not a problem for them to find a replacement for Anthony', and Anthony is not too special so his absence will make it difficult for Brazil to win.
Just waiting to see what Manchester United will do for this player.

[Sithara007]

And it's not only in two countries, the next World Cup will be played in three different countries: US, Canada, Mexico.

And there's a South American bid that includes four countries: Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

I really wish they select that one because it will be the 100th anniversary, and the first one was in Uruguay. It would be epic to go back to it.

I am strongly against multiple countries hosting the world cup, because it creates a lot of complexities not just for logistics and travel, but also for qualification. In case the combined bid from South America ends up winning the hosting rights for 2030, then how many of these nations will be granted automatic qualification? If all the four nations are being provided direct entry, then it would mean that there will be just 2 entries available from the CONMEBOL qualifiers. And one of them will be taken up by Brazil, which means just one spot for all the other teams.

[Litzki1990]

Anthony situation is a weird one, if it was real then I would understand him being dropped from the national team, but if it is a lie? Then why would Brazil suffer from some woman's lie? Anthony is a player that helps his team win games, he plays good, he is talented and he definitely could create his own possessions, so he is someone they really would need.

I am not saying that do not drop him if he did it, if he really hurt his ex girlfriend not only he should be dropped from the nation team, but he should be let go from United and just be jailed overall, hurting someone is not acceptable no matter how big your name is. But there is zero proof about that so far, and that is not going to be ok to just lie about it.

CBF should not have taken such a decision before the offense was proved. Anthony has been accused of beating his ex-girlfriend, but the accusation has not been proven in court so far, so the decision to exclude him from the national team based on the allegations alone is not correct by the CBF, the highest governing body of Brazilian football. Even if his allegations are proven true, he should have been punished according to the law, keeping a star like him out of football could ruin his football skills. Anthony is a very talented Brazilian player who has performed well in several matches for Brazil in important matches so it is a very disappointing news that he has been left out of the squad.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

And it's not only in two countries, the next World Cup will be played in three different countries: US, Canada, Mexico.

And there's a South American bid that includes four countries: Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

I really wish they select that one because it will be the 100th anniversary, and the first one was in Uruguay. It would be epic to go back to it.

I am strongly against multiple countries hosting the world cup, because it creates a lot of complexities not just for logistics and travel, but also for qualification. In case the combined bid from South America ends up winning the hosting rights for 2030, then how many of these nations will be granted automatic qualification? If all the four nations are being provided direct entry, then it would mean that there will be just 2 entries available from the CONMEBOL qualifiers. And one of them will be taken up by Brazil, which means just one spot for all the other teams.

I very much agree with you though, but then, I believe the coming world cup will be the first in history fifa history that multiple countries will be hosting the world cup, I personally have this believe that the coming world cup will act as an experiment for them, if it happens that they the coming tournament difficult in any way, maybe in terms of logistics and other factors like traveling, this I believe will tell if the bid for a multiple countries hosting the 2030 world cup will hold or not.

Though I still personally believe that aside the possible logistics and travel complexities , the idea of a multiple countries hosting the world cup is not completely bad, as it has its benefits as well .

[Docnaster]

~snip~
Apart from being simpler and able to provide good efficiency, it will also improve the smooth running of the World Cup because using multiple countries as the host of the World Cup can cause conflicts that can occur at any time and each team must adapt in every place that will be used with the weather conditions of each country is different and not all players can easily adapt to these differences.

It's that on the other hand there is a positive impact with the multi-country hosting the World Cup, namely being able to develop the football industry for two countries at once and being able to provide financial benefits for the people of the two countries.

And it's not only in two countries, the next World Cup will be played in three different countries: US, Canada, Mexico.

And there's a South American bid that includes four countries: Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

I really wish they select that one because it will be the 100th anniversary, and the first one was in Uruguay. It would be epic to go back to it.

The new FIFA adoption that allows multiple countries to host the FIFA World Cup doesn't sit well with majority of football lovers even when the World football body are trying to be more inclusive in their policies and help many nations to brag of hosting the World Cup that comes just ones in every four years.
One of the reasons some fans aren't okay with the multiple hosting is the fact that every hosting country automatically qualifies to play in the competition making it difficult for other countries of the same continental association to qualify for the finals of the tournament because their number of a available slots will reduce

[Sithara007]

The new FIFA adoption that allows multiple countries to host the FIFA World Cup doesn't sit well with majority of football lovers even when the World football body are trying to be more inclusive in their policies and help many nations to brag of hosting the World Cup that comes just ones in every four years.
One of the reasons some fans aren't okay with the multiple hosting is the fact that every hosting country automatically qualifies to play in the competition making it difficult for other countries of the same continental association to qualify for the finals of the tournament because their number of a available slots will reduce

Isn't it strange that the defending champions (Argentina) need to play the qualifier tournament to gain entry to the world cup in 2026, while teams like Canada and Mexico don't need to go through the same? And these two nations are hosting less than 10% of the total matches (10 each, out of a total of 104), and despite that they are being granted automatic entry. I didn't had an issue with Russia in 2018 and Qatar in 2022, partly because only one team is being given direct entry. But 2026 is not like that. And 2030 seems to be even more complicated, given the South American bid.

[armanda90]

The new FIFA adoption that allows multiple countries to host the FIFA World Cup doesn't sit well with majority of football lovers even when the World football body are trying to be more inclusive in their policies and help many nations to brag of hosting the World Cup that comes just ones in every four years.
One of the reasons some fans aren't okay with the multiple hosting is the fact that every hosting country automatically qualifies to play in the competition making it difficult for other countries of the same continental association to qualify for the finals of the tournament because their number of a available slots will reduce

Isn't it strange that the defending champions (Argentina) need to play the qualifier tournament to gain entry to the world cup in 2026, while teams like Canada and Mexico don't need to go through the same? And these two nations are hosting less than 10% of the total matches (10 each, out of a total of 104), and despite that they are being granted automatic entry. I didn't had an issue with Russia in 2018 and Qatar in 2022, partly because only one team is being given direct entry. But 2026 is not like that. And 2030 seems to be even more complicated, given the South American bid.

Its not happening for World Cup, Argentina as defend national team after winning FIFA World Cup 2022 in Qatar must play in qualifier round there are not special placed get by them. Not first time but all national teams have winning World Cup need to play in qualifier round for next world cup except they will be host. Spain, Germany and France are national team winning last edition of FIFA World Cup but they must play in qualifier round and I don't its good ideas adapting in World Cup. For host of World Cup have special for them and qualify to World Cup without have to play in qualifying stage.

United State, Canada and Mexico will not take participant in qualifying round and they will automatically will play in World Cup 2026 because they are host in this edition.

[tsaroz]

The new FIFA adoption that allows multiple countries to host the FIFA World Cup doesn't sit well with majority of football lovers even when the World football body are trying to be more inclusive in their policies and help many nations to brag of hosting the World Cup that comes just ones in every four years.
One of the reasons some fans aren't okay with the multiple hosting is the fact that every hosting country automatically qualifies to play in the competition making it difficult for other countries of the same continental association to qualify for the finals of the tournament because their number of a available slots will reduce

Isn't it strange that the defending champions (Argentina) need to play the qualifier tournament to gain entry to the world cup in 2026, while teams like Canada and Mexico don't need to go through the same? And these two nations are hosting less than 10% of the total matches (10 each, out of a total of 104), and despite that they are being granted automatic entry. I didn't had an issue with Russia in 2018 and Qatar in 2022, partly because only one team is being given direct entry. But 2026 is not like that. And 2030 seems to be even more complicated, given the South American bid.

Its not happening for World Cup, Argentina as defend national team after winning FIFA World Cup 2022 in Qatar must play in qualifier round there are not special placed get by them. Not first time but all national teams have winning World Cup need to play in qualifier round for next world cup except they will be host. Spain, Germany and France are national team winning last edition of FIFA World Cup but they must play in qualifier round and I don't its good ideas adapting in World Cup. For host of World Cup have special for them and qualify to World Cup without have to play in qualifying stage.

United State, Canada and Mexico will not take participant in qualifying round and they will automatically will play in World Cup 2026 because they are host in this edition.

I don't think that would be a greater problem as the number of teams are up from 32 to 48. Even though Canada, Mexico and United states are let in without qualifier, there are 14 more slots available than the last time. Increasing 16 teams at once means there would be 50% more teams than last time competing in this tournament. The tournament would last longer and there would be increased number of matches.
The idea of including larger number of diverse team are inline with creating a global tournament but how the people would react to the longer format is not clear yet. I personally believe 104 matches which are nearly double from last tournament would be fine as it's once in a 4 year event and everyone would attract larger viewership than last tournaments.

[synchronym]

After injury, Brazilian star Neymar returned to the team of the World Cup qualifiers. Brazil is persistent in the goal of Mission Hexa. Brazil is already active in fulfilling their dream of their sixth trophy in the United States in 2026. Therefore, the Brazil Football Confederation has announced a 23-member team for the first two rounds of the qualifiers, keeping Neymar, the symbol of Brazil's hope. The last time Neymar, who was named in Al Hilal, played in the Seleção jersey in the World Cup in Qatar. After that, the star missed three friendly matches of the national team due to injury. Neymar can return to the team with the qualifying match against Bolivia on September 8. The Selecao will play against Peru on September 12.