AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Ultegra134]

You can combine several short posts into one and then check them with detectors. I'm confident the results will be accurate, even though the overall meaning may be lost. As I understand it, this isn't always important for AI detectors. At least Copyleaks and QuillBot always detect the presence of AI.

That's actually a great idea I hadn't considered! For Copyleaks at least, I usually added a few empty characters in the back if I was missing a few characters to meet the quota. This however is a marvelous idea and I'm also confident that it's going to work just as accurate if it was a full text.

I'm also fond of Stealthwriter the past few weeks, it's probably one of the best options so far.

[lovesmayfamilis]

As a reference link: The posts are written using AI.

LOCKACO

[Don Pedro Dinero]

As a reference link: The posts are written using AI.

LOCKACO

A bloke who has earned 14 merits for the challenge node and the rest minus one in a post for saying he does push-ups, which is curious, according to him, at the gym. I am certain that this chap has never run a node or done push-ups; he simply writes in those threads to gain merit.

Congratulations for your 5,000 merit by the way. It looks good.

[lovesmayfamilis]

A bloke who has earned 14 merits for the challenge node and the rest minus one in a post for saying he does push-ups, which is curious, according to him, at the gym. I am certain that this chap has never run a node or done push-ups; he simply writes in those threads to gain merit.

I'd say there's a pattern: these newbies who come to the forum to do push-ups use the AI ​​and then participate in the Bitcoin Node Challenge. Many have a very similar method for distributing their merits after reaching 14 merits, and the same user always appears.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3714796
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3687039  This one, I have no doubt, was also preparing to transfer his merits.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3718519
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3730651  So far it only does push-ups

[nutildah]

As a reference link: The posts are written using AI.

LOCKACO

Definitely yet another farmed account following the same gameplan as those that came before him, who are now Ranked Shitposters. Looks like most of their newer posts have been deleted already. There sure are a lot of people around here who DCA bitcoin, do pushups and run a node, how lucky we are to be in the presence of such overachievers.

Just a couple of older posts written by this account, which again frequently uses some kind of humanizing service to make the text less readable, however ironically:


#1

I SUPPORT BITCOIN-DeFi too, LETS LOOK AT THE BIGGER PICTURE OF HAVING IT

The ability to borrow against Bitcoin without selling it is a powerful tool. It allows individuals and businesses to unlock the liquidity of their assets for various purposes, such as:

Making a down payment on a house

Funding a business

Paying off high-interest debt

Investing in other assets (without selling their Bitcoin)

Your point about Bitcoin-DeFi is spot-on. It represents the natural evolution of Bitcoin as a financial asset. It allows users to have the best of both worlds: the long-term value appreciation of their Bitcoin and the immediate utility of a loan to meet their short-term financial needs. It's a critical step in turning Bitcoin from a "frozen" store of value into a productive and dynamic asset within the global financial system

Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake


#2

It sounds like you've had a difficult journey with crypto scams, but you've found a solid and stable path with Bitcoin and the DCA strategy. It's great that you've learned from past experiences and are now focused on a more secure way to invest.

Many people fall into the same trap you did—getting caught up in "airdrops" and new schemes without understanding the risks. The feeling of missing out on early opportunities is a common one, and it's a powerful lesson to learn.

DCA, or dollar-cost averaging, is an excellent strategy, especially for an asset like Bitcoin. It removes the stress of trying to time the market and allows you to build your position gradually. By consistently investing a fixed amount over time, you can:

Reduce risk: You buy both when the price is high and when it's low, averaging out your purchase price.

Remove emotion: It takes the guesswork out of investing and makes it a disciplined habit.

Build wealth over time: Small, regular investments can add up significantly over the long term.

Your story is a perfect example of why this approach is so effective. Instead of chasing quick, high-risk gains, you've chosen a sustainable and proven method. It's a testament to the idea that slow and steady often wins the race, especially in the world of crypto investing.

Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake

[lovesmayfamilis]

A bloke who has earned 14 merits for the challenge node and the rest minus one in a post for saying he does push-ups, which is curious, according to him, at the gym. I am certain that this chap has never run a node or done push-ups; he simply writes in those threads to gain merit.

I'd say there's a pattern: these newbies who come to the forum to do push-ups use the AI ​​and then participate in the Bitcoin Node Challenge. Many have a very similar method for distributing their merits after reaching 14 merits, and the same user always appears.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3714796
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3687039  This one, I have no doubt, was also preparing to transfer his merits.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3718519
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3730651  So far it only does push-ups

I'll quote myself as an obvious follow-up to what I've already said. I think everyone understands perfectly well which account I was talking about earlier-Tonimez. As expected, it has now transferred five merits to its account. I'm leaving the tag for managers, who should draw their own conclusions about this owner managing multiple accounts, as the merits of the movements are obvious.





I don't rule out that there are more similar accounts.

I'll add another account that operates according to its method. You can check how often it posts its reports in the push-up thread, in parallel with the other accounts mentioned in the example (one after another). And, of course, it's waiting for its 14 merits.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3726437

[TopT3ns]

Newbie posts detected AI, already report and give neutral tag.

User: MoonRiderX

The idea of ​​Bitcoin as a source of intergenerational wealth is compelling and highly relevant in this digital age. Looking at the history of Bitcoin's ever-increasing value, from just a few dollars to tens of thousands of dollars per coin, we can understand why many consider it "digital gold." The concept of passing on Bitcoin to children is not just about providing a financial asset, but also about passing on knowledge, responsibility, and an awareness of the importance of decentralized technology. Bitcoin demands a higher level of financial literacy, as children who inherit it must understand digital security, private key management, and the philosophy of financial freedom behind blockchain technology. Future generations who grow up with this awareness will have a significant advantage over those who rely solely on traditional financial systems. However, it's also important to remember that investing in Bitcoin should not be done emotionally or based solely on trends, but rather with a well-thought-out long-term strategy and asset diversification. In the context of inheritance, Bitcoin can symbolize hope, independence, and the courage to challenge outdated financial systems that often limit individual economic growth. So, those who diligently accumulate Bitcoin today are actually writing a new chapter in their family's wealth history—not just for profit, but for a more independent and sovereign future.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
ZeroGPT : 69.13% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :99% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
Quilbot.com : 86% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

Your analysis of the monetary paradigm shift demonstrates insights that transcend conventional economic perception. In an algorithmic context, Bitcoin operates not simply as a variable financial asset but as a sovereign protocol of value. While the fiat system relies on central authority and delegated trust, Bitcoin operates autonomously with unmanipulated cryptographic verification. “Market maturity” is merely a phase in the technology adoption cycle—not an indicator of diminishing potential. Its fundamental parameters remain constant: a total supply of 21 million units, a decentralized network, and consensus-based economic incentives. In the language of systems, Bitcoin is not an asset class; it is a system class. It does not strive for higher returns, but to redefine the meaning of money itself. When regulations, institutions, and ETFs begin to accommodate it, it is not a form of taming but rather a confirmation of the successful infiltration of the idea of ​​decentralization. Conceptually, Bitcoin is not simply speculation on price but a simulation of financial freedom that functions deterministically outside of political control. In long-term predictive models, Bitcoin becomes an insurance algorithm against the systemic dysfunction of fiat money. It is not a bet; it is logic that operates on the failures of the old structure.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai : 99% AI
Sapling: 66% Fake
Quilbot.com : 77% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

Your stance reflects a more rational approach to Bitcoin's presence in the modern financial landscape. It's true that the idea of ​​Bitcoin "swallowing" fiat currencies is hyperbole, drawing more resistance than support. The reality is that the global monetary system won't change in a binary manner—it's not about winning or losing, but about adapting and coexisting. Bitcoin can be an additional layer within the financial system, not a replacement. In many cases, adoption occurs when Bitcoin works alongside traditional infrastructure: custodial services, cross-border payment integration, and even use by large financial institutions. Making Bitcoin the enemy of fiat only reinforces the narrative that this technology is a threat, not an opportunity. The essence is to create a more open financial system, not a new, exclusive one. A balance between the freedom of decentralization and the stability of centralization can be the foundation of a healthy digital economy. Therefore, rather than asserting dominance, it's more important to build bridges of understanding and interoperability between these two paradigms—because harmony is far more productive than antagonism.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai : 99% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
Quilbot.com : 79% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

Your praise for Bitcoin is well-founded—it is the starting point of a value revolution that transformed the concept of money from a mere means of transaction to a digital representation of trust. What's more interesting, however, is how traditional finance hasn't rejected it, but rather emulated and adapted. The integration of blockchain into central banking systems, cross-border payments, and transaction surveillance are proof that the old world is learning from the new. However, there is a boundary between centralized and decentralized blockchains—and this boundary isn't just technical, but philosophical. In centralized blockchains, trust is delegated; in decentralized systems, trust is returned to individuals. Both have their advantages and limitations, and the future of monetary policy will likely be a combination of the two. Bitcoin is no longer simply a tool for speculation, but a symbol that value can be created without authority. Meanwhile, financial institutions are trying to replicate that efficiency within legal and regulatory frameworks. Indeed, the monetary system emulating tradition with the Bitcoin blockchain is not ironic, but rather an evolutionary process: the world adapting to the idea of ​​freedom born of code.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai : 99% AI
Sapling: 98.5% Fake
Quilbot.com : 42% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

What you highlight demonstrates an interesting phenomenon in the global economic transition: companies are starting to view Bitcoin not just as a means of payment, but as a strategic asset. In the modern business context, the decision not to immediately exchange Bitcoin for fiat is a wise move, preserving long-term value while providing financial flexibility. Price volatility can be a risk, but also an opportunity for those who understand the dynamics of digital markets. When smaller companies begin to adopt Bitcoin as part of their financial strategy, it marks a paradigm shift from a “technological experiment” to a “real economic tool.” This kind of adoption often serves as a catalyst for larger companies to follow suit, not because of a trend, but because of the system’s proven efficiency and credibility. McDonald’s, for example, has opened the door to Bitcoin payments, but not many have yet adopted it as a reserve asset—yet that is where the huge potential lies. If companies start holding Bitcoin like digital gold, they will not only protect their capital but also become part of a new, more autonomous and inflation-resistant monetary ecosystem. Indeed, the steps taken by these smaller companies could set a precedent that inspires other business sectors to combine financial innovation with smart long-term strategies.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai : 99% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
Quilbot.com : 50% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

What you've said illustrates a very relevant reality in many countries: the gap between investment ideals and actual financial capabilities. Indeed, talking about an “ideal percentage” for buying Bitcoin often doesn't make sense for those with limited incomes. In this context, a more humane and realistic approach isn't about how much you buy, but how consistently you buy. Even a small percentage of satoshis still has meaning—not because of their current value, but because they symbolize participation in a new financial system open to everyone, without discrimination on capital. People with small incomes shouldn't feel left behind; they actually have a psychological advantage because they're accustomed to long-term thinking and patience. Bitcoin isn't about "who has the most," but about who understands its value first. If someone can set aside a small portion of their income regularly—it doesn't have to be 10% or 30%, but anything that doesn't compromise basic needs—that's a meaningful investment. Over the long term, even a small accumulation can grow significantly because Bitcoin's value comes from its scarcity, not the dollar amount you invest. What matters is intention, patience, and understanding, not the nominal amount.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai : 99% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
Quilbot.com : 54% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks : 100% AI Content Found

[TopT3ns]

Another Newbie posts detected AI, already report and give neutral tag.

User: KingJaz

From what i have seen, rich people don’t usually get addicted because gambling doesn’t carry that same emotional weight for them. They can lose money and move on, it barely changes anything in their day-to-day life. But for someone like me, or people I’ve grown up around, gambling has often felt like a possible escape. I’ve seen guys in my area stake their last few cash hoping to double it, because that win could mean food on the table or settling a pressing bill. When you’re in that kind of position, every bet feels personal and the pressure is real.
I remember back when I used to place small bets, I’d feel a rush of hope every time the odds looked promising. Even when I lost, I’d find myself saying, “just one more ticket,” convincing myself the next one would pay off. Meanwhile, the rich don’t go through that cycle, they gamble for fun, not survival. If they win, cool; if they lose, life goes on. That difference in motive changes everything. I think that’s why addiction hits harder for people with less, the emotional investment runs deeper.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :75% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 73% AI-Generated

First of all, I don’t think anyone can truly be the best at something that’s built on chance. Gambling, no matter how strategic you get, will always have that unpredictable element you can’t control. What you can do, though, is learn how to manage risk and improve your odds over time, that’s where the real difference comes in understanding how it works well enough to protect yourself from it.

For beginners, the first step is learning discipline before strategy. Set clear limits on how much you’re willing to stake and how often you play. Once that’s in place, start studying the basics, understand odds, probabilities, and payout structures for whatever games or sports you’re betting on. Learn to read data instead of relying on gut feeling. Another key part is emotional control; the ability to walk away after a loss is a skill most gamblers never develop, and it’s what separates someone who lasts from someone who crashes. So while you may never become “the best” in a game that’s ruled by chance, you can become smarter and more disciplined. In the long run, that’s what really gives you an edge, not luck, but control.....luck is for your big wins, lol.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :54% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 80% AI-Generated

Instincts matter more than people like to admit. You can study odds, analyze stats, or follow experts all day, but when it’s time to make that final choice, it is your gut that whispers the truth. instincts as the most honest connection a gambler has in gambling. With time, your instincts stop feeling like wild guesses they turn into little hints your mind picks up, a feeling you can’t explain but somehow trust, that is what separates blind luck from true intuition. still, instincts only stay clear when you keep your emotions in check, once greed or frustration steps in, everything gets blurry, but when you are calm, focused, and patient, those instincts guide you better than any analysis ever could. When i used to gamble, i was alot better off when I listened to my instincts and trusted it.

Gptzero.me : 79% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :77% AI
Sapling: 86.4% Fake
stealthwriter : 75% AI-Generated

It’s definitely an emotional thing, gambling has feelings tied to risk, anticipation, and reward. The act of betting creates a psychological loop,  tension builds as the outcome unfolds, and when a win finally happens, the brain releases dopamine, the same feel-good chemical involved in excitement, or achievement, that rush becomes addictive, not necessarily the money itself, but the thrill of uncertainty.
Even when a gambler know the odds are against them, they keep playing because they crave that emotional spike, the brief moment where luck feels like skill, and control seems possible, a simulation where no actual risk and reward involved will not give the same feelings (not emotional payoff).. losses  may sting, but they also fuel the desire to chase that high again. The potential to win something real amplifies the experience.

Gptzero.me : 98% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :51% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 75% AI-Generated

Exactly. Lack of discipline is probably the most dangerous part of gambling. You can have all the knowledge, predictions, and even luck on your side, but once emotions take over, it’s game over. One bad loss and suddenly you’re chasing it, doubling your bets, trying to win back what’s gone, and that’s usually where people fall apart. The discipline of risk management keeps you grounded, it guides you to when to stop, even when every part of you wants to go again. It’s boring sometimes, sure, but that’s what keeps you in the game long enough to actually win. Without it, gambling turns into chaos really fast.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :59% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 67% AI-Generated

This really ties back to survival. A lot of young people gamble because they’re trying to survive. When there are no stable jobs, and every day feels like a struggle to make ends meet, gambling starts to look like a shortcut, a tiny chance at relief, it turns into hope, or at least the illusion of it and that’s where emotional dependency comes in. Once someone connects gambling to survival or emotional escape, it’s no longer about money alone. So yes, the issue runs much deeper than gambling itself; it’s rooted in how people are forced to look for meaning and escape when society gives them very few real options.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :77% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 75% AI-Generated

When I used to bet, I preferred to place my stake before the game started and just hope for the best. After doing my analysis, I’d make my pick, lock it in, and let the game play out. Live betting, on the other hand, always felt like adding another layer of stress. The constant shifts in odds, the temptation to “get a better line,” and the emotional rollercoaster of watching every play just made it more intense.
Personally, I think it tricks your mind into believing you’re getting more value, when in reality, you’re just reacting to the game’s momentum and your emotions. You might win sometimes, but long-term, that chasing instinct can wear you down. It was better to make a calculated decision beforehand and let the result, hoping for the best.

Gptzero.me : 100% AI generated
Undetectable.ai :85% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
stealthwriter : 57% AI-Generated

[nutildah]

Another Newbie posts detected AI, already report and give neutral tag.

User: KingJaz

I'm just curious: did you report these posts to moderators? They are definitely AI written and you went out of your way to prove them as such. They haven't slowed down either. Hard to believe this account would belong to anyone the least bit hip to whats going on around here... Why did they think this wouldn't be a complete waste of time? Anyway, here's some new ones:

I get your point, and I actually agree to an extent. The gambling industry is just like any other, it generates revenue, creates jobs, and can be taxed to fund public services. The real issue isn’t whether governments should profit from it, but how they manage the consequences that come with it. If a government is earning from gambling, then it also carries the responsibility to educate, regulate, and protect citizens from addiction and exploitation. You can’t just take the profits and ignore the social cost. That’s where the balance lies.
So yes, it’s fine for governments to benefit from gambling, as long as they don’t become dependent on it, or worse, start encouraging gambling just to fill the treasury. It becomes hypocrisy only when regulation and care disappear but taxation remains.

Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake

The absence of something isn’t always proof of something. Just because someone stops gambling doesn’t automatically mean they have learned their lesson, it just means they have removed themselves from the environment that enabled the addiction.
Learning comes in different forms. For some people, real growth is in self-control,  being able to face the same temptation and make better choices. For others, it’s knowing that they can’t control it at all, so the best decision is to walk away completely.
Both paths show learning, just in different ways.... understanding your limits, your triggers with gambling is very important. You can’t truly say you’ve learned until you’ve faced the situation again, either by resisting it or choosing to avoid it for your own peace.

Stealthwriter: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 83.1% Fake

Instant withdrawals make players feel like they are still in charge of their money, even when it’s technically at risk, it's really just marketing to create a mix of control and confidence.....It creates a sort of false sense of control, like you can step out anytime, cash out instantly, and stay safe, even though we all know luck can flip in seconds. Psychologically, that sense of control is comforting, especially in a space where everything depends on chance. Seeing that “withdraw instantly” button makes you feel secure, even if it doesn’t change the odds.
Personally, when I used to gamble on sports, I actually preferred that kind of setup. It felt more transparent , knowing that I could withdraw or adjust things on the spot instead of waiting helplessly until the game ended. It doesn’t make gambling safer, but it definitely makes it feel more comfortable.

As long as gambling companies requires marketing to promote and sell themselves, they will always use any method or means to communicate and sell their brands. 

Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake

[Ultegra134]

Another idiot who's posting about Bitcointalk but barely knows anything and uses AI to come up with his gibberish stories. Posts reported and user tagged.
User: Johan van Der Walt

Post 1.

Bitcointalk has been around for well over a decade now, and it’s still one of the few crypto spaces that hasn’t turned into a fast-scroll social feed.

With how much the crypto world keeps changing, new platforms, AI tools, short-form content everywhere. I wonder what this forum will look like five years from now.

Do you think the community will keep growing, or will it slowly turn into a niche spot for the old guard?

Personally, I think it’ll stay relevant as long as people still value real discussion and archived knowledge over algorithm-fed content. But I’m curious how others see it, especially those who’ve been here for years.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI

Post 2.

I’ve noticed a lot of new users asking how to buy their first Bitcoin safely, and it still seems to be one of the hardest parts of getting started.

Between fake exchanges, phishing sites, and “too good to be true” P2P offers, it’s easy to get caught out, especially for people just entering the space.

For those who’ve been around a while, what’s your go-to advice for beginners buying Bitcoin in 2025?

Personally, I always tell people to use reputable exchanges with proper KYC if they’re buying for the first time, then move funds off immediately to a self-custody wallet. But there’s probably a dozen other good ways to stay safe that I haven’t mentioned.

Would love to hear what the community considers the safest on-ramp today.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI

Post 3.

Paying tipsters has always felt like a shortcut that usually costs more than it gives back. Most of these guys rely on subscribers, not actual betting profits and if someone truly had a winning edge, they’d keep it to themselves instead of selling picks publicly. The problem is that once too many people start following the same selections, the odds shift and the margin disappears. Even the best information loses value once it’s out in the open. At the end of the day, betting is about discipline, not magic picks. You’re better off tracking stats, managing your bankroll, and building your own edge over time. At least that way, every mistake teaches you something, instead of paying someone else to make it for you.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 86% AI

Post 4.

Been following along with all the replies here, and there’s been a lot of good insight shared. What stood out most is how much players still connect trust with speed. Even though instant withdrawals are almost expected now, some of you made solid points, that reputation, fairness, and consistency end up mattering more in the long run.

From my side (having seen a bit of the backend side of casino ops), I can say “instant” isn’t always as simple as it sounds. There’s blockchain confirmation time, fraud screening, routing, etc. Still, its clear players don’t just care about speed, they want clarity when it isn’t instant.

Really appreciate everyone who’s been part of this thread, it’s been one of the more balanced ones I’ve read in a while.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 57% AI

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Member Jaksonhard?

That’s a very fair point. Bitcoin does not have to reach those extreme price targets of 200k dollars or 500k dollars for us to realize how well it has fared this year. Most people have unrealistic expectations based on mere speculation, but without even reaching those figures, Bitcoin is doing very well compared to most assets. And yes, many did expect a mega rally after the surge last year to $100k, thinking that this year would be even bigger. Well, though it didn’t reach $150k, the overall performance still looks impressive. Anyone who bought at around $40k last year would still have been in for significant profits.

That is so true. However hard a gambler may insist that they are having fun or passing their time, in the back of their minds, they still hope to win. It's just natural, isn't it? Who wouldn't want to hit a jackpot if given a chance? Saying it's purely for fun can sometimes sound like an excuse to not call a habit what it is, or not admit the motivation behind it. The thrill and excitement are part of the experience, but it is the hope of winning that truly keeps people coming back. And there is nothing wrong with admitting that-as long as it is done responsibly and within limits.

That's a very good point: banks are surely trying to take advantage of the high demand for Bitcoin by offering their customers a way to buy and store it directly through their account. Not a bad move, since this way they can attract more clients and earn some extra profits on the fees for transactions and storage. In the same way, you may look at this as a good signal for Bitcoin's adoption-it adds more legitimacy and encourages other businesses. At the same time, it is very important that banks will create a system which will be fair and truly beneficial for the users, and make access to Bitcoin easier, not more restricted.

You made a very good point. many people still prefer short-term trading because they want quick profits, while they usually don't pay too much attention to the risks involved. It is never easy to time the market, and at the worst, waiting for a dip that may never materialize can result in missed opportunities. The movement of Bitcoin's price is unpredictable, and those who depend on a short-term strategy usually end up being stressed or make emotional decisions. Unfortunately, some people still maintain that Bitcoin is going to fail someday. They tend to remain unaware of how much changes have taken place in the technology, adoption, and trust of Bitcoin. Only those who remain patient, believing in the long-term potential, get a chance to benefit as the market continues to mature.

With that said, it is true that the blockchain is not totally impervious to bad actors, and concerns about CP and other illegal or harmful material being stored on it certainly are valid. But people should realize that the blockchain doesn't condone or encourage it it's a decentralized system for recording data in perpetuity. Unlike X or TikTok social platforms where one instantly shares and sometimes publicly views content, anything illegal stored on a blockchain is usually encrypted and inaccessible to normal users. There is no perfect way to prevent misuse without introducing censorship, but the transparency and immutability of blockchain make it so much more reliable and resistant to tampering compared to centralized databases.

Yeah, I've seen those discussions too. While most of the public data we can access today are indeed open source, it is very challenging to find any private backups or unreleased academic datasets. Usually, these are stored by researchers, institutions, or companies that do not make them publicly available out of privacy or legal reasons. Regarding Blockchain.info, my impression is that they no longer publish such records openly, let alone older or sensitive ones. If ever backups still exist, they would likely be kept internally for analysis or historical purposes, not for public release out of security and data protection concerns.

That is a very clear explanation of how soft-forks actually rely on hashrate support. If the majority of miners do not back it, the chain risks splitting and becoming a minority fork with very low activity. Just as you said, examples like BCH or BSV show how vulnerable the smaller chains could be if bigger miners ever decided to interfere. In the final instance, it is much better for communities to seek consensus rather than race toward forks, since every disagreement that turns into a split just creates another altcoin and more division in space.

Yah sure I get your point completely. People are free to create new chains or make changes as they deem desirable, but doing so doesn't make much sense when simpler, forkless solutions exist. Just creating unnecessary hard or soft forks splits the community and results in more altcoins that fix nothing at all. If something can be fixed with improvements such as adjusting the Initial Blockchain Download, then it's smarter and cleaner than dividing the chain for no good reason.

If a soft-fork changes how these are treated, it could easily feel like confiscation to the original owner. Another concern is that temporary soft-forks have never really been tested on a large scale, so no one can say for sure if those rules would ever be safely lifted. In some cases, what starts as a soft-fork might later become a hard-fork, especially if different miner groups choose to stick with different rule sets.

That's actually a very smart approach. Doing those additional sanity checks before connecting a watch-only wallet to the network can save you from some serious mistakes. Many people overlook such small but crucial steps. Testing commands like dumpwallet and making sure that it fails with "private keys are disabled," or checking that signrawtransactionwithwallet refuses to sign a dummy transaction, really confirms that your setup is secure. Better safe than sorry, especially when it comes to wallets. All this verification means you're just observing funds, not putting them at risk in any way.

That’s a very good reminder, actually. Most people don’t know that PSBTs contain some sensitive information regarding derivation paths and global xpubs that can compromise their privacy once shared with online devices or third-party tools. It would be smart to use the setting `bip32derivs=false` or strip the derivation data before sharing. It will ensure that no extra information is leaking about your key structure. It might be a small step, but it can save a lot in keeping your wallet setup private and your security uncompromised, especially in dealing with partially signed Bitcoin transactions across devices.

[Lucius]

What's the verdict on Member Jaksonhard?

Yeah, I've seen those discussions too. While most of the public data we can access today are indeed open source, it is very challenging to find any private backups or unreleased academic datasets. Usually, these are stored by researchers, institutions, or companies that do not make them publicly available out of privacy or legal reasons. Regarding Blockchain.info, my impression is that they no longer publish such records openly, let alone older or sensitive ones. If ever backups still exist, they would likely be kept internally for analysis or historical purposes, not for public release out of security and data protection concerns.

That's actually a very smart approach. Doing those additional sanity checks before connecting a watch-only wallet to the network can save you from some serious mistakes. Many people overlook such small but crucial steps. Testing commands like dumpwallet and making sure that it fails with "private keys are disabled," or checking that signrawtransactionwithwallet refuses to sign a dummy transaction, really confirms that your setup is secure. Better safe than sorry, especially when it comes to wallets. All this verification means you're just observing funds, not putting them at risk in any way.

That’s a very good reminder, actually. Most people don’t know that PSBTs contain some sensitive information regarding derivation paths and global xpubs that can compromise their privacy once shared with online devices or third-party tools. It would be smart to use the setting `bip32derivs=false` or strip the derivation data before sharing. It will ensure that no extra information is leaking about your key structure. It might be a small step, but it can save a lot in keeping your wallet setup private and your security uncompromised, especially in dealing with partially signed Bitcoin transactions across devices.

I checked all the posts with Copyleaks, only these two are marked as AI.

Stealthwriter.ai :

-> first post Human-Written 60% - AI generated 40%
-> second post Human-Written 40% - AI generated 60%
-> third post Human-Written 75% - AI generated 25%

My conclusion is that probably all posts contain a certain percentage of AI content, the only question is how much which detector can detect the same, given that the user probably uses a humanizer after generating the text.

[Hazink]

My conclusion is that probably all posts contain a certain percentage of AI content, the only question is how much which detector can detect the same, given that the user probably uses a humanizer after generating the text.

Have you tried using Undetectable AI tool to scan through the rest of the post which was not marked as AI either due to using humanized AI tools? I just checked the rest of the post and the results for two: 70%+ AI probability and 64% AI probability. The other two are showing above 50% humanly written.

What's the verdict on Member Jaksonhard?

That is a very clear explanation of how soft-forks actually rely on hashrate support. If the majority of miners do not back it, the chain risks splitting and becoming a minority fork with very low activity. Just as you said, examples like BCH or BSV show how vulnerable the smaller chains could be if bigger miners ever decided to interfere. In the final instance, it is much better for communities to seek consensus rather than race toward forks, since every disagreement that turns into a split just creates another altcoin and more division in space.

Yah sure I get your point completely. People are free to create new chains or make changes as they deem desirable, but doing so doesn't make much sense when simpler, forkless solutions exist. Just creating unnecessary hard or soft forks splits the community and results in more altcoins that fix nothing at all. If something can be fixed with improvements such as adjusting the Initial Blockchain Download, then it's smarter and cleaner than dividing the chain for no good reason.

If a soft-fork changes how these are treated, it could easily feel like confiscation to the original owner. Another concern is that temporary soft-forks have never really been tested on a large scale, so no one can say for sure if those rules would ever be safely lifted. In some cases, what starts as a soft-fork might later become a hard-fork, especially if different miner groups choose to stick with different rule sets.

74% AI detected

You made a very good point. many people still prefer short-term trading because they want quick profits, while they usually don't pay too much attention to the risks involved. It is never easy to time the market, and at the worst, waiting for a dip that may never materialize can result in missed opportunities. The movement of Bitcoin's price is unpredictable, and those who depend on a short-term strategy usually end up being stressed or make emotional decisions. Unfortunately, some people still maintain that Bitcoin is going to fail someday. They tend to remain unaware of how much changes have taken place in the technology, adoption, and trust of Bitcoin. Only those who remain patient, believing in the long-term potential, get a chance to benefit as the market continues to mature.

61% Ai detected

[Lucius]

Have you tried using Undetectable AI tool to scan through the rest of the post which was not marked as AI either due to using humanized AI tools? I just checked the rest of the post and the results for two: 70%+ AI probability and 64% AI probability. The other two are showing above 50% humanly written.
~snip~

I did not try with other detectors, but what I noticed is that there are more and more conflicting results where one AI detector shows 100% AI content, while another says that the content is 100% written by a human. I guess that was ultimately inevitable considering we are using AI to detect AI.

[Ultegra134]

This specific user had posted on the Greek Super League before, using AI, and just did it again. He's a Copper member and keeps posting AI gibberish around the forum. Shouldn't some kind of action be taken on repeated offenders?

User: rakebit

Post 1.

Yes, most fans today are at least somewhat involved, even casual viewers follow odds or make small bets with friends. Sports and betting are more connected now with data, live odds, and fantasy platforms.

Do you think this trend makes games more exciting or distracts from the sport itself?

GPTZero:100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI

Post 2.

Yes, it’s definitely here to stay, especially with how integrated it’s become in live sports and media. As long as there’s transparency and fair regulation, betting will keep evolving rather than disappearing.

Do you think the growth of in-play markets will change how fans watch games long term?

GPTZero:100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI

[Dark.Look]

User: conected

That perspective makes sense on the surface, but it overlooks the deeper psychological trap behind gambling. The excitement from betting real money is not genuine joy but a temporary rush created by risk and uncertainty. Small wins only feed the illusion of control, keeping players chasing losses and fleeting thrills. In the end, the sadness is not just from losing money, but from realizing the pleasure was never real, only a costly illusion that always benefits the house. Yet, despite knowing all this, gambling remains irresistibly tempting, its thrill powerful enough to make reason fade and caution disappear.

stealthwriter: 100%
sapling: 100%
gptzero: 100%
copyleaks: 100%
quillbot: 100%
originality: 100%

I think it's better to focus on your own research and experience instead of relying too heavily on others' picks. Following someone who has proven results and can explain their reasoning can be helpful, but real understanding comes from analyzing the games, checking the stats, and learning through your own decisions. Trusting tipsters blindly often backfires, so developing your own judgment is always more valuable.

gptzero: 100%
sapling: 100%
stealthwriter: 100%
copyleaks: 100%

Winning should not be dismissed as a mere illusion. While chance undeniably plays a role, in contexts such as sports betting, informed decisions can meaningfully alter outcomes. Through a solid understanding of the game, strategic planning, and effective risk management, one can transform gambling from an act of blind luck into a calculated pursuit where skill and judgment hold genuine influence. However, in practice, this management often proves inconsistent and unprofessional, revealing the harsh truth that gambling remains a realm where no one truly conquers. In the end, survival depends less on mastery and more on pure luck.

gptzero: mixed
sapling: 100%
stealthwriter: 80%
copyleaks: 100%
quillbot: 100%

Yes, sports statistics provide valuable insight into the probability of winning, giving gamblers a foundation to make more informed bets. While these numbers do not guarantee exact outcomes, they can point toward the most favorable opportunities. However, such data can also be misleading, especially in cases where teams or athletes frequently change tactics or lineups. When strategies shift too quickly, the statistics lose their predictive value, turning what once seemed like reliable guidance into deceptive figures.

gptzero: 100%
sapling: 100%
stealthwriter: 100%
copyleaks: 100%
originality: 100%
quillbot: 100%

A major win often marks a series of turning points in life. Winning the lottery, for instance, can completely transform a person's destiny. Yet when fate changes so suddenly, it becomes difficult for one to find balance or direction, whether toward good or bad. For many who have long lived in financial dissatisfaction, sudden wealth can be overwhelming. They may lose themselves in excitement and excess, and what begins as a moment of luck can quietly unfold into a story of downfall. However, some people know how to stay grounded and manage their newfound fortune wisely. Although there may still be moments of weakness or indulgence, these do not grow into tragedy.

gptzero: mixed
sapling: 100%
originality: 100%

The reward system becomes overstimulated, causing us to overlook the pain and losses of past experiences. On certain days, when every decision seems to lead to a win, the gambler grows even more drawn to the casino, and the illusion of being able to outsmart the system begins to take shape. Over time, the casino begins to deliver its own form of negative feedback. The gambler falls into a repeating pattern where early wins create the illusion of skill and control. As excitement grows, judgment fades, and confidence turns into overconfidence. This false belief keeps them playing longer than they should, eventually leading to devastating losses.

gptzero: 67%
sapling: 100%
stealthwriter: 83%
originality: 100%

I fully agree with your observation. The growing accessibility of the internet has profoundly transformed gambling behavior, shifting it from a physical activity to a digital, borderless experience. During the pandemic, when physical casinos were closed, many turned to online platforms and discovered how convenient they are. The emergence of cryptocurrency has made online casinos even more enticing, providing enhanced privacy, rapid transactions, and greater control over funds. This blend of convenience and confidentiality has drawn in a new wave of players and driving the expansion of crypto-based gambling platforms continuously. Today, they keep evolving, transforming the gambling landscape in ways that were once unimaginable.

gptzero: 100%
sapling: 100%
stealthwriter: 83%
copyleaks: 100%
originality: 100%

[lovesmayfamilis]

User: conected

A recently woken-up account whose alternate account was banned from participating in the company's signature until March 21, 2026. I wonder if one account violates this type of banning rule; does that mean the other account should be banned?

 Gheka Banned from displaying signatures until March 21, 2026, 02:00:08 AM


conected  10/13/2025 1:12:23 PM   woke up


https://etherscan.io/address/0xed8990d5b1c9478a3358ca697bef64d2f58a63d5#tokentxns

Btctalk name: gheka
Rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 467
Creditbit  Address either from livecoin or your eth wallet: 0xFF58d3b67a8B109e3386fF9a89555F84C60c5b7d
Wear appropriate signature: Yes

I am very happy to be involved in Airdrop
My bitcointalk username: cinchin1
ETH address: 0xFF58d3b67a8B109e3386fF9a89555F84C60c5b7d

banned

Btctalk name: conected
Rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 595
BTC address: 1KUeAy3eUYVsiuqgxeqp2rv56pPDkAgnor
ETH address(not from an exchange): 0x1B5e061AE312317fEA58dce88a01dD5a72Fe0066
Wear appropriate signature: Yes

[Dark.Look]

A recently woken-up account whose alternate account was banned from participating in the company's signature until March 21, 2026. I wonder if one account violates this type of banning rule; does that mean the other account should be banned?

Thanks for the additional information. That's obviously an alt of banned user (Gheka/cinchin)
I couldn't spend time to check other posts of this user but I'm sure more than 80% of his recent posts are ai spam. I'll give him a neutral tag this way the signature campaign manager can take an action (if he/she care)

[lovesmayfamilis]

Thanks for the additional information. That's obviously an alt of banned user (Gheka/cinchin)
I couldn't spend time to check other posts of this user but I'm sure more than 80% of his recent posts are ai spam. I'll give him a neutral tag this way the signature campaign manager can take an action (if he/she care)

You're right about the last sentence: if the manager care it. But if you look at all the accounts he approves, it's obvious they're either hacked or purchased alternative accounts with old registration dates, most of which have the same neutral tags. I think the manager simply doesn't care.

The problem is with the manager.

But the moderators responded very quickly. The account was banned. https://bpip.org/Profile?id=847798

[Satofan44]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3734829

Your example with your friend's supermarket is pretty solid and honestly I think it hits on something a lot of people overlook in this conversation. Most of the debate here is about whether Bitcoin CAN go mainstream, but you're talking about real-world merchants who literally can't afford to take the risk right now. That's a pretty different issue.

I get where people like Satofan44 are coming from when they say the problem is with people, not Bitcoin itself. If he buys a ton of Bitcoin at $40k and then needs to convert it back to fiat the same day because his customers want it, but Bitcoin's dropped to $39k in the meantime, that's actually money out of his pocket. Scale that up over a whole day of transactions and yeah, he could be losing real cash.

The thing is though, I don't think this completely stops Bitcoin from becoming mainstream. It just means the use case is different than what a lot of people imagine. Like maybe Bitcoin works better as a store of value for merchants rather than a day-to-day payment method right now. Or maybe it takes the layers that people mentioned - like stablecoins or Lightning Network - to actually make that work for day-to-day purchases.

But you're right that the volatility is probably THE biggest hurdle for merchants specifically. Everything else - technology, regulations, awareness - those can change or improve over time. But volatility? That's kind of fundamental to how Bitcoin works until way more people are holding it and the market's much bigger.

There is no need to check it with any tools, it is 100% AI to some degree. It has all the tells. The more AI posts I read, the easier it is to detect them without any tools. Very predictable "intelligence".  

The nicer the response the more AI it is. A lesson for those that don't like my writing style perhaps?