AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Ultegra134]

Don't let the door hit you on the way out @xmrhopium, I also hadn't noticed the numerous "Ok" replies on his part, what he was trying to do by editing all of his posts into "Ok"? At first I thought it was simply to get his activity up, but then noticed that it's all edited posts. Anyway, back to the subject, more AI spammers. Posts reported and user tagged.

User: IsraelK

Post 1.

That’s a really sharp framework, and honestly, the analogy fits. This version of Arsenal does feel like it’s built on security and uptime, not hype. The defensive floor, improved depth, and ability to grind ugly wins are exactly what title teams need, and DCA-ing futures instead of chasing week-to-week variance is a disciplined approach.

GPTZero: 95% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI

Post 2.

It sounds logical on paper, but it still feels more rumor than reality. A €300m bid would force PSG to listen, sure—but Mbappé’s leverage has always been about choice, not just money. Real Madrid remain the obvious destination if he leaves, given the long courtship and sporting pull. Liverpool could enter the conversation financially, but unless Mbappé wants Anfield specifically, their chances are still slim compared to Madrid.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 75% AI

Post 3.

Gambling has genuinely changed some lives for the better. Those stories are real: people who won, invested wisely, built homes, started businesses, and created long-term stability. That’s exactly why gambling is attractive in the first place, because it sometimes works, and when it does, the impact can be life-changing.

At the same time, the negative stories dominate because they’re more common. The key issue isn’t gambling itself, but how it’s approached. The winners who benefited usually shared a few traits: discipline, limits, emotional control, and the wisdom to treat winnings as capital, not an invitation to keep chasing risk.

So the truth sits in the middle, Gambling can be an opportunity, not a guarantee, It rewards a very small percentage, and punishes excess
It becomes destructive when it’s driven by desperation instead of strategy

Acknowledging both sides matters. Pretending gambling is only evil ignores reality, but pretending it’s a shortcut to success ignores risk. The difference between success and ruin is rarely luck alone; it’s restraint, mindset, and knowing when to stop.That balance is the real lesson most people miss.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 90% AI

[Mitchell]

But I'd also like to point out that xmrhopium, as a champion of forum purity, has changed most of his posts and, noticeably, not deleted them but modified them, leaving the word included in Rule 1 as a zero value for the forum. Why and for what reason?? He could have simply deleted the posts, but he kept his activity. Everyone has their skeletons in the closet, right, xmrhopium?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3674660;sa=showPosts;start=140
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3674660;sa=showPosts;start=120

Hmmmm, that is a lot of (now) useless posts. :/

[nutildah]

Here's one I found right away by clicking on Recent Unread Topics, just for a change of scenery.

Alphie12

#1

Yeah, that one got ugly fast 😅.

Give Boston Celtics their credit — doing that without Jayson Tatum just shows how deep and well-drilled they are. And Jaylen Brown dropping 50 on 69% shooting? That’s not a hot night, that’s a crime scene. The Clippers’ defense basically filed a missing persons report.

From the Los Angeles Clippers side, it felt like one of those games where everything that could go wrong did — cold offense, no resistance on defense, and before you know it you’re down 30 and the bench unit is in before halftime. Their winning streak didn’t just end, it got unplugged.

Still, it’s one game. But if Brown sees that level of defense again, he might start circling those matchups on the calendar in red 😭🏀.

#2

Nice rundown — this card actually makes a lot of sense situationally.

Steelers–Ravens games really do ignore logic and spreadsheets. You can throw records out the window when Pittsburgh Steelers and Baltimore Ravens play — it’s usually a fistfight that stays close no matter what the spread says.

The Washington Commanders angle is sneaky too. Anytime Philadelphia Eagles start resting bodies, the game turns into “just survive and get out healthy,” which is exactly how underdogs hang around.

And that Saints–Falcons chaos scenario is peak NFC South. New Orleans Saints playing meaningful spoiler while Atlanta Falcons, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and Carolina Panthers all wait on calculators is very on brand. Saints finishing strong when it “doesn’t matter” is classic too.

Overall, this feels less like chasing numbers and more like reading motivation — and late-season NFL is all about who actually cares. Let’s see how wild it gets. 🍿🏈

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 100% Fake

#3

Bold to say “two games today” and still lock in just one 😄 — that’s real discipline.

I get the angle though. Seattle Seahawks at -2.5 feels like one of those “trust your gut and don’t overcook it” spots. If Sam Darnold is comfortable and the Seahawks defense actually shows up, things can tilt fast.

The funny part is calling Brock Purdy “on fire” and then immediately saying “yeah but not that fire tonight.” That’s basically betting-speak for: I respect him… just not today, brother 😂.

Also, only betting one game is how you avoid the classic “I was 1–0 and decided to add a late sweat” disaster. Sometimes the sharpest play is knowing when to log off. Good luck 🍀🏈

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 100% Fake

Dear JayJuanGee, I wasn't even thinking of accusing you, quite the opposite. As one of the kindest sources of merit, you're popular with newbies, and they've followed your threads where you appear and bestow merits upon their like thread to needle.

That's very poetic. I suppose I don't mind seeing JJG sprinkle merits in this thread, because its funny to see the account farmers turn on each other.

[memehunter]

User: Cryptoblck

His recent post got my attention 

In Satoshi's public key, there is an Easter egg encrypted for you. It has been waiting for you for 16 years. I wonder who will be the first to find it. PS: There is a hint to the private key

Is this post worthy of labelled as 'misinformation' ?

Anyway, here is one of his AI chatbot post. He is posting technical things so please check out.

ENGRAMMAchain is a distributed system for autobiographical memory in robots, designed to provide irreversible recording of experience, causal relationships, and decisions without reliance on external control centers.  A decentralized system for recording life processes and distributed memory is an architecture of autonomous nodes in which each robot forms and maintains its own independent memory, reflecting its individual states, actions, and changes throughout its lifecycle.

Each robot acts as a sovereign carrier of its memories, recording them locally as sequential, cryptographically linked entries.
This structure ensures integrity, verifiable origin, and resistance to unauthorized modification.

Depending on its purpose, role, or operational context, a robot may cooperate with other robots to form a shared memory space —
a collection of mutually confirmed memories from multiple robots, cryptographically bound through digital signatures.

Shared memory does not replace or overwrite individual memory.
Each record preserves authorship, source identity, and contextual origin, while any attempt to alter or falsify a memory breaks the cryptographic chain, making tampering detectable and invalidating the affected fragment.

Robots may selectively exchange memory fragments with other robots or with humans,
allowing verified experience, observations, and knowledge to be transferred without loss of provenance or integrity.
Received memories can be used as external context or cooperative memory without disrupting the continuity of a robot’s own history.

The architecture supports asynchronous interaction and dynamic formation of both individual and shared memory structures,
ensuring that past states cannot be silently modified due to cryptographic linkage between records.

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 97% 

[LoyceV]

More specifically, Bitcoin only increased by about 82% during this cycle, and compared to previous cycles, this is one of the worst growth cycles. Similarly, historically, 2025 was projected to be a year of strong growth, similar to 2017 and 2021. However, ironically, it ended with a negative growth rate of 6.33%.
I also find it confusing that many people say 2025 will be a great year.

It's hard to say if this came from a chatbot or something else, but those numbers without reference aren't something someone typed without getting the data from somewhere. In academics, that's plagiarism.

I have some auto correction tools installed in my browser, like Grammarly and a few other extension.

So where did the numbers come from?

for the punishment i'm leaving the forum immediately for the lifetime

Did you just sudoku over this? How dramatic!

[Ultegra134]

Another newbie with more spam and speculation subject on Bitcoin discussion. Posts reported and user tagged.

User: TokenTsunami

Post 1.

Bitcoin trading above $92K appears strong, but the underlying drivers matter more than the headline. ETF inflows have become a consistent source of demand, while global political uncertainty continues to push capital toward liquid, neutral assets like BTC.

The key technical and psychological level is $90K. Strong defense there would support continuation. Weak reaction could signal that this move was largely momentum-driven.

Worth watching how the market reacts on dips rather than chasing the breakout

https://citytelegraph.com/market/295705/bitcoin-geopolitical-tension-market-structure-analysis/

GPTZero: 96% AI
Stealthwriter: 83% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI

Post 2.

Google is quietly shaking up both the Bitcoin mining world and the AI infrastructure game. Instead of buying up data centers or mining rigs themselves, they’re backing Bitcoin miners with at least $5 billion in credit guarantees. They do this through long-term AI hosting leases, often teaming up with companies like Fluidstack. Basically, Google steps in as the financial safety net, which suddenly lets these risk-heavy mining firms get the kind of financing that’s usually reserved for serious infrastructure projects. It’s a big shift: those unpredictable crypto miners are turning into stable, reliable operators of AI data centers.

With Bitcoin mining getting less profitable and way more unpredictable, a lot of miners are jumping at the chance to lock in steady income through long-term AI and high-performance computing contracts. For Google, this isn’t just about making money. It’s a smart way to secure things like electricity and real estate stuff that’s getting harder to find—without sinking a ton of money into ownership or drawing too much attention from regulators. They also keep the door open for future profits if these ventures take off. Of course, this approach isn’t risk-free. There are real concerns about how concentrated things could get, how operations might run into trouble, and what regulators might say. Plus, as more miners focus on powering AI instead of securing the Bitcoin network, less energy goes into keeping Bitcoin itself safe. In the end, this isn’t just a minor tweak it’s a real shakeup. Mining, money, and infrastructure are all getting rewired, moving away from chasing crypto rewards and toward fueling the AI boom.

SOURCE: https://citytelegraph.com/blockchain/293237/google-backing-bitcoin-miners-ai-infrastructure/

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI

Post 3.

Hi everyone, I'm Kelvin J Wong. I've been in crypto and Web3 for several years, mostly on development and product. Recently I started a project focused on improving UX and scalability for real users.

What strikes me most is how hard Web3 still is for normal people – wallet setup, seed phrases, gas fees, fear of mistakes. Yet many projects are genuinely solving real problems.

I joined Bitcointalk to learn from experienced Bitcoin and crypto users. Quick questions:

 What Web3/crypto projects do you actually find useful in daily life?
 What are your biggest pain points using wallets, exchanges, or dApps?
 Any recommended threads on Bitcoin philosophy?

Not here to shill just to learn and contribute. Thanks for any guidance.

Kelvin

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 78% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie hbqchjy?

I noticed him repeating was had been said already on the tech board:

Your 2014 Acer Aspire E5-411 (2GB RAM + 500GB HDD) is too weak for a smooth full node in 2026—Bitcoin blockchain is ~500-600GB+ now (growing ~100-150GB/year), initial sync would crawl forever on that old HDD/CPU, and 2GB RAM will likely OOM during IBD.
Realistic answers:

Hardware: Won't really work well. Upgrade to at least 8GB RAM (if possible) and use the external 1TB as SSD if you can (HDD sync = days/weeks of pain). Better: get a cheap used mini-PC/RPi 5 with 8GB+ RAM + SSD. External drive helps for storage, but speed matters more than size.
Full vs Pruned: Go pruned (-prune=550 or higher) unless you want to serve full archival data. Full node verifies everything once (during sync), pruned discards old blocks after, uses ~7-10GB + chainstate. Benefits of full: you help network more (serve blocks), can audit history fully. Pruned is fine for personal validation/privacy.
Linux distro for beginner: Ubuntu Server LTS (24.04 or latest) — dead simple, huge community, Bitcoin Core in repos or easy PPA. Avoid desktop flavors if headless. Debian stable is rock-solid too but slightly more conservative.
Tor? Not necessary, but recommended for privacy (hides your IP from peers). Easy: add onlynet=onion or use Tor proxy in bitcoin.conf. Many run without and it's fine.

Start with pruned mode on Ubuntu, use external drive for datadir. Great first step—run it pruned, learn as you go. If sync dies, consider Umbrel or RaspiBolt guides for easier setup on better hardware. You've got this! 🚀

On other boards it's not much better:

Thanks @Don Pedro Dinero for the merit and the reply!
You're right—this topic has been discussed many times before. I'm just trying to bring it up again to catch the attention of more newcomers.
I totally agree that media loves big numbers. "Bitcoin hits $89,000!" grabs way more headlines than "1 sat = $0.00089". That's why sats won't become mainstream anytime soon.
Still, I'm optimistic: Bitcoin reaching $1 million per coin won't take as long as people think. Ten years ago, almost no one imagined it going from a few hundred dollars to $10k—yet it smashed through $60k, $70k, $80k... Things often move much faster than we expect. When 1 BTC is truly worth millions, pricing daily items with tons of decimals will feel ridiculous, and the shift to sats will happen naturally.
Hope we all live to see that day!

The above account sent Merit to Newbie bits86, who fits the same pattern:

Your wallet is a modern descriptor wallet (default in recent Bitcoin Core versions), so importprivkey only works on legacy wallets—that's why you're getting error -4.
Instead, use importdescriptors with a combo descriptor for full support (legacy + segwit + taproot):
JSONimportdescriptors '[{"desc": "combo(Your52CharHexPrivKeyHere#checksum)", "timestamp": "now", "active": true}]'

Replace Your52CharHexPrivKeyHere with your actual hex key (no 0x prefix).
Bitcoin Core will auto-calculate the checksum after you paste the desc—copy the full thing with #checksum.
Use "now" if the key is new/no old tx; otherwise use a timestamp or block height for rescan.

If it's just a single legacy key and you don't care about segwit/taproot, you could use pkh(yourkey#checksum) instead of combo.
Rescan might take time if there are old transactions. Backup first!

[memehunter]

What's the verdict on Newbie hbqchjy?

1st post is 100% AI, but second one is giving me mixed results (combination of AI and human inputs) so I am not sure but he is using 'em dash' so 

Your 2014 Acer Aspire E5-411 (2GB RAM + 500GB HDD) is too weak for a smooth full node in 2026—Bitcoin blockchain is ~500-600GB+ now (growing ~100-150GB/year), initial sync would crawl forever on that old HDD/CPU, and 2GB RAM will likely OOM during IBD.
Realistic answers:

Hardware: Won't really work well. Upgrade to at least 8GB RAM (if possible) and use the external 1TB as SSD if you can (HDD sync = days/weeks of pain). Better: get a cheap used mini-PC/RPi 5 with 8GB+ RAM + SSD. External drive helps for storage, but speed matters more than size.
Full vs Pruned: Go pruned (-prune=550 or higher) unless you want to serve full archival data. Full node verifies everything once (during sync), pruned discards old blocks after, uses ~7-10GB + chainstate. Benefits of full: you help network more (serve blocks), can audit history fully. Pruned is fine for personal validation/privacy.
Linux distro for beginner: Ubuntu Server LTS (24.04 or latest) — dead simple, huge community, Bitcoin Core in repos or easy PPA. Avoid desktop flavors if headless. Debian stable is rock-solid too but slightly more conservative.
Tor? Not necessary, but recommended for privacy (hides your IP from peers). Easy: add onlynet=onion or use Tor proxy in bitcoin.conf. Many run without and it's fine.

Start with pruned mode on Ubuntu, use external drive for datadir. Great first step—run it pruned, learn as you go. If sync dies, consider Umbrel or RaspiBolt guides for easier setup on better hardware. You've got this! 🚀

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%

[Don Pedro Dinero]

1st post is 100% AI, but second one is giving me mixed results (combination of AI and human inputs) so I am not sure but he is using 'em dash' so  

He is probably doing that. I merited his OP because it didn't struck me as AI generated but didn't check at the time. That OP is 100% AI generated according to GPTzero and Copyleaks, only 31% according to Quillbot. Anyway, I am going to put him on my ignore list and to tag him as well.

[HustleZ]

What's the verdict on Newbie hbqchjy?

He is Using Ai that's For sure. But in some posts he just rephrases some of the words while in some he just directly copy/pastes.

I noticed them a few days ago and even reported them.

I have Spotted 2 users using Ai and they are probably alts of eachother As the 1 sMerit hbqchjy had he sent it to bits86 on an Ai Generated Post.

[SatoPrincess]

User: Worldtraveller321

Bitcoin as a right-wing / elite economic trap
I don’t see Bitcoin as a neutral technology. I see it as a political and economic project that ultimately benefits right-wing ideology and financial elites while misleading ordinary people into thinking it’s a tool for liberation.
Here’s why:
1. It promotes radical individualism, not collective solutions.
Bitcoin is built on the idea that people should opt out of public systems entirely — public banking, public regulation, public accountability. That lines up perfectly with right-wing and libertarian ideology, which opposes social programs, taxation, and collective responsibility. It doesn’t strengthen society; it weakens shared institutions.
2. It shifts power from democratic systems to unaccountable private actors.
Instead of decisions being made through public policy, Bitcoin concentrates influence in the hands of miners, early adopters, whales, and private exchanges — none of whom are democratically accountable. That’s not decentralization in practice; that’s privatization with a tech label.
3. It creates the illusion of economic freedom while reproducing inequality.
Early insiders became extremely wealthy. Latecomers are encouraged to “buy in” with the hope of future gains, while taking on most of the risk. That mirrors classic speculative bubbles — wealth flows upward, risk flows downward.
4. It distracts from real, structural economic reform.
Instead of fighting for fair taxation, strong public services, worker protections, and accountable financial systems, people are encouraged to believe a piece of software will magically fix capitalism. That narrative weakens political pressure for real change — which benefits those already at the top.
Conclusion:
Bitcoin doesn’t challenge power — it reroutes it. It doesn’t democratize wealth — it reshuffles it upward. And it doesn’t fix broken economic systems — it provides an escape hatch for people who would rather abandon them than improve them.
That’s why I reject the idea that Bitcoin is progressive, liberating, or left-leaning. I see it as a tool that ultimately serves private power, not the public good.

Copyleaks - 100% AI
Gptzero - 100% AI

Has Bitcoin Become All Right-Wing?

Bitcoin was born as a decentralized alternative to centralized banking systems — a way for individuals to hold and transfer value without government oversight or interference. Its roots lie in libertarian ideals, appealing to anyone skeptical of state power — left, right, or neither. But today, a strange new political narrative has taken shape: has Bitcoin become the darling of the right wing?

Prominent right-wing figures like Donald Trump and Canada’s Pierre Poilievre have loudly embraced Bitcoin, often tying it to populist ideas of “freedom” from government control and anti-central bank rhetoric. Trump has even begun promoting his own crypto-themed NFTs and memecoins. In the U.S. and abroad, Bitcoin is increasingly framed as a political tool by conservative movements — especially those leaning toward the radical right — to push back against what they claim are overreaches by the state and globalist institutions.

This shift raises the question: is Bitcoin inherently right-wing now?

Not necessarily. The technology itself hasn’t changed. Bitcoin’s appeal as a decentralized store of value, resistant to censorship, remains relevant across the political spectrum. For left-wing advocates, the promise of financial autonomy, transparency, and resistance to corporate banking power still aligns with broader anti-capitalist or democratic socialist goals.

The louder voices may simply be coming from the right. Crypto is still in its “Wild West” era — volatile, unregulated, and chaotic — which naturally draws in political extremes and opportunists. But the ideological battle for Bitcoin is far from over. Whether it tilts permanently toward one side may depend less on the code and more on who shows up to shape the narrative.

Copyleaks - 100% AI
Gptzero - 100% mixed

[Mitchell]

What's the verdict on Newbie hbqchjy?

[...]

The above account sent Merit to Newbie bits86, who fits the same pattern:

[...]

Butts have been kicked and I'm keeping an eye on a possible alt.

[LoyceV]

I noticed them a few days ago and even reported them.

My bad, I only checked the last page of this thread.

Butts have been kicked and I'm keeping an eye on a possible alt.

Lovely

[HustleZ]

I was just seeing my old posts where I saw a reply to my post, by Alpen who replied me on a post of mine. I got suspicous seeing his reply and decided to run a check unfortunately for him he turned out to be a Ai shitposter.

1.

Everyone waits for 'New Year miracles,' but those expectations are often just wishful thinking. What we really need are concrete goals and proven models.

Throughout last year, I watched the explosion of new stablecoins from various developers and even traditional finance firms. This gave me a simple arbitrage idea: capturing a 0.1% spread on trades where both assets are nominally pegged to the USD.

I’ve already battle-tested this on Cryptomus using USDT pairs and even wrote an arbitrage bot for it. In the new year, I plan to scale this strategy to other stablecoins with better margins. If I can reach a 1% daily return, it will be a massive success.

GPTZero: 91% Ai Generated
Stealthwriter Ai: 86% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident

2.

As I see it, your parents' main issue is that they are poor judges of character. If that’s the case, business might not be for them. In this world, losing funds like that is essentially natural selection.

However, with the rise of AI agents, we might soon be able to remove the 'human factor' from business entirely.

Back to crypto: keeping funds on a CEX is just as risky as using a DEX. Look at the recent Binance case — their developers designed the non-custodial wallet so 'efficiently' that it sent seed phrases directly to a scammer's server.

Personally, I split my trust 50/50 between 'new faces' and proven services. With newcomers like Cryptomus, I get advanced, cutting-edge features. With legacy ones like MetaMask, I get time-tested quasi-reliability. I’ve moved almost everything off old exchanges, except for Poloniex — mostly because I’m just too lazy to switch

GPTZero: 100% Mixed
Stealthwriter Ai: 60% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident
( we should use our judgement too and from that it doesn't look human)

3.

The core problem is this: you still need regular money (fiat) to buy crypto, which forces you onto exchanges and through their KYC checks. But I really don't want my wallets to be de-anonymized, where just anyone could look up how much I'm holding. These days, it seems like everyone is tracking blockchain transactions.

You can break the trail of your transfers by using a coin mixer. But I don't want to accidentally receive coins that were stolen by, say, North Korean hackers. That would land my wallet on the blacklist of nearly every exchange and trading platform.

This is where using Monero (XMR) starts to make sense. I can buy XMR legitimately on Kraken or through a gateway like Cryptomus. Those transfers are still untraceable because of how Monero's transactions are built for privacy.

So my question is, what's the next step? Which decentralized exchanges (DEXs) are reliable for swapping XMR into the cryptocurrency I actually want?

GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated
Stealthwriter Ai: 91% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident

Ps: he was tagged by LoyceV as an Ai spammer. He is also doing a good job in disguising the Ai Generated Text after getting the Tag but it's sure That he's still using Ai.

[HustleZ]

This user andikarl is posting Using Ai and Was also Pointed out by @ABCbits for sharing something that didn't make sense.

1.

flapduck,
You are absolutely correct — a bare Merkle root in OP_RETURN is only a commitment, not a full security model.
The Planetary Computer solves data availability and independent verification exactly the same way Bitcoin itself solved it in 2009:
1.  Full state is carried by the swarm
Every FPGA node stores the complete current state (FLOP balances, RWA commitments, active bitstream registry). The state is small — less than 100 MB even at 1 million nodes — because FLOP tokens are soul-bound and RWA proofs are zero-knowledge.
2.  The Bitcoin anchor is a fraud-proof trigger, not a data layer
The OP_RETURN commitment is published by any node. If a dishonest majority tries to publish a false root, any single honest node can broadcast the correct state + Merkle proof off-chain (Nostr, torrent, etc.) and the community will reject the false anchor. The dishonest chain loses monetary premium immediately.
3.  No trusted off-chain actor
There is no single publisher. Thousands of nodes compete to include the correct root. The first honest miner to include it wins the small TIME reward. This is the same economic game theory that secures Bitcoin block inclusion.
4.  Reorg resistance
Because FLOP tokens burn on downtime and are location-locked, a malicious reorg of the swarm state would require physically controlling >51% of global FPGA hardware — the same hardness as a Bitcoin 51% attack, but geographically distributed.
In short: Bitcoin provides the ultimate timestamp and economic finality. The swarm provides data availability and consensus. Neither trusts the other — they mutually secure each other.
The full state machine and verification rules will be in the genesis code release (after the first 1 000 nodes and first anchor).
Thank you for the sharp question. This is exactly the level of scrutiny the design requires.

Stealthwriter: 82% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated

2.

ABCbits,

Thank you for the feedback.

1. On centralised AI censoring Bitcoin tools  
You are right that the immediate pressure would fall on the developers or companies behind the tools.  
But the deeper risk is that cutting-edge AI models themselves become the bottleneck.  
Today, the best code assistants, trading algorithms, on-chain analytics, and even wallet UX improvements rely on large language/vision models that are all controlled by a handful of corporations.  
If those corporations are forced (or choose) to refuse service to Bitcoin-related prompts — or if governments mandate “responsible AI” filters that block certain topics — the entire ecosystem loses access to state-of-the-art intelligence overnight.  
We have already seen early signs: certain models refuse to discuss Bitcoin scripting tricks, mixer designs, or privacy tools.  
A decentralized swarm removes that single point of failure and gives the Bitcoin community its own independent intelligence layer.
I think having an independent artificial intelligence layer not only helps to maintain balance in the world, it also enables real innovation for everybody without large cooperations. Bitcoin enabled true independence for those who have their Bitcoin in self-custody. And for those operating a node or even a mining rig. Giving tools to everyone to participate in a AI world independent from all other entities gives true freedom and therefore gives also economic freedom to each and everyone. Especially if AI evolves exponentially having a FPGA based network as a backbone would help that AI could restructure logical units itself but with certain boundaries trough the blockchain anchor. I think this is crucial for our further development as decentralized community and also give balance of power.

2. On ASIC miners and dual-use compute  
You are correct — current Bitcoin ASICs can only do SHA-256 and are useless for AI workloads.  
The Planetary Computer does not attempt to repurpose existing SHA-256 ASICs.  
Instead, it targets  field-programmable gate arrays(FPGAs) — reconfigurable hardware that can run both useful AI workloads (INT8 matrix multiplies, transformer attention) and, in the future, alternative proof-of-work algorithms if the community ever chooses to migrate or only to further secure AI restructuring decisions on a blockchain.
Many Bitcoin miners already experiment with FPGAs for development, testing, or alternative chains.  
The swarm simply gives that hardware a permanent, high-value use case: censorship-resistant AI compute that pays in TIME tokens backed by Bitcoin collateral.

The goal is not to change Bitcoin’s PoW today, but to create a parallel, Bitcoin-anchored compute layer that strengthens the ecosystem against future centralisation risks — in energy, intelligence, and narrative.

Appreciate the sharp questions. This is exactly the discussion the design needs. Hope to get more feedback to help kick start this. I hope that some agree that this is also in the spirit of Satoshi and the early Bitcoin developers when first starting Bitcoin.

Stealthwriter: 70 Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident
GPTZero: 100% Confident

3.

To move forward on the Planetary Computer, here is the proposed foundation for the genesis code. Feedback and contributions welcome — especially from those who understand Bitcoin’s security model.

Foundation Code Functions (What to Implement First)

1. P2P Swarm Pipeline & Syncing
   - Use libp2p-rs (Rust) for Kademlia DHT discovery + gossipsub.
   - Nodes broadcast: heartbeat (Flops/second claim), benchmark proof, state deltas.
   - Sync: On join, request full state from 10 random peers, verify against latest Bitcoin anchor.
   - Pipeline: Torrent-style for large data (models/bitstreams) via IPFS or custom magnet links.

2. Proof-of-Compute (Instead of Traditional PoW)
   - Standardized benchmark: Fixed-size INT8 matrix multiply + transformer attention layer.
   - Node runs benchmark, signs result + timestamp.
   - Peers verify signature + re-run benchmark to confirm Flops/second.
   - Hash the Swarm State Before Contribution: Every epoch, nodes hash local state + benchmark proof → include in next heartbeat. This creates a "swarm PoW" chain — dishonest state can't propagate without redoing proofs.

3. Stronger Bitcoin Binding
   - OP_RETURN Anchors: Every epoch (~24h), nodes compete to broadcast Merkle root of (state + all proofs) in OP_RETURN. First honest miner wins small satoshi fee (paid via Lightning to hotkey).
   - Covenant-Lite Collateral (Native Script): Use OP_CLTV only — lock BTC with absolute timelock (5-10 years). Fraud proof = pre-signed transaction spending to bounty address.
   - Drivechains-Inspired Fraud Proofs: If false anchor detected, any node broadcasts correcting data off-chain (Nostr/torrent). Community rejects false chain — monetary premium flows to honest swarm.
   - Future-Proof: Design for OP_CTV or TXHASH when activated — but v0 works with current Bitcoin.

Who would like to review, improve, or help implement this base layer?

Stealthwriter: 100% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident
GPTZero: 97% Ai Generated

These new shitposters are targeting Technical discussions as there are more merits distributed in it. They need to get red tag if they are caught using Ai in the Technical Discussions

Edit: He has deleted the posts reported here thus confirming he is an Ai Spammer.
 

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie Foxworld?

           Governments around the world continue to debate how to regulate cryptocurrency. Some welcome it and see it as a step toward innovation, while others fear its potential for misuse and want strict control. As Bitcoin grows in popularity, will governments eventually accept it as part of the financial system, or will they try to limit its use? How do you think regulation will affect the price, adoption, and future of Bitcoin? This is an important discussion because regulation can either support or slow down the entire crypto industry.

[memehunter]

What's the verdict on Newbie Foxworld?

Thank you for sharing this your explanation makes a lot of sense. I agree that Bitcoin has already embedded itself into the global financial system long before governments even understood what it was. It really is something they can’t fully control anymore, only regulate around the edges.

     What you mentioned about regulation being a form of acknowledgment is very true. In some ways it gives legitimacy and makes traditional institutions pay attention. But I also share your concern that the more regulated the space becomes, the further it moves away from Bitcoin’s original vision of decentralization and open access. It’s ironic that the services aligned with Bitcoin’s core philosophy—like non-KYC platforms or decentralized exchanges are now the ones struggling the most.

     It makes me wonder: as Bitcoin continues to grow, do you think it’s possible for the ecosystem to balance both compliance and decentralization? Or will the industry eventually split into two separate worlds the regulated, institutional version and the more cypherpunk, privacy-focused side?

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%

           Governments around the world continue to debate how to regulate cryptocurrency. Some welcome it and see it as a step toward innovation, while others fear its potential for misuse and want strict control. As Bitcoin grows in popularity, will governments eventually accept it as part of the financial system, or will they try to limit its use? How do you think regulation will affect the price, adoption, and future of Bitcoin? This is an important discussion because regulation can either support or slow down the entire crypto industry.

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 85%


Rest of his posts are too short to say anything.

[mv1986]

What's the verdict on Newbie Foxworld?

           Governments around the world continue to debate how to regulate cryptocurrency. Some welcome it and see it as a step toward innovation, while others fear its potential for misuse and want strict control. As Bitcoin grows in popularity, will governments eventually accept it as part of the financial system, or will they try to limit its use? How do you think regulation will affect the price, adoption, and future of Bitcoin? This is an important discussion because regulation can either support or slow down the entire crypto industry.

Not very foxy to use AI to write foxy stuff.

[AuchanX]

A junior member is using AI in every one of his posts. To confirm this, I tested 3 of his posts on 5 different websites with the AI ​​detector mentioned in the OP. The results were almost the same in each case, which clearly indicates that the person is creating the posts through AI.

User: Victoria01

As the first weekend of 2026 kicks off, the crypto market is settling into a calm but constructive phase. Bitcoin continues to trade in the $88,000–$90,000 range, signaling consolidation after the holiday slowdown. This range-bound movement suggests the market is digesting recent gains while waiting for the next macro or on-chain catalyst to define direction.

Ethereum is also holding firm above $3,000, maintaining strength as the leading smart-contract network. At the same time, meme assets like PEPE and other community-driven tokens remain active, posting higher volatility and volume than the broader market — a reminder that risk appetite is still present beneath the surface.

On the activity side, BingX’s Weekly Featured Trading Championship (Phase V) is currently live, running from Dec 29, 2025 to Jan 5, 2026 (UTC+0). The event features spot trading across selected pairs such as PIEVERSE/USDT, ZKP/USDT, METEORA/USDT, and others, with 80,000 USDT in rewards distributed based on trading volume. It adds an extra layer of engagement for traders navigating this consolidation phase.

Overall, this weekend reflects the tone of the early 2026 market:
Bitcoin holding its ground, altcoins rotating, memes staying lively, and structured trading events keeping participation high. A market that isn’t rushing but clearly staying alert.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Quillbot: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI

At some point in my trading journey, I had to admit something to myself: trading without structure is no different from gambling.

Like many people, I initially approached trading with the hope of quick returns. A few wins made it feel easy, until losses started coming without clear reasons. That’s when it became obvious that trading isn’t a shortcut to wealth; it’s a business that requires the same discipline as any other profession.

Every market crypto, forex, or stocks operates on structure. Without understanding risk management, position sizing, and market behavior, consistency is almost impossible. Once I shifted my focus to learning, testing strategies on live markets, and reviewing results, my mindset changed from chasing profits to building sustainability.

Another lesson I learned the hard way is that the choice of exchange matters. As a crypto futures trader, moving to BingX made my trading process more organized. Instead of pushing reckless leverage, the platform emphasizes tools that help traders manage risk isolated and cross margin options, visible liquidation levels, and straightforward TP/SL execution. The availability of demo trading and copy trading also helped me observe how experienced traders approach the market in real time.

Trading will always involve risk, and no platform removes that reality. However, using an exchange that prioritizes structure, transparency, and learning makes a significant difference in long-term survival.

I’d be interested to hear how others here approach trading what worked for you, and what lessons cost you the most to learn?

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 99% AI
Quillbot: 40% AI
Stealthwriter: 79% AI
Originality: 100% AI

On-chain liquidity indicators for BTC$BTC are showing the first signs of recovery, according to data from Swissblock Bitcoin Vector Lite.

Historically, shifts in liquidity, the blue leading signal on the chart - tend to precede price movements by 10–14 days. After weeks of capital outflows and tight liquidity conditions, this uptick could mark the beginning of a reversal phase.

At the time of analysis, BTC trades around $103.5K, with market participants watching closely for confirmation.

If liquidity continues to expand, it may trigger the next leg of price recovery - just as it did in mid-2024 and early 2025.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: No AI Detected
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
quillbot: 100% AI
Originality:100% AI

[TokenTikas]

User: Worldtraveller321

More added few AI Post:

Over the last few years, I’ve been watching something really frustrating happen to the crypto space—especially Bitcoin. What started as a movement built around decentralization, financial autonomy, transparency, and real technological innovation has been twisted into something almost unrecognizable.
And honestly, a big part of the damage came during the Trump era.
Once Trump and a wave of right-wing opportunists realized they could use crypto culture as a marketing tool, the whole space turned into a circus. Meme coins, pump-and-dump communities, questionable “patriot tokens,” and endless grifts started popping up everywhere. Instead of genuine experts, we got “influencers” and self-appointed gurus claiming crypto knowledge simply because they backed Trump politically.
Then it got even worse—reports of people with no real blockchain background being treated as “crypto experts” around the White House. That gave an official veneer to people who were basically salesmen, not technologists. When you politicize something like crypto, you strip away the neutrality and open-access ethos that made it powerful in the first place....................

Undetectable.ai: 99%
Zerogpt: 46.42%
Copyleaks: 100%

Question to the Crypto Community:

Have we been deceived about the true purpose of the crypto space?
For years, many have speculated about the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto—the mysterious creator of Bitcoin. What if this person (or group) was never the benevolent innovator we were led to believe? What if, instead, Bitcoin was designed as a tool for global manipulation—an elaborate scheme to consolidate power, undermine democracy, and ultimately enslave people under a new financial order?
In recent years, we’ve witnessed an alarming rise of radical right-wing influence in crypto. Today, the space is overrun with scams—99% of projects are fraudulent, from ICOs and NFTs to meme coins—designed not for decentralization, but as a means to extract more fiat currency. This contradicts the original vision of Bitcoin and raises the question: Was this the plan all along?
Governments and powerful institutions have increasingly entered the crypto space, not to empower people, but to guide them toward predatory schemes. Crypto, once seen as a path to financial freedom, is now being weaponized to deepen economic enslavement—driving people into debt and ensuring they remain prisoners of a collapsing system..........................

Undetectable.ai: 93%
Zerogpt: 85.7%
Copyleaks: 100%
Normally, when you look at the account’s previous general post and reply post, it is clear that the person is not very active on the forum. He usually comes in once in a while, makes one or two posts and then disappears/unactive again. From his older posts, it seems that most of them were low-quality or shit posts, but starting from 2025, he began posting using AI. That is also why many of his posts have been deleted. If he had kept the same posting style as before, there would not have been any problem but lately he has been using AI to make posts. Also, if you look closely, you will see that he received a tag on 2018-02-05 as a “shitposter.”

The Sceptical Chymist

2018-02-05

Shitposter.