AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[nutildah]

Could anyone check user Easteregg69?

1. He already received multiple neutral and negative tag due to non stop spamming.
2. I used BitList search, but no one bothered to check so far. Only https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66540310#msg66540310 mention his spam.
3. https://bpip.org/Report?r=postsdeleted shows he currently have 316 reply deleted moderator, with rank 125th for account with most deleted posts.
4. He just made such ridiculous/off-topic reply on Bitcoin Technical Support board. I don't expect anyone find his post actually useful to solve technical issue they face.

I don't know whats up with this account, but his style hasn't really changed since 2018. Tons and tons of posts about nothing in particular. Just a stream-of-consciousness style flow, with only the first sentence addressing the actual subject matter. Maybe this is his way of having a good time, lol.

[macson]

Yes, you're right. If you check the posts of these two accounts, it is obvious that these are most likely just two alternative accounts using AI for such frequent posting and using the same "scenario" in one of the AI bots. Have you sent reports to the moderators on these two accounts?

In some topics, their answers follow one another.

WannaParadise  March 28, 2018, 08:51:27 PM
ayomarcelle  May 14, 2018, 03:38:20 AM

I also found another account that might be connected to those accounts because it has the same pattern. Here's what I found:

My think on political donations via cryptocurrency is that it is a complex issue with advantages and risks. I do not believe that cryptocurrency donations should be completely banned. I think, its use should be limited and controlled with strict transparency identity verification donation limits and antimoney laundering controls as this would be more balanced....

GPTZero: 57% (AI Paraphrasing)

It is natural that taking risks is scary.. I think, this fear is a catalyst for growth. Calculated risks open doors to new opportunities. That's why i believe taking goal oriented steps brings less regret in the long run. Of course, courage alone is not enough. I think, to minimize risks, it is necessary to conduct research, prepare a plan B and proceed with small testable experiments. Failures are educational. I have observed that failure provides experience and knowledge. In conclusion, take risks but not blindly!!! Decisions based on data, mentors, and step by step implementation yield more sustainable results. So, in which area would you consider taking a risk right now?

GPTZero: 97% (AI Paraphrasing)

The balance between idea generation and implementation is critical for success. I think, the ability to take risks and act quickly provides an advantage in the short term. It seizes market opportunities and creates a competitive edge through agility. However, in my think, mere assertiveness is not enough "thinkers" strategic foresight, analysis, and attention to detail guarantee the sustainability of the moves made. I think, the most effective leaders are those who can both think and act. They develop ideas, assess risks and implement them rapidly. Therefore, organizations and individuals must invest in cultures that integrate thinking with doing!! Decision making processes should incorporate both data and intuition.

GPTZero: 100% (AI Generated)
Sapling.ai: 88.7%
Originality.ai: 100%

I think AI has really made things easier. My opinion is that it delivers great results for certain tasks. I think, it would be overly pessimistic to say that creativity and manual dexterity will completely disappear. So why? Because AI provides speed and ideas but it may not fully convey human touch, originality and emotion. My think is that it's best to use AI as a tool to enhance our own capabilities. This way, we become more efficient while continuing to learn. Ultimately, whether AI makes us lazy is debatable. What's important is how we use it....

GPTZero: 53% (AI Paraphrasing)
Sapling.ai: 99.9%

I’ve only just started out in this field but i’ve done some research and carried out my own small scale experiments. I’m speaking as an amateur here, but generally speaking simply connecting a wallet doesn’t mean it’ll be emptied straight away. If you approve the signature or permission requests that appear after connecting an attacker could withdraw the funds. Still, i reckon that when you connect to dodgy sites they can cause damage quickly through automatic permission traps or known vulnerabilities. I try not to connect to sites i don’t recognise. I don’t approve signature requests without reading them first. And i think that’s how i’m protecting myself 

GPTZero: 31% (AI Polished)
Sapling.ai: 99.9%

thank you WannaParadise the information you’ve shared is truly invaluable. Your emphasis on security and simplicity is spot on the platforms you’ve recommended and your advice on 2FA, hardware wallets and risk management will shape my approach. i fully agree with your perspective; i’m grateful for your support and for sharing your experiences. i’ll put your advice into practice and get used to the interfaces by practising trading with a small amount. i’ll also prioritise security and only keep the amount strictly necessary for trading on the exchange. Thanks again  these lessons have been a real guide for me. Anf, which hardware wallet and 2FA method would you recommend?

GPTZero: 100% (AI Generated)
Sapling.ai: 99.7%

It's highly likely that the majority of his posts are AI-generated and paraphrased. Just like before, he uses the same pattern of "I believe," "I think," and "My think," and he'll lowercase the letter i for each "I," he also uses ... and !!, and occasionally moves words out of place and uses emoticons  for question marks.

[MRY]

This newbie generate post and spamming the forum with AI.

User: ClaudeKing

Conceptually, this narrative can be understood as an affirmation that Bitcoin operates not as a normative entity directing behavior, but rather as a probabilistic infrastructure that provides a spectrum of possible uses without imposing specific preferences. Within this framework, institutional investors' decisions to access it through spot ETFs are simply a manifestation of market rationality seeking to reduce perceived volatility, while usage scenarios in strategic trading channels reflect the exploitation of its inherent pseudonymity and censorship resistance. Furthermore, adoption in fiscal domains such as taxes and remittances demonstrates a convergence between decentralized systems and formal economic structures, which were previously antagonistic. Nevertheless, Bitcoin's essence remains its mathematical determinism, unaffected by user intentions. Thus, the variability in usage is not a deviation, but rather a validation of its antifragile design against interpretation.

GPTZero.me: 95%
Copyleaks: 100%
Quilbot : 73%
undetectable.ai: 99%

In an in-depth analysis of the dynamics of the crypto market cycle, particularly Bitcoin as a pioneering digital asset, your perspective reveals a complex layer of behavioral finance psychology where investors are often trapped in cognitive biases such as recency bias and optimism bias, comforting themselves with projections of an eternal bull market that historically only lasts 12-18 months while a chronic bear market can take up to 2-3 years to achieve capitulation and healthy asset redistribution; This is not a coincidence but rather a manifestation of the principle of mean reversion in economics, where a deep correction phase cleans up excess leverage, improves on-chain metrics such as realized price and HODL waves, and prepares Layer-2 scalability infrastructure and institutional adoption through ETFs and mature regulations, so for those who missed the previous entry point, this is a divine timing to implement hybrid strategies such as DCA augmented with technical analysis Fibonacci retracement, sentiment monitoring via the fear & greed index, and understanding global macroeconomics including halving cycles and correlation with treasury yields, all of which will generate authentic, data-driven euphoria when the next bull run begins, transforming regret into an empowering narrative of sustainable financial independence, where true happiness is born from algorithmic discipline and a long-term vision of decentralization as the foundation of a new, fairer economic society.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Quilbot : 100%
undetectable.ai: 99%

Government systems use monopoly on currency and resource distribution as instruments of control, making social and economic pressure more effective than direct physical attempts to seize power. A stable alternative emerges when citizens shift their reliance to decentralized financial systems, where the independent accumulation of assets provides leverage to influence social structures without confrontation. Increased participation in non-governmental financial ecosystems reduces the risk of starvation and economic manipulation, while creating recurring opportunities for redistribution of power. This approach is more adaptable to volatility and provides a foundation for consistent and sustainable social change, focusing on disciplined accumulation and systematic risk management.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Quilbot : 100%
undetectable.ai: 99%

An optimal approach to Bitcoin investment requires a gradual understanding of market mechanisms, including liquidity and volatility. Historical data shows that beginners who jump straight into leveraged trading face higher risks than those who accumulate assets over the long term. A systematic strategy requires an initial evaluation: whether the primary objective is asset ownership or leveraged speculation. Market liquidity is the dominant variable determining transaction execution and risk, while an investor's experience level influences their ability to manage exposure and minimize losses. Discipline, evaluating the probability of price movements, and understanding market cycles increase the chances of investment success compared to impulsive approaches lacking fundamental understanding.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Quilbot : 84%
undetectable.ai: 99%

An evaluation of Bitcoin's evolution confirms that the initial block release design established a distribution structure that enabled significant long-term growth. The accumulation of assets by early investors, although larger than initially predicted, did not hinder adoption or ecosystem expansion, but instead stimulated market integration and global value recognition. This growth demonstrates that an idea with consistent protocol execution can surpass the creator's initial vision, resulting in steady value expansion, distribution, and adaptation. This phenomenon illustrates the capacity of innovative ideas to evolve over time through a combination of effective internal mechanisms and dynamic market response.

GPTZero.me: 95%
Copyleaks: 100%
Quilbot : 76%
undetectable.ai: 99%

[nutildah]

This newbie generate post and spamming the forum with AI.

That's nice if you want to contribute to this thread but don't think I won't tag you someday if I find out you're a bought account.

[MRY]

This newbie generate post and spamming the forum with AI.

That's nice if you want to contribute to this thread but don't think I won't tag you someday if I find out you're a bought account.

Fair enough and enjoy your investigation mate 

[ABCbits]

--snip--

I don't know whats up with this account, but his style hasn't really changed since 2018. Tons and tons of posts about nothing in particular. Just a stream-of-consciousness style flow, with only the first sentence addressing the actual subject matter. Maybe this is his way of having a good time, lol.

I must admit i didn't check his post from many years ago. So in that case, the possibility of he using AI is rather low. But it doesn't change the fact there are few thread/topic where such reply would be very annoying.

This newbie generate post and spamming the forum with AI.

User: ClaudeKing
--snip--

I'm not sure his username refer to musician or he's "king" at using Claude AI (one of commercial AI out there).

[Misa Amane]

User: worrygenuine
Reason: This user just joined the forum yesterday and has already made a post. It seems to me that they used AI or ChatGPT to create their very first post right after joining.

Interesting discussion! It really shows how fast things evolve in crypto—what seems unclear or risky today can become standard tomorrow. Always important to do your own research and stay cautious, especially with new projects. Curious to see how this develops over time.

• ZeroGPT 100% AI
• GPTzero  100% AI
• CopyLeaks 100% AI

[LoyceV]

User: worrygenuine
Reason: This user just joined the forum yesterday and has already made a post. It seems to me that they used AI or ChatGPT to create their very first post right after joining.

You've been here for a week, had 5 chatbot shitposts posts deleted by Moderators, earned yourself neutral feedback, and made it to my Ignore list already. What makes you post here to report a Newbie? I wouldn't be surprised if you created another shitposter account just to be able to report it.

[Misa Amane]

User: worrygenuine
Reason: This user just joined the forum yesterday and has already made a post. It seems to me that they used AI or ChatGPT to create their very first post right after joining.

You've been here for a week, had 5 chatbot shitposts posts deleted by Moderators, earned yourself neutral feedback, and made it to my Ignore list already. What makes you post here to report a Newbie? I wouldn't be surprised if you created another shitposter account just to be able to report it.

Friend, I’ve been here for about a week, and moderators have already deleted 5 of my chatbot-related shitposts. I also received a neutral feedback for that. However, I only used the chatbot as a translator when I wrote something myself, I asked it to translate and refine it before posting. Still, my posts were detected as AI-generated, so I deleted them myself and took time to read the forum rules.

I’m not here to report newbies I’m here to help clean up the forum by addressing AI/chatbot misuse. If reporting AI users is considered wrong, then I sincerely apologize for that. I can also see that you’ve already added another neutral feedback, which I honestly didn’t expect just for reporting.

[Mitchell]

Wikipedia made a good article on how to detect signs of AI writing: Signs of AI writing.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Wikipedia made a good article on how to detect signs of AI writing: Signs of AI writing.

One day, one of the old-timers compared the search for cheaters to the struggle with windmills. It looks like our fight against AI texts will soon become a similar battle.

Various scenarios for bypassing AI detection detectors are regularly set up on GitHub. If you read all the signs of text recognition, and those ways to circumvent them, so far, it seems to me, AI wins. We can only rely on intuition, and the "past," of the accounts writing here for comparison, since, I think, our search becomes more difficult every time.

https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing

[babo]

Wikipedia made a good article on how to detect signs of AI writing: Signs of AI writing.

One day, one of the old-timers compared the search for cheaters to the struggle with windmills. It looks like our fight against AI texts will soon become a similar battle.

Various scenarios for bypassing AI detection detectors are regularly set up on GitHub. If you read all the signs of text recognition, and those ways to circumvent them, so far, it seems to me, AI wins. We can only rely on intuition, and the "past," of the accounts writing here for comparison, since, I think, our search becomes more difficult every time.

https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing

It's the classic prey-predator fight, you can't stop it
and although it's "stupid" in our case, i.e. people writing on the forum, there are worse cases like deepfakes
Understanding whether a video is real or fake is important, a fake video can start wars and many other worse things, so there is also a continuous race between prey and predator

[AnisEverRise]

AI is no more seen as something bad ........ I believe that 2026 and the more coming years will erase similar posts
... i mean respect to you but  maybe you stick on an old idea  ; old such as my grand mother .... ( respect ....... i said that just because both of my grand fathers are under the ground )  ...

[nutildah]

AI is no more seen as something bad ........ I believe that 2026 and the more coming years will erase similar posts
... i mean respect to you but  maybe you stick on an old idea

Any idiot can copy/paste text from Grok or ChatGPT or whatever. Its no different than plagiarism. If the forum accepted this behavior it would quickly be overrun by chatbots.

The forum is primarily intended to be a place where people come to discuss ideas with one another. If you're a person talking through a robot, its impossible for the listener to know you're not a robot.

You can use AI for every single other thing in thew world, just don't use it to write your posts for you.

You're removing the only element that makes you human here when you do that. Why is that so hard to understand?

[AnisEverRise]

AI is no more seen as something bad ........ I believe that 2026 and the more coming years will erase similar posts
... i mean respect to you but  maybe you stick on an old idea

Any idiot can copy/paste text from Grok or ChatGPT or whatever. Its no different than plagiarism. If the forum accepted this behavior it would quickly be overrun by chatbots.

The forum is primarily intended to be a place where people come to discuss ideas with one another. If you're a person talking through a robot, its impossible for the listener to know you're not a robot.

You can use AI for every single other thing in thew world, just don't use it to write your posts for you.

You're removing the only element that makes you human here when you do that. Why is that so hard to understand?

AI is no more seen as something bad ........ I believe that 2026 and the more coming years will erase similar posts
... i mean respect to you but  maybe you stick on an old idea

Any idiot can copy/paste text from Grok or ChatGPT or whatever. Its no different than plagiarism. If the forum accepted this behavior it would quickly be overrun by chatbots.

The forum is primarily intended to be a place where people come to discuss ideas with one another. If you're a person talking through a robot, its impossible for the listener to know you're not a robot.

You can use AI for every single other thing in thew world, just don't use it to write your posts for you.

You're removing the only element that makes you human here when you do that. Why is that so hard to understand?

I agree and maybe yes you are right ..... but maybe for my situation it was a discover + i have been not only CTR C CTRL V but any ways I can tell you and the others Feedbacks on my profile that i m not as you may see ..... the thing is that i discovered the forum in 2026 but after a period of hospitalisation 1 month of COMAback to 2023 ....... I M NOT TRYING TO HAVE SYMPATHY I KNOW HOW FORUMS WORK AND WAS A PART OF MANY OTHER ONES .... it s just that it came with the introduction of AI .... personally i didn t entended to do so ...

[DireWolfM14]

Wikipedia made a good article on how to detect signs of AI writing: Signs of AI writing.

I like how the article mentions that AI detecting AI is unreliable.  In fact, when I first saw this post I used AI detectors on it to confirm.  All of them claimed 0% chance that it was AI.  100% human, they said.  Well, I reported it anyway.

No human uses "springboard" and "parabolic" in the same sentence unless he's trying to mimic a robot.

[nutildah]

I like how the article mentions that AI detecting AI is unreliable.  In fact, when I first saw this post I used AI detectors on it to confirm.  All of them claimed 0% chance that it was AI.  100% human, they said.  Well, I reported it anyway.

GPTZero did a good job with this one, saying its 100% AI generated. Sapling is usually the most liberal in terms of dishing out false positives, but it said 0% for this one. I'm pretty sure that the logic is being upgraded in the better detectors. Indeed it will forever be a cat-and-mouse game.

My personal opinion is that

- if a post is only possibly AI generated but its not saying anything substantive, it should be deleted anyway... too many formulaic posts about nothing here. And,

- if someone goes through the trouble of crafting their prompt or altering the output enough to the point where their posts consistently evade detectors, they're already doing more work than it would take to just write post using one's own brain. In my experience pure shitposters and spammers are not fond of having to jump through extra hoops.

[Yabani]

The member slandered me. He was using AI in almost all of his posts.
The member was caught using AI in this post.

I've noticed a new trend emerging among AI spammers, and that is to prompt the bot to generate only lowercase text.

Here's an example from blomen.

As is:

i see a lot of negative comments about bitcoin lately. there are too many people in panic mode. i keep seeing questions like, "are we in a bear market?" "is this the end?" if you’re thinking this way, i want you to stop and reflect for a moment. how many times has bitcoin surprised us? how many times have we heard people say, "it’s over" or "don’t waste your time" just because they didn’t believe in it?

bitcoin hasn’t just surprised and proven people wrong a couple of times—it has done so repeatedly, forcing skeptics to swallow their words. those who doubted it in the past now regret not buying or panic-selling at the wrong time. while those who saw bitcoin as a get-rich-quick scheme have struggled with it, the ones who ignored the comparisons to endlessly printed fiat currencies like the usd have always managed to make better financial decisions.

guys, i’m telling you, i believe in bitcoin so much that even if everything i’ve saved becomes 10 times less valuable one day, i’ll still be proud. this isn’t a gamble, it’s not a get-rich-quick scheme—it’s a change. and i want to be part of that change. if it fails, i’d rather see my money disappear as part of a revolution than sit in a currency that’s endlessly printed without backing. i can accept that.

there will always be those who are impatient, chasing quick profits. but in the long run, the real winners are the ones who truly understand what bitcoin stands for. patience over panic, knowledge over fear, conviction over doubt.

bitcoin is here to stay. what matters is that we stay with it.

Sapling: 0.0% Fake
Copyleaks: 0% AI-generated

After capitalization is corrected:

I see a lot of negative comments about bitcoin lately. There are too many people in panic mode. I keep seeing questions like, "are we in a bear market?" "is this the end?" If you’re thinking this way, I want you to stop and reflect for a moment. How many times has bitcoin surprised us? How many times have we heard people say, "it’s over" or "don’t waste your time" just because they didn’t believe in it?

Bitcoin hasn’t just surprised and proven people wrong a couple of times—it has done so repeatedly, forcing skeptics to swallow their words. Those who doubted it in the past now regret not buying or panic-selling at the wrong time. While those who saw bitcoin as a get-rich-quick scheme have struggled with it, the ones who ignored the comparisons to endlessly printed fiat currencies like the USD have always managed to make better financial decisions.

Guys, I’m telling you, I believe in bitcoin so much that even if everything I’ve saved becomes 10 times less valuable one day, I’ll still be proud. This isn’t a gamble, it’s not a get-rich-quick scheme—it’s a change. And I want to be part of that change. If it fails, I’d rather see my money disappear as part of a revolution than sit in a currency that’s endlessly printed without backing. I can accept that.

There will always be those who are impatient, chasing quick profits. But in the long run, the real winners are the ones who truly understand what bitcoin stands for. Patience over panic, knowledge over fear, conviction over doubt.

Bitcoin is here to stay. What matters is that we stay with it.

Sapling: 94.4% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated

Here's another example where I fixed the capitalization:

Recently, I’ve been seeing a lot of gambling strategies in entertainment-focused posts on social media.

These strategies are mostly for games like mines, limbo, or dice, where we set the odds and make the decisions. They usually involve increasing the bet after a loss. The person making the video demonstrates the strategy for a short time, showing that it can make money.

They usually start off well. With a classic strategy, you can probably increase your money by around 10-20%. At first glance, everything seems great, giving you the hope that you'll double or triple your money and walk away.

But as you slowly win, a problem suddenly appears. Your strategy of increasing the bet after every loss drags you into a downward spiral. You just can't seem to win, even a little. And in the end, your exponentially growing bets will likely drain your entire balance.

This is the part that video creators never mention. When losing streaks last longer than expected, you can’t stop playing (because you’d lose your previous balance), and you can’t prevent your money from running out either.

All of these strategies will end the same way in the long run.In a game where the RTP isn’t fair, losing is only a matter of time. No one can beat the casino.

My question to you is: have you ever tried any of these strategies before? Were you successful?

Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated

(this post probably won't be deleted as its the first post of a long topic, but it should... losing their posts would encourage other posters to think twice before replying to a bot).

Here's one more for good measure, with corrected capitalization:

If you're going to place a bet on your favorite team, there are two possibilities.  

1. Betting on your team to win.  

If you do this, you'll celebrate every goal with pure joy. Your team scores, and your bet's chances of winning increase. It's a win-win situation. But there are risks. If your team concedes a goal, you have two reasons to be upset.  

2. Betting on the opposing team to win.  

If you’re doing this, I’d say you’re playing it safe. You can celebrate every goal in the match. If your team scores, you celebrate for them. If they concede, you celebrate for your bet. Whether you feel happier about money or your team depends on which one matters more to you.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 69% Probability AI Generated

One other thing to note is that this person posts a lot in Turkish, which could theoretically be an excuse to use AI for proof-reading of translating posts, but then telling it to decapitalize everything suggests AI is doing the heavy lifting.

The member had promised not to use AI here.

...

...

ok, anyway, i promise all btt members that from now on i will not use ai even for a single sentence (even for a translation).

i don't want you to take this promise as an admission that i used to be an ai spammer, that wasn't really my mindset. i'm just trying to produce quality posts, i want you to be sure of that.

i've only used AI in areas where my level of English is not enough to explain what i think,

One other thing to note is that this person posts a lot in Turkish, which could theoretically be an excuse to use AI for proof-reading of translating posts

like here. i've never done it to increase my post count, i swear. your reports of my posts are mostly informational, and they contain my thoughts. so it seems impossible for an AI to write them completely on its own. i don't think any AI would be able to express such a humanistic opinion about the montenegro vs turkey match that evening.

again, i write all of my posts (in terms of content) myself. i.e. all of the prompts i enter into ai before they are translated are my own writing. please don't think i'm lying about this. some of the times i used ai for translation, it probably escaped my attention that ai didn't translate exactly what i said. by writing in its own style, it didn't translate exactly what i wrote, and this is one of the reasons why it shows up as “100% ai written” in the detectors.

 

but if you use it to fix grammar, then it shouldn't be discouraged anyway.

We're already having some few issues on this thread - non- native English posters are getting nailed for using AI to correct their sentences and grammar to native standard..

It's going to create a lot of false positive reports if care is not taken and if we solely depends on those tools.

The exciting thing about AI is no one needs to accept it, it's already part of our daily lives except you live under the rock.

...

briefly,

i wrote it in Turkish, the AI translated it and i checked whether it reflected what i said and posted it. it won't happen again.

However, they are still using AI in their posts in 2026.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5176196.msg66410312#msg66410312 originality.ai/ %99  humanizeai %35  https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector %100
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5176196.msg66577807#msg66577807 humanizeai %95 sapling.ai %99
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5578578.msg66555875#msg66555875 https://www.humanizeai.pro/detector %84
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5578576.msg66553698#msg66553698 https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector %99.9 aİ https://www.humanizeai.pro/detector %47  https://stealthwriter.ai/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5578418.msg66546302#msg66546302 https://sapling.ai/ai-content-detector %99.9

The member continues to write as captured in the post above.

[blomen]

The member slandered me.

i didn’t slander you, i just pointed out what i noticed. i rarely check anyone’s messages through ai detectors. yours just stood out so much to me that i just wanted to give it a try, it’s nothing personal. i only reported what you did here because for me, your case required more than just a minor warning. you could have simply explained yourself and said you didn’t do that. if you didn’t, of course. i didn’t even give you neutral feedback because i thinked you can just stop posting with ai.

The member had promised not to use AI here.

However, they are still using AI in their posts in 2026.

no, i don’t.

since i made that promise, i haven’t used ai even once for any of my posts on the forum. i won’t let you smear my name just because you hate me for exposing you.

as i mentioned earlier, i usually have to use translation websites to write messages in english. i think the reason these examples you gave are perceived as ai is that translation programs use a certain degree of “standard” language.

briefly,

i wrote it in Turkish, the AI translated it and i checked whether it reflected what i said and posted it. it won't happen again.

Do you know how to read in English?  Or do you also translate words on the English board to Turkish, respond in Turkish, and have AI translate them to English before posting?  It must be quite difficult.

no, i can read and understand english easily except for very extreme limits. sometimes there are problems when i write it down, but i have improved in that too compared to my early days.

what i usually do is to read and understand the latest comments on topics i'm interested in, then write a reply in my head in turkish and translate the sentences into english. it's easier than writing directly in english.

He was using AI in almost all of his posts.

no, i don’t use ai for any of my messages. since various ai detectors have produced these results for a few different messages of mine, i’m not sure how else to explain myself. if someone asks me to do so, i can answer any questions. as i said, the translation language of the programs i use probably caused a similar issue to the language problem i experienced when using ai for my previous translations.

is there anything users who are accused of using ai can do to prove they didn’t use it? cause i didn't. i can do it if there is a way.

from now on, i could continue without using any translation service, but i think users trying to read my posts might have a bit of a hard time 

[AnisEverRise]

AI is no more seen as something bad ........ I believe that 2026 and the more coming years will erase similar posts
... i mean respect to you but  maybe you stick on an old idea

Any idiot can copy/paste text from Grok or ChatGPT or whatever. Its no different than plagiarism. If the forum accepted this behavior it would quickly be overrun by chatbots.

The forum is primarily intended to be a place where people come to discuss ideas with one another. If you're a person talking through a robot, its impossible for the listener to know you're not a robot.

You can use AI for every single other thing in thew world, just don't use it to write your posts for you.

You're removing the only element that makes you human here when you do that. Why is that so hard to understand?

Anyways i removed my négative feedback on your profile and not asking you to do the same ...... I know that i have too much skills what ever it is i will always with power of almigthy EverRise .

 

BTW i guess surviving to car accident and coma is a rich experience however i prefer to forget and work hard ... without AI of course but my usage of it was linked to my period of Wake up a( re-born ) anyways i like your total comittement  to this... cheers