|
bramvnl
|
 |
April 23, 2014, 03:52:36 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coincookie
|
|
April 23, 2014, 06:45:27 AM |
|
mining over at Hardcore since 10 hours. Sum ting wong here.. With a network hashrate just over half the pool and hardly finding blocks.., what up? And what pool is finding the blocks? This is a waste of Kw to me..   |
NLG: GNszAQ7Nwhz2E5ygqucYjVV36gV2Nkikzj
|
|
|
|
thsminer
|
|
April 23, 2014, 06:51:23 AM |
|
mining over at Hardcore since 10 hours. Sum ting wong here.. With a network hashrate just over half the pool and hardly finding blocks.., what up? And what pool is finding the blocks? This is a waste of Kw to me..
I PMed the poolowner last night about this. This morning the netdiff dropped to .7 for a couple of hours and I was able to make 5000 an hour with 6 MHs while HC was still on the same block. |
|
|
|
|
|
Coincookie
|
|
April 23, 2014, 06:52:44 AM |
|
But where are the current block being found? Not at HC, not at Omar, not at miners-pool. Solo miners? Seems unlikely..
|
NLG: GNszAQ7Nwhz2E5ygqucYjVV36gV2Nkikzj
|
|
|
|
OmarGsPools
|
|
April 23, 2014, 06:56:00 AM |
|
Please don't use that theme! Thats from hashing.at
We got coins stealing code from each other, we don't want pools to do the same.
Get your own theme, don't use the one from Hashing.at, he's a nice guy and doesnt deserve this.! It's the Bucket Admin Dashboard 1.4 Theme. It's a template that's publicly available and is one of the top rated ones. I've changed several parts from it. I'll continue to change the frontend so that they don't look similar. |
|
|
|
|
thsminer
|
|
April 23, 2014, 06:56:18 AM |
|
But where are the current block being found? Not at HC, not at Omar, not at miners-pool. Solo miners? Seems unlikely..
Pool.mn has 50Mhs |
|
|
|
|
|
Coincookie
|
|
April 23, 2014, 06:59:35 AM |
|
But where are the current block being found? Not at HC, not at Omar, not at miners-pool. Solo miners? Seems unlikely..
Pool.mn has 50Mhs Hmm, ok. It seems either a pool is hacked, offline or they're "We are investingating issues in the backend." and payouts are disabled. Seems all kinda fishy to me. hx though. You're mining at pool.mn? |
NLG: GNszAQ7Nwhz2E5ygqucYjVV36gV2Nkikzj
|
|
|
BlackB
Member
 Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
April 23, 2014, 07:05:59 AM |
|
Why is it so, when i find a lots of coin at pool.mn, they do they investigation thing...
when i lose all my coins this time i will stop mining at pool.mn forever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
thsminer
|
|
April 23, 2014, 07:06:15 AM |
|
But where are the current block being found? Not at HC, not at Omar, not at miners-pool. Solo miners? Seems unlikely..
Pool.mn has 50Mhs Hmm, ok. It seems either a pool is hacked, offline or they're "We are investingating issues in the backend." and payouts are disabled. Seems all kinda fishy to me. hx though. You're mining at pool.mn? No, solo. |
|
|
|
|
|
Spekske
|
|
April 23, 2014, 07:08:08 AM |
|
But where are the current block being found? Not at HC, not at Omar, not at miners-pool. Solo miners? Seems unlikely..
Pool.mn has 50Mhs Hmm, ok. It seems either a pool is hacked, offline or they're "We are investingating issues in the backend." and payouts are disabled. Seems all kinda fishy to me. hx though. You're mining at pool.mn? That's exactly the reason why I personally prefer P2pool, it doesn't use a complicated structure that can be hacked, miners mine directly to their own receive address and p2pool nodes actually communicate and share info about blocks and shares found, hence the name p2pool (p2p). http://dutchpool.org:27100 offers p2pool mining at only 1% fee and PPLNS payout system. |
|
|
|
BlackB
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
April 23, 2014, 07:20:34 AM |
|
But where are the current block being found? Not at HC, not at Omar, not at miners-pool. Solo miners? Seems unlikely..
Pool.mn has 50Mhs Hmm, ok. It seems either a pool is hacked, offline or they're "We are investingating issues in the backend." and payouts are disabled. Seems all kinda fishy to me. hx though. You're mining at pool.mn? That's exactly the reason why I personally prefer P2pool, it doesn't use a complicated structure that can be hacked, miners mine directly to their own receive address and p2pool nodes actually communicate and share info about blocks and shares found, hence the name p2pool (p2p). http://dutchpool.org:27100 offers p2pool mining at only 1% fee and PPLNS payout system. is finding all the blocks, who owns that? Rank Donor User Name KH/s NLG/Day 1 dark8011 12,536 117,923.006 2 zhongjiancai 11,019 103,652.779 on nlg.pool.mn |
|
|
|
|
|
Spekske
|
|
April 23, 2014, 07:20:49 AM |
|
But where are the current block being found? Not at HC, not at Omar, not at miners-pool. Solo miners? Seems unlikely..
Pool.mn has 50Mhs Hmm, ok. It seems either a pool is hacked, offline or they're "We are investingating issues in the backend." and payouts are disabled. Seems all kinda fishy to me. hx though. You're mining at pool.mn? That's exactly the reason why I personally prefer P2pool, it doesn't use a complicated structure that can be hacked, miners mine directly to their own receive address and p2pool nodes actually communicate and share info about blocks and shares found, hence the name p2pool (p2p). http://dutchpool.org:27100 offers p2pool mining at only 1% fee and PPLNS payout system. is finding all the blocks, who owns that? No idea, http://whois.domaintools.com/107.161.145.152EDIT: I'm not awake yet, it's your blockexplorer address  |
|
|
|
|
thsminer
|
|
April 23, 2014, 07:28:23 AM |
|
But where are the current block being found? Not at HC, not at Omar, not at miners-pool. Solo miners? Seems unlikely..
Pool.mn has 50Mhs Hmm, ok. It seems either a pool is hacked, offline or they're "We are investingating issues in the backend." and payouts are disabled. Seems all kinda fishy to me. hx though. You're mining at pool.mn? That's exactly the reason why I personally prefer P2pool, it doesn't use a complicated structure that can be hacked, miners mine directly to their own receive address and p2pool nodes actually communicate and share info about blocks and shares found, hence the name p2pool (p2p). http://dutchpool.org:27100 offers p2pool mining at only 1% fee and PPLNS payout system. is finding all the blocks, who owns that? Rank Donor User Name KH/s NLG/Day 1 dark8011 12,536 117,923.006 2 zhongjiancai 11,019 103,652.779 on nlg.pool.mn No, don't think so because this address was mining early this morning.The netrate dropped to 30 Mhs this morning of which 20% was mine  Those chinese miners popped up afterwards. They watch the diff and value of the coins and hop in when it's more profitable. So they will soon disapear at a diff of 2.something |
|
|
|
|
BlackB
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
April 23, 2014, 07:44:24 AM |
|
But where are the current block being found? Not at HC, not at Omar, not at miners-pool. Solo miners? Seems unlikely..
Pool.mn has 50Mhs Hmm, ok. It seems either a pool is hacked, offline or they're "We are investingating issues in the backend." and payouts are disabled. Seems all kinda fishy to me. hx though. You're mining at pool.mn? That's exactly the reason why I personally prefer P2pool, it doesn't use a complicated structure that can be hacked, miners mine directly to their own receive address and p2pool nodes actually communicate and share info about blocks and shares found, hence the name p2pool (p2p). http://dutchpool.org:27100 offers p2pool mining at only 1% fee and PPLNS payout system. is finding all the blocks, who owns that? Rank Donor User Name KH/s NLG/Day 1 dark8011 12,536 117,923.006 2 zhongjiancai 11,019 103,652.779 on nlg.pool.mn No, don't think so because this address was mining early this morning.The netrate dropped to 30 Mhs this morning of which 20% was mine Those chinese miners popped up afterwards. They watch the diff and value of the coins and hop in when it's more profitable. So they will soon disapear at a diff of 2.something Ohh boyy i hope i dont lose my coins again...pfff |
|
|
|
|
|
thsminer
|
|
April 23, 2014, 07:50:23 AM |
|
Something strange is happening... the added poolrates of the known pools do not by far match the netrate, but are on the same block... I know the netrate is calculated from the diff, but the diff should be adjusted quickly due to KGW. When I look at the rate GeMGtt1Xjr1oNwbciM3KM1FsfMrGMvveHY finds blocks now (the last 10 in 15mins) it's not matching!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wildwest
|
|
April 23, 2014, 08:11:42 AM |
|
Why is the majority of the hash being mined here if they not paying out people? http://nlg.pool.mn/ |
INVALID BBCODE: close of unopened tag in table (1)
|
|
|
|
Spekske
|
|
April 23, 2014, 08:13:06 AM |
|
Something strange is happening... the added poolrates of the known pools do not by far match the netrate, but are on the same block... I know the netrate is calculated from the diff, but the diff should be adjusted quickly due to KGW. When I look at the rate GeMGtt1Xjr1oNwbciM3KM1FsfMrGMvveHY finds blocks now (the last 10 in 15mins) it's not matching!!
10 in 15 minutes would be strange, if I'm not mistaken the blocktime has changed to 150 sec. so that would be 24 per hour max, unless something is messed up of course  |
|
|
|
|
Spekske
|
|
April 23, 2014, 08:18:45 AM |
|
It can be quite frustrating, tell me about it, can't argue with that.... You as a miner can loose coins but did you think about the pools what work is involved? Its frustrating to both parties.
When a fork happened and the pool credited users and paid those users out (crediting balanced), also the associated servers costs, user support, crap coins failing. Just to name some things, it's a pain to get things fixed..
When i add things up it's not very profitable to run a pool.
Best way to mine is always solo, you don't depend on others.
Hahaha I run http://dutchpool.org and I totally agree, running a pool will hardly make you anything, it costs you countless hours just to keep up with all the changes to all the coins, so the more coins you host the more work you'll have. For me it's a passion and a hobby to run a pool, it's not cash driving me |
|
|
|
|
thsminer
|
|
April 23, 2014, 08:20:08 AM |
|
Something strange is happening... the added poolrates of the known pools do not by far match the netrate, but are on the same block... I know the netrate is calculated from the diff, but the diff should be adjusted quickly due to KGW. When I look at the rate GeMGtt1Xjr1oNwbciM3KM1FsfMrGMvveHY finds blocks now (the last 10 in 15mins) it's not matching!!
10 in 15 minutes would be strange, if I'm not mistaken the blocktime has changed to 150 sec. so that would be 24 per hour max, unless something is messed up of course 34645 2014-04-23 08:01:16 1 1000 2.266 204644000 15.8725 4495.33 30.1498% 34644 2014-04-23 08:01:11 1 1000 2.247 204643000 15.8726 4495.33 30.1499% 34643 2014-04-23 08:00:37 1 1000 2.232 204642000 15.8722 4495.33 30.1504% 34642 2014-04-23 07:59:31 1 1000 2.22 204641000 15.8716 4495.33 30.1514% 34641 2014-04-23 07:57:58 1 1000 2.242 204640000 15.8706 4495.33 30.1529% 34640 2014-04-23 07:52:12 1 1000 2.26 204639000 15.8666 4495.33 30.1582% 34639 2014-04-23 07:48:12 1 1000 2.237 204638000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619% 34638 2014-04-23 07:48:07 1 1000 2.217 204637000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619% 34637 2014-04-23 07:47:59 1 1000 2.18 204636000 15.8639 4495.32 30.1621% 34636 2014-04-23 07:47:25 1 1000 2.157 204635000 15.8636 4495.32 30.1626% And all the same guy... |
|
|
|
|
|
Wildwest
|
|
April 23, 2014, 08:22:51 AM |
|
Something strange is happening... the added poolrates of the known pools do not by far match the netrate, but are on the same block... I know the netrate is calculated from the diff, but the diff should be adjusted quickly due to KGW. When I look at the rate GeMGtt1Xjr1oNwbciM3KM1FsfMrGMvveHY finds blocks now (the last 10 in 15mins) it's not matching!!
10 in 15 minutes would be strange, if I'm not mistaken the blocktime has changed to 150 sec. so that would be 24 per hour max, unless something is messed up of course 34645 2014-04-23 08:01:16 1 1000 2.266 204644000 15.8725 4495.33 30.1498% 34644 2014-04-23 08:01:11 1 1000 2.247 204643000 15.8726 4495.33 30.1499% 34643 2014-04-23 08:00:37 1 1000 2.232 204642000 15.8722 4495.33 30.1504% 34642 2014-04-23 07:59:31 1 1000 2.22 204641000 15.8716 4495.33 30.1514% 34641 2014-04-23 07:57:58 1 1000 2.242 204640000 15.8706 4495.33 30.1529% 34640 2014-04-23 07:52:12 1 1000 2.26 204639000 15.8666 4495.33 30.1582% 34639 2014-04-23 07:48:12 1 1000 2.237 204638000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619% 34638 2014-04-23 07:48:07 1 1000 2.217 204637000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619% 34637 2014-04-23 07:47:59 1 1000 2.18 204636000 15.8639 4495.32 30.1621% 34636 2014-04-23 07:47:25 1 1000 2.157 204635000 15.8636 4495.32 30.1626% And all the same guy... Is this person solo mining or at a pool? Then he must be using a hack or something...? |
INVALID BBCODE: close of unopened tag in table (1)
|
|
|
|
