NA

[Wildwest]

Something strange is happening... the added poolrates of the known pools do not by far match the netrate, but are on the same block... I know the netrate is calculated from the diff, but the diff should be adjusted quickly due to KGW. When I look at the rate  GeMGtt1Xjr1oNwbciM3KM1FsfMrGMvveHY finds blocks now (the last 10 in 15mins) it's not matching!!

10 in 15 minutes would be strange, if I'm not mistaken the blocktime has changed to 150 sec. so that would be 24 per hour max, unless something is messed up of course

34645 2014-04-23 08:01:16 1 1000 2.266 204644000 15.8725 4495.33 30.1498%
34644 2014-04-23 08:01:11 1 1000 2.247 204643000 15.8726 4495.33 30.1499%
34643 2014-04-23 08:00:37 1 1000 2.232 204642000 15.8722 4495.33 30.1504%
34642 2014-04-23 07:59:31 1 1000 2.22 204641000 15.8716 4495.33 30.1514%
34641 2014-04-23 07:57:58 1 1000 2.242 204640000 15.8706 4495.33 30.1529%
34640 2014-04-23 07:52:12 1 1000 2.26 204639000 15.8666 4495.33 30.1582%
34639 2014-04-23 07:48:12 1 1000 2.237 204638000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619%
34638 2014-04-23 07:48:07 1 1000 2.217 204637000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619%
34637 2014-04-23 07:47:59 1 1000 2.18 204636000 15.8639 4495.32 30.1621%
34636 2014-04-23 07:47:25 1 1000 2.157 204635000 15.8636 4495.32 30.1626%

And all the same guy...

Is this person solo mining or at a pool? Then he must be using a hack or something...?

Or the KGW timewarp hasnt been fixed...

Did this allow miners to exploit and get majority of the blocks?

[Coincookie]

No those are stats from pool.mn.

[thsminer]

Something strange is happening... the added poolrates of the known pools do not by far match the netrate, but are on the same block... I know the netrate is calculated from the diff, but the diff should be adjusted quickly due to KGW. When I look at the rate  GeMGtt1Xjr1oNwbciM3KM1FsfMrGMvveHY finds blocks now (the last 10 in 15mins) it's not matching!!

10 in 15 minutes would be strange, if I'm not mistaken the blocktime has changed to 150 sec. so that would be 24 per hour max, unless something is messed up of course

34645 2014-04-23 08:01:16 1 1000 2.266 204644000 15.8725 4495.33 30.1498%
34644 2014-04-23 08:01:11 1 1000 2.247 204643000 15.8726 4495.33 30.1499%
34643 2014-04-23 08:00:37 1 1000 2.232 204642000 15.8722 4495.33 30.1504%
34642 2014-04-23 07:59:31 1 1000 2.22 204641000 15.8716 4495.33 30.1514%
34641 2014-04-23 07:57:58 1 1000 2.242 204640000 15.8706 4495.33 30.1529%
34640 2014-04-23 07:52:12 1 1000 2.26 204639000 15.8666 4495.33 30.1582%
34639 2014-04-23 07:48:12 1 1000 2.237 204638000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619%
34638 2014-04-23 07:48:07 1 1000 2.217 204637000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619%
34637 2014-04-23 07:47:59 1 1000 2.18 204636000 15.8639 4495.32 30.1621%
34636 2014-04-23 07:47:25 1 1000 2.157 204635000 15.8636 4495.32 30.1626%

And all the same guy...

Is this person solo mining or at a pool? Then he must be using a hack or something...?

Or the KGW timewarp hasnt been fixed...

Did this allow miners to exploit and get majority of the blocks?

Yep this guy is able to do a double spend attack

[Spekske]

Something strange is happening... the added poolrates of the known pools do not by far match the netrate, but are on the same block... I know the netrate is calculated from the diff, but the diff should be adjusted quickly due to KGW. When I look at the rate  GeMGtt1Xjr1oNwbciM3KM1FsfMrGMvveHY finds blocks now (the last 10 in 15mins) it's not matching!!

10 in 15 minutes would be strange, if I'm not mistaken the blocktime has changed to 150 sec. so that would be 24 per hour max, unless something is messed up of course

34645 2014-04-23 08:01:16 1 1000 2.266 204644000 15.8725 4495.33 30.1498%
34644 2014-04-23 08:01:11 1 1000 2.247 204643000 15.8726 4495.33 30.1499%
34643 2014-04-23 08:00:37 1 1000 2.232 204642000 15.8722 4495.33 30.1504%
34642 2014-04-23 07:59:31 1 1000 2.22 204641000 15.8716 4495.33 30.1514%
34641 2014-04-23 07:57:58 1 1000 2.242 204640000 15.8706 4495.33 30.1529%
34640 2014-04-23 07:52:12 1 1000 2.26 204639000 15.8666 4495.33 30.1582%
34639 2014-04-23 07:48:12 1 1000 2.237 204638000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619%
34638 2014-04-23 07:48:07 1 1000 2.217 204637000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619%
34637 2014-04-23 07:47:59 1 1000 2.18 204636000 15.8639 4495.32 30.1621%
34636 2014-04-23 07:47:25 1 1000 2.157 204635000 15.8636 4495.32 30.1626%

And all the same guy...

Is this person solo mining or at a pool? Then he must be using a hack or something...?

Or the KGW timewarp hasnt been fixed...

Did this allow miners to exploit and get majority of the blocks?

Yep this guy is able to do a double spend attack

I think the devs need to step in and stop this imediately, they need to sit down and rethink the whole thing and release a solid version, not 4 different ones in a row that are all somehow flawd.....

[Coincookie]

again, it's not one guy, it's stats from pool.mn. I agree that time between blocks is too fast, but it's not a hack.

[thsminer]

Something strange is happening... the added poolrates of the known pools do not by far match the netrate, but are on the same block... I know the netrate is calculated from the diff, but the diff should be adjusted quickly due to KGW. When I look at the rate  GeMGtt1Xjr1oNwbciM3KM1FsfMrGMvveHY finds blocks now (the last 10 in 15mins) it's not matching!!

10 in 15 minutes would be strange, if I'm not mistaken the blocktime has changed to 150 sec. so that would be 24 per hour max, unless something is messed up of course

34645 2014-04-23 08:01:16 1 1000 2.266 204644000 15.8725 4495.33 30.1498%
34644 2014-04-23 08:01:11 1 1000 2.247 204643000 15.8726 4495.33 30.1499%
34643 2014-04-23 08:00:37 1 1000 2.232 204642000 15.8722 4495.33 30.1504%
34642 2014-04-23 07:59:31 1 1000 2.22 204641000 15.8716 4495.33 30.1514%
34641 2014-04-23 07:57:58 1 1000 2.242 204640000 15.8706 4495.33 30.1529%
34640 2014-04-23 07:52:12 1 1000 2.26 204639000 15.8666 4495.33 30.1582%
34639 2014-04-23 07:48:12 1 1000 2.237 204638000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619%
34638 2014-04-23 07:48:07 1 1000 2.217 204637000 15.8639 4495.33 30.1619%
34637 2014-04-23 07:47:59 1 1000 2.18 204636000 15.8639 4495.32 30.1621%
34636 2014-04-23 07:47:25 1 1000 2.157 204635000 15.8636 4495.32 30.1626%

And all the same guy...

Is this person solo mining or at a pool? Then he must be using a hack or something...?

Or the KGW timewarp hasnt been fixed...

Did this allow miners to exploit and get majority of the blocks?

Yep this guy is able to do a double spend attack

I think the devs need to step in and stop this imediately, they need to sit down and rethink the whole thing and release a solid version, not 4 different ones in a row that are all somehow flawd.....

The KGW seems to work because things slow down now. To do something agains a 51% attack is not in the power of the devs. It's the principle of POW. However beeing able to do something does not imply it's going to happen. A lot of nations have the power to start a war, but are they willing too.
If you want a coin with resistance agains 51% attacks look at POS design, but both systems have their own merites.

[Wildwest]

Alright is it not possible to get more hash power spread onto other pools like Omars and hardcore miners and see if this really is a issue?

[Coincookie]

Sure it is, but I mined over at Hardcore for then hours and found 3 blocks in that time. My Kw/h costs too much to keep mining there so I switched too.

[Wildwest]

Sure it is, but I mined over at Hardcore for then hours and found 3 blocks in that time. My Kw/h costs too much to keep mining there so I switched too.

Last block seems to have found at Hardcore miners.

Try Omars and see if we can get a block found there with more hash, it might just be a issue with hardcore miners, better to test everything for everyones sake.

[Wildwest]

Update: hardcore got another block

[Coincookie]

Ok, will point my 9 Mh to Hardcore again. It's best to divide the hashes a little more.

Cookie.

[soulreader]

I understood what better to solo mining. But i lost so much time with this fixes. I had lost 20000 because this fixes, wrong chain FFS!!!!!!!

[Svener]

I understood what better to solo mining. But i lost so much time with this fixes. I had lost 20000 because this fixes, wrong chain FFS!!!!!!!

Until coins are established you have to keep a close eye on them because lots of forks are occuring on scrypt based coins until more network hash comes.
That's why I stick with pools if I am going to be away for a period of time.

[Svener]

Any reason why network hash is misreporting on the pools. It should be a lot higher.

[Svener]

We are keeping a close eye on the pools, but it seems one pool had almost 90% of the hash this morning. HC is finding blocks again now.
By the way the timewarp patch has been implemented from start.

Nice!!!

BTW any clues as to what the new is this week?

[thsminer]

We are keeping a close eye on the pools, but it seems one pool had almost 90% of the hash this morning. HC is finding blocks again now.
By the way the timewarp patch has been implemented from start.

Blocks are flowing, 4 blocks this morning for me and 1 orphan... a bit pity the diff rose to 2.88

[Svener]

We are keeping a close eye on the pools, but it seems one pool had almost 90% of the hash this morning. HC is finding blocks again now.
By the way the timewarp patch has been implemented from start.

Nice!!!

BTW any clues as to what the new is this week?

Oh yes, lets say refresh this ANN a few times the next hour...

Country coins have a bad rep atm, this is why I am curious to see what NLG is going to do . So far everything is different from other country coins... 10% premine, newb devs , totally different specifications and the fact your homepage was registered in December.

All these things caught my eye.

[BlackB]

there is something fishy about nlg.pool.mn
 

[emrcan]

I'm doing nlg.hardcoreminers.co mining. 1 hour and 22 thousand coin supposed to be, there are four thousand coin.

[Svener]

So we will actually be able to buy food with guldencoin?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Please tell me this is true!