languagehasmeaning
|
|
January 31, 2016, 01:51:58 AM Last edit: January 31, 2016, 02:06:16 AM by languagehasmeaning |
|
Is there an up to date, working block explorer?
There are at least 2 that I know of: Block Explorer: Boollberry Block Explorer on MinerGate: https://minergate.com/blockchain/bbr/blocksBlock Explorer: Boolberry Block Explorer on ChainRader: http://chainradar.com/bbr/blocksI am a little tired of crypto_zoidberg not updating the OP to delete dead links, add lists of seed nodes, mentioning a dormant Twitter account instead of one that is active today, not mention popboolr.com etc. I have been told crypto_zoidberg probably controls boolberry.com and registration for http://boolberry.com/forum/ has not been working for a while. If he wants to come back and start developing, great. In the meantime it is time to act. What does the community think about moving to a new unmoderated thread which we can control and keep updated?
|
|
|
|
LucyLovesCrypto
|
|
January 31, 2016, 05:28:10 AM |
|
What does the community think about moving to a new unmoderated thread which we can control and keep updated?
Lets give him another week or two to see how his new project will help Boolberry. He will have a much easier time raising money for the new project if it is clear he has not abandoned Boolberry. He has an incentive to remain active here. Here is thread for discussion: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=887482PS About Boolberry: In any case Boolbery is my primary project, and since both this projects based on the same code base - it will be win-win for both of this project from technology point of view. ATM scruffy is working on BBR new wallet version since i want to have second developer who familiar with BBR code, so this took more time that i expected, but this is need for project safety, a lot of people were talked about it before in this thread. Zoidberg He says it is close to being ready for alpha: Hi! Yep, we fix some small bugs and improve some elements of design. PoS-minig works! Alpha is ready for 95% We can make it public for you. Do you guys want to test it ? http://take.ms/prAeK
|
|
|
|
Namsbreh
|
|
January 31, 2016, 10:18:49 AM |
|
Thanks, both are stuck and behind by several days at the moment, hence me asking.
|
|
|
|
languagehasmeaning
|
|
January 31, 2016, 06:51:14 PM Last edit: January 31, 2016, 07:01:56 PM by languagehasmeaning |
|
Thanks, both are stuck and behind by several days at the moment, hence me asking. Sorry! They were up do date a few weeks ago when I last checked. It is strange that 2 block explorers would stop at exactly block 442,156. Cold they both be controlled by the same person who may have taken their node down for maintenance? I am on block 445,522 now with plenty of peer connections.
|
|
|
|
boolberry
|
|
February 01, 2016, 12:35:12 AM Last edit: February 01, 2016, 12:52:45 AM by boolberry |
|
Thanks, both are stuck and behind by several days at the moment, hence me asking. Sorry! They were up do date a few weeks ago when I last checked. It is strange that 2 block explorers would stop at exactly block 442,156. Cold they both be controlled by the same person who may have taken their node down for maintenance? I am on block 445,522 now with plenty of peer connections. I contacted both Chainradar and Minergate and await their response. This is my GUESS: Minergate only wants to maintain block explorers for coins they operate mining pools for. Chainradar might rely on the Minergate block explorer. I cannot think of another rational explanation for why both block explorers stopped on the same block. Regardless of my guess above, Boolberry could benefit from more: 1. Block explorers 2. Miners 3. Mining pools There are other working block explorers. Here are a few: http://bbr.poolto.be/#pool_blockshttp://cncoin.farm/#pool_blockshttp://bbr.mbkpool.info/#pool_blocks
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
|
|
February 01, 2016, 01:19:01 AM |
|
... I contacted both Chainradar and Minergate and await their response. This is my GUESS: Minergate only wants to maintain block explorers for coins they operate mining pools for. Chainradar might rely on the Minergate block explorer. I cannot think of another rational explanation for why both block explorers stopped on the same block. Regardless of my guess above, Boolberry could benefit from more: 1. Block explorers 2. Miners 3. Mining pools There are other working block explorers. Here are a few: http://bbr.poolto.be/#pool_blockshttp://cncoin.farm/#pool_blockshttp://bbr.mbkpool.info/#pool_blocksThose aren't really block explorers as they can't be searched by block, tx id, etc., they only show the last 50 or 100 blocks and their hash. I think Chainradar and Minergate are run by the same entity (possibly/probably Bytecoin related); I'm pretty sure they've had issues at exactly the same time in the past as well. I actually tried to load up my daemon and solo mine some blocks the other night, but I couldn't get connected to any peers, so my daemon wasn't syncing...
|
|
|
|
boolberry
|
|
February 01, 2016, 01:46:56 AM |
|
... I contacted both Chainradar and Minergate and await their response. This is my GUESS: Minergate only wants to maintain block explorers for coins they operate mining pools for. Chainradar might rely on the Minergate block explorer. I cannot think of another rational explanation for why both block explorers stopped on the same block. Regardless of my guess above, Boolberry could benefit from more: 1. Block explorers 2. Miners 3. Mining pools There are other working block explorers. Here are a few: http://bbr.poolto.be/#pool_blockshttp://cncoin.farm/#pool_blockshttp://bbr.mbkpool.info/#pool_blocksThose aren't really block explorers as they can't be searched by block, tx id, etc., they only show the last 50 or 100 blocks and their hash. I think Chainradar and Minergate are run by the same entity (possibly/probably Bytecoin related); I'm pretty sure they've had issues at exactly the same time in the past as well. I actually tried to load up my daemon and solo mine some blocks the other night, but I couldn't get connected to any peers, so my daemon wasn't syncing... Thank you jwinterm! You are of course correct. Obviously I did not looks at those "block explorers" very carefully. Based on your finding getting some new block explorers online should be an extremely high priority. Is there anyone in the community able to do this? Did you try this to solve the peer problem? Someone else had this problem the other day. Here's what got them working. Right-click on the shortcut, click properties and add this after the filename --add-priority-node 66.228.33.249:10101 --add-priority-node 59.120.166.36:10101 --add-priority-node 62.201.213.25:10101 --add-priority-node 95.85.21.33:10101 --add-priority-node 107.170.97.197:10101 My daemon shows 6 connections right now
|
|
|
|
shojayxt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 01, 2016, 02:10:45 AM |
|
Start the daemon with the --add-priority-node argument and use these peers:
print_cn 2016-Jan-31 18:08:21.914303 Connections: Remote Host Peer id Recv/Sent (idle,sec) State Livetime(seconds) [OUT]5.9.38.137:10101 a9046e7dadd740ea 296177(26)/110759(27) state_normal 2217 [OUT]66.228.33.249:10101 7b310d1ae9aae498 222316(27)/63471(27) state_normal 2314 [OUT]81.39.24.26:10101 1ed0c1e83bd84bfb 713628(24)/123872(24) state_normal 2341 [OUT]106.185.46.152:10101 1056f3d057a82878 291907(26)/111263(27) state_normal 2222 [OUT]128.204.214.119:10101 914c40381b15b1c1 2115695(26)/135045(27) state_normal 2335 [OUT]59.120.166.36:10101 ccd2aae0f31fa810 302456(26)/114974(27) state_normal 2309 [OUT]91.155.235.8:10101 af038b424f669694 305199(15)/116435(15) state_normal 2303
boolbd --add-priority-node xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:10101 --add-priority-node xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:10101 etc...
--add-peer arg Manually add peer to local peerlist --add-priority-node arg Specify list of peers to connect to and attempt to keep the connection open
|
|
|
|
boolberry
|
|
February 02, 2016, 06:52:31 AM |
|
Good news! Minergate block explorer is working again. This was the response I received from support: Hello, Planned website maintenance was in progress, now it is finished and the blockchain is updating normally. Sorry for the issue. Best regards, MinerGate support team Chainradar has not responded to me yet, but their block explorer is also up to date now. Because of the price spike today mining should be more profitable that it was yesterday so start mining! https://minergate.com/blockchain/bbr/blockshttp://chainradar.com/bbr/blocks
|
|
|
|
rentahash
|
|
February 02, 2016, 09:38:55 AM |
|
Is pump ahead for BBR? I see on poloniex activity any real reason?
thnx
|
|
|
|
languagehasmeaning
|
|
February 02, 2016, 12:20:51 PM |
|
Is pump ahead for BBR? I see on poloniex activity any real reason?
thnx
If you are genuinely interested in learning about Boolberry technology please stick around. If you are here looking for a pump and dump you have come to the wrong place.
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
|
|
February 02, 2016, 01:04:40 PM |
|
Start the daemon with the --add-priority-node argument and use these peers:
print_cn 2016-Jan-31 18:08:21.914303 Connections: Remote Host Peer id Recv/Sent (idle,sec) State Livetime(seconds) [OUT]5.9.38.137:10101 a9046e7dadd740ea 296177(26)/110759(27) state_normal 2217 [OUT]66.228.33.249:10101 7b310d1ae9aae498 222316(27)/63471(27) state_normal 2314 [OUT]81.39.24.26:10101 1ed0c1e83bd84bfb 713628(24)/123872(24) state_normal 2341 [OUT]106.185.46.152:10101 1056f3d057a82878 291907(26)/111263(27) state_normal 2222 [OUT]128.204.214.119:10101 914c40381b15b1c1 2115695(26)/135045(27) state_normal 2335 [OUT]59.120.166.36:10101 ccd2aae0f31fa810 302456(26)/114974(27) state_normal 2309 [OUT]91.155.235.8:10101 af038b424f669694 305199(15)/116435(15) state_normal 2303
boolbd --add-priority-node xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:10101 --add-priority-node xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:10101 etc...
--add-peer arg Manually add peer to local peerlist --add-priority-node arg Specify list of peers to connect to and attempt to keep the connection open
Thanks, I'll give it a shot tonight or tomorrow...
|
|
|
|
rentahash
|
|
February 02, 2016, 01:15:21 PM |
|
Is pump ahead for BBR? I see on poloniex activity any real reason?
thnx
If you are genuinely interested in learning about Boolberry technology please stick around. If you are here looking for a pump and dump you have come to the wrong place. I am developing some prediction algorithms for cryptocurrency price trends, and BBR peaked in monitor... that is all. The reason why I am asking it, is there any news in dev process or update on technology or any other issue which could cause this rising of BBR price? I couldnt find any news here relevant... Sorry if I was off the topic.
|
|
|
|
fernforest
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
February 03, 2016, 10:08:50 PM Last edit: February 03, 2016, 10:23:16 PM by fernforest |
|
BBR is being pumped it seems. It's now in the top 100 on coinmarketcap, with a market cap of $456,000, and an $18,000 volume on Poloniex.
|
|
|
|
mitache365
|
|
February 03, 2016, 10:34:04 PM |
|
BBR wtf?
|
BTC
|
|
|
xboxsold
|
|
February 03, 2016, 10:55:58 PM Last edit: February 04, 2016, 05:24:52 AM by xboxsold |
|
OOPS i accidently bought at market .. My Bad .. Just Kidding
|
|
|
|
ph4nt0m
|
|
February 04, 2016, 12:01:47 AM |
|
Fun time. 42 BTC buy order up to 33k sats for no reason unless there is something we don't know.
|
|
|
|
erok
|
|
February 04, 2016, 12:12:21 AM |
|
Fun time. 42 BTC buy order up to 33k sats for no reason unless there is something we don't know.
OOPS i accidently bought at market .. My Bad ..
At least it got some eyes back on this project even if it was an accident.
|
"the destruction of privacy widens the existing power imbalance between the ruling factions and everyone else" -- Julian Assange
|
|
|
bitcoinrocks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 04, 2016, 12:19:20 AM |
|
It wasn't an accident. The big orders came in gradually.
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
February 04, 2016, 12:53:54 AM |
|
Fun time. 42 BTC buy order up to 33k sats for no reason unless there is something we don't know.
OOPS i accidently bought at market .. My Bad ..
At least it got some eyes back on this project even if it was an accident. Somebody bought 42 btc worth at market on accident? Wow. Well, that is one heck of a green dildo candle on the daily now.
|
|
|
|
|