e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
September 15, 2014, 03:57:42 AM Last edit: September 15, 2014, 06:04:36 AM by e1ghtSpace |
|
Where is everybody? It's like a ghost town in here.
|
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
September 15, 2014, 09:18:55 AM |
|
Where is everybody? It's like a ghost town in here.
I am around And mining from time to time. It's more easy to human mine now!
|
|
|
|
HunterMinerCrafter
|
|
September 15, 2014, 01:45:41 PM |
|
Where is everybody? It's like a ghost town in here.
I'm still around, had a busy weekend. The bot seems to be continually backing off hash-rate when others aren't human mining. Human mining just keeps getting a little easier each day. Seems like there is a golden opportunity for someone to introduce a second bot and give it some competition.
|
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
September 15, 2014, 03:42:42 PM Last edit: September 15, 2014, 04:31:45 PM by unamis76 |
|
Where is everybody? It's like a ghost town in here.
I'm still around, had a busy weekend. The bot seems to be continually backing off hash-rate when others aren't human mining. Human mining just keeps getting a little easier each day. Seems like there is a golden opportunity for someone to introduce a second bot and give it some competition. Is there someone developing a new bot? EDIT: no nodes for syncing?
|
|
|
|
HunterMinerCrafter
|
|
September 15, 2014, 04:57:57 PM |
|
Is there someone developing a new bot?
I'm sure I can't be the only one working on it. EDIT: no nodes for syncing?
You should be able to peer with the block explorer node, at least. If you addnode onetry it, what does your debug.log show for it?
|
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
September 15, 2014, 05:02:58 PM |
|
Is there someone developing a new bot?
I'm sure I can't be the only one working on it. EDIT: no nodes for syncing?
You should be able to peer with the block explorer node, at least. If you addnode onetry it, what does your debug.log show for it? 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Motocoin version v0.8.7.2-unk-beta (2014-09-08 02:51:48 +0200) 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1h 5 Jun 2014 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Default data directory C:\Users\*****\AppData\Roaming\Motocoin 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Using data directory C:\Users\*****\AppData\Roaming\Motocoin 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Using at most 125 connections (2048 file descriptors available) 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Using 2 threads for script verification 2014-09-15 17:00:51 init message: Verifying wallet... 2014-09-15 17:00:51 dbenv.open LogDir=C:\Users\*****\AppData\Roaming\Motocoin\database ErrorFile=C:\Users\*****\AppData\Roaming\Motocoin\db.log 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Bound to [::]:13107 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Bound to 0.0.0.0:13107 2014-09-15 17:00:51 init message: Loading block index... 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Opening LevelDB in C:\Users\*****\AppData\Roaming\Motocoin\blocks\index 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Opened LevelDB successfully 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Opening LevelDB in C:\Users\*****\AppData\Roaming\Motocoin\chainstate 2014-09-15 17:00:51 Opened LevelDB successfully 2014-09-15 17:00:54 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file = 0 2014-09-15 17:00:54 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=215459, size=69391267, heights=0...215399, time=2014-05-20...2014-09-15) 2014-09-15 17:00:54 LoadBlockIndexDB(): transaction index disabled 2014-09-15 17:00:54 LoadBlockIndexDB(): hashBestChain=756a6fec20bb4700acd4466d57571f6e848b3e54113634e7c9af6ff8e663c164 height=215399 date=2014-09-15 03:29:25 2014-09-15 17:00:54 init message: Verifying blocks... 2014-09-15 17:00:54 Verifying last 288 blocks at level 3 2014-09-15 17:01:11 No coin database inconsistencies in last 289 blocks (289 transactions) 2014-09-15 17:01:11 block index 19655ms 2014-09-15 17:01:11 init message: Loading wallet... 2014-09-15 17:01:11 nFileVersion = 80702 2014-09-15 17:01:11 wallet 115ms 2014-09-15 17:01:11 init message: Loading addresses... 2014-09-15 17:01:11 Loaded 10904 addresses from peers.dat 50ms 2014-09-15 17:01:11 mapBlockIndex.size() = 215459 2014-09-15 17:01:11 nBestHeight = 215399 2014-09-15 17:01:11 setKeyPool.size() = 93 2014-09-15 17:01:11 mapWallet.size() = 28 2014-09-15 17:01:11 mapAddressBook.size() = 2 2014-09-15 17:01:11 net thread start 2014-09-15 17:01:11 dnsseed thread start 2014-09-15 17:01:11 Loading addresses from DNS seeds (could take a while) 2014-09-15 17:01:11 0 addresses found from DNS seeds 2014-09-15 17:01:11 dnsseed thread exit 2014-09-15 17:01:11 init message: Done loading 2014-09-15 17:01:11 opencon thread start 2014-09-15 17:01:11 upnp thread start 2014-09-15 17:01:11 dumpaddr thread start 2014-09-15 17:01:11 addcon thread start 2014-09-15 17:01:11 msghand thread start 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connecting(0) to 31.172.63.253:80 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connecting(0) to 192.121.121.30:80 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connecting(0) to 194.71.107.27:80 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connecting(0) to 62.210.137.203:1337 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connecting(0) to 31.172.63.226:80 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connecting(0) to 94.228.222.192:6969 2014-09-15 17:01:11 refreshWallet 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connected to 62.210.137.203:1337 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: announcing(0) on 62.210.137.203:1337 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connected to 31.172.63.253:80 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: announcing(0) on 31.172.63.253:80 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connected to 31.172.63.226:80 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: announcing(0) on 31.172.63.226:80 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connected to 94.228.222.192:6969 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: announcing(0) on 94.228.222.192:6969 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: connected to 192.121.121.30:80 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: announcing(0) on 192.121.121.30:80 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: announced on 62.210.137.203:1337, next announce in 1667 seeconds, got 15 peers: ; 5.18.157.211:13107; 5.19.248.158:13107; 37.153.97.65:13107; 46.138.159.74:13107; 46.165.208.140:13107; 88.201.155.239:13107; 89.155.197.211:13107; 91.224.168.5:13107; 95.69.242.241:13107; 109.171.80.246:13107 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: announced on 31.172.63.226:80, next announce in 1906 seeconds, got 11 peers: ; 37.153.97.65:13107; 46.138.159.74:13107; 89.155.197.211:13107; 91.224.168.5:13107; 95.69.242.241:13107; 109.171.80.246:13107; 184.56.115.245:13107; 188.16.142.246:13107; 195.211.103.206:13107; 195.211.206.238:13107 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: announced on 31.172.63.253:80, next announce in 1921 seeconds, got 13 peers: ; 37.153.97.65:13107; 46.138.159.74:13107; 88.201.155.239:13107; 89.155.197.211:13107; 91.224.168.5:13107; 95.69.242.241:13107; 109.171.80.246:13107; 178.141.166.176:13107; 184.56.115.245:13107; 188.16.142.246:13107 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: announced on 94.228.222.192:6969, next announce in 1680 seeconds, got 14 peers: ; 5.18.157.211:13107; 5.19.248.158:13107; 37.153.97.65:13107; 46.138.159.74:13107; 46.165.208.140:13107; 89.155.197.211:13107; 91.224.168.5:13107; 95.69.242.241:13107; 109.171.80.246:13107; 184.56.115.245:13107 2014-09-15 17:01:11 BTTrackers: announced on 192.121.121.30:80, next announce in 1910 seeconds, got 12 peers: ; 37.153.97.65:13107; 46.138.159.74:13107; 46.165.208.140:13107; 89.155.197.211:13107; 91.224.168.5:13107; 95.69.242.241:13107; 109.171.80.246:13107; 184.56.115.245:13107; 188.16.142.246:13107; 195.211.103.206:13107 2014-09-15 17:01:11 trying connection 5.18.157.211:13107 lastseen=1.3hrs 2014-09-15 17:01:14 UPnP: ExternalIPAddress = 89.155.197.211 2014-09-15 17:01:14 AddLocal(89.155.197.211:13107,3) 2014-09-15 17:01:14 GetMyExternalIP() received [89.155.197.211] 89.155.197.211:0 2014-09-15 17:01:14 GetMyExternalIP() returned 89.155.197.211 2014-09-15 17:01:14 AddLocal(89.155.197.211:13107,4) 2014-09-15 17:01:16 UPnP Port Mapping successful. 2014-09-15 17:01:16 connection timeout 2014-09-15 17:01:17 trying connection 188.162.229.46:13107 lastseen=2536.2hrs 2014-09-15 17:01:22 connection timeout 2014-09-15 17:01:22 trying connection 89.113.192.84:13107 lastseen=2749.6hrs Just put addnode on the conf, let's see how it goes. EDIT: synced as I was finishing writing
|
|
|
|
HunterMinerCrafter
|
|
September 15, 2014, 05:16:33 PM |
|
EDIT: synced as I was finishing writing Glad to hear it!
|
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
September 16, 2014, 12:03:35 AM |
|
Is there someone developing a new bot?
I'm sure I can't be the only one working on it. Can you please release a really bad buggy version so others can try?
|
|
|
|
HunterMinerCrafter
|
|
September 16, 2014, 01:41:04 AM |
|
Can you please release a really bad buggy version so others can try? When I have one, sure! So much to do, so few hours in a day.
|
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
September 16, 2014, 07:16:21 AM Last edit: September 16, 2014, 07:26:50 AM by e1ghtSpace |
|
Can you please release a really bad buggy version so others can try? When I have one, sure! So much to do, so few hours in a day. Awesome thanks! I want to play around with the setting and see if I can make it really good. (Very very VERY unlikely. But worth a try)
|
|
|
|
Vz
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
September 16, 2014, 11:59:07 AM Last edit: September 16, 2014, 12:24:31 PM by Vz |
|
What kind of tradebot now working on C-Cex MOTO/BTC ? It move orders up and down on the both sides of the "cup"(don't know right word both tables).. maybe it try to catch gap profit... The tradings volume is amazing low!! we need to do the Piar Action).. I want a big boom.. how we can attract the attention? EDIT: The "edges" of tradingbot is close to 480 buy and 499 to sell.. O!!! Or maybe he automatic count the levels) **I want such one!
|
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
September 16, 2014, 12:01:16 PM |
|
What kind of tradebot now working on C-Cex MOTO/BTC ? It move orders up and down on the both sides of the "cup"(don't know right word both tables).. maybe it try to catch gap profit... The tradings volume is amazing low!! we need to do the Piar Action).. I want a big boom.. how we can attract the attention? We could do some sort of giveaway maybe. That always booms the price. For a cost that is.
|
|
|
|
Gargo
|
|
September 16, 2014, 07:04:05 PM |
|
What kind of tradebot now working on C-Cex MOTO/BTC ? It move orders up and down on the both sides of the "cup"(don't know right word both tables).. maybe it try to catch gap profit... The tradings volume is amazing low!! we need to do the Piar Action).. I want a big boom.. how we can attract the attention? EDIT: The "edges" of tradingbot is close to 480 buy and 499 to sell.. O!!! Or maybe he automatic count the levels) **I want such one! every programmer who is able to write a program with requests to a server can write a bot. It is much more difficult to find an optimal algorithm
|
|
|
|
HunterMinerCrafter
|
|
September 16, 2014, 07:19:42 PM |
|
every programmer who is able to write a program with requests to a server can write a bot. It is much more difficult to find an optimal algorithm
You mean you can't just script "buy low and sell high?"
|
|
|
|
Vz
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
September 16, 2014, 07:29:40 PM |
|
It is much more difficult to find an optimal algorithm
I quite agree with you.. I tried to trading on forex with EUR/USD GBP/USD some other pairs.. lost several deposites, readed books, browsing forums, browsing blogs, lost some another deposites), listen webinars, visited some seminars.. The trading is very tricky.. I'am interesting in that.. But i can't find the "ultimate" trading technology)).. There is likely to need some kind of intuition and instict.. I tried to dump MOTO several weeks ago (I want to buy cheap).. afterwards I have to buy more expensive than it was.. When we take the path-patch The price HIT only 5% of my sell orders.. and now I'm very dissapointed about it.. cause I was really ready to sell them all).. at ~4600 satoshi.. Now i want to buy.. but noone want to sell.. maybe there are will be some pump in close days.. small or maybe not (the resistance will catch at ~2200 maybe early as sellers will arrive at 1500 with big unsold volumes) every programmer who is able to write a program with requests to a server can write a bot. It is much more difficult to find an optimal algorithm
You mean you can't just script "buy low and sell high?" It is not a perfect tactic) I can "post" the orders and move the bot prices.. EDIT: Maybe it was a joke)).. lol so that was funny..*Once I got used recently to always take you seriously
|
|
|
|
Vz
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
September 16, 2014, 07:43:31 PM |
|
Why we not on bittrex yet? What they said, think about us?
|
|
|
|
HunterMinerCrafter
|
|
September 16, 2014, 08:22:35 PM |
|
EDIT: Maybe it was a joke)).. lol so that was funny..*Once I got used recently to always take you seriously
Yes, I'm told that it can be hard to tell when I am not serious because I usually am very much so. My comment was, indeed, intended to be a little bit sarcastic. The subject of algorithmic trading is something I have been interested in for a very long time. It is so fascinating particularly because, unlike most other machine learning problems, it is continually a moving target. There is never a "best algorithm" or "right answer" for the market. (By some theory, if you were to find one the very act of trying to capitalize on it would cause the model to begin to invalidate itself.)
|
|
|
|
HunterMinerCrafter
|
|
September 16, 2014, 08:32:16 PM |
|
Why we not on bittrex yet? What they said, think about us?
I think anyone on the merchant/exchange side of things is likely still waiting to see a definite resolution to our hash-rate concerns. Right now, I don't think anyone would argue that we've reached one. (Although I don't think anyone would argue that we're not, at least, much better off now.) We need more hash-rate and certainly need much more distributed hash-rate. (A public bot would be ideal.) We need some mining "process" clean-ups. (Map filters, and other "cyborg" mining tools.) We may need to reconsider our block confirmation times, relative to anti-warp parameters. (Regular tx confirms should take a bit longer and anti-warp interval should be a bit shorter. I think coin maturation time is probably just about right, regardless.) If anyone who is on the merchant/exchange side of things would like to chime in on the matter I'd be very interested to hear their take on the current situation, and what they feel should be prioritized in terms of working to make adoption more realistically possible.
|
|
|
|
llanillo
|
|
September 16, 2014, 08:37:10 PM |
|
Best idea ever for a cryptocurrency ... ill keep an eye on this
|
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
September 16, 2014, 08:46:28 PM |
|
EDIT: Maybe it was a joke)).. lol so that was funny..*Once I got used recently to always take you seriously
Yes, I'm told that it can be hard to tell when I am not serious because I usually am very much so. I could tell because you put " " after.
|
|
|
|
|