TheRealSteve
|
|
June 08, 2014, 02:59:31 AM Last edit: June 09, 2014, 02:04:43 AM by TheRealSteve |
|
where ?
There are currently three pools:
|
|
|
|
ShadowOfScales
|
|
June 08, 2014, 03:00:27 AM |
|
So essentially, one of the very few innovative coins, amongst the recent obsession with anonymity is being given a toxic community?
As a question to the dev, I've got a few "Minted By burn" transactions. But if I go into transaction details, despite the transaction telling me I've made 20-30SLM for each "Mint by burn", the net is usually something like: +0.041604 SLM. Why is this? Should I not be recieving the 20-30 the wallet tells me?
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
|
June 08, 2014, 03:02:09 AM |
|
I saw a new coin copy from SLM yesterday~
If you mean TGC, it's been mentioned before. At least there's others who will experiment with PoB
|
|
|
|
WhatDisk
|
|
June 08, 2014, 03:07:45 AM Last edit: June 08, 2014, 03:44:52 AM by WhatDisk |
|
I want to humiliate you for making such a shitty wallet, whitepaper and for being a dick. This is the point where I will let the community judge the credibility of your posts. Also, the people that complain the most are the ones that know nothing and can't do anything. You are mad if you think community let alone traders have any sympathy for you. Why are you here anyway? You've only addressed one issue so far -hard fork due to a wallet bug. Your first post is deceitful and you are no better than scammers lurking bitcointalk. thi "sprimer-" guy Just say And not to do anything
|
|
|
|
mbk
|
|
June 08, 2014, 05:45:03 AM |
|
Looks like we have a new problem - 2 parallel forks. There are block 9246 at diff 0.04594785 and block 9218 at diff 0.03496026 at the same time in different wallets.
|
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
June 08, 2014, 05:50:20 AM |
|
Looks like we have a new problem - 2 parallel forks. There are block 9246 at diff 0.04594785 and block 9218 at diff 0.03496026 at the same time in different wallets.
I was in the middle of writing exactly about this. I have all my nodes (4) on 9232 ( 5:49AM GMT) but the pool http://new.hashharder.com/dcrypt/slimcoin is on 9255
|
|
|
|
butterfly sea
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
June 08, 2014, 05:52:58 AM |
|
why so many people dump the scarce coins?
|
|
|
|
skottiejay
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 110
bitcoinnaire
|
|
June 08, 2014, 06:07:58 AM |
|
I had to give up mining full time on this coin at least on my cpu (still have my digital ocean one running but not for much longer I think) this is a waste of my time. If I were making more than less than half of a half of a coin then I wouldn't have a problem but I have no idea of the concept of this, nor do I know anything about how to mine this. I'm sorry I had faith in the beginning but it seems like there's a lot of toxicity in this community here and I don't like it, I have enough problems of my own to deal with.
Anyways interesting concept op, hope slimcoin picks up again in the future. I'll find something to do with my 4 whole coins.
|
What else could I say?
|
|
|
bitspender
|
|
June 08, 2014, 06:11:21 AM |
|
Our pool has a lower difficulty, meaning you should see shares more often. But we do need miners. Once we have our first block, we will be able to adjust the algorithms for expected shares etc. http://new.hashharder.com/dcrypt/slimcoinYour pool does not accept my shares!!!
|
|
|
|
Frigga77
|
|
June 08, 2014, 06:12:35 AM |
|
Looks like we have a new problem - 2 parallel forks. There are block 9246 at diff 0.04594785 and block 9218 at diff 0.03496026 at the same time in different wallets.
I was in the middle of writing exactly about this. I have all my nodes (4) on 9232 ( 5:49AM GMT) but the pool http://new.hashharder.com/dcrypt/slimcoin is on 9255 I just checked and indeed I am also having the same problem being at block 9241 and 9268 at the same time in 2 different wallets. I am still solomining.
|
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
June 08, 2014, 06:17:23 AM |
|
Looks like we have a new problem - 2 parallel forks. There are block 9246 at diff 0.04594785 and block 9218 at diff 0.03496026 at the same time in different wallets.
I was in the middle of writing exactly about this. I have all my nodes (4) on 9232 ( 5:49AM GMT) but the pool http://new.hashharder.com/dcrypt/slimcoin is on 9255 sandor111's pool on http://63.141.232.170/ seems to be also on the fork with the lower block height ( 9241 @ 7:13AM GMT) so I suggest that the this is the "dominant" fork. The question is about bter.com. Can the owner of http://new.hashharder.com/dcrypt/slimcoin check also this issue?
|
|
|
|
mbk
|
|
June 08, 2014, 06:33:27 AM |
|
Right now 2 forks are at 9283 and 9250. I've stopped the wallet on 9250 chain, deleted blk* files and addr.dat, added nodes below, restarted and it synced to the 9283 chain. I think everybody on this chain should do it. The difference between chains is more then 30 blocks and 9283 chain has 30% more hashpower.
Nodes: addnode=63.141.232.170 addnode=144.76.142.47 addnode=144.76.142.49 addnode=94.229.76.122 addnode=185.21.191.189 addnode=85.110.8.131 addnode=96.237.174.192 addnode=60.250.174.75 addnode=198.199.101.230 addnode=192.82.119.85 addnode=107.170.123.185 addnode=95.85.25.57 addnode=222.134.95.70 addnode=54.187.155.212 addnode=54.201.166.212 addnode=192.241.173.228 addnode=119.63.94.173 addnode=181.193.75.66 addnode=144.76.142.47 addnode=144.76.142.49 addnode=76.127.202.17 addnode=96.237.174.192 addnode=125.115.54.166 addnode=76.127.202.17 addnode=96.237.174.192 addnode=107.181.250.216 addnode=107.181.250.217
|
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
June 08, 2014, 06:38:54 AM |
|
Right now 2 forks are at 9283 and 9250. I've stopped the wallet on 9250 chain, deleted blk* files and addr.dat, added nodes below, restarted and it synced to the 9283 chain. I think everybody on this chain should do it. The difference between chains is more then 30 blocks and 9283 chain has 30% more hashpower.
Nodes: addnode=63.141.232.170 addnode=144.76.142.47 addnode=144.76.142.49 addnode=94.229.76.122 addnode=185.21.191.189 addnode=85.110.8.131 addnode=96.237.174.192 addnode=60.250.174.75 addnode=198.199.101.230 addnode=192.82.119.85 addnode=107.170.123.185 addnode=95.85.25.57 addnode=222.134.95.70 addnode=54.187.155.212 addnode=54.201.166.212 addnode=192.241.173.228 addnode=119.63.94.173 addnode=181.193.75.66 addnode=144.76.142.47 addnode=144.76.142.49 addnode=76.127.202.17 addnode=96.237.174.192 addnode=125.115.54.166 addnode=76.127.202.17 addnode=96.237.174.192 addnode=107.181.250.216 addnode=107.181.250.217
I did exactly the same 30 min ago on 2 daemons with these nodes from the list and got on the other chain. I will try now again.
|
|
|
|
WhatDisk
|
|
June 08, 2014, 07:08:41 AM |
|
Right now 2 forks are at 9283 and 9250. I've stopped the wallet on 9250 chain, deleted blk* files and addr.dat, added nodes below, restarted and it synced to the 9283 chain. I think everybody on this chain should do it. The difference between chains is more then 30 blocks and 9283 chain has 30% more hashpower.
Nodes: addnode=63.141.232.170 addnode=144.76.142.47 addnode=144.76.142.49 addnode=94.229.76.122 addnode=185.21.191.189 addnode=85.110.8.131 addnode=96.237.174.192 addnode=60.250.174.75 addnode=198.199.101.230 addnode=192.82.119.85 addnode=107.170.123.185 addnode=95.85.25.57 addnode=222.134.95.70 addnode=54.187.155.212 addnode=54.201.166.212 addnode=192.241.173.228 addnode=119.63.94.173 addnode=181.193.75.66 addnode=144.76.142.47 addnode=144.76.142.49 addnode=76.127.202.17 addnode=96.237.174.192 addnode=125.115.54.166 addnode=76.127.202.17 addnode=96.237.174.192 addnode=107.181.250.216 addnode=107.181.250.217
I did exactly the same 30 min ago on 2 daemons with these nodes from the list and got on the other chain. I will try now again. Good I want to do it
|
|
|
|
bitspender
|
|
June 08, 2014, 07:14:36 AM |
|
Still nobody wants to share how to setup a private pool?? Great community...
|
|
|
|
Starving_Marvin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 511
Merit: 250
Open and Transparent Science Powered By Blockchain
|
|
June 08, 2014, 07:43:50 AM |
|
The OP has instructions how to compile Slimminer with Windows but no instructions how to compile with Linux. Any help?
|
|
|
|
bitspender
|
|
June 08, 2014, 07:44:43 AM |
|
The OP has instructions how to compile Slimminer with Windows but no instructions how to compile with Linux. Any help?
sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev libjansson4 autoconf git git clone https://github.com/slimcoin/slimminer.gitcd slimminer ./autogen.sh ./configure CFLAGS="-O3" make make install
|
|
|
|
Starving_Marvin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 511
Merit: 250
Open and Transparent Science Powered By Blockchain
|
|
June 08, 2014, 07:46:05 AM |
|
The OP has instructions how to compile Slimminer with Windows but no instructions how to compile with Linux. Any help?
sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev libjansson4 autoconf git git clone https://github.com/slimcoin/slimminer.gitcd slimminer ./autogen.sh ./configure CFLAGS="-O3" make make install Many thanks!
|
|
|
|
mumus
|
|
June 08, 2014, 08:57:43 AM |
|
If the slimcoin dev is around it would be advisable to urgently release a new wallet with checkpoints to solve this forking problem. The 2 chains are still alive and with similar hashing power on both of them. One party will be very upset soon. I have also 2 new blocks on just one of the chains.
|
|
|
|
sandor111
|
|
June 08, 2014, 09:46:45 AM |
|
We are on the right fork! Come join our pool...
|
|
|
|
|