[ANN][CRYPT] CryptCoin x11 + PoS | P2P Anonymity | 0% Premine | Commander

[TheAntiFud]

This group is playing people like puppets fontas, prom, boomsling etc all act innocent when the next coin dies. Never their fault they will say... LoL. No words man. Someday they'll get burned bad.

They will all go to prison sooner than later...and they dont even know it yet. Only a fool would think that the authorities havn't been watching the alt markets for quite some time now.

[1713408876]

1713408876

[1713408876]

1713408876

[knightlife999]

For those who cant go to IRC:

------------------------------------
<MrKK> mindfox on business trip till end of august apparently
<MrKK> or holiday idk
------------------------------------
<MrKK> Mindfox on vacation
<Apostle4444_> .
<mikmaday212> eh
<mikmaday212> how do u know
<mikmaday212> lol
<MrKK> cuz he ain't getting shit done
<MrKK> no work has been done in the last 2 months
<MrKK> i am not expecting him to finish anytime soon
<mikmaday212> mmm
<mikmaday212> interesting
-------------------------------------

Mr.KK was kidding. He wasn't serious when he posted that. The only person presently in direct contact with Mindfox is Moosa.

[knightlife999]

Prom's group is not behind Halcyon (not creators or devs), but they are buying into it like many other groups.

[NSA360]

Well, as we all have predicted in the morning...Now its time for the HALCYON chart #3

[StonerStanley]

Oh I respect the choice, I wasn't sure so thanks for clearing that up. But the fact that it is Anon would make it so difficult to trace that MindFox could make a satoshi disappear into his wallet and no one would know the difference. But I have heard hard to trace used so this may be different and debugging works better with this not so anon solution?

And I would have to agree MindFox is smart to not give his code and keys to the devs since they already got locked out once.

You can debug to check the amount of coins, but hey.... it's fastest to use your brain to compare how many coins you had and how many coins you send (ho wait... the amount shown in the GUI can be falsified, then you have to use a debugger)

Anyway you can debug anything, even your own transactions (since it's client side  )

If you don't know that's possible to debug you own transaction i think your security skills is not enough in order to read and understand each line of the source, then to be able to know if a function can be exploited by a hacker or not.

Sorry but it's true, the most part of the people who want the code source are trying to play the pros by compiling the code themselves, or they are just checking the blocks, but finally this is the only one thing that they are able to do with a source code. They are free ok, but they don't have to intervene where they are not able to work and if they have a problem with that they have nothing other to do that moving away (or watching/telling their opinions) instead of talking bullshit for nothing good.

ps: nothing is personal, i talk for everybody but answer to you at the same time.

[timk225]

I am still waiting for my bribe / payoff / recompense from this shitcoin...........

Is anyone here dumb enough to still be mining it?

[NSA360]

Net Hashrate:
From ~225GHs (2 months ago) to ~5.53 GHs (today)

[doo]

No surprises here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=748507.0

[NSA360]

No surprises here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=748507.0

Not fair. That poll should have there ALL coins.

[RoyalTY64]

Beware ShadowCoin (SDC), the developer is the same Rynomster disappeared "for family reasons" for Cinni leaving everyone in the lurch and the currency problems stake.
Enough of both DEV swindler who are killing trade in altcoins !!

[DevCoder]

Beware ShadowCoin (SDC), the developer is the same Rynomster disappeared "for family reasons" for Cinni leaving everyone in the lurch and the currency problems stake.
Enough of both DEV swindler who are killing trade in altcoins !!

Give it up cinnitroll....and get off this thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.msg8142514#msg8142514

"I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system. My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best."

-rynomster

[CryptoNick]

Oh I respect the choice, I wasn't sure so thanks for clearing that up. But the fact that it is Anon would make it so difficult to trace that MindFox could make a satoshi disappear into his wallet and no one would know the difference. But I have heard hard to trace used so this may be different and debugging works better with this not so anon solution?

And I would have to agree MindFox is smart to not give his code and keys to the devs since they already got locked out once.

You can debug to check the amount of coins, but hey.... it's fastest to use your brain to compare how many coins you had and how many coins you send (ho wait... the amount shown in the GUI can be falsified, then you have to use a debugger)

Anyway you can debug anything, even your own transactions (since it's client side  )

If you don't know that's possible to debug you own transaction i think your security skills is not enough in order to read and understand each line of the source, then to be able to know if a function can be exploited by a hacker or not.

Sorry but it's true, the most part of the people who want the code source are trying to play the pros by compiling the code themselves, or they are just checking the blocks, but finally this is the only one thing that they are able to do with a source code. They are free ok, but they don't have to intervene where they are not able to work and if they have a problem with that they have nothing other to do that moving away (or watching/telling their opinions) instead of talking bullshit for nothing good.

ps: nothing is personal, i talk for everybody but answer to you at the same time.

I was talking about ANON transfers. So if a Transfer is Anonymous how do you track it? But the fact that Crypt is not truly Anon I guess you can track it.

[StonerStanley]

Oh I respect the choice, I wasn't sure so thanks for clearing that up. But the fact that it is Anon would make it so difficult to trace that MindFox could make a satoshi disappear into his wallet and no one would know the difference. But I have heard hard to trace used so this may be different and debugging works better with this not so anon solution?

And I would have to agree MindFox is smart to not give his code and keys to the devs since they already got locked out once.

You can debug to check the amount of coins, but hey.... it's fastest to use your brain to compare how many coins you had and how many coins you send (ho wait... the amount shown in the GUI can be falsified, then you have to use a debugger)

Anyway you can debug anything, even your own transactions (since it's client side  )

If you don't know that's possible to debug you own transaction i think your security skills is not enough in order to read and understand each line of the source, then to be able to know if a function can be exploited by a hacker or not.

Sorry but it's true, the most part of the people who want the code source are trying to play the pros by compiling the code themselves, or they are just checking the blocks, but finally this is the only one thing that they are able to do with a source code. They are free ok, but they don't have to intervene where they are not able to work and if they have a problem with that they have nothing other to do that moving away (or watching/telling their opinions) instead of talking bullshit for nothing good.

ps: nothing is personal, i talk for everybody but answer to you at the same time.

I was talking about ANON transfers. So if a Transfer is Anonymous how do you track it? But the fact that Crypt is not truly Anon I guess you can track it.

Ok but now the question is: why you want to track the transfers ?

If you can debug to see how many coins you send and the destination address (this is client side), why do you want to track the transfers ?

Anyway nothing prevents you to send some coin to a second wallet, then you will see if you receive it or not (fastest solution)

 

[MsCollec]

I'm so surprised that this coin is still on life support after months of neglect and abuse.

[StonerStanley]

I'm so surprised that this coin is still on life support after months of neglect and abuse.

I'm even more surprised about your vootcoin. (i sold my last 160k voot 3 days ago lol)

Sorry MsCollec but i think you are not welcome to talk about scamming or fail coin.

[MsCollec]

I'm so surprised that this coin is still on life support after months of neglect and abuse.

I'm even more surprised about your vootcoin. (i sold my last 160k voot 3 days ago lol)

Son, it's not my coin.. It's a community takeover.  Continue holding your crypt bag, Jesus is coming soon

[StonerStanley]

I'm so surprised that this coin is still on life support after months of neglect and abuse.

I'm even more surprised about your vootcoin. (i sold my last 160k voot 3 days ago lol)

Son, it's not my coin.. It's a community takeover.  Continue holding your crypt bag, Jesus is coming soon

"Community takeover" haha, it's fun, it was a "MsCollec takeover", we told you to relaunch vootcoin since the first day... but no, you was only on the project for save your profit , like me, when i saw that you was not able to code something.

Sorry but i think it was not a good idea from your part. Now excuse me but i don't like how you talk about crypt saying that the devs "abuse" (i don't know why you say that)

[CryptoNick]

Oh I respect the choice, I wasn't sure so thanks for clearing that up. But the fact that it is Anon would make it so difficult to trace that MindFox could make a satoshi disappear into his wallet and no one would know the difference. But I have heard hard to trace used so this may be different and debugging works better with this not so anon solution?

And I would have to agree MindFox is smart to not give his code and keys to the devs since they already got locked out once.

You can debug to check the amount of coins, but hey.... it's fastest to use your brain to compare how many coins you had and how many coins you send (ho wait... the amount shown in the GUI can be falsified, then you have to use a debugger)

Anyway you can debug anything, even your own transactions (since it's client side  )

If you don't know that's possible to debug you own transaction i think your security skills is not enough in order to read and understand each line of the source, then to be able to know if a function can be exploited by a hacker or not.

Sorry but it's true, the most part of the people who want the code source are trying to play the pros by compiling the code themselves, or they are just checking the blocks, but finally this is the only one thing that they are able to do with a source code. They are free ok, but they don't have to intervene where they are not able to work and if they have a problem with that they have nothing other to do that moving away (or watching/telling their opinions) instead of talking bullshit for nothing good.

ps: nothing is personal, i talk for everybody but answer to you at the same time.

I was talking about ANON transfers. So if a Transfer is Anonymous how do you track it? But the fact that Crypt is not truly Anon I guess you can track it.

Ok but now the question is: why you want to track the transfers ?

If you can debug to see how many coins you send and the destination address (this is client side), why do you want to track the transfers ?

Anyway nothing prevents you to send some coin to a second wallet, then you will see if you receive it or not (fastest solution)

 

So you don't think we would need to track a transfer, and if you send coin to yourself and it shows up all is good? Ok but pretty simplistic. If the Dev made it so that all this checks out with your Debugger without the Dev showing the code for their ANON function, they could attack your wallet address anonymously since the function they created just allows the wallet to accept their malformed transaction. They could send your coin to their wallet and since you don't need to track the transfer your coin just vanishes and went somewhere anonymously. If you can't track a transfer to see where the coin came from how would you pay for goods and prove you sent the coin to receive the product?

[Bluestreet]

Beware ShadowCoin (SDC), the developer is the same Rynomster disappeared "for family reasons" for Cinni leaving everyone in the lurch and the currency problems stake.
Enough of both DEV swindler who are killing trade in altcoins !!

Guys I am going to give you a tip, don't worry I also fell for the CINNI scam. You can read the below if you want. Those that look into it can thank me in a few months, those that don't will wish they took the time to do so.

https://timeline.guldencoin.com/

[tljenson]

Beware ShadowCoin (SDC), the developer is the same Rynomster disappeared "for family reasons" for Cinni leaving everyone in the lurch and the currency problems stake.
Enough of both DEV swindler who are killing trade in altcoins !!

Guys I am going to give you a tip, don't worry I also fell for the CINNI scam. You can read the below if you want. Those that look into it can thank me in a few months, those that don't will wish they took the time to do so.

https://timeline.guldencoin.com/

This coin doesn't even have a working website, and people are still going on about what a joke.