[ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"

[dooglus]

clams is a WALLET STEALER ...

That's not true. There have been no reports of anyone having their wallet stolen by the CLAM client.

Please retract your false statement or provide evidence for it.

happy $2000 ~ it's just stating the obvious

~*~EMC2~*~@1700 pitching your back into einsteincoin will reward enormous karmic snow drifts

https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_emc2

~so annoying !!! $EMC2  #winning

Oh, it's you.

Remove the lies, please.

[ymh343993]

CLAM segwit?

[National]

CLAM segwit?

Lol lets please make this happen. CLAM on margin, such a low number of coins, over 7000 btc bought and sold over/at CLAMs current price just a few days back, this would really get the party started.

[BayAreaCoins]

CLAM segwit?

Lol lets please make this happen. CLAM on margin, such a low number of coins, over 7000 btc bought and sold over/at CLAMs current price just a few days back, this would really get the party started.

Fuck segwit(?)

Not entirely sure on this one.  I'd probably just go the easy route and agree with Dooglus.

If segwit was the best for CLAM... we'd already be doing it. (I'd assume)

[lthcmk]

One node only must choose one biggest address for staking

[almightyruler]

Edit: works for me...

ditto from hetzner.de:

Code:

gjh@Ubuntu-1510-wily-64-minimal ~ $ dig clam.just-dice.com

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-11ubuntu1.3-Ubuntu <<>> clam.just-dice.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10841
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;clam.just-dice.com.		IN	A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
clam.just-dice.com.	60	IN	A	220.239.41.71
clam.just-dice.com.	60	IN	A	31.204.128.80

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
clam.just-dice.com.	40000	IN	NS	support.just-dice.com.

;; Query time: 50 msec
;; SERVER: 213.133.98.98#53(213.133.98.98)
;; WHEN: Sun May 21 02:34:05 CEST 2017
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 101

Cheers

Graham

Looks like you may be getting the necessary A records from replies to other incidental queries related to just-dice.com, but from my PoV, the authoritative DNS server support.just-dice.com does not appear to be replying to DNS queries. Try querying it directly:

Code:

AUSTRALIA:

$ dig clam.just-dice.com @support.just-dice.com

; <<>> DiG 9.8.7 <<>> clam.just-dice.com @support.just-dice.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached


CANADA:

$ dig clam.just-dice.com @support.just-dice.com

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5 <<>> clam.just-dice.com @support.just-dice.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached


FRANCE:

dig clam.just-dice.com @support.just-dice.com

; <<>> DiG 9.8.4-P2 <<>> clam.just-dice.com @support.just-dice.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached

[lfwjaw]

Maybe I don't understand something so you guys could explain it to me. Why should this coin rise? As far as I know it has no development work at the moment

[jpcfan]

Lucky games dice site takes clam now. I'v been here for a month and love it here.








This is good for clam. i  got many there interested in clam


bay, you should check out site it rocks

https://luckygames.io/?ref=1545125

[gjhiggins]

Looks like you may be getting the necessary A records from replies to other incidental queries related to just-dice.com

That crossed my mind as a fleeting thought, I should have paid it heed, thank you.

Code:

gjh@Ubuntu-1510-wily-64-minimal ~ $ dig clam.just-dice.com @support.just-dice.com

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-11ubuntu1.3-Ubuntu <<>> clam.just-dice.com @support.just-dice.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached

Cheers

Graham

[BayAreaCoins]

bay, you should check out site it rocks[/b]

https://luckygames.io/?ref=1545125

I'll have it added to Clamcoin.org

[National]

CLAM segwit?

Lol lets please make this happen. CLAM on margin, such a low number of coins, over 7000 btc bought and sold over/at CLAMs current price just a few days back, this would really get the party started.

Fuck segwit(?)

Not entirely sure on this one.  I'd probably just go the easy route and agree with Dooglus.

If segwit was the best for CLAM... we'd already be doing it. (I'd assume)

So is there any innovation in the works?

[BayAreaCoins]

CLAM segwit?

Lol lets please make this happen. CLAM on margin, such a low number of coins, over 7000 btc bought and sold over/at CLAMs current price just a few days back, this would really get the party started.

Fuck segwit(?)

Not entirely sure on this one.  I'd probably just go the easy route and agree with Dooglus.

If segwit was the best for CLAM... we'd already be doing it. (I'd assume)

So is there any innovation in the works?

The distribution.

www.FreeBitcoins.com was launched about the time the price started to swing back upward... who knows if that has anything to do with it, but that's the only "news" I saw that was new.

[freedomno1]

Maybe I don't understand something so you guys could explain it to me. Why should this coin rise? As far as I know it has no development work at the moment

BAC and the others have been building projects on the side, the value proposition is proof of stake and a reliable service to leave coins other than Bitcoin on Just-Dice since dooglus leaves audit and cold storage logs and I guess for traders margin and lending as it acts as a base coin for that margin index on poloniex.
Segwit Dunno could be done if wanted I guess not sure the code has a rule against it, side with Doog lol.

[dooglus]

Fuck segwit(?)

Not entirely sure on this one.  I'd probably just go the easy route and agree with Dooglus.

If segwit was the best for CLAM... we'd already be doing it. (I'd assume)

It's really not anything to do with me.

I would be in favor of having SegWit and Lightning Network for CLAM, but I don't feel like I'm able to do the work needed to make it happen. It's quite a big job merging in the Bitcoin Core changes - there are so many of them. xploited has been the one to do the merging in the past so I guess it's likely to happen if he's willing to put in the work.

[BayAreaCoins]

Fuck segwit(?)

Not entirely sure on this one.  I'd probably just go the easy route and agree with Dooglus.

If segwit was the best for CLAM... we'd already be doing it. (I'd assume)

It's really not anything to do with me.

I would be in favor of having SegWit and Lightning Network for CLAM, but I don't feel like I'm able to do the work needed to make it happen. It's quite a big job merging in the Bitcoin Core changes - there are so many of them. xploited has been the one to do the merging in the past so I guess it's likely to happen if he's willing to put in the work.

Ah ok well I support SegWit and Lighting Nework as well then.

[BayAreaCoins]

I'm updating Clamcoin.org.

Can anyone think of any websites I'm missing?

Does cryptosprout still use CLAM?

[Leon.S.Kenedy]

I'm updating Clamcoin.org.

Can anyone think of any websites I'm missing?

Does cryptosprout still use CLAM?

Can you compare the similar and different between CLAMS and BTC ? Is there any advantages of CLAMS? I want to invest in CLAMS, but I dont see any good news can come to increase it's value.

[BayAreaCoins]

I'm updating Clamcoin.org.

Can anyone think of any websites I'm missing?

Does cryptosprout still use CLAM?

Can you compare the similar and different between CLAMS and BTC ? Is there any advantages of CLAMS? I want to invest in CLAMS, but I dont see any good news can come to increase it's value.

The major difference is in my opinion:

Bitcoin is Proof of Work.  So a third party miner is spinning the network and adding security.

CLAM is Proof of Stake.  So the coins them self are spinning and securing the network

Think of the two like companies:

Bitcoin your voting power is in a third party machine that has nothing to do with the company.

CLAM your voting power is the coin itself and that is the economy as well.

CLAM is scary cause someone with enough money could buy out the voting power and rule the system.  Bitcoin has a bit more security due to the number of computers and such already in the world, but it is still a concern such as ASIC and future tech.

Blending the two together is going to be the bread and butter of these two coins.  It's the crowd that floats around BTC and CLAM that make them interesting.


FreeBitcoins.com is in the process of beginning to combine the two in what I believe is the "proper" way.

[BTC Community]

segwit ? why not ,its great news for clam

[Leon.S.Kenedy]

The major difference is in my opinion:

Bitcoin is Proof of Work.  So a third party miner is spinning the network and adding security.

CLAM is Proof of Stake.  So the coins them self are spinning and securing the network

Think of the two like companies:

Bitcoin your voting power is in a third party machine that has nothing to do with the company.

CLAM your voting power is the coin itself and that is the economy as well.

CLAM is scary cause someone with enough money could buy out the voting power and rule the system.  Bitcoin has a bit more security due to the number of computers and such already in the world, but it is still a concern such as ASIC and future tech.

Blending the two together is going to be the bread and butter of these two coins.  It's the crowd that floats around BTC and CLAM that make them interesting.


FreeBitcoins.com is in the process of beginning to combine the two in what I believe is the "proper" way.

So I wrote this, do you agree with me?

In the global economy, cash is increasingly unable to meet the rapidly growing demand for trading. Include USD transactions when you have to complete a series of strict procedures due to foreign exchange policy. Cash can also be tracked, confiscated or taxed. Bitcoin was able to overcome some of those shortcomings, making P2P trading much easier and more free. Global economic change really becomes a flat world. However Bitcoin still has some shortcomings that are lacking in fairness and too slow processing.
Bitcoin's Proof of Work system makes the power more and more focused on the professional miner, the individual miner who can not compete with the larger miner. This goes against the ideals of a decentralized Blockchain system and can lead to a 51% attack. Anyone who has 51% of the digging capacity can manipulate the entire system and deal fraud by offering fake blocks, rejecting valid blocks that other communities dig. Another unfair thing to do is that the transaction is fast or slow depending on the amount of money the trader accepts when transferring Bitcoin to the block. People who are willing to spend more money will be able to trade faster, while less money will have to wait a lot longer. A current average cost of Bitcoin transaction can take from 2 to 4 days to be confirmed.
  The CLAMS coin has overcome that, right from its initial slogan, "The Fairly Crypto Currency." With the Proof of Stake system, just as you prove that you own a stake in that CryptoCurrency you will be able to mine equivalent. If you own 3% of CLAMS, you will have the right to mine 3% of the new fresh CLAMS. The scale of extraction will be linear. Encourage the community to engage in transactions, promote decentralization and more democracy. With this system, a CLAMS transaction takes only about 10 minutes and is fair to everyone even the rich or the poor.
The Proof of Stake system is currently considered the current best system for the BlockChain system. Ethereum (ETH) is also evolving to switch from PoW to PoS and is already 75% progressive, which will be completed by the end of the year.
On the Coinmarketcap website, CLAMS currently has a capitalization of $ 15 million at $ 6.5 per share on May 25, 2017 and is listed on major exchanges such as Poloniex and Bitrex. Especially CLAMS is one of the few coin that Poloniex allows Margin so experienced trader can surf large without too much initial capital investment.


https://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/15805116/640/s/CLAMS-vs-BITCOIN.jpg