|
virtualfaqs
|
 |
June 02, 2014, 09:15:20 PM |
|
Ask not what the coin can do for you - but what u can do for the coin !
I like that. Stealing you quote!  |
|
|
|
|
|
benthach
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:16:41 PM |
|
Good day! I think that the price dropped because of lack of knowledge of how to use the wallet!
I myself would like to take his wallet, but don `t know how to do it and how much profit I get this!
You can paint like a step-by-step actions to activate the wallet and profits for example. Sorry I'm from Eastern Europe and my English is bad.
I'd really like to User purse was in different languages (Russian required) it will add strength and global growth and popularity of coins!
Thank you!
THe price of this coin is going down because basic things like ADVERTISING OUR STRENGTHS is something we are not doing! Put our progress in the topic title! Put a clear, concise OP together that advertises our strengths! DRK had to shut down it's masternodes because it didn't work and the payment system caused a fork! Our beta is overtaking them! And that's just the beginning. We have the superior tech! Screw the fudding trolls! DRK never had to withstand half the scrutiny that we have! Because the DRK people put relentless pressure on us because we are their DIRECT competitor. CopyCatorI correct it for you. it can't be because from what I know masternode still not work and xnodes are already worked. what I know DRK is baiting for XC code |
reddit btcwriter1 - twitter kingpininvestor
|
|
|
|
zsnorbi
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:21:15 PM |
|
Good day! I think that the price dropped because of lack of knowledge of how to use the wallet!
I myself would like to take his wallet, but don `t know how to do it and how much profit I get this!
You can paint like a step-by-step actions to activate the wallet and profits for example. Sorry I'm from Eastern Europe and my English is bad.
I'd really like to User purse was in different languages (Russian required) it will add strength and global growth and popularity of coins!
Thank you!
THe price of this coin is going down because basic things like ADVERTISING OUR STRENGTHS is something we are not doing! Put our progress in the topic title! Put a clear, concise OP together that advertises our strengths! DRK had to shut down it's masternodes because it didn't work and the payment system caused a fork! Our beta is overtaking them! And that's just the beginning. We have the superior tech! Screw the fudding trolls! DRK never had to withstand half the scrutiny that we have! Because the DRK people put relentless pressure on us because we are their DIRECT competitor. CopyCatorI correct it for you. Sorry but what is DRK is trying to get working is already functional in XC |
|
|
|
|
|
Samuray
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:21:22 PM |
|
Hello!
For some reson the coins in my wallet r not staking.
I am using last version of wallet and it says your wight is XXXX expected reward is in X hours.(for the past couple of days)
what should I do?
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:22:18 PM |
|
I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet. ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity. His rev 3 will get to that level. If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver.... |
|
|
|
|
studio1one
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:25:09 PM |
|
I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet. ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity. His rev 3 will get to that level. If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver.... you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it? bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better. |
| BINTEX | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| | | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| |
Powered by,
|
|
|
|
|
Reese212
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:26:10 PM |
|
Hello!
For some reson the coins in my wallet r not staking.
I am using last version of wallet and it says your wight is XXXX expected reward is in X hours.(for the past couple of days)
what should I do?
you should wait. the Minimum stake time is 8hrs, the Maximum stake time is up to 30 days. XC was released couple days ago - it can take up to 30 days before your coins begin staking. just wait and don't move them and have the wallet sometimes "opened for minting". opening a encrypted wallet for minting can be done in 2 ways: a) decrypt the wallet (not so cool and not necessarry) b) goto help --> debug window --> console and enter this text: walletpassphrase "your wallet Password without the quotes" 99999999 true a) fully opens your wallet and b) leaves your wallet encrypted but allows it to stake |
Dear Lord, please grant me the ability...
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:26:54 PM |
|
XC anon works fantastically, just finished testing and everything works as described on my end  Thank you for the test! Good one mate! |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:27:50 PM |
|
I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet. ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity. His rev 3 will get to that level. If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver.... you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it? bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better. Sure you should test it, but don't take it like it's an official representation of what XC will ultimately deliver at the end. The test is on the sending of it arriving at the destination, not on how "secure" or "anonymous" the final XC will deliver. Everyone knows that coin mixing isn't 100% anonymous and ATCSecure have already said that for rev 1, it's just a generic mixer that won't deliver 100% anonymity. DRK trolls will run with this and FUD this to death. There is no need to create FUD for them. Now, if REV3 anonymity fails, then that's a different story. |
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:30:07 PM |
|
XC TO INFINITY !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:31:05 PM
Last edit: June 02, 2014, 09:56:27 PM by Teka |
|
Forum installed so hopefully it will be finished tomorrow. There will be a Q&A sections where users can mark the best answer
|
|
|
|
|
|
greyskies
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:32:49 PM |
|
I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet.
ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity. His rev 3 will get to that level.
If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver....
you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it? bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better. XC is a decentralised coin mixer with some encryption chucked in. Ahead of DRK in terms of the coin mixing as it's less centralised and the nodes aren't causing forks. But neither are perfect. The fact the dev has accomplished so much in such a short period of time already shows great promise for the coming weeks and months ahead. Now is the time for testing and ironing out the inevitable kinks in the system before then moving onto enhancing it to the next level. I trust this dev more than any other dev I have known. |
|
|
|
|
|
roede94105
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:35:31 PM |
|
I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet. ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity. His rev 3 will get to that level. If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver.... you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it? bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better. Sure you should test it, but don't take it like it's an official representation of what XC will ultimately deliver at the end. The test is on the sending of it arriving at the destination, not on how "secure" or "anonymous" the final XC will deliver. Everyone knows that coin mixing isn't 100% anonymous and ATCSecure have already said that for rev 1, it's just a generic mixer that won't deliver 100% anonymity. DRK trolls will run with this and FUD this to death. There is no need to create FUD for them. Now, if REV3 anonymity fails, then that's a different story. Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't. One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do. |
|
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:38:20 PM |
|
Ask not what the coin can do for you - but what u can do for the coin !
Hey! That's from my favorite prez.... Nakamoto !!! |
|
|
|
|
|
mfqrs3
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:39:20 PM |
|
Price hasn't been boring like this loong time... no fireworks, no nothing ? What's up with the bet  ? I guess all the power is at DRK now... |
|
|
|
|
|
greyskies
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:44:01 PM |
|
Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.
DRK masternodes don't work at the moment because the node payment system caused a fork last week. Do I need to link you to the DRK dev's official testing topic where's he's trying to sort it out? |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:44:49 PM |
|
Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.
Does DRK have a decentralized multi-path anonymizer that any users can run from their wallet without 10 years+ of IT/Linux experience to setup a Masternode just so they don't get hacked? I don't recall that... |
|
|
|
|
Kai Proctor
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:48:14 PM |
|
Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.
DRK masternodes don't work at the moment because the node payment system caused a fork last week. Do I need to link you to the DRK dev's official testing topic where's he's trying to sort it out? No, DarkSend works, you can use it right now, only the payment of the masternodes has been postponed to mid-June. PS: No FUD intended it's just fun to deduct the real sender from a mixed transaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
studio1one
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:48:26 PM |
|
I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet. ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity. His rev 3 will get to that level. If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver.... you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it? bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better. I hold DRK and I hold XC I evangelise for neither. I just want the tech behind my coins to be as good as possible, if people break it all the better. Then the dev knows what needs to be fixed. Sure you should test it, but don't take it like it's an official representation of what XC will ultimately deliver at the end. The test is on the sending of it arriving at the destination, not on how "secure" or "anonymous" the final XC will deliver. Everyone knows that coin mixing isn't 100% anonymous and ATCSecure have already said that for rev 1, it's just a generic mixer that won't deliver 100% anonymity. DRK trolls will run with this and FUD this to death. There is no need to create FUD for them. Now, if REV3 anonymity fails, then that's a different story. |
| BINTEX | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| | | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| |
Powered by,
|
|
|
|
|
